LAST DAYS MADNESS

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Obsession of the Modern Church

Gary DeMar

Last Days Madness

Obsession of the Modern Church

Copyright © 1999 by American Vision,

Powder Springs, Georgia

All rights reserved.

Fourth revised edition, 1999

Printed in the United States of America

08 07 06 05 04 03 02 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

Cover design by Luis Lovelace

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval

system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical,

photocopy, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of

the publisher, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles. Such

quotations must be in context.

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations are from the New American

Standard Bible, © 1960, 1963, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, by the

Lockman Foundation and are used by permission.

Last Days Madness: Obsession of the Modern Church is produced by American

Vision, a Christian educational and communications organization. For

more information about American Vision and receive a catalog of materials,

contact:

American Vision

P.O. Box 220

Powder Springs, Georgia 30127

1-800-628-9460

www.AmericanVision.org

ISBN10: 0-915815-35—4

ISBN 13: 978-0-915815-35-7

Contents

Preface . .. .. .. .. .... ..........vii

Introduction ... .. ... .. .. .. .. 13

Chapter

1 The Dating Game .. 19

2 When Will These Things Be? .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 35

When Did Jesus "Come In Glory"? 43

4 Timing Is Everything 51

5 See That No One Misleads You 65

6 Signs For All To See 77

7 The Temple Of Doom 93

8 The Abomination Of Desolation 101

9 The Past Great Tribulation 117

10 Signs In The Heavens 131

11 Sun, Moon, And Stars . 141

12 The Return Of Christ 157

13 Gathering The Elect 173

14 This Generation Or This Race? .. 183

15 The Passing Away Of Heaven And Earth. .. 189

16 Avoiding Rapture Fever 205

vi LAST DAYS MADNESS

17 No Evidence For A Rapture 215

18 Who's Got The Number? 231

19 Technology And The Mark Of The Beast.. .. 241

20 Identifying The Beast 255

21 Identifying Antichrist 263

22 The Man Of Lawlessness (I) .. 273

23 The Man Of Lawlessness (II) 289

24 Armageddon Theology .. .. .. .. .. 313

25 Daniel's Seventy Weeks 323

26 Today's World In Prophecy 339

27 Mystery Babylon 353

28 Roshing To Judgment ,. 363

Appendix

1 God Can Tell Time .. .. .. .. 379

2 Fruitless Trees And National Israel ......397

3 "Anti-Semitism" And Eschatology .. 407

4 Sola Scriptura And Prophecy 425

5 Zechariah 14 And The Coming Of Christ.. .. 437

Index .. ... ...... ...... .... 445

Preface

The response to Last Days Madness has been overwhelming. With little

advertising, Last Days Madness has had a profound effect on thousands

of Christians around the world. It is gratifying to get letters from readers

who have been blessed by its content. Many write and tell me that they have

gained a renewed appreciation of God's Word since they no longer have to

ignore passages that seemed to be mistaken about the timing of Jesus' return.

They can now read the Bible with confidence.

The interpretive methodology outlined in Last Days Madness is not inno-

vative. For the past 150 years Christians have been sidetracked by a novel

interpretive methodology known as dispensational premillennialism. While

Last Days Madness is not primarily directed at dispensationalism, much of

what is addressed herein is critical of this very popular interpretive belief

system.

Like the second (1994) and third (1997) editions, this fourth edition is

not a revision in the usual sense. After doing numerous radio interviews and

debates, I learned where certain arguments could be better stated and sup-

ported by Scripture and history. These additions made up the bulk of the

new material in the third edition of Last Days Madness. In this edition, I have continued my policy of interacting with the latest Bible prophecy books to

keep Last Days Madness current. Most of the new books on prophecy simply

restate the tired and still unproven assumptions of the old books.

The additional study that went into this edition of Last Days Madness has

continued to solidify my conviction that the time texts are key indicators of

when certain prophetic events will take place. Most books on prophecy do

vii

v iii

LAST DAYS MADNESS

not interpret time texts literally. In fact, some books ignore the time texts

altogether. For example, Robert Van Kampen quotes a portion of Revelation

1:1, leaving out this very important phrase: "the things which must shortly

take place." He follows the same method when he does not quote all of

Revelation 1:3, leaving out "for the time is near."1 he claims to interpret the Bible literally, but he refuses to handle these texts in a literal way.2 In his

latest book, Van Kampen once again suspiciously fails to deal with the time

texts. There is no discussion of Revelation 1:1 ("shortly") and 1:3 ("near").

Matthew 16:27-28, a crucial time text, is not dealt with. On the dedica-

tion page, he concludes with "Come quickly, Lord Jesus," and yet he does

not expound on Revelation 22:20 where Jesus said nearly 2000 years ago,

"Yes, I am coming quickly." In his analysis of those of us who believe the

time texts are supremely important, he writes:

Both the allegorical and spiritualized views must deny a literal un-

derstanding of the prophecies found in the Book of Daniel, the Olivet

Discourse, and the greater part of the Book of Revelation. Preterists view

these passages as past, historical events (even though nothing historically

has ever happened that bears any resemblance to these specific passages),

with minimal end-time relevance.3

A preterist is someone who believes that certain prophecies have been

fulfilled, that is, their fulfillment is in the past. For example, Floyd Hamilton, writes that there "are in the Old Testament 332 distinct predictions which

are literally fulfilled in Christ."4 All Christians are preterists regarding these

prophecies since they believe they have been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Jews

who are still waiting for the promised Messiah are anti-preterists since they

believe these prophetic passages have not been fulfilled. They are futurists.

Van Kampen believes that the preterist interpretation of prophecy regarding

the judgment coming of Christ in the first century is indefensible because

"nothing historically has ever happened that bears any resemblance to these specific passages," that is, the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24.

Notice that Van Kampen writes that there is "nothing" in history that

shows that the events of the Olivet Discourse happened in the first cen-

tury. Nothing? Jesus predicted that there would be earthquakes before that

first-century generation passed away. There were earthquakes (Matt. 27:54;

28:2; Acts 16:26) and famines (Acts 11:28; cf. Rom. 8:35), just like Jesus

Pr e face

i x

predicted (Matt. 24:7). Paul tells us that the "gospel" had been preached "to all the nations" in his day (Rom. 16:25-26), just like Jesus predicted (Matt.

24:14). This says nothing of the promise by Jesus that the temple would

be destroyed within a generation (Matt. 24:34). All of history attests to the

fact that the temple was destroyed within a generation of Jesus' Olivet Dis-

course. Therefore, Van Kampen's assertion that "nothing historically has ever happened that bears any resemblance to these specific passages" is absurd.

Van Kampen dismisses the preterist perspective hoping his readers will not

check out the evidence for themselves. That's why Last Days Madness was

written—to examine the evidence, all the evidence.

Dispensationalists and other futurists realize that an honest analysis of

biblical texts related to the timing of prophetic events jeopardizes their

prophetic views. In fact, the entire thesis of futurism rests on a non-literal

reading of the time texts. This arbitrary manner of dealing with Scripture

has proven to be a foundation of sand for the entire prophetic system called

dispensationalism and the newly promoted pre-wrath rapture position.5 Dis-

pensational scholars and former rank and file dispensationalists recognize the

problem and are doing everything to prop up the faltering system. Some like

Marvin Rosenthal and Robert Van Kampen advocate "A new understanding

of the Rapture, the Tribulation, and the Second Coming."6

Dispensational author Robert L. Saucy, professor of systematic theology

at Talbot School of Theology, tells us, "Over the past several decades the

system of theological interpretation commonly known as dispensationalism

has undergone considerable development and refinement."7 The change has

been radical enough to warrant the label "the new dispensationalism" or

"progressive [dispensationalism]... to distinguish the newer interpretations

from the older version of dispensationalism."8

In Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The Search for Definition, the contributors describe how dispensationalism has changed and will continue to

change. One writer states that "dispensationalism has been in the process of

change since its earliest origins within the Plymouth Bretheren [siC] move-

ment of the nineteenth century."9 In the same series, Craig Blaising admits

of and welcomes "modifications currently taking place in dispensational

thought."10 Similar to Saucy, the contributors to Dispensationalism, Israel and

the Church have no discussion of those texts which describe the "soon" return of Jesus in judgment. Even those contributors from amillennial and historical

premillennial positions who respond to the ten lengthy chapters make no

viii

10 LAST DAYS MADNESS

mention of the time texts. They, too, are trapped in eschatological systems

filled with contradictions.

A Christian should never fear having his "system" scrutinized by the

plain teaching of the Bible. The rallying cry of the Reformation was ecclesia

reformata quia semper reforman d a est; "the church reformed because it must always be reforming." This should be every Christian's rallying cry. Last

Days Madness is an appeal to the church to take another look at the topic

of eschatology, the study of last things. The topic has not been settled in

spite of a great deal of misplaced dogmatism. If you decide to read on, be

prepared to be challenged. Moreover, be prepared to gain a greater respect

for the integrity of the Bible.

Last Days Madness is unique because it argues its case rather than just states it. Most popular prophecy writers simply declare their position with little

analysis or interaction with competing systems, assuming that their posi-

tion is the only viable interpretive model. This is especially true in books

like John Hagee's Beginning of the End: The Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and

the Coming Antichrist1 and Ed Dobson's 50 Remarkable Events Pointing to the

End: Why Jesus Could Return by A.D. 2000. 12 These authors dismiss, without sustained analysis, any view that does not agree with their opinion. In fact,

for them no other views on prophecy even exist. Readers are left with the

impression that the Church has always believed what these men claim is true.

Last Days Madness takes a different approach. It acknowledges the existence

of opposing views, lists their supporting evidences, considers their line of

argumentation, and offers a counter opinion with detailed exegetical and

historical testimony. Unlike most books on Bible prophecy, Last Days Madness

is not "an ill-digested rehash of someone else's views"13 but a careful and

detailed analysis of Bible prophecy.

Preface

xi

Notes

1. Robert D. Van Kampen, The Rapture Question Answered: Plain and Simple (Grand Rapids, MI: Revell, 1997), 135.

2. Van Kampen even admits that he does not interpret the Bible literally when

it comes to the wound suffered by the Beast (Rev. 13:14), which he believes

is either Nero or Hitler: "Antichrist must have died by a 'wound of the sword'

(Rev. 13:14). Neither Nero nor Hitler died literally by the sword, but both

died by weapons used in warfare, and Hitler in particular took his life during

battle rather than surrender." (Robert Van Kampen, The Sign of Christ's Coming

and the End of the Age [Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1999], 14.).

3. Van Kampen, The Sign of Christ's Coming and the End of the Age, 14.

4. Floyd E. Hamilton, The Basis of Christian Faith: A Modern Defense of the Christian

Religion, rev. ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), 160.

5. Marvin Rosenthal, The Pre-Wrath Rapture of the Church (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1990).

6. Cover-copy to Rosenthal, The Pre-Wrath Rapture of the Church.

7. Robert L. Saucy, The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism: The Interface Between

Dispensationalism and Non-Dispensational Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zonder-

van, 1993), 8.

8. Saucy, Case for Progressive Dispensationalism, 9.

9. Stanley N. Gundry, "Foreword," Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The

Search for Definition (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992), 11.

10. Craig A. Blaising, "Dispensationalism: A Search for Definition," Dispensational-

ism, Israel and the Church, 15 .

11. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1996.

12. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 1997.

13. William Graham Scroggie, The Unfolding Drama of Redemption, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, [1953-71] 1994), 3:357.

•

Introduction

Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.1

—Niels Bohr

Prophecy is easier to explain after it has been fulfilled than before.2

—Henry M. Morris

In 1973, after a series of extraordinary acts of providence, I found myself

sitting at a table in a dimly lighted pub in Ann Arbor, Michigan, listening

to a high school friend explain the intricacies of Bible prophecy through the

interpretative grid of someone named Hal Lindsey. This seemingly chance

encounter was my first introduction to The Late Great Planet Earth. I was

fascinated. Certainly the topic of Bible prophecy interested me, but I was

more captivated by the Bible itself. I had been raised Roman Catholic. The

only knowledge of the Bible that I had came from a Gideon New Testament

that my father had brought back from his tour of duty in the Pacific during

World War II. While I had read from it on a number of occasions, the Bible

had remained a closed book until the day my friend convinced me that

there was contemporary relevance in its pages. For him, that contemporary

relevance was prophecy.

An in-depth study of prophecy was not what I needed at the time, but

the curiosity factor that the prophecy issue raised did motivate me to read

the Bible in a systematic way. Through another friend's direction, I read C.S.

Lewis's Mere Christianity, and through it became interested in the defense of the Christian faith. In time I realized that I was a sinner in need of salvation.

In the solitude of my room, in a rented house shared by six other students,

13

14

13 LAST DAYS MADNESS

one vagrant, two dogs, and three cats at 715 Village Street, Kalamazoo,

Michigan, I turned to Jesus Christ as my Savior and Lord. Those dark days

in that dilapidated house prior to Christ will never be forgotten.

Soon after graduation from college in 1973 I began to delve into the

complexities of Bible prophecy once again. By this time I was no longer the

biblically ignorant convert. Bible study had become a daily affair. While I

was certainly far from being an expert, I noticed that a number of verses did

not fit with the prevailing system of Bible prophecy offered by Hal Lindsey

and others who shared his views. A number of questions were raised when

I tried to put together all the pieces of Lindsey's prophetic jigsaw puzzle.

Too many pieces were missing. That is, a number of verses were either not

discussed or were so twisted as to have no real meaning. At the time it

seemed as if a prophetic system was trying to govern what the Bible says.

In 1974 I entered Reformed Theological Seminary (RTS) in Jackson,

Mississippi. Two new worlds were opened up to me at RTS: the theological

library and campus bookstore. Most bookstores typically carry only those

books that sell well. This means that the average Christian is introduced to

a small number of new books each year. Many great books are never read or

even seen. There is no such limitation at a seminary library or a bookstore

like the one at RTS. I scrutinized Bible commentaries and history books. My

dissatisfaction with the Lindsey system forced me to go digging for answers

to solve the hermeneutical puzzle.

I believed the Bible. There is no way that it could err. This was my starting

presupposition. Scripture had to be taken at face value. Pet interpretations had

to go, no matter how dearly held or how popular they were. This is why it

was disheartening for me to read Bible passages that could not be reconciled

with what I had been reading about the last days in prophetic best sellers

like The Late Great Planet Earth. Either Lindsey was wrong or the Bible was

wrong. Hal Lindsey was egregiously wrong. But Lindsey wasn't the only

one who was dodging the plain meaning of the Bible. I soon learned that

there were others who did not share Lindsey's end-time scenario but who

still fudged on some of the most crucial prophetic texts.

The first area of dissatisfaction came with how commentators handled

Matthew 24:34: "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until

all these things take place." At first reading one gets the distinct impression

that Jesus is saying that the people with whom He was speaking would live

to see and experience the events described in Matthew 24. This seemed

Introduction

15

impossible! And yet, there it was. I looked up every other occurrence of the

phrase "this generation," and each time I came up with the same answer:

Jesus was referring to His generation, the generation of people alive when

He uttered the words. Every Bible commentator danced around the text.

"It means the generation alive when the events described in the previous

verses begin to manifest themselves," one respected commentator wrote. If

that's true, I thought, then this is the only place where "this generation"

means a future generation. That's not sound Bible interpretation. Another

commentator, skirting the obvious, claimed that the Jewish race was in view.

"The Jewish race," he wrote, "would not pass away until all these things

took place." This interpretation has even more interpretive problems. My

discontent grew. I was stuck with the obvious, straightforward, literal, plain

interpretation: The generation to whom Jesus was speaking would not pass

away until all those things listed in Matthew 24:1—34 came to pass.

If this is the correct interpretation, as I believe it is and hope to prove

in the course of this book, then today's speculative madness related to re-

peated failed attempts at predicting the end must be attributed to a gross

misunderstanding of Bible prophecy. As I soon learned, I was not alone in

coming to this conclusion. For centuries great Bible expositors had taught

that many New Testament prophecies had already been fulfilled. They taught

that many texts that are often futurized actually describe events in the first

century. This literature made sense of the passages that millions of Christians

struggle to understand. Moreover, I soon learned that today's prophetic sce-

nario, so popular with radio and television evangelists and multimillion-copy

best sellers, has a short history. The system of prophetic interpretation that

is familiar to most Christians had its beginning in 1830.

But what about world conditions? Aren't we seeing prophecy being

fulfilled right before our eyes? This protest is offered when people are hit

with an interpretation that no longer fits their doctrinal views. They shift

from the clear teaching of Scripture to current events. The Bible is then

read through the lens of today's newsprint, a form of "newspaper exegesis."

When current events change, somehow the clear teaching of the Bible on

these subjects also changes. Few people ever take the time to check what

prophecy "experts" wrote ten years earlier.

Our nation, and every nation, could go through the most tumultuous up-

heaval that history has ever experienced, and this still would not mean that

Jesus was returning "in our generation." For date setters, history is ignored

16

15 LAST DAYS MADNESS

and the Bible is twisted to fit a preconceived view of prophecy; the result is

that the church experiences wild gyrations in the field of biblical prophecy.

W. Ward Gasque writes:

The problem with the evangelicals who turn the Bible into a kind of

crystal ball is that they show very little historical awareness. They speak

assuredly about the signs that are being fulfilled "right before your very

eyes" and point to the impending end. Lindsey confidently refers to our

own as "the terminal generation." However, these writers do not seem to be

aware that there have been many believers in every generation—from the

Montanists of the second century through Joachin of Fiore (c. 1135-1202)

and Martin Luther to those Russian Mennonites who undertook a "Great

Trek" to Siberia in 1880-84 and the nineteenth-century proponents of

dispensationalism—who have believed that they were living in the days

immediately preceding the second coming of Christ. So far they have all

been mistaken. How many people have lost confidence in clear doctrines

of Scripture affecting eternal life because misguided prophetic teaching

is, unfortunately, not likely to be investigated?3

Gasque's admonition is borne out by considering the religious and cultural

conditions prior to the Reformation of the sixteenth century. Medieval life

was dominated by a corrupt church which positioned itself to be the ruler of

all life, from personal thought and behavior to political power. The theology

of the majority in the church could be described as heretical. It's no wonder

that the Reformers saw the Papacy as the Antichrist. The Westminster Con-

fession of Faith of the seventeenth century, for example, named the Roman

Pontiff as the Antichrist in the chapter on "Of the Church."

There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ: nor can

the Pope of Rome in any sense be the head thereof; but is the Antichrist,

that man of sin and son of perdition that exalteth himself in the Church

against Christ, and all that is called God.

In addition to apostasy, the outbreak of bubonic plague nearly decimated

Medieval Europe. The Black Death or "The Great Dying" had started its trek

through the great trade routes from the East in the fourteenth century. All

ages and classes were affected, and death, when it came, struck quickly and

Introduction

17

with a vengeance. While estimates vary on the number of deaths—from one-

third to one-half of Europe's population—no epidemic since has matched

its black scourge.

The plague reached Constantinople in 1347 and spread through Europe

to England by late 1348. As one could imagine, all of society was affected.

The burial of the dead was a major task since the living were often outnum-

bered by victims who had succumbed to the epidemic. Courts were closed.

Food prices dropped because people were afraid to buy meat. Crops lay in

the field for want of workmen. Those laborers who would work demanded

exorbitant wages.

The time was ripe for prophecy advocates to predict the near-demise of

the times. The English Reformer John Wycliffe (1329—1384) "describes

the 'covetousness, sensuality, and fraud' of the clergy as infecting all of

humanity, thus causing the chastisement under which Europe mourned."4

In addition to plague, heresy, social unrest, monumental economic changes,

and class conflict there were "exaggerated forms of religious mysticism,"

and "the lack of educated clergy reduced the church's intellectual vigor."5

While Wycliffe was right about the theological and moral climate of his era,

it was not the last days.

Then there was the Hundred Years' War (1337—1453), which could

be described as years of war interrupted by peace, a series of invasions and

treaties, challenged succession to the French throne, disputes over trade

and ports, territorial claims and counter claims. But this was not the end,

although there were certainly enough people around making their predic-

tions, using the same Bible verses and the same methodologies that are

being used today.

Last Days Madness was written to take a fresh look at the Bible. There is

little that is new in the following pages. As you will read, the views expressed

herein have been around for centuries. Unfortunately, they have been buried

under millions of copies of paperback books that have assured us year after

year that the end is near. If you are afraid to have your views challenged,

then I suggest that you stop reading now.

18

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Quoted in Chris Morgan and David Langford, Facts and Fallacies: A Book of

Definitive Mistakes and Misguided Predictions (Toronto, Canada: John Wiley & Sons Canada Limited, 1981), 57.

2. Henry M. Morris, Creation and the Second Coming (El Cajon, CA: Master Books, 1991), 36.

3. W. Ward Gasque, "Future Fact? Future Fiction?" Christianity Today (15 April 1977), 40.

4. "Wycliffe's England: A Time of Turmoil," Christian History, Issue 3 (1983), 8.

5. "Wycliffe's England," 8.

Chapter One

THE DATING GAME

Dip into any period of history and you will find prophets of all types,

from any number of theological traditions, who claimed they knew

when the next endtime event would occur. Some have pointed to the rise in

apostasy, lawlessness, natural disasters, signs in the heavens, and an increase

in rival religions in their day as unmistakable evidence that the end was near

for them. Finding hidden meanings in biblical numbers was another favorite

pastime that assured the faithful that the end had to be at hand.

In the second century, Tertullian, in Ad Nationes, wrote, "What terrible wars, both foreign and domestic! What pestilences, famines ... and quakings

of the earth has history recorded!"1 Evaluating current events and conclud-

ing that they offer "compelling evidence" that Jesus would return soon has

been a common practice among prophecy writers. In the sixth century, Pope

Gregory assured the world that the return of Christ could not be far off since

he claimed that so many prophecies were being fulfilled in his day.

Of all the signs described by our Lord as presaging the end of the world

some we see already accomplished.... For we now see that nation arises

against nation and that they press and weigh upon the land in our own

times as never before in the annals of the past. Earthquakes overwhelm

countless cities, as we often hear from other parts of the world. Pestilence

19

20

19 LAST DAYS MADNESS

we endure without interruption. It is true that we do not behold signs in

the sun and moon and stars but that these are not far off we may infer

from the changes of the atmosphere.2

Peculiar sectarian cults arose during periods of hype and hysteria, when

endtime prophetic speculation was fueled by expected promises of imminent

catastrophe and the hope of a future millennium. "At first sight, one could

hardly imagine two more dissimilar ideas. The first suggests death and desola-

tion; the second, salvation and fulfillment. Yet the two intertwine again and

again. Those who regard the Millennium as imminent expect disasters to

pave the way. The present order, evil and entrenched, can hardly be expected

to give way of itself or dissolve overnight."3 Some took advantage of peril-

ous times by heightening eschatological expectations to agitate the faithful,

knowing that "men cleave to hopes of imminent worldly salvation only when

the hammerblows of disaster destroy the world they have known and render

them susceptible to ideas which they would earlier have cast aside."4

Others stirred the revolutionary fires in those preoccupied with a coming

apocalypse. The zealous were duped into joining a "vision of a new moral

order, a world purified and freed from conflict and hatred,"5 a world based

on socialistic and communistic ideals that proved tragic for those caught

up in the frenzy.6

The End is Near-Again!

The small and the great, the sane and the insane, the sacred and the pro-

fane have been quick to predict when the end might come. For example,

Billy Graham and Barbra Streisand—two people on different ends of the

spiritual spectrum—have at least one thing in common: They both believe

that we cannot hold out much longer. Barbra Streisand believes "the world

is coming to an end." She just feels "that science, technology, and the mind

have surpassed the soul—the heart. There is no balance in terms of feeling

and love for fellow man."7 Billy Graham, feeling equally pessimistic, writes:

"If you look in any direction, whether it is technological or physiological,

the world as we know it is coming to an end. Scientists predict it, sociolo-

gists talk about it. Whether you go to the Soviet Union or anywhere in the

world, they are talking about it. The world is living in a state of shock."8

Billy Graham does not "want to linger here on the who, what, why, how,

The Dating Game

21

or when of Armageddon." He simply states that "it is near."9 What does

Graham mean by "near"? The Book of Revelation states that the time was

"near" for those who first read the prophecy (Rev. 1:1,3). Since Revelation

was written during Nero's reign, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D.

70, the prophetic events of Revelation were fulfilled during the lifetime of

those who first read the prophecy.10

Prophetic Deja Vu

As early as the second century, prophets were suggesting dates for the

bodily return of Christ. The "prophet" Montanus was one of the first to

propose such a date. He proclaimed the imminent appearance of the New

Jerusalem, the signal for which was to be a new outpouring of the Holy

Spirit. Montanus as a new convert to Christianity believed himself to be the

appointed prophet of God. Two prophetesses, Prisca and Maximilla, soon

joined him. They claimed to be mouthpieces of the Paraclete, the Greek

title used in John's Gospel for the Holy Spirit. The Montanists' predictions

failed. Their failures, however, did not deter other date setters:

In the third century, a prophet called Novatian gathered a huge

following by crying, "Come, Lord Jesus!" Donatus, a fourth-century

prophet, commanded attention when he stressed that only 144,000

people would be chosen by God. He found this magic figure in Revela-

tion 14:1 (a verse which the Jehovah's Witnesses use to proclaim their

own version of this heresy). Both Novatian and Donatus were branded

as heretics by the Church.11

The sack of Rome by the Vandals (A.D. 410) was supposed to bring on the

end; the birth of the Inquisition (1209—44) prompted many well-meaning

saints to conclude that it was the beginning of the end; the Black Death

that killed millions was viewed as the prelude to the demise of the world

(1347-50). The plague disrupted society at all levels. Giovanni Boccaccio

wrote a vivid description of how some people responded. For some,

debauchery was the road to salvation, or, if there was to be no salvation

[from the plague], to happiness in the few days that remained. These

profligates abandoned all work and drifted from house to house, drink-

22

21 LAST DAYS MADNESS

ing, stealing, fornicating. "People behaved as though their days were

numbered," Boccaccio wrote, "and treated their belongings and their own

persons with equal abandon. Hence most houses had become common

property, and any passing stranger could make himself at home.... In the

face of so much affliction and misery, all respect for the laws of God and

man had virtually broken down.... Those ministers and executors of the

laws who were not either dead or ill were left with so few subordinates

that they were unable to discharge any of their duties. Hence everyone

was free to behave as he pleased."12

Martin Luther "frequently expressed the opinion that the End was very

near, though he felt it was unwise to predict an exact date. Christians, he

said, no more know the exact time of Christ's return than 'little babies in

their mothers' bodies know about their arrival.'" This, however, did not

stop him from concluding that the end was not a distant event. In January

1532, he wrote, "The last day is at hand. My calendar has run out. I know

nothing more in my Scriptures."13 As it turned out, there was a lot more time

to follow. Many other disasters, natural and political, gave rise to the same

speculation, century after century.

Contemporary events like the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 were in-

terpreted as evidence of the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. Above all,

the French Revolution excited a spate of interpretations on both sides of

the Atlantic designed to show that the world was entering upon the last

days. Millennialism was widely espoused by leading scholars and divines.

In America the names of Timothy Dwight (President of Yale), John H.

Livingston (President of Rutgers), and Joseph Priestly come to mind: in

Britain, George Stanley Faber, Edward King, and Edward Irving. A spate

of pamphlets and sermons by Church of England clergy and orthodox

American ministers poured forth from the 1790s; and there was a constant

reference back to the prophetical studies of Sir Isaac Newton, Joseph Mede,

and William Whiston. The usual method of interpretation was some vari-

ant of the year-day theory, by which days mentioned in the prophecies

were counted as years, weeks as seven—year periods, and months as thirty

years. There was general agreement in the late eighteenth century that the

1,260 days mentioned in Revelation 12:6 were to be interpreted as 1,260

years, and that this period was now ended. An alternative theory, which

The Dating Game

23

became increasingly popular after 1800, emphasized the importance of

the 2,300-year period of Daniel 8:14 and the 'cleansing of the sanctu-

ary' which would fall due some time in the 1840s. The fulfillment of the

time prophecies meant that mankind was living in the last days, that the

'midnight cry' might soon be heard, and that the coming of the mes-

siah might be expected shortly. Such beliefs had an influence far beyond

the members of explicitly adventist sects. They were part and parcel of

everyday evangelical religion.14

The lessons of history are recorded for all to heed. For many, however,

the past is a distant memory. All that counts is the present. Sure, they were wrong, the prophecy "experts" warn us, but it will be different with us.

The First Millennium

As the last day of 999 approached, "the old basilica of St. Peter's at Rome

was thronged with a mass of weeping and trembling worshipers awaiting the

end of the world," believing that they were on the eve of the Millennium.15

Land, homes, and household goods were given to the poor as a final act of

contrition to absolve the hopeless from sins of a lifetime. Some Europeans

sold their goods before traveling to Palestine to await the Second Coming.

This mistaken application of biblical prophecy happened again in 1100,

1200, and 1245. Prophetic speculation continued. "In 1531, Melchior

Hofmann announced that the second coming would take place in the year

1533.... Nicholas Cusa held that the world would not last past 1734."16

As the second Millennium approaches, we can expect increased activity

among the prophetic speculators as we are assured that the time of the end

is imminent. Lester Sumrall wrote in his book I Predict 2000 A.D.: "I predict the absolute fullness of man's operation on planet Earth by the year 2000

A.D. Then Jesus Christ shall reign from Jerusalem for 1000 years."17 In Ar-

mageddon Now!, Dwight Wilson observed that there had been no significant

increase regarding "hazardous speculation" because "the quarter century that

remains makes the year 2000 too far removed to induce a sense of crisis or

terror; but as it approaches, the cry of impending doom may be expected

to swell. To the extent that this cry is reinforced by continuing crises in the

Middle East there will grow an ever more deafening roar of 'Armageddon

Now!'"18 Remember, this was written in 1977, a full fourteen years before

24

23 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

Was Wilson right? Mikkel Dahl predicated in The Midnight Cry that the

present era would end by 1980. Reginald Edward Duncan predicted in The

Coming Russian Invasion of America that the Millennium would begin in 1979.

Emil Gaverluk of the Southwest Radio Church predicted that the rapture

would occur by 1981. The year 1988 saw an abundance of books predicting

the rapture of the church since this was thought to be the final year of the

"terminal generation" because of the resettlement of the nation Israel in 1948.

The most notorious was Edgar C. Whisenant's 88 Reasons Why the Rapture Is

in 1988.19 Upon the release of his calculations, Whisenant remarked, "Only if the Bible is in error am I wrong, and I say that unequivocally. There is

no way Biblically that I can be wrong; and I say that to every preacher in

town."20 When the author's intricate system of predicting the end failed, he

went on undaunted with a new book called The Final Shout: Rapture Report

1989. It seems that he had made a critical error because he was following

the wrong calendar:

My mistake was that my mathematical calculations were off by one

year.... Since all centuries should begin with a zero year (for instance,

the year 1900 started this century), the first century A.D. was a year short,

consisting of only 99 years. This was the one-year error in my calcula-

tions last year [1988]. The Gregorian calendar (the calendar used today)

is always one year in advance of the true year. Numbered correctly from

the beginning, i.e., 1 A.D., 1989 Gregorian would be only one thousand

nine hundred eighty eight years of 365.2422 days each.21

Whisenant was not alone in making 1988 the termination point of the

last days. Many others succumbed to last days madness. Clifford Hill writes

that "two young men from Denmark announced that they were the two

witnesses of Revelation 11:3 sent by God to prepare the way for Messiah.

Two years earlier I had met two young Americans camping on the Mount

of Olives also claiming to be the two witnesses."22

On the heels of Whisenant came Grant R. Jeffrey's Armageddon: Appoint-

ment with Destiny. Jeffrey writes that through his own research into biblical prophecies he has discovered a number of indications "which suggest that

the year A.D. 2000 is a probable termination date for the 'last days.'"23 His

argument is little different from that of Edgar Whisenant's 88 Reasons thesis.

The Dating Game

25

Instead of Whisenant's 365.2422 days, Jeffrey concludes that a biblical year

is made up of only 360 days. Here is an example of his reasoning:

The year when [Jesus' reading from Luke 4:18-21] occurred, the

fall of A.D. 28, was, in fact, not only a Jubilee Year, but also the thirtieth Jubilee since the Sabbatical-Jubilee system of years began when Israel crossed

the Jordan River in 1451 B.C. Thus, Jesus Christ precisely fulfilled "the

acceptable year of the Lord" on the exact year of Jubilee—the year

of liberty and release.

Please note that He stopped reading at "the acceptable year of the

Lord" because He knew that the next phrase of the prophet's sentence,

"and the day of vengeance of our God," which refers to Armaged-

don, would be postponed exactly 2000 biblical years (2000 biblical years

times 360 days equals 720,000 days divided by 365.25 equals 1971.25

calendar years).

If we add 2000 biblical years (1971.25 calendar years) to the beginning

of Christ's ministry on a Jubilee Year when He read the prophecy about

"the acceptable year of the Lord" in the fall of A.D. 28; we arrive at

the year A.D. 2000, forty Jubilee Cycles later.

The next Jubilee Year will occur in A.D. 2000, completing the Sabbati-

cal—Jubilee system of years—the seventieth Great Jubilee.24

Part of Jeffrey's interpretive method is based on where Jesus stopped

reading in Isaiah. Supposedly the "day of vengeance" (Isa. 61:2; cf. 63:4)

has been postponed for nearly two thousand years because Jesus did not

continue reading Isaiah 61:2. Nothing in the New Testament supports this

interpretation. In fact, Luke's Gospel later indicates that the "days of ven-

geance" (Luke 21:22) would be poured out before that first-century genera-

tion passed away. This means that the "days of vengeance" are past for us

since these "days" refer to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. The "days of vengeance" were future for those who first heard Jesus' reading.

Jesus began His public ministry by reading from an Old Testament

Scripture that identified Him as the promised Messiah. He would spend

three years preaching and teaching to learn how He would be received

by His countrymen. They despised and rejected Him, turning Him over

to the Roman authorities to be crucified as a common criminal. Peter, an

eyewitness to these events, said of his countrymen: "But you disowned

26

25 LAST DAYS MADNESS

the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted to

you, but put to death the Prince of life, the one whom God raised from

the dead..." (Acts 3:14—15). Their cry, when Jesus was presented to them

as their king, was, "We have no king but Caesar!" (John 19:15). In the

Olivet Discourse as recorded by Luke, Jesus quotes from Isaiah 61:2,

warning His disciples of the coming "days of vengeance" that would be-

fall their city and temple. In fact, Jesus told them that this would befall

their generation, not some future postponed generation (Matt. 24:34; Mark

13:30; Luke 21:32).

There is no need for mathematical schemes to determine hidden timetables

that are not self-evident for all to see and understand. When God wants

to set a timetable, He sets a timetable: 7 years (Gen. 45:6), 40 years (Num.

14:34), 70 years (Jer. 25:10), 430 years (Gen. 15:13).

There was a lull on the prophetic scene after the dismal failure of Edgar

Whisenant's 88 Reasons. Then Iraq invaded Kuwait, and the prophecy books

once again came rolling off the presses. Hal Lindsey's Late Great Planet Earth

found new life. John F. Walvoord reissued a revised edition of Armageddon, Oil

and the Middle East Crisis to fit new developments in the Mideast. Walvoord

claimed that Saddam Hussein's "move into Kuwait was motivated by a desire to

'set up a power base from which to attack Israel.'"25 Charles Dyer, a professor

at Dallas Theological Seminary, claimed that modern Babylon was a fulfillment

of end-time prophecy. Using events leading up to and including the events of

the Gulf War with Saddam Hussein, Dyer sought to "prove" that prophecy was

being fulfilled right before our eyes. His book The Rise of Babylon now sells for pennies on the dollar.26 Sensationalism, not sound biblical study, sells.

A Korean group placed newspaper advertisements predicting that the

rapture would take place on October 28, 1992. As we all know, the rapture

did not take place. When asked about the non-event, Kim Tae-jin replied,

"We got the message from God wrong. Jesus will be back in several years."27

The only message from God we have is found in the Bible, and that message

clearly states that Jesus' coming was near for the first-century church.

Charles R. Taylor wrote in Bible Prophecy News in the summer of 1992 that

Jesus' return would occur in the fall of the same year: "What you are starting

to read probably is my final issue of Bible Prophecy News, for Bible prophecy fulfillments indicate that Jesus Christ our Lord will most likely return for us

at the rapture of the Church before the Fall 1992 issue can be printed." Not

to be outdone, Harold Camping wrote 1994? Camping's approach is similar

The Dating Game

27

to Edgar Whisenant's. Through a series of intricate calculations based on

a number of unproven assumptions, Camping concluded that Jesus would

return sometime in the fall of 1994. He based his calculations on the belief

that Adam was created in 11,013 B.C. and that the numbers 13, 130, 1,300,

and 13,000 are significant biblical numbers. For Camping, judgment day

was to be 13,006 years after Adam's creation.28

"Ranch Apocalypse"

David Koresh and his Branch Davidian sect believed that the end was near.

Koresh based his prophetic premonitions on a contemporary application of

the "seven seals" found in the Book of Revelation (5:1, 5; 6:1; 8:1), a method

not unlike the theories of modern-day fundamentalists and evangelicals who

believe we are living in the last days.

If America could learn these seals, they would respect me.... I'm the

anointed one. I teach the seven seals.... It's the fulfillment of prophecy.

This is it. This is the end.... They don't want to be bound by the truth.

There's one truth that ties men into God, and that's the seven seals. And

the anointed one is the only one that can present it. And that's me.29

While we will never know Koresh's true understanding of the application

of the seven seals, there is little doubt that the Branch Davidian's fiery end fit

well with his understanding of the seventh seal: "And the angel took the censor;

and he filled it with the fire of the altar and threw it to the earth; and there

followed peals of thunder and sounds and flashes of lightning and an earth-

quake" (8:5). In the last two weeks of the standoff with federal agents, three

scrawled communiques were retrieved from outside the compound. Although

apparently written by Koresh, they were signed "God." They threatened that

catastrophe would befall God's enemies, an allusion to the judgment theme

in the Book of Revelation (14:7). "Open your eyes and not your mouth," read

one. "Fear the hour of judgment, for it has come."30 FBI agent Bob Ricks

stated that Koresh was following his "apocalyptic theory of resolution. He says

that the final days are being fulfilled by what is occurring. I think he has put

forth a self-fulfilling prophecy, and we're hoping that something will happen

to interrupt that prophecy."31 The events in Waco serve as a tragic lesson for

those who maintain that the judgment themes depicted in Matthew 24, Mark

28

27 LAST DAYS MADNESS

13, Luke 21, and the Book of Revelation are still in our future. How many

more such tragedies will it take before Christians realize that these prophetic

events have been fulfilled?

Because of the mix of eschatology and violence among some fringe

groups, the FBI has been keeping a close eye on apocalyptic cults. USA Today

reports that FBI Director Louis Freeh is preparing for possible violence from

rightwing extremists, religious cults, and apocalyptic groups.32 The FBI was

unprepared for the end-time logic of Vicki and Randy Weaver in the Ruby

Ridge disaster. The Weavers were treated like fringe political extremists who

were tied to white supremacist, anti-semitic, and Aryan Nation groups rather

than believers in an imminent apocalypse that they (the Weavers) concluded

would be led by governmental powers ("the Beast").

The Weaver family's flight to Ruby Ridge was greatly influenced by

The Late Great Planet Earth. Though Vicki Weaver, the family's spiritual

leader, was also influenced by H.G. Wells and Ayn Rand, it was Lindsey's

prophetic work, coupled with her home-spun visions, that convinced

her to pack up her family and move to Ruby Ridge. She believed that

the enemies of God predicted by Lindsey were prepared to strike at any

moment.33

The Weavers mixed conspiracy theories, apocalypticism, and paranoia to

conclude that the end was near.34 You can imagine what the Weavers thought

as they saw armed soldiers attacking their homestead. Was this happening

everywhere? Was this the prelude to the end that they read so much about

in popular prophecy books and expected in their lifetime? The Book of

Revelation was being acted out right before their eyes, so they thought.

The history of date setting is long and tortuous. Francis Gummerlock

catalogs more than a thousand false predictions over the past two millennia,

everything from the identity of the antichrist to the date of Christ's com-

ing. Two common streams run through all of them: they were sure of their

prediction and they were wrong.35

Crying Wolf

Historian Mark Noll serves us a warning: "At the very least, it would be

well for those in our age who predict details and dates for the End to re-

The Dating Game

29

member how many before them have misread the signs of the times."36

As children we learned Aesop's fable of the "Shepherd Boy and the Wolf."

In the end we learn that the sheep are the ones that are harmed by the shouts

of "Wolf!" by the Shepherd Boy. In the same way the people of God—the

sheep—are harmed by continual shouts of "the end is near!" God is looking

for shepherds after His own heart, "who will feed" the flock "on knowledge

and understanding" (Jer. 3:15), not on the latest newspaper headlines.

Day after day, a Shepherd Boy tended a flock of sheep in the hills

above his village. One day, just to cause some excitement, the Shepherd

Boy ran down from the hills shouting "Wolf! Wolf!"

The townsfolk came running with sticks to chase the Wolf away. All

they found was the Shepherd Boy, who laughed at them for their pains.

Seeing how well his trick worked, the Shepherd Boy tried it again the

next day. Again he ran down from the hills shouting, "Wolf!" Again the

townsfolk ran to his aid in vain.

But the day after, it happened that a Wolf really came. The Shepherd

Boy, now truly alarmed, shouted, "Help! Come and help me! The Wolf

is killing the sheep!"

But this time the townsfolk said, "He won't fool us again with that

trick!" They paid no attention to his cries, and the Wolf destroyed the

entire flock.

When the people saw what happened to their sheep, they were very an-

gry. "There is no believing a liar," they said, "even when he speaks the truth!'37

Of course, if you cry "last days" long enough, you just might be the one

to get it-right, but by then there might not be anyone listening. Preaching

about the soon coming of Christ has long been used by Christian prophecy

teachers as a way of pleading with the lost to commit themselves to Jesus

Christ. Such a motivating device can backfire on even the most well-inten-

tioned evangelist. What happens if a listener shouts out, "Preachers like you

have been telling us for centuries that Jesus is coming soon. Why should we

believe you now?" By crying wolf and being wrong each time, the church

is perceived as unreliable. Skeptics of the Christian faith are likely to con-

clude that since these self-proclaimed prophets were wrong on the timing

of Jesus' return when they seemed so certain (particularly of the nearness of

the rapture, the rise of Antichrist, the Great Tribulation, and Armageddon),

30

29 LAST DAYS MADNESS

then maybe they are wrong on other issues which they teach with equal

certainty. Maybe the entire Christian message is a sham.

The New Testament does use the near and soon coming of Jesus in judgment

as a way of spurring the church on to greater works. The near judgment

spoken of in Scripture refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, not

a distant future coming of Christ. Peter wrote, "The end of all things is at

band; therefore, be of sound judgment and sober spirit for the purpose of

prayer" (1 Peter 4:7). At hand for whom? If words mean anything, then

Peter must have had his contemporary readers in mind. What end was he

describing? In Luke's Gospel we read Jesus saying, "But keep on the alert

at all times, praying in order that you may have strength to escape all these things that are about to take place, and to stand before the Son of Man" (Luke 21:36). John says in his first epistle, "Children, it is the last hour, and just as

you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from

this we know it is the last hour" (1 John 2:18).

The Bible is not a book that can be taken lightly. The integrity of the

Bible is at stake if we dismiss these clearly worded statements of time. As

students of the Bible, we are obligated to take God at His word, even when

it contradicts what we've been taught by popular prophecy writers.

The Dating Game

31

Notes

1. Quoted in Carl Olof Jonsson and Wolfgang Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last

Days—When? (Atlanta, GA: Commentary Press, 1987), ix.

2. Quoted in T. Francis Glasson, His Appearing and His Kingdom (London: Epworth, 1953), 45.

3. Michael Barkun, Disaster and the Millennium (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974), 1.

4. Barkun, Disaster and the Millennium, 1.

5. Clarke Garrett, Respectable Folly: Millenarians and the French Revolution in France

and England (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975), 2.

6. Igor Shafarevich, The Socialist Phenomenon, trans. William Tjalsma (New York: Harper and Row, [1975] 1980). Also see Norman Cohn's The Pursuit of the

Millennium (New York: Oxford University Press, [1957] 1970).

7. Quoted in Mike Evans, The Return (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1986),

222.

8. Quoted in Evans, The Return, 22.

9. Billy Graham, Storm Warning (Dallas, TX: Word, 1992), 294. This is a revised version of Approaching Hoofbeats: The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (Waco,

TX: Word, 1983). Graham had to revise the 1983 edition because historical

circumstances changed.

10. For a defense of this position, see Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., B e fore Jerusalem Fell:

Dating the Book of Revelation, 2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999).

"Indeed, it is becoming an increasingly persuasive argument that all the New

Testament books were written before 70 A.D.—within a single generation of

the death of Christ." John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Ready With An Answer:

For the Tough Questions About God (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers,

1997), 364-65.

11. John C. Souter, "The Sky is Falling," Future (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1984), 6.

12. Otto Friedrich, The End of the World: A History (New York: Coward, McCann and Geoghegan, 1982), 116.

13. Mark Noll, "Misreading the Signs of the Times," Christianity Today (6 February 1987), 10-11. Also see Mark U. Edwards, Jr., "Apocalyptic Expectations:

The Scourge of God," Luther's Last Battles: Politics and Polemics, 1531—46 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), 97-114.

14. J.E.C. Harrison, The Second Coming: Popular Millenarianism, 1780-1850 (Hew

31

31 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1979), 5.

15. Richard Erdoes, AD 1000:Livingon the Brink of Apocalypse S an Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1988), 1. Other scholars dispute the claim that the year

1000 was a key prophetic date. See Dick Teresi and Judith Hooper, "The

Last Laugh?," Omni (January 1990), 84.

16. Souter, "The Sky is Falling," 6.

17. Quoted in Ron Rhodes, "Millennial Madness," Christian Research Journal (Fall 1990), 39.

18. Dwight L. Wilson, Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and

Israel Since 1917 (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, [1977] 1991), 13.

19. Edgar C. Whisenant, 88 Reasons Why the Rapture Is In 1988 (Nashville, TN: World Bible Society, 1988).

20. Quoted in Ralph Lyman, A Critique on the 1988 Rapture Theory (Oklahoma

City, OK: Southwest Radio Church, 1988), 2.

21. Edgar Whisenant and Greg Brewer, The Final Shout: Rapture Report 1989

(Nashville, TN: World Bible Society, 1989), 1.

22. Clifford Hill, Prophecy Past and Present: An Explanation of the Prophetic Ministry

in the Bible and the Church Today (Ann Arbor, MI: Servant, 1989), 5.

23. Grant R. Jeffrey, Armageddon: Appointment with Destiny (Toronto: Frontier Research, 1988), 193. In Jeffrey's The Millennium Meltdown: The Year 2000

Computer Crisis (1998), copy on the back cover reads: "Grant Jeffrey's new prophecy blockbuster explores the potential of the disastrous Year 2000

computer meltdown that will set the stage for the rise of the world govern-

ment of the Antichrist." This is a prediction!

24. Jeffrey, Armageddon: Appointment with Destiny, 192.

25. Stephen L. Lutz, "Evangelical Publishers Cash in on Iraq War," World (26

January 1991), 16.

26. Charles H. Dyer, The Rise of Babylon: Sign of the End Times (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale), 1991. Fellow dispensationalist Ed Hindson disagrees with Dyer on the

identity of Babylon: "Babylon is still in ruins in fulfillment of Old Testament

prophecies. Saddam Hussein's attempt to 'rebuild' it as a tourist trap hardly

qualifies it as the great city of the last days. Besides, his attempts have failed.

Babylon has no sacred significance to the religion of Islam. Muslims are inter-

ested in protecting only their holy sites. They have no interest in rebuilding

ancient pagan sites, including Babylon." (Approaching Armageddon: The World

Prepares far War with God [Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997], 245).

The Dating Game

27. B.J. Lee, '"Sorry, Let's Go Home': Miracle of the Rapture a No-Show in South

Korea," Atlanta Constitution (29 October 1992), A4.

28. Harold Camping, 1994? (New York: Vantage Press, 1992), 444.

29. Cited in Mark Potok, "Sect leader charismatic, 'dangerous,"' USA Today (2

March 1993), 2A. Koresh had granted interviews to CNN, KRLD radio,

and others during the siege at his cult's compound near Waco, Texas. In

these interviews, Koresh mentioned the "seven seals," a reference to biblical

prophecies he believed foreshadowed the imminent return of Jesus.

30. Sam Howe Verhovek, "F.B.I. Saw the Ego in Koresh But Missed Willingness

to Die," New York Times (22 April 1993), A 1.

31. "Is Koresh hoping his followers get killed?," Atlanta Journal/Constitution (28

March 1993), B3. None of this is to exonerate the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol,

Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), and the Justice Department in the way they

handled the situation. See "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," a video docu-

mentary that is critical of the way the FBI and BATF handled the Davidian

group.

32. "FBI: Violence possible as 2000 approaches," USA Today (February 5, 1998), 13 A.

33. Paul T. Coughlin, Secrets, Plots & Hidden Agendas: What You Don't Know About

Conspiracy Theories (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1999), 145-46.

34. Jess Walter, Every Knee Shall Bow: The Truth and Tragedy of Ruby Ridge and the

Randy Weaver Family (New York: Regan Books/Harper Collins, 1995).

35. Francis X. Gummerlock, The Day and the Hour: Christianity's Perennial Fascination

with Predicting the End of the World (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999).

36. Noll, "Misreading the Signs of the Times," 10-11.

37. "The Shepherd Boy and the Wolf," Aesop's Fables as retold by Ann McGovern (New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1963), 33.

Chapter Two

WHEN WILL THESE

THINGS BE?

With rockets soaring over the land of the apocalyptic prophets, many

people have turned to end-times experts for insights."1 It seems that

any time a war breaks out or an earthquake is recorded on the Richter scale

or famine sweeps through a third-world country, books predicting that the

end is near are hurriedly readied for publication. Such books have little re-

gard for the historical context of Bible prophecy and the failed predictions

of past writers who were equally certain. As we've seen, there is nothing

new in any of this. Floods in the Midwest in the summer of 1993 led one

Baptist minister to conclude: "The Bible says that in the latter days, there

will be earthquakes, and all of that refers to natural disasters.... We live in a

time like that."2 Such comments are not unusual. Books long ago discarded

by anxious Christians contain similar assessments of world conditions and

their supposed relationship to end-time events.

Based on current events in the late 1970s and early '80s, Hal Lindsey

wrote, "We are the generation that will see the end times ... and the return

of Christ."3 When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait and coalition forces

led by the United States sent troops to force him out, John F. Walvoord

revised his Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East, first published in 1974, to 35

36

LAST DAYS MADNESS

address how the Bible applies to "the future of the Middle East and the end

of Western Civilization."4 Based on current events coupled with Bible passages which he believes throw light on the state of affairs just prior to a so-called

Rapture, Jerry Falwell boasts, "We will not be here for Armageddon."5 On a

December 27, 1992, television broadcast, Falwell stated, "I do not believe

there will be another millennium ... or another century." Like Falwell,

Walvoord, who is in his eighties, "expects the Rapture to occur in his own

lifetime. So many people will be suddenly missing, he muses, 'I wish I could

be around to see how the media explains [sic] it."'6 According to William

T. James in Storming Toward Armageddon, "We live in days such as delineated in 2 Timothy 3:1-5. The evidence is astoundingly abundant to anyone not

wishing to be a foolish, deceived, brute beast but rather desiring to seek to

be wise unto salvation."7 A careful reading of 2 Timothy 3 will show that

Paul was describing conditions in Timothy's day, what the writer of Hebrews

characterizes as the "last days" of the Old Covenant (Heb. 1:1-2; cf. 1 Cor.

10:11). Notice Paul's optimism when he states that those who perform such

deeds "will not make further progress; for their folly will be obvious to all"

(2 Tim. 3:9). Second Timothy 3 is not a description of what the world will

be like before the so-called rapture.

"Your Timing Is Off"

Why is there so much speculation and error about when the end might

be, whether the "end" has reference to the rapture, the return of Christ to set

up His millennial kingdom, or the return of Christ to inaugurate the "new

heavens and new earth" (2 Peter 3:13; Rev. 21:1)? While there are a number

of reasons why prophetic speculation continues unabated, as we will see in

subsequent chapters, one reason stands above them all: Fulfilled prophecy is

being interpreted as if it were unfulfilled prophecy. This error was also made by the first-century Jews. When Jesus "came to His own ... those who were

His own did not receive Him" (John 1:11). These unbelieving Jews did not

believe Jesus was the fulfillment of centuries of prophetic pronouncements

that are found in "the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms"

(Luke 24:44).

Let's look at a similar contemporary example. Many Jews today are still

awaiting the Messiah. Like their first-century counterparts, they do not

believe that the messianic prophecies were fulfilled in the person and work

When Will These Things Be?

37

of Jesus in the first century. The messianic prophecies have been taken from

their first-century fulfillment context and have been projected into the distant

future as unfulfilled prophecy. In effect, present-day Jews are still awaiting the

first coming of the Messiah. In a similar way, many Christians take prophe-

cies that have been fulfilled—either in Old Testament events or in events

following the ascension of Jesus—and view them as still unfulfilled. They

then manipulate these fulfilled prophecies and apply them to contemporary

events. Their speculations are wrong because they are applying fulfilled

prophecies to current events. As we will see, they ignore the time texts that

speak of a near coming of Jesus in judgment upon an apostate Judaism that

rejected its Messiah in the first century.

The Last Days

One of the first things a Christian must learn in interpreting the Bible

is to pay attention to the time texts. Failing to recognize the proximity of

a prophetic event will distort its intended meaning. The New Testament

clearly states that the "end of all things" was at hand for those who first

read 1 Peter 4:7; that is, the Old Covenant with its types and shadows was

about to pass away. The Book of Hebrews opens with two verses that put

the timing of certain eschatological events into perspective: "God, after He

spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many

ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world" (Heb. 1:1—2). Prior to the

coming of Jesus, God spoke via dreams, prophets, written revelation, and types.

Through the New Covenant God "has made the first obsolete. But whatever

is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready [lit., nea r ] to disappear" (8:13).

The New Covenant is better than the Old Covenant because the blood

of Jesus is better than the blood of animals (Heb. 7:22; 8:6). In addition,

the way God communicates with His people has changed. For example,

under the Old Covenant no man could look upon the face of God and live

(Ex. 33:20). At the dawning of the New Covenant, however, God was no

longer hidden. He had taken on human flesh in the person of Jesus Christ:

•"The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory,

glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth"

(John 1:14).

38

LAST DAYS MADNESS

• "What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen

with our eyes, what we beheld and our hands handled, concerning the

Word of Life" (1 John 1:1).

God spoke in this new way "in these last days." The last days were in operation in the first century when God was manifested in the flesh in the person

of Jesus Christ! Those Hebrew Christians who read the letter addressed to

them were being told that an important covenantal era was about to end, the

era of "the fathers in the prophets." The proof that the last days had come

was that God " has spoken in His Son." The last days are not way off in the distant future. The end came to an obsolete covenant in the first century.

In A.D. 70 the "last days" ended with the dissolution of the temple and

the sacrificial system. A similar pronouncement is made in 1 Peter 1:20: "For

He was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has appeared in

these last times for the sake of you." Gordon Clark comments on what Peter means by "these last times": "'The last days,' which so many people think

refers to what is still future at the end of this age, clearly means the time of

Peter himself. I John 2:18 says it is, in his day, the last hour. Acts 2:17 quotes Joel as predicting the last days as the life time of Peter."8

Certain destructive events confronted the early Church, events that

were "near" for those who first read the New Testament prophecies (Matt.

24:32-33; Rev. 1:3; 22:10). The Apostle Paul mentions "the present distress"

(1 Cor. 7:26). There is no getting around this language, that most of the

verses that many believe are yet to be fulfilled already have been fulfilled.

Forcing the following verses to describe a time nearly two thousand years

in the future is the epitome of "Scripture twisting":

• "And you will be hated by all on account of My name, but it is the

one who has endured to the end who will be saved. But whenever

they persecute you in this city, flee to the next; for truly I say to you, you

shall not finish going through the cities of Israel, until the Son of Man comes

(Matt. 10:22-23).

• "For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with

His angels; and WILL THEN RECOMPENSE EVERY MAN ACCORDING TO

HIS DEEDS. Truly I say to you, there are some of those standing here who shall

not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom (Matt.

16:27-28).

When Will These Things Be?

39

• "Jesus said to [the high priest], 'You have said it yourself [that I am the

Christ, the Son of God]; nevertheless I tell you, hereafter you shall see

the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of

heaven'" (Matt. 26:64).

• "Peter therefore seeing him [John] said to Jesus, 'Lord, and what about

this man?' Jesus said to him, 'If I want him [John] to remain until I come,

what is that to you? You follow Me!'" (John 21:21-22).

• "And this do, knowing the time, that it is already the hour for you to

awaken from sleep; for now salvation is nearer to us than when we believed'

(Rom. 13:11).

• "The night is almost gone and the day is at hand. Let us therefore lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light" (Rom. 13:12).

•"And the God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet" (Rom.

16:20).

• "But this I say, brethren, the time has been shortened so that from now on both those who have wives should be as though they had none"

(1 Cor. 7:29).

•"For the form of this world is passing away" (1 Cor. 7:31).

••"Now these things happened to [Israel] as an example, and they were

written for our instruction, upon whom the ends of the ages have come'

(1 Cor. 10:11).

• "And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he may be revealed" (2 Thess. 2:6).

• "For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work" (2 Thess. 2:7).

• "Let your forbearing spirit be known to all men. The Lord is nea r " (Phil.

4:5).

• "But now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself" (Heb. 9:26).

• "Not forsaking our own assembling together, as it is the habit of some,

but encouraging one another; and all the more, as you see the day drawing

near (Heb. 10:25).

• "FOR YET IN A VERY LITTLE WHILE,9 HE WHO IS COMING WILL COME,

AND WILL NOT DELAY" (Heb. 10:37).

• "Be patient, therefore, brethren, until the coming of the Lord Behold, the farmer waits for the precious produce of the soil, being patient about

it, until it gets the early and late rains" (James 5:7).

40

LAST DAYS MADNESS

• "You too be patient; strengthen your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is

at hand' (James 5:8).

• "Do not complain, brethren, against one another, that you yourselves

may not be judged; behold, the Judge is standing right at the door (James

5:9).

• "For He was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has

appeared in these last times for the sake of you (1 Peter 1:20).

• " The end of all things is at hand, therefore, be of sound judgment and sober spirit for the purpose of prayer" (1 Peter 4:7).

• "And when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive 10 the unfading crown of glory" (1 Peter 5:4).

• "Children, it is the last hour, and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it is

the last hou r " (1 John 2:18).

• "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His

bond-servants, the things which must shortly take place.. ." (Rev. 1:1).

• "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the proph-

ecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near (Rev.

1:3).

• "'Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep

you from the hour of testing, that hour which is about to come upon

the whole world,11 to test those who dwell upon the earth [land]'" (Rev.

3:10).

• "I am coming quickly, hold fast what you have, in order that no one take your crown" (Rev. 3:11).

• "The second woe is past; behold, the third woe is coming quickly" (Rev.

11:14).

• "The beast that you saw was and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss" (Rev. 17:8).

• "And he said to me, 'These words are faithful and true'; and the Lord,

the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show to his

bond-servants the things which must shortly take place (Rev. 22:6).

•"And behold, lam coming quickly. Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book" (Rev. 22:7).

• "And he said to me, 'Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this

book, for the time is near" (Rev. 22:10)

• "Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render

When Will These Things Be?

41

to every man according to what he has done" (Rev. 22:12; cf. Matt.

16:27).

• "He who testifies to these things says, 'Yes, I am coming quickly.' Amen.

Come, Lord Jesus" (Rev. 22:20).

These passages and others like them tell us that a significant eschatologi-

cal event was to happen in the lifetime of those who heard and read the

prophecies. Dispensationalists reject this literal approach to interpreting

the time texts by fabricating a doctrine called imminency. The following

definition is typical:

The primary thought expressed by the word "imminency" is that

something important is likely to happen, and could happen soon. While

the event may not be immediate, or necessarily very soon, it is next on

the program and may take place at any time.12

There is nothing in the above texts that would support this definition.

Words such as "likely," "could happen," and "may take place" are nowhere indicated. The biblical writers are straightforward in their claim that the

events described were to happen "soon" for those who first read the prophe-

cies. No other interpretation is possible if the words are taken in their "plain,

primary, ordinary, usual, or normal" sense. If the biblical authors had wanted

to be tentative in the way they described future events, they would have

used words expressing probability.

The time texts are the most important element in Bible prophecy. If they

are ignored or manipulated in any way, then God's Word can be made to mean

anything. A Bible that can mean anything is a Bible without meaning.

42

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Joe Maxwell, Christianity Today (11 March 1991), 60.

2. Quoted in Alan Bash, "Some see signs of doom in storms' clouds," USA Today

(13 July 1993), 3D.

3. Back-cover copy of Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King

of Prussia, PA: Westgate Press, 1980).

4. Cover copy of John F. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East, rev. ed.

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1974, 1976] 1990).

5. Cited in Kenneth L. Woodward, "The Final Days are Here Again," Newsweek

(18 March 1991), 55.

6. Cited in Woodward, "The Final Days are Here Again," 55.

7. William T. James, "What the Future Holds," Storming Toward Armageddon: Essays

in Apocalypse (Green Forest, AR: New Leaf Press, 1992), 45.

8. Gordon H. Clark, II Peter: A Short Commentary (Nutley, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1975), 64.

9. "Little while" is used to describe events that take place in the lifetime of the audience: Mark 1447; John 7:33; 12:35; 13:33; 14:19; 16:16; Heb. 2:7, 9;

James 4:14; 1 Peter 1:6; 5:10; Revelation 6:11; 17:10.

10. If Peter had a distant generation in mind, he would have written, "they will receive."

11. The Greek word translated "world" is not kosmos but oikoumenes, "the inhabited earth," most often interpreted as "the Roman Empire" (see Luke 2:1 and Matt.

24:14).

12. Gerald B. Stanton, "The Doctrine of Imminency: Is It Biblical?" in Thomas

Ice and Timothy Demy, eds., When the Trumpet Sounds (Eugene, OR: Harvest

House, 1995), 222.

Chapter Three

WHEN DID JESUS

"COME IN GLORY"?

Almost any interpretation can be put on a verse or series of verses if the

grammatical and historical contexts are not first determined. The time

when Jesus said certain events would take place is all-important. To miss

the identification of the time when an event is said to occur will mean that

the discourse can be made to fit any generation. This, of course, would

lead to tremendous confusion. There is no doubt that this error is the chief

problem for those who maintain that the events of Matthew 24-25 and

other prophetic passages are yet to be fulfilled, either in our generation or

in some future generation. A few examples will put this concept in proper

perspective.

In Matthew 16:27-28, Jesus proclaims, "For the Son of Man is going to

come in the glory of His Father with His angels; and will then recompense

every man according to His deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those

who are standing here who shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom." If we maintain that the event Jesus is describing

is still in our future, then how should we interpret His statement that some

of those with whom He was speaking would still be alive when He did in

fact "come in the glory of His Father with His angels"? Some claim that the

"coming" Jesus had in mind was the transfiguration. But the transfiguration

43

44

LAST DAYS MADNESS

cannot be its fulfillment since Jesus indicated that some who were standing

with Him would still be alive when He came but most would be dead. If we

adopt the view that the transfiguration is the fulfillment, we must conclude

that most of the people with whom Jesus spoke were dead within a week

of Jesus' prediction (Matt. 17:1)! Dispensationalist Stanley D. Toussaint

disagrees: "The Lord is simply asserting the fact that it would not be a long

time before some of them saw Christ coming in His kingdom, which oc-

curred in the Transfiguration."1 If this is what Jesus wanted to communicate,

then why did He say that some of those who were standing before Him

would not taste death before they saw Him coming in His kingdom? Tous-

saint comments that preterists, those who believe that these verses were

fulfilled nearly forty years later, read "more into the text than is being said."

In reality, Toussaint dismisses what is plainly said. Moreover, if he believes

that Matthew 16:27—28 has been fulfilled in the transfiguration, then he is

a preterist! He has refuted his own anti-preterist argument since he believes

that the fulfillment is in the past.

Others see Pentecost, with the coming of the Holy Spirit, as the fulfillment.

But the same problem arises—nearly all the disciples would have had to die

within a period of a few months after the events described by Jesus in Mat-

thew 16:27-28. Such a scenario does not fit with the language of the text

and what we know took place. Anyway, finding a fulfillment in these two

proximate events does not solve the problem for futurists who maintain that

"the Son of Man coming in His kingdom" is language that refers exclusively

to the second-coming.

The Bible Interprets Itself

A helpful biblical commentary on Matthew 16:27-28 is found in John

21:18-23. After Jesus describes for Peter how he will die (21:18), Peter asks

of John's fate, "Lord, and what about this man?" (21:21). Jesus says to Peter,

"If I want him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow Me!"

(21:22). History tells us that Peter died before Jerusalem was destroyed, and

John lived beyond Jerusalem's destruction, a perfect and expected fulfillment

of Matthew 16:27-28. If we are still waiting for the fulfillment of Jesus'

prediction of His coming "in the glory of His Father with His angels," then

some of those who were with Jesus are still alive! An impossibility, to be sure.

So, then, we must look for an event that was far enough in the future where

When Did Jesus "Come in Glory"?

most of Jesus' hearers would be dead, but not so far in the future where they all would be dead. Is there such an event? Yes! The destruction of Jerusalem

in A.D. 70 by the Romans. Henry Hammond (1605-1660) offers a helpful

harmony of Matthew 16:27-28, John 21:18-23, and Matthew 24 and their

relationship to Jesus' judgment on Jerusalem:

The nearness of this to the story of Christ's Transfiguration, makes it

probable to many, that this coming of Christ is that Transfiguration of his,

but that cannot be, because the 27th verse of the son of man's coming in his

glory with his Angels to reward, &c. (to which this verse clearly connects) cannot be applied to that. And there is another place, John 21:23. (which

may help to the understanding of this) which speaks of a real coming,

and one principal person (agreeable to what is here said of some standing

her e ) that should tarry, or not die, till that coming of his. And that surely was fulfilled in John's seeing the .. .famous destruction of the Jews, which was to fall in that generation, Matthew 24, that is, in the lifetime of some there

present, and is called the Kingdom of God and the Coming of Christ, and by consequence here most probably the son of man's coming in his kingdom, ...

that is, his coming in the exercise of his Kingly office, to work vengeance

on his enemies, and discriminate the faithful believers from them.2

Hammond's view is not unusual. In fact, most evangelical commentators

applied these passages to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Henry

Alford states that this passage refers "to the destruction of Jerusalem, and the full manifestation of the Kingdom of Christ by the annihilation of the

Jewish polity...."3 The Dutch commentator S. Greijdanus offers a helpful

summary of Matthew 16:27-28 in his comments on the parallel passage

in Luke 9:27:

Then this coming of God's dominion cannot refer to our Lord's res-

urrection, nor to the gift of the Holy Spirit which were to be realized

within the year.... Nor can it refer to our Lord's coming in judgment

which is yet even now in abeyance.... Nor can the powerful spread of

the gospel be meant, for this already came about within comparatively

few years.... We shall have to think of the destruction of Jerusalem.... In

it God revealed his kingly dominion in his judgment, a precursor of his

judgment on the last day.4

46

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Charles H. Spurgeon's comments get to the heart of the matter when he

writes, "If a child were to read this passage I know what he would think it

meant: he would suppose Jesus Christ was to come, and there were some

standing there who should not taste death until really and literally he did

come. This, I believe, is the plain meaning." Though plain, Spurgeon still

could not accept it.5

Mark's gospel adds more to the context. "For whoever is ashamed of Me

and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, " Jesus declares, "the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father

with the holy angels" (Mark 8:38). A distant generation is not in view; it's

Jesus' contemporaries who will experience His wrath. And how does Jesus

define the time context of "this adulterous and sinful generation"? "And He

was saying to them, 'Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing

here who shall not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power"' (Mark 9:1).

Questioning Jesus and the Bible

Why is a discussion of these texts so important? First, we want to be

accurate in our understanding of Scripture since it is God's only Word to

us, the expression of His will. To misinterpret Scripture is to misinterpret

God's will. Second, the integrity of the Bible is at stake. Critics of the Bible

have studied Jesus' words in these passages and have concluded that He

was wrong! Jesus predicted that He would return within a generation, as

Matthew 24:34 clearly states, and He did not. The conclusion? The Bible

cannot be trusted as a reliable book. It is filled with errors. The well-known

atheist Bertrand Russell seized on what he perceived to be a mistake and

concluded that the Bible was not trustworthy. He wrote the following in

Why I Am Not a Christian:

I am concerned with Christ as he appears in the Gospel narrative as

it stands, and there one does find some things that do not seem to be

very wise. For one thing, He certainly thought that His second coming

would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who

were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that

and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that

His coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living. That

When Did Jesus "Come in Glory"? 47

was the belief of His earlier followers, and it was the basis of a good

deal of His moral teaching.6

If Jesus was wrong on the timing of His coming, Russell concludes, then

His moral worldview should be questioned as well. Jesus' moral teaching is

based on His character. If His character is flawed, so is His morality.

A similar line of argument is attempted by the skeptic Tim Callahan in

Bible Prophecy: Failure or Fulfillment? Callahan's arguments are identical to those used by futurists who claim that Jesus coming in His kingdom (Matt.

16:27-28) and the events of the Olivet Discourse prophecy (Matt. 24—25)

could not have been fulfilled prior to the destruction of the temple in A.D.

70. "Obviously," Callahan writes, "the gospel had not been preached to

the entire world by 70. C.E., even if we interpret the whole world as being

nothing more than the Roman Empire."7 This is the same argument used

by dispensationalists to get around what Jesus said so clearly, that He would

come in judgment before that generation passed away.

Writing for the Skeptical Inquirer, Gerald A. Larue follows Russell and

Callahan's line of argumentation and concludes that the Bible is riddled with

errors because Jesus' was wrong about the timing of His coming:

Although apocalyptic mythology is found throughout the New Testa-

ment and is portrayed in its most organized form in Revelation, the gospel

writers gave authority for the idea to John the Baptizer, who introduced

the theme in the gospels, and to Jesus, who explained signs of the end of

the age and promised his disciples that the new kingdom of God would

be ushered in during their lifetime (Matt. 16:28). Jesus was wrong. In-

deed, during the second century CE, some Christians asked, "Where is the

promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things

have continued as they were from the beginning of creation." (2 Peter 3:4).

All we can say is that from that time on, every prophetic pronouncement

of the ending of time has been wrong.8

If Jesus was wrong, then critics like Russell, Callahan, and Larue can

rightly conclude that we cannot trust anything He said. In addition, if

Jesus, being the Son of God, was wrong, then how can we trust the writers

of the New Testament, who claimed to be nothing more than finite and

fallible sinners?

48

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Evangelicals have done a poor job in reconciling these time texts with

other parts of the Bible and with history. Their argument goes something

like this: "It seems that Jesus was predicting that He would return before the last disciple died, but He didn't really mean to leave that impression." Even C.S. Lewis understood the dilemma present in Jesus' statement in Matthew

24:34, that He would return before that first-century generation passed

away. After dealing with critics who maintain that Jesus was just another

Palestinian seer, Lewis confronts the more serious objection:

"But there is worse to come. 'Say what you like,' we shall be told, 'the

apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false.

It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second

Coming in their own lifetime. And, worse still, they had a reason, and

one which you will find very embarassing. Their Master had told them

so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many

words, "this generation shall not pass till all these things be done." And

He was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world

than anyone else.'"9

Lewis considers Matthew 24:34 "the most embarrassing verse in the Bible."

His attempts to reconcile this and other time texts with the reality that Jesus'

coming did not take place in the first century are ineffective. He's not alone.

Gleason Archer believes that there "are three possible fulfillments of [Mat-

thew 16:28]": the transfiguration, Pentecost, and the destruction of Jerusalem

in A.D. 70. He dismisses the transfiguration and the destruction of Jerusalem

and opts for Pentecost as the fulfillment.10 Nowhere does he explain how

verse 28 fits: "there are some of those who are standing here who shall not

taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom" (16:28).

J. Carl Laney believes that the transfiguration is the fulfillment. How does

he explain verse 28? "Jesus was not mistaken in thinking that some of the

disciples would witness the inauguration of His kingdom. He simply en-

couraged them with the promise that some would experience a foretaste

of His kingdom glory!" Laney avoids dealing with what the text actually

says and puts words in Jesus' mouth.11 Larry Richards ignores the time ele-

ment in the passage by failing to explain how verse 28 could be fulfilled

in either the transfiguration or Pentecost.12 R. A. Torrey follows a similar

line of argument.13 A note in The Believer's Study Bible (1991) suggests that When Did Jesus "Come in Glory"?

49

Matthew 16:28 might refer to Jesus' "triumphal entry into Jeusalem a few

days hence" (1366) without ever discussing the time issue.

But What Does It Mean?

But how can we maintain that Jesus came "in the glory of His Father

with His angels" in A.D. 70? As we've seen, the time indicator in the passage

precludes either an immediate fulfillment (transfiguration, resurrection, Pen-

tecost) or a distant fulfillment (the second coming of Christ). The language

of Matthew 16:27-28 is similar to the way Jehovah came to "the sons of

Israel" under the Old Covenant:

"The LORD came from Sinai, and dawned on them from Seir; He

shown forth from Mount Paran, and He came from the midst of ten

thousand holy ones. At His right hand there was flashing lightning for

them" (Deut. 33:1-2).

Jude presents a similar picture in the New Testament. But his is a de-

scription of God's coming in judgment: "Behold, the Lord came with many

thousands of His holy ones, to execute judgment upon all, and to convict

all of the ungodly of all their ungodly deeds which they have done in an

ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken

against Him" (Jude 14—15). The language is almost identical with that of

Matthew 16:27. In addition, "Jesus alludes to Daniel 7:13-14 and thus ap-

plies Old Testament language for God as judge to Himself (Ps 62:12; Prov

24:12; Jer 17:10; 32:19; Ezek 18:30). The reference to angels is probably

from Zechariah 14:5, though it also fits the context of the image in Daniel

7:13-14."14 Jesus assumes the Old Testament apocalyptic language referring

to Jehovah's coming and applies it to Himself. A similar pattern is found

in Revelation 2:5: "Remember therefore from where you have fallen, and

repent and do the deeds you did at first; or else I am coming to you, and

will remove your lampstand out of its place—unless you repent." Similar

"coming" language is used in Revelation 2:16, neither of which refer to

Christ's second coming.

48

48 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. In a paper presented at the Fourth Annual Pre-Trib Study Group in Dallas,

Texas (December 11-13, 1995), 20.

2. Henry Hammond, A Paraphrase, and Notations Upon all the Books of the New

Testament, 7th ed. (London: John Nicholson, [1653] 1702), 74-75. For

similar comments on John 21:18-21, see John Lightfoot, A Commentary on

the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica: Matthew—1 Corinthians, 4 vols.

(Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, [1859] 1989), 3:451-54 and John

Gill, Exposition of the Old and New Testaments, 9 vols. (London: Mathews and Leigh, 1809), 8:135.

3. Henry Alford, The New Testament for English Readers (Chicago, IL: Moody Press,

[1886] n.d.), 122.

4. S. Greijdanus, Het heilig Evangelic naar de beschrijving van Lukas (1940), 1:424, 425. Quoted in Herman Ridderbos, The Coming of the Kingdom, trans. H. de

Jongste (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1975), 504.

5. Charles H. Spurgeon, "An Awful Premonition," in 12 Sermons on the Second

Coming of Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1976), 5.

6. Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957), 16.

7. Tim Callahan, Bible Prophecy: Failure or Fulfillment? (Altadena, CA: Millennium Press, 1997), 185-89.

8. Gerald A. Larue, "The Bible and the Prophets of Doom," Skeptical Inquirer

0anuary/February 1999), 29.

9. C. S. Lewis, The World's Last Night and Other Essays (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1960), 97-98.

10. Gleason L. Archer, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Regency Reference Library, 1982), 326-27.

11. J. Carl Laney, Answers to Tough Questions: A Survey of Problem Passages and Issues

from Every Book of the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1997), 198-99.

12. Larry Richards, 735 Baffling Bible Questions Answered (Grand Rapids, MI: Revell,

[1993] 1997), 249.

13. R. A. Torrey, Difficulties and Alleged Errors and Contradictions in the Bible (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1907), 116-118.

14. Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 91.

Chapter Four

TIMING IS

EVERYTHING

Once the timing of prophetic events is established, the next step is to

survey the events that are to take place during the time intervals. Two

large prophetic passages are outlined for us in the Bible where both time

indicators and sign indicatiors are used: the Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24—25;

Mark 13; Luke 21) and the Book of Revelation. Revelation, with its visions,

apocalyptic imagery, and symbols is a difficult book to interpret for those

who are not intimately familiar with the Bible as a whole. The best place

to start to understand Jesus' prophetic plan is the Olivet Discourse. We are

given a time text (Matt. 24:34) and specific events that are said to unfold

prior to that first-generation's passing. Therefore, we can test the events that

Jesus said would take place before that first-century generation passed away

with the Bible and history.

To understand Matthew 24, we must begin with a brief background study

of Matthew 23. The disciples had just heard Jesus pronounce His "woes" on

the Pharisees. Jesus ended His denunciation of Israel's religious leaders with

this bombshell: "Behold, your house is being left to you desolate!" (23:38).

What "house" did Jesus have in mind? Matthew 24 begins: "And Jesus came

out from the temple and was going away when His disciples came up to point

51

52

LAST DAYS MADNESS

out the temple buildings to Him" (24:1). So then, the "house" that is being

left to them "desolate" in Matthew 23:38 is the "temple" that will soon be judged and torn down, stone by stone (24:1).

The disciples were obviously curious since the temple was the most holy

site in all Israel. Earlier in His ministry, Jesus pronounced to the religious

leaders that His own body was the true temple. The temple of stone was

a temporary edifice that pointed to a greater, permanent temple (John

2:19-22). Only after Jesus' resurrection did the disciples begin to understand

that the true and everlasting temple is "the temple of His body" (2:21). The

physical temple was designed to be temporary. To make the temple of stone

a permanent structure in the light of Jesus' atoning work would be a denial

of the Messiah and His redemptive mission.

The disciples were surprised when Jesus told them that the temple was

going to be destroyed, with not one stone left on top of another (Matt. 24:2).

In response, they asked this multifaceted question: "Tell us, when will these

things be, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the

age" (24:3)? It is crucial that we pay close attention to when Jesus said these events would take place.

Jesus told the scribes and Pharisees, "Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation," that is, the destruction of their temple and city will be realized before the then-existing generation passes into history (23:36).

It was the generation of those who rejected Jesus who would experience

His wrath. The "this generation" of Matthew 23:36 is the generation upon

whom Jesus pronounced judgment.

But what of those who say that the Olivet Discourse is a prophecy about

a still-future temple that must be rebuilt in Jerusalem and destroyed like the

temple that was destroyed by the Roman military leader Titus in A.D. 70?

This supposed future temple would have to be rebuilt with the same stones

that made up the temple that was destroyed. Not just any stones will do.

Jesus said that "not one stone here shall be left upon another, which will not be torn down" (Matt. 24:2).

The temple that Jesus said would be destroyed is the same temple

with the same stones that were pointed out by Jesus to His disciples. No

future temple is in view. Jesus gives no indication that He has a future

rebuilt temple in mind. Certainly Jesus' disciples would not be thinking of a rebuilt temple when they were looking at an existing temple that Jesus said

would be destroyed! But what if the Jews are able to rebuild the temple?

Timing is Everything

53

Such a temple will have nothing to do with the fulfillment of any part of

this prophecy.

The Severity of Judgment

Why did Jesus treat this first-century generation of Jews so harshly? Why

was their generation destined for destruction? They made up the generation that

had to make a choice either to accept or reject the promised Messiah who "became flesh and dwelt among" them (John 1:14). Certainly every generation must

make a decision about Jesus. But no other generation will ever have the

chance to turn Him over to the Romans to be crucified. Jesus "came to His

own, and those who were His own did not receive Him" (John 1:11). No

other generation will be given such an opportunity. The Lord of glory was

in their midst, and they crucified Him, choosing a murderer in place of

God's only begotten Son (Matt. 27:20-26; Acts 3:14—15). The following

verses are biblical descriptions of "this generation," that is, the generation

that Jesus addressed:

• They were "sons of those who murdered the prophets" (Matt. 23:31).

•The measure of their fathers' guilt was filled up with their generation

(23:32).

• They were "serpents" and a "brood of vipers" who would not "escape the sentence of hell" (23:33).

• They will "scourge," "persecute," "crucify," and "kill" some of the "prophets and wise men and scribes" that Jesus will send (23:34).

Of course, these indictments had been heard before. During the ministry

of John the Baptist these same men were described as a "brood of vipers"

who had heard of a "wrath to come," a wrath they thought they could escape

in the baptismal waters of the Jordan River (3:7).

"But to what shall I compare this generation? It is like children sitting in the market places, who call out to other children, and say, 'We played

the flute for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did

not mourn.' For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, 'He

has a demon!' The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say,

'Behold, a gluttonous man and a drunkard, a friend of tax-gatherers and

54

LAST DAYS MADNESS

sinners!' Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds."

Then He began to reproach the cities in which most of His miracles

were done, because they did not repent. "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe

to you, Bethsaida! For if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon

which occurred in you, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth

and ashes" (11:16-21).

Not long after this pronouncement of judgment the religious leaders

accused Jesus of being in league with Satan because He cast out demons

(12:24). Jesus once again called them a "brood of vipers" (12:34). They were

"condemned" by their words (12:37). The scribes and Pharisees asked for a

sign (12:38), and Jesus informed them that "an evil and adulterous genera-

tion craves for a sign" (12:39). Jesus warned the unregenerate of His day that

"the men of Nineveh shall stand up with this generation at the judgment, and shall condemn it because they repented at the preaching of Jonah" (12:41).

Judgment was certain to come upon "this generation" because "something

greater than Jonah is here" (12:41). Jesus compared "this generation" to

that of "unclean spirits" who occupy a man's house, exacerbating the man's

spiritual condition. "That is the way it will also be with this evil generation,"

Jesus said (12:45). This all took place in one of their synagogues (12:9). Is

this the "house" that will be occupied by "unclean spirits," which the Book of Revelation describes as a "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9)?

Jesus told them on another occasion, "The kingdom of God will be taken

away from you, and be given to a nation producing the fruit of it. And he

who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but on whomever it falls,

it will scatter him like dust" (Matt. 21:43-44). There is no mistaking the

context, the audience, and the time of judgment; the generation with whom

Jesus spoke would be destroyed within forty years, along with the temple and

the city. "And when the chief priests and the Pharisees heard His parables,

they understood that He was speaking about them," not a generation two thousand years in the future (21:45).

This is why Dave Hunt's strained interpretation of "this generation" is so

off-base. He ends up, unwittingly, of course, indicting all Jews throughout

history with his novel interpretation of the phrase "this generation." In fact,

he turns a passage that is addressed specifically to Jews of the first century

and applies it to Jews in general. Hunt states, "Certainly anyone living at

any time who exhibited the same evil tendencies would also be part of that

Timing is Everything

55

'generation of vipers."'1 This explanation makes "this generation" meaningless.

Jesus isn't describing any time or any generation; He has the generation of

His own day in mind: "All these things shall come upon this generation....

This generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (Matt.

23:36; 24:34). How could Jesus have said it more clearly? How could Jesus

have better designated the generation to whom He was speaking?

The "woes" of Matthew 23 and the destruction of the temple and the

city of Jerusalem were a result of all that John the Baptist and Jesus had

been warning the scribes, Pharisees, and chief priests regarding the judg-

ment that would come upon them if they did not repent. "All these things,"

Jesus cautioned, "shall come upon this generation" (23:36). It is after hearing about the desolation of "their house" (temple)2 that the disciples ask about

the "temple buildings" (24:1). Jesus answered the disciples' questions relating

to the time and signs of Jerusalem's destruction, always with the background

of Matthew 23 in view, since His comments in that chapter had raised the

questions (24:3). The Old Covenant order would end with the destruction

of Jerusalem. This would be the "sign" of the "end of the age," the end of the Old Covenant, and the consummation of the New Covenant.

The Time Text: "This Generation7'

Since the events described in Matthew 23 precipitated the questions of

Matthew 24, we should expect to see some connection between the two

chapters. If Matthew 24 is an elucidation and expansion of Matthew 23,

then we should expect the events of both chapters to describe the same pe-

riod of time. We only assume this to be true because we have biblical cause

to make the connection. The two chapters contain two verses that speak of

time. The time texts are found in Matthew 23:36 and 24:34.

• "Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation"

(23:36).

• "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (24:34).

These verses form eschatological bookends for determining when the

predicted events that occur between these two time markers are to be

fulfilled. Sandwiched between the time texts are the "sign" texts. The futurist

56

LAST DAYS MADNESS

interpreters of Matthew 24 assert that "this generation" does not mean the

generation to whom Jesus was speaking. Rather, they maintain that it refers

to a distant generation alive at the time when these events will take place.

There are a number of difficulties with this position.

First, "this generation" always means the generation to whom Jesus was

speaking. How do we know this? Scripture is our interpreting guide. We do

not have to speculate about the meaning of "this generation." Those who deny

that "this generation" refers to the generation to whom Jesus was speaking in

the Matthew 24 context must maintain that "this generation" means some-

thing different from the way it is used in every other place in Matthew and

the rest of the New Testament. Matthew 23:36 clearly refers to the Pharisees

and their associates. Why should we interpret "this generation" in Matthew

24:34 in a way different from 23:36, since Jesus is answering His disciples'

questions regarding His statement in Matthew 23:36 to the Pharisees about

their house—the temple— being left to them desolate? The usual rejoinder

is, "All of Matthew 24 could not have been fulfilled during the life of the

apostles. There must be a future fulfillment even though 'this generation'

seems to refer to those who lived between A.D. 30 and 70."

But this is not the way we should interpret Scripture. If Jesus said that all

the events prior to Matthew 24:34 would occur before the contemporary

generation (within forty years) passed away, then we must take Him at His

word. Dispensationalists insist on literalism. Why not in this instance? "If

'this generation' is taken literally, all of the predictions were to take place

within the life-span of those living at that time."3 An honest assessment of

Scripture can lead to no other conclusion. The integrity of the Bible is at

stake in the discussion of the biblical meaning of "this generation."

Second, the use of "this generation" throughout the Gospels makes it clear

that it means the generation to whom Jesus was speaking. The following is

a list of every occurrence of "this generation" in the Gospels:

•"But to what shall I compare this generation?" (Matt. 11:16).

• "The men of Nineveh shall stand up with this generation at the judgment, and shall condemn it because they repented at the preaching of Jonah;

and behold, something greater than Jonah is here" (Matt. 12:41).

• "The Queen of the South shall rise up with this generation at the judgment and shall condemn it, because she came from the ends of the earth

to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, something greater than

Timing is Everything

57

Solomon is here" (Matt. 12:42).

• "Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation' (Matt.

23:36).

• "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (Matt. 24:34).

• "Why does this generation seek for a sign? Truly I say to you, no sign shall be given to this generation" (Mark 8:12).

• "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (Mark 13:30).

• "To what then shall I compare the men of this generation, and what are they like?" (Luke 7:31).

•" This generation is a wicked generation; it seeks for a sign, and yet no sign shall be given to it but the sign of Jonah" (Luke 11:29).

• "For just as Jonah became a sign to the Ninevites, so shall the Son of

Man be to this generation" (Luke 11:30).

• "The Queen of the South shall rise up with the men of this generation

at the judgment and condemn them, because she came from the ends

of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, something

greater than Solomon is here" (Luke 11:31).

• "The men of Nineveh shall stand up with this generation at the judgment and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and

behold something greater than Jonah is here" (Luke 11:32).

•"For this reason also the wisdom of God said, 'I will send to them

prophets and apostles, and some of them they will kill and some they

will persecute, in order that the blood of all the prophets, shed since

the foundation of the world, may be charged against this generation, from

the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who perished between the

altar and the house of God; yes, I tell you, it shall be charged against

this generation" (Luke 11:49—51).

• "But first He must suffer many things and be rejected by this genera-

tion'

(Luke 17:25).

• "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all things take place" (Luke 21:32).

Without exception, these verses describe events within the lifetime of the

then-present generation. All the evidence points to the generation of Jews

58

LAST DAYS MADNESS

who heard Jesus' words and would suffer the same judgment as the scribes,

Pharisees, and the chief priests if they did not heed Jesus' warning and es-

cape before the Roman armies surrounded the city and destroyed it (Matt.

24:15-22; Luke 21:20-24). David Chilton summarizes the argument:

Not one of these references is speaking of the entire Jewish race over

thousands of years; all use the word in its normal sense of the sum total of

those living at the same time. It always refers to contemporaries. (In fact, those who say it means "race" tend to acknowledge this fact, but explain that

the word suddenly changes its meaning when Jesus uses it in Matthew 24!

We can smile at such a transparent error, but we should also remember that

this is very serious. We are dealing with the Word of the living God.)4

Third, the adjective this points to the contemporary nature of the gen-

eration Jesus was referencing (cf. Matt. 11:23; 27:8; 28:15). If some future

generation had been in view, Jesus could have chosen the adjective that (cf.

7:22; 10:19; 24:10, 36; 26:29). The passage would then read this way:

"That generation will not pass away until all these things take place." A study of the way Matthew uses the adjective "this" will show that Jesus had

the generation to whom He was speaking in mind when He described its

soon destruction:

• "Give us this day our daily bread" (6:11).

• "And this news went out into all the land" (9:26).

• "But whenever they persecute you in this city, flee to the next" (10:23).

•'"This is the one about whom it was written" (11:10).

• "This man casts out demons only be Beelzebul the ruler of the demons"

(12:24).

• "And whoever shall speak a word against the Son of Man, it shall be

forgiven him; but whoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall

not be forgiven him, either in this age, or in the age to come" (12:32).

Fourth, notice how many times Jesus uses the plural you in Matthew 24

and in the parallel passages in Mark 13 and Luke 21: "They will lay their

hands on you and will persecute you, delivering you to the synagogues and prisons, bringing you before kings and governors for My name's sake" (Luke

21:12; see verses 13—20, 28, 30). Now, if you heard Jesus say that all these

Timing is Everything

59

things would happen to "this generation" while you were standing there

listening to Him, and in every other instance of its use "this generation"

meant the present generation, and you also heard Him say that when "you"

would see these things, what would you conclude? The most natural (literal)

interpretation is that it would happen to your generation, and maybe even to you personally (Matt. 16:27-28). Again, if it were a future generation, we

would expect Jesus to have said, "when they see ... they will bring them ...

they will persecute them."

This overwhelming evidence does not phase futurists. Stanley D. Toussaint

writes that "the second person plural may be employed of those who are not

contemporaries." (Notice that he says "may be.") He turns to Matthew 23:35

for support. In this passage, Toussaint argues, "the Lord Jesus referred to the

death of Zechariah and says, 'whom you murdered.' Obviously Zechariah

was killed centuries before Christ."5 Note that Jesus makes it clear that He

is referring to the contemporary generation of Jews who heard His message

of judgment. The "you" refers to them as Toussaint admits, regardless of who murdered Zechariah. It was their generation that "filled up the measure of

the guilt" begun by their fathers (23:32). Jesus tells us that "you" refers to them. The "you" does not refer to a past generation of murderers. Nowhere

are we told that "you" refers to anyone but them. The burden of proof is

on Toussaint to prove otherwise. And since there is a great deal of specula-

tion as to the identity of this Zechariah, it is possible that they had indeed

killed him.

Fifth, a survey of Bible commentators will show that for centuries, prior

to the advent of dispensational premillennialism, "this generation" was

interpreted as the generation of Jesus' day and not a distant generation. In

addition, these same commentators understood that all the events prior to

Matthew 24:34 referred to events leading up to and including the destruc-

tion of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Here are some examples:

• "Hence it appears plain enough, that the foregoing verses are not to be

understood of the last judgment, but, as we said, of the destruction of

Jerusalem. There were some among the disciples (particularly John), who

lived to see these things come to pass. With Matt. xvi. 28, compare John

xxi. 22. And there were some Rabbins alive at the time when Christ

spoke these things, that lived until the city was destroyed."6

•"It is to me a wonder how any man can refer part of the foregoing

60

LAST DAYS MADNESS

discourse to the destruction of Jerusalem, and part to the end of the

world, or any other distant event, when it is said so positively here in

the conclusion, All these things shall be fulfilled in this generation."7

•"[T]he obvious meaning of the words 'this generation' is the people

contemporary with Jesus. Nothing can be gained by trying to take the

word in any sense other than its normal one: in Mark (elsewhere in

8:12, 9:19) the word always has this meaning."8

• "This is a full and clear proof, that not any thing that is said before [v.

34], relates to the second coming of Christ, the day of judgment, and

the end of the world; but that all belongs to the coming of the son

of man in the destruction of Jerusalem, and to the end of the Jewish

state."9

• "[This generation] can only with the greatest difficulty be made to mean

anything other than the generation living when Jesus spoke."10

• "The significance of the temporal reference has been debated, but in

Mark 'this generation' clearly designates the contemporaries of Jesus

(see on Chs. 8:12, 38; 9:19) and there is no consideration from the

context which lends support to any other proposal. Jesus solemnly

affirms that the generation contemporary with his disciples will witness

the fulfillment of his prophetic word, culminating in the destruction of

Jerusalem and the dismantling of the Temple."11

In the past, there has been almost unanimous agreement among Bible-

believing commentators that "this generation" means the generation of Jews

who lived between A.D. 30 and 70.

On One Condition

"For I say to you, from now on you shall not see Me until you say, 'BLESSED

IS HE WHO COMES IN THE NAME OF THE LORD!'" (Matt. 23:39)

Stanley Toussaint believes that Matthew 23:39 speaks against a first-

century fulfillment of the Olivet Discourse because it holds out hope for a

future conversion of the Jews as a nation. He agrees that "your house" (23:38)

refers to the destruction of the temple in A.D. 70 but that "verse 39 describes

Israel's future repentance when as Zechariah 12.1012 says they shall mourn

Timing is Everything

61

for their great sin."13 This interpretation is impossible.

The word "For with which the verse begins unambiguously links it

with God's abandonment of his house in v. 38."14 Part of the problem in

understanding the relationship between verses 38 and 39 in Matthew 23

is in the way "until" is used. R.T. France contends that "the words until you

say are expressed in Greek as an indefinite possibility rather than as a firm prediction; this is the condition on which they will see him again; but there

is no promise that the condition will be fulfilled."15 The following verses

demonstrate the conditional use of "until":

• "Truly I say to you, you shall not come out of there, until you have paid up the last cent" (Matt. 5:26).

• "He was unwilling however, but went and threw him in prison until he

should pay back what was owed" (Matt. 18:30).

• "And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until

he should repay all that was owed him" (Matt. 18:34).

• "And when it was day, the Jews formed a conspiracy and bound them-

selves under and oath, saying that they would neither eat nor drink

until they had killed Paul" (Acts 23:12).

Throughout the period between the crucifixion and the destruction of

Jerusalem, Jews cried out, "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the

Lord" and were saved from judgment. Until these religious leaders do the

same, Jesus warns them, they will die in their sin and face Him as their

judge (Acts 3:11—26). Many Jews did embrace Jesus as the promised Mes-

siah. They came to Christ by the thousands in Jerusalem alone just days

after Jesus' ascension (2:41; 4:4). The restoration had begun in Jerusalem

and would extend throughout the Roman Empire prior to the destruction

of the temple and city in A.D. 70.

There is nothing in Jesus' teaching in this Gospel which suggests that

after this period of judgement there will be a restoration; the 'seven evil

spirits enter and live there' ([Matt.] 12:45), the 'vineyard is leased to oth-

ers' (21:41), the city is 'burnt' (22:7), the Temple is 'abandoned' (23:38);

the Apocalyptic Discourse (ch. 24) moves away from Jerusalem to focus

on the coming of the Son of Man.16

62

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Toussaint is willing to dismiss repeated references to an impending

judgment by straining to find a single passage to bolster his argument that

a pretribulational rapture, a rebuilt temple, and the reinstitution of Old

Covenant Judaism during an earthly millennium remain to be fulfilled. A

careful study of the New Testament will dispel such notions. Once again,

the time texts are the key.

Does this mean that there was no hope for these Jews after Jesus declared

that their house was being left to them desolate? Not at all. As James De Young

writes, "Although the temple shall be destroyed, a new religious order will

be instituted in which the Jews are still invited to come to Christ and greet

him as the Messiah within the new temple, the spiritual house that God will

build, the Church. But there is in this passage no expression of the thought

that this judgment on the temple, and hence on Jerusalem as the religious

center of God's people, will ever be reversed; that God will ever return to

his temple in Jerusalem and once again make it the place where he exercises

his redemptive revelational relation with his people."17

Timing is Everything

63

Notes

1. Dave Hunt, How Close Are We?: Compelling Evidence fir the Soon Return of Christ

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1993), 288.

2. Prior to the Olivet Discourse Jesus had described the temple as "My house"

(Matt. 21:13) and "My Father's house" (John 2:16). Now that the temple is

coming under judgment, it is now "your house."

3. William Sanford LaSor, The Truth About Armageddon: What the Bible Says About

the End Times (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1987), 122.

4. David Chilton, The Great Tribulation (Ft. Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987), 3. Emphasis in original.

5. Stanley D. Toussaint, "A Critique of the Preterist View of the Olivet Discourse"

(presented at the Fourth Annual Pre-Trib Study Group, held in Dallas, Texas,

December 11-13, 1995), 19.

6. John Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica:

Matthew-1 Corinthians, 4 vols. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, [1859]

1989), 2:320.

7. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at This Time are Fulfilling in the Whole World (London: J.F. Dove, 1754), 377.

8. Robert G. Bratcher and Eugene A. Nida, A Translator's Handbook of the Gospel

of Mark (New York: United Bible Socieites, 1961), 419.

9. John Gill, Exposition of the Old and New Testaments, 9 vols. (London: Mathews and Leigh, 1809), 3:296.

10. D.A. Carson, "Matthew" in The Expositor's Bible Commentary, gen. ed. Frank E.

Gaebelein, 12 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1985), 8:507.

11. William L. Lane, Commentary on the Gospel of Mark (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974), 480.

12. John 19:37 quotes Zechariah 12:10 as something that "came to pass, that

the Scripture might be fulfilled" at the time of the crucifixion (19:36).

13. Toussaint, "A Critique of the Preterist View of the Olivet Discourse," 4.

14. R. T. France, The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), 333.

15. France, The Gospel According to Matthew, 332.

16. P.W.L. Walker, Jesus and the Holy City: New Testament Perspectives on Jerusalem

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 42. Also see John Forster, The Gospel-

Narrative (London-. John W. Parker, 1847), 227.

17. James Calvin De Young, Jerusalem in the New Testament: The Significance of the

City in the History of Redemption and in Eschatology (Amsterdam: J.H. Kok/N.V.

Kampen, 1960), 89.

Chapter Five

SEE THAT NO ONE

MISLEADS YOU

Journalist Hap Cawood says he shares "the fascination with the Bible and

its mysteries" with those he calls "Armageddon-here guys." But he has

a problem. When he was around ten years old, he found a huge old book

that offered an interpretation of what the author said were biblical prophe-

cies. "I got more and more engrossed as I read on about how world events

would unfold," Cawood wrote. "Finally, the author said when the world

would END—in 1934, or thereabouts. What a relief that it all had hap-

pened before I was born!"1 What impact did that failed 1934 prophecy

have on Mr. Cawood's perceptions of the Christian faith? Do you think

today's speculative prophetic dogmatism about "robots that can reproduce

themselves" and "an artificial brain created by Japanese scientists" are hav-

ing similar effects?2

In our day, prophetic speculators are misleading millions of people with

their supposed certainties about the next series of events they believe are

signs that Jesus is about to return to "rapture" His church. For example, in

1988 John F. Walvoord wrote that "in these present closing years of the

twentieth century, evidence is pointing to the fulfillment of end-time events

leading up to the second coming of Christ."3 In his book on the continual

65

66

LAST DAYS MADNESS

crisis in the Middle East, Walvoord writes, "[T]he events of history clearly

indicate that the world is poised and ready for the Rapture of the church

and the beginning of the countdown to Armageddon."4 He tells us that "the

world is like a stage being set for a great drama. The major actors are already

in the wings waiting for their moment in history. The main stage props are

already in place. The prophetic play is about to begin.... All the necessary

historical developments have already taken place."5

But we have heard all of this before. In fact, also in 1988, we were assured

that the rapture would occur sometime in a three-day period in September

of that year. "But by sunset Tuesday [September 13, 1988], the end of the

48-hour period pinpointed by former NASA rocket engineer and author

Edgar G. Whisenant as the time of the Rapture, it was apparent that The

End was not quite at hand."6 Whisenant remained confident. He later "re-

vised his prediction, saying the Rapture could possibly occur by 10:55 A.M.

Wednesday [September 14]."7 A final modification was made, predicting that

1989 would be the year.8 As one might suspect, such predictions can have

a negative effect on Christians and non-Christians. "Too much wild-eyed

speculation could eventually discredit the essential message we are called

to proclaim. Remember, [Jack] Van Impe himself was certain the Soviet flag

would fly over Independence Hall in Philadelphia by 1976."9 Van Impe,

after uttering one failed prediction after another, goes on undaunted, revis-

ing his prophetic pronouncements as current events change: "I just can't

believe that I've preached this all my life and that I've lived to see these

things happening."10 Self-proclaimed Bible prophecy "experts" like Van

Impe are as eager to predict the future as they are eager to forget their failed

past predictions. They count on the people forgetting as well. These failed

prophecy "experts" are the "Christian" equivalent of the "Psychic Network."

We'll never know how much damage they've done to the credibility of the

Bible and the Christian faith.

The airwaves are filled with prophecy pundits who continually assure

us the end is threatening. Praise the Lord, the official newsletter of the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN), which boasts being "on the air worldwide,"

states emphatically that "the end of the world is coming soon." In the same

issue of Praise the Lord, Hal Lindsey and Chuck Smith, described by TBN as

"two of the most respected Bible prophecy teachers," believe that "the signs

in our world today clearly point to the imminent return of our Lord."11

See That No One Misleads You 67

Confusion over Fulfilled Prophecy

One of the most wonderful benefits of fulfilled prophecy, over against the

speculations of self-appointed prophetic speculators, is that fulfilled prophecy

can be used to support the Bible's own claim that it is indeed the very Word

of God. For example, the crucifixion of Jesus was outlined in remarkable detail

centuries before Roman soldiers pierced Jesus' hands and feet and divided His

garments among them (Psalm 22:11—18) on that horrible day at Golgotha.

Isaiah 53 reads like an eyewitness account of the Crucifixion. But Isaiah was

not an eyewitness. He wrote centuries before Jesus lived and died.

The faith of Christians is strengthened when they read what was predicted

in the Old Testament and fulfilled in the New Testament pertaining to the

coming Messiah. "Canon Liddon is authority for the statement that there are

in the Old Testament 332 distinct predictions which were literally fulfilled

in Christ,"12 all demonstrating the veracity of the Bible's assertion that "all

Scripture is God-breathed" (2 Tim. 3:16, NIV).

The New Testament continues with its own prophetic pronouncements.

We should expect prophecies found in the New Testament to be fulfilled

with equal precision. While there are many who believe that much from the

New Testament is yet to be fulfilled, many fine scholars have taught that

much has been fulfilled.

No Stone upon Another

Before embarking on a verse by verse exposition of the Olivet Discourse,

setting the context for the prophetic material outlined by Jesus in Matthew

24—25 must be considered. It begins with Jesus' full-scale indictment of

the Pharisees in Matthew 23 and the questions the promised desolation

of the temple raises for the disciples. Jesus warned the Pharisees that their

"house"—the temple— would be left to them "desolate" (23:38). When Jesus finished His verbal indictment, He "came out from the temple and was going

away when His disciples came to point out the temple buildings to Him"

(24:1). It was at this point that Jesus makes a remarkable prediction.

'And He answered and said to them, 'Do you not see all these things? Truly

I say to you, not one stone here shall be left upon another, which will not

be torn down" (Matt. 24:2).

68

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notice that Jesus says, "not one stone here shall be left upon another."

Jesus is not describing what will happen to some future rebuilt temple. No

mention is ever made in the New Testament about a rebuilt temple. Those

who claim that the temple must be rebuilt during a future period of "great

tribulation" cannot point to one verse in the New Testament that describes

such a rebuilding program. Even those who teach that the temple will be

rebuilt admit, "There are no Bible verses that say, 'There is going to be a third

temple.'"13 The temple under discussion throughout the Olivet Discourse

is the one that was standing during the time of Jesus' ministry, the same

temple that was destroyed by the Romans in A.D. 70. Probably stunned at

this point, the disciples ask the following multi-faceted question.

"Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of Your com-

ing, and of the end of the age?" (Matt. 24:3)

The disciples' question involves three interrelated, contemporary events:

(1) the time of the temple's destruction; (2) the sign that will signal Jesus'

coming related to the destruction of the temple; and (3) the sign they should look for telling them that "the end of the age" has come. These questions are

related to the destruction of the temple and the end of the Old Covenant

redemptive system and nothing else. Alfred Plummer offers a helpful sum-

mary of the significance of the end of the age terminology: '"The end' of

course means the end of the age, and in interpreting that we must remember

the subject of this discourse and the persons to whom it is addressed. Our

Lord is speaking of the overthrow of Jerusalem and of the Temple to men

who would inevitably think of such an overthrow as the end of the age....

What was important for them to know was that the Temple was doomed

and its end near."14

Jesus never indicates that He has a distant coming in mind. There is noth-

ing in the Olivet Discourse that would give the reader the impression that a

distant event is in view. Remember, Jesus told his disciples that He was "going

to come in the glory of His Father with His angels" before the last apostle

died (Matt. 16:27-28). While they did not understand the full implications

of this coming in judgment, they did know that it would happen within the

span of their generation. Jesus confirms the timing of His coming as He out-

lines the events leading up to the temple's destruction. We know the temple

was destroyed just as Jesus prophesied. This happened within a generation.

See That No One Misleads You

69

For when the Romans had taken Jerusalem, Titus ordered his soldiers

to dig up the foundations both of all the city and the temple.... As we

read in the Jewish Talmud and in Maimonides, Turnus Rufus, or rather

Terentius Rufus, who was left to command the army at Jerusalem, did with

a ploughshare tear up the foundation of the temple; and thereby signally

fulfilled those words of Micah, (iii. 12,) "Therefore shall Zion for your

sake be ploughed as a field." Eusebius too affirms, that it was ploughed

up by the Romans, and he saw it lying in ruins.15

Flavius Josephus (A.D. 37-101), the Palestinian Jewish historian of priestly

decent who compiled a history of the Jewish people for the Romans, was an

eyewitness to these events. His Wars of the Jews was written about A.D. 75,

five years after the fall of Jerusalem. He wrote of the temple's destruction

that "there was left nothing to make those who had come thither believe it

had ever been inhabited."16

The End of the Age

Notice that the disciples did not ask about the end of the "world" ( kos-

mos), as some Bible versions translate the Greek word aion. In context, with the temple and city as their primary focus, they asked about the end of the

"age." They were asking when time would run out for the temple, the city of

Jerusalem, and the covenant promises that were related to the Mosaic system

of animal sacrifices, ceremonial washings, and the priesthood.

Time was divided by the Jews into two great periods, the age of the law and

the age of the Messiah. The conclusion of the one was the beginning of the

other, the opening of that kingdom which the Jews believed the Messiah was

to establish, which was to put an end to their sufferings, and to render them

the greatest people upon the earth. The apostles, full of this hope, said to our

Lord, immediately before his ascension, "Lord, wilt thou at this time restore the

kingdom to Israel?" [Acts 1:6]. Our Lord used the phrase of his coming to denote

his taking vengeance upon the Jews by destroying their city and sanctuary.17

The "end of the age" refers to the end of the Old Covenant redemptive

system with its attendant sacrifices and rituals. These were designed to be tem-

porary symbols of the coming atoning work of Christ. The "end of the age"

refers to the termination of the exclusive Jewish entitlement to the covenant

70

LAST DAYS MADNESS

promises and the inclusion of the Gentiles into the blessings of the covenant

and the privileges of the gospel and kingdom (Matt. 21:41,43; 22:10). "End

of the age" is a covenantal phrase. With the temple destroyed, there would

be no way and no need to carry out the rigorous demands of the sacrificial

system, a system that was predestined to pass away with the incarnation, death,

resurrection, ascension, and enthronement of Jesus. Jesus replaces the sacrificial

system as the "lamb of God" (John 1:29), God's dwelling place as the "temple

of God" (2:13-22), God's sanctuary as the "true tabernacle" (Heb. 8:2; John

1:14), and God's earthly sinful high priest as the "perfect High Priest" (Heb.

2:17, 3:1, 5:1-10, 7:26-28).18

The End of the Old Covenant

The temple was a constant reminder that a wall separated Jew from Gen-

tile. In Christ, the wall was removed (Eph. 2:11-22). There is no longer any

need for the blood of "bulls and goats" (Heb. 10:4; 9:1-28), and thus, no

need for a temple of stone or a future, rebuilt, millennial temple as dispen-

sationalism requires.19 In opposition to this view, Don Stewart and Chuck

Missler use more than 230 pages to convince readers that a temple will be

rebuilt according to Bible prophecy. What biblical evidence do they offer?20

Not a single verse states that another temple will be or needs to be rebuilt

to fulfill Bible prophecy. The passages from the New Testament that they

do cite (Matt. 24:15, 2 Thess. 2:4, and Rev. 11:1-2) were written before the

temple was destroyed in A.D. 70. Anyone who read these texts when they

were first written would have immediately assumed that they referred to the

temple still standing in Jerusalem.

With these facts in mind, the destruction of the temple inaugurates a new

era in which "the blood of Christ" cleanses our "conscience from dead works

to serve the living God" (Heb. 9:14). Therefore, the expression "end of the

age" refers "to the end of the 'Jewish age,' i.e., the time of transference from a national [Israel only] to an international people of God [the world],"21

what the Apostle Paul describes as the "ends of the ages," a period of time

that had come upon the first-century church (1 Cor. 10:11). The phrase the

"ends of the ages" is used in the same way by the author of Hebrews: "But

now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away

sin by the sacrifice of Himself" (Heb. 9:26). Jesus was manifested, not at

the beginning, but "at the consummation of the ages." Notice that the text

says, "He was manifested," an event already past. The period between A.D.

See That No One Misleads You 68

71

30 and 70 is, as the apostle Peter describes it, "these last times" (1 Peter

1:20). As time drew near for Jerusalem's destruction, Peter could say that

"the end of all things was at hand" (4:7). Milton Terry defines "end of the

age" in covenantal terms:

It is, according to Matthew's phraseology, the end or "consummation

of the age."... It is the solemn termination and crisis of the dispensation

which had run its course when the temple fell, and there was not left one

stone upon another which was not thrown down. That catastrophe, which

in Heb. xii, 26, is conceived as a shaking of the earth and the heaven, is

the end contemplated in this discourse; not "the end of the world," but the termination and consummation of the pre-Messianic age.22

Again, the Bible establishes the time parameter for when the "end" was

to take place. We are told that it was "at hand," that is "near" for those reading Peter's letter.

The Coming of Christ

But how can we maintain that Jesus "came" in A.D. 70? Keep in mind that

Jesus stated that the generation to whom He was speaking would not pass

away "until all these things take place," that is, all those things He specified in verses 2 through 34 of Matthew 24. Jesus was very dogmatic about the

timing of these events.

Jesus' "coming" in judgment upon Jerusalem (Matt. 24:27) and His com-

ing "up to the Ancient of Days" (Dan. 7:13) were two events that occurred within the time span of the first generation of Christians. There is no future

fulfillment of these events. Since Jesus left no doubt that He would "come"

before that first-century generation passed away, we must conclude that the

idea of "coming" in this context is different from the way many contem-

porary Christians understand the concept. Jesus' coming in judgment upon

Jerusalem in A.D. 70 was an event that would occur within a specified time

frame—the generation between A.D. 30 and 70 would not pass away until

all the events predicted in the Olivet Discourse took place.

Since Scripture is the best interpreter of Scripture, we must allow the Bible

to direct us to the best interpretation of what "coming" means based on the

context and an evaluation of parallel passages. The "Son of Man coming

on the clouds of the sky with power and great glory" appears later in the

7 2

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Olivet Discourse (24:30). We will discuss its meaning there. At this point,

however, it is enough to say that Jesus' coming in Matthew 24 is little dif-

ferent from the way God came many times in the Old Covenant (e.g., Gen.

11:5; Ex. 3:8; 19:9; 34:5; Psalm 18:6-17; 72:6; 104:3; Isa. 19:1-4; 31:4;

Micah 1:3-5) and the way Jesus promised to come in the New Testament

(e.g., Matt. 10:23; 16:27-28; 18:30; 26:64; Mark 14:61-62; Luke 10:1;

John 14:21, 23, 30).

Jesus warned the Church at Ephesus that He would come and remove

their lampstand "unless you repent" (Rev. 2:5). He issued a similar warning

to the church at Pergamum: "Repent therefore; or else I am coming to you

quickly, and I will make war against them [i.e., the Nicolaitans] with the

sword of My mouth (2:16; see 19:15). Sardis is forewarned using similar

judgment language: "If therefore you will not wake up, I will come like a

thief, and you will not know at what hour I will come to you" (3:3; see 1

Thess. 5:2, 4; 2 Peter 3:10; Rev. 16:15). These are judgment comings that

were threatened on a particular church at a particular time similar to Jesus'

promised coming in judgment against apostate Judaism in the first century.

The passages that describe the coming of Christ to first-century churches are

not descriptive of the "second coming" (consummating coming) of Christ,

contrary to Robert L. Thomas' strained efforts to make them so.23

Jesus clearly states that He would come in some way before the last apostle

died: "For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with

His angels; and WILL THEN RECOMPENSE EVERY MAN ACCORDING TO HIS

DEEDS. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who

shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom' (Matt.

16:27—28). Henry Alford states that this passage refers "to the destruction of

Jerusalem, and the full manifestation of the Kingdom of Christ by the anni-

hilation of the Jewish polity.. ,."24 The question about the "end of the age"

was asked against the backdrop of this text. Peter certainly understood that

Jesus' coming was near. He specifically asked whether John would be alive

when Jesus came (John 21:21-22). Of course, as we saw earlier, Peter states

in his first epistle that he was writing in the "last times" (1 Peter 1:20) and

that the "end of all things was at hand" (4:7).

"And Jesus answered and said to them, 'See to it that no one misleads you. For

many will come in My name, saying, "I am the Christ," and will mislead

many'"(Matt. 24:4-5).

See That No One Misleads You 70

73

By comparing the New Testament with secular histories of the period,

we can see that all of what Jesus said in the Olivet Discourse about signs

was fulfilled prior to the Roman invasion of Jerusalem and in events leading

up to the destruction of the temple in A.D. 70. Notice that the warning was

addressed to Jesus' disciples: "See that no one misleads you!' They would be hearing of "wars and rumors of wars." Jesus said, "See that you are not frightened." The disciples would be delivered up to tribulation: "They will kill you," and "you will be hated." The conclusion is obvious: Jesus' warning was to the generation of disciples who asked the question about the temple

and those who heard His response.

"False Messiahs"

False messiahs made regular appearances in Israel. The book of Acts

lists a number of them. Gamaliel mentions "Theudas" who claimed "to be

somebody" (Acts 5:36). He describes another false messiah, Judas of Galilee,

who "rose up in the days of the census, and drew away some people after

him" (5:37). Simon is probably the best known: "Now there was a certain

man named Simon, who formerly was practicing magic in the city, and

astonishing the people of Samaria, claiming to be someone great; and they

all, from smallest to greatest, were giving attention to him, saying, 'This

man is what is called the Great Power of God. And they were giving him

attention because he had for a long time astonished them with his magic

arts'" (Acts 8:9-11).

Secular historians record these and other examples of false messiahs and

prophets who rose up soon after the death, resurrection, and ascension of

Jesus. "Jerome quotes Simon Magus as saying, 'I am the Word of God, I am

the Comforter, I am Almighty, I am all there is of God.'... And Irenaeus tells

us how Simon claimed to be the Son of God and the creator of angels."25

Eusebius records the words of one Justin and his description of Simon in

a communique to Antonine in one of the earliest defenses of Christianity.

This is an early testimony of the truthfulness of Jesus' words:

And after the ascension of our Lord into heaven, certain men were

suborned by demons as their agents, who said they were gods. These

were not only suffered [permitted] to pass without persecution, but were

even deemed worthy of honours by you. Simon, a certain Samaritan of

the village called Githon, was one of the number, who, in the reign of

74

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Claudius Caesar, performed many magic rites by the operation of demons,

was considered a god, in your imperial city of Rome, and was honoured by

you with a statue as a god, in the river Tiber—(on an island)—between the

two bridges, having the superscription in Latin, Simoni Deo Sancto, which

is, To Simon the Holy God; and nearly all the Samaritans, a few also of

other nations, worship him, confessing him as the Supreme God.26

Josephus tells of "a certain impostor named Theudas [who] persuaded a great

number to follow him to the river Jordan which he claimed would divide for

their passage."27 Cuspius Fadus, procurator of Judea, "sent a troop of horse[s]

against them, who falling unexpectedly upon them, killed many, and made

many prisoners; and having taken Theudas himself alive, they cut off his

head, and brought it to Jerusalem."28 Dositheus, a Samaritan, "pretended

that he was the lawgiver prophesied of by Moses."29 There were so many

of these impostors preying on the gullibility of the people that under the

procuratorship of Felix, "many of them were apprehended and killed every

day. They seduced great numbers of the people still expecting the Messiah;

and well therefore might our Saviour caution his disciples against them."30

While this particular prophecy relates to events leading up to the destruc-

tion of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, this does not mean that false messsiahs no longer

appear on the scene. Their appearance in our day, however, has nothing to

do with the fulfillment of the events outlined in the Olivet Discourse.

See That No One Misleads You

75

Notes

1. Hap Cawood, "If Buying Armageddon Theories, Insist on Money-back

Guarantee," Atlanta Constitution (9 February 1991), A19.

2. An advertisement for a video tape produced by Jack and Rexella Van Impe,

Last Days: Hype or Hope? ( October 1996).

3. John F. Walvoord, The Nations in Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/

Academie, 1988), xiv.

4. John F. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East: What the Bible Says About

the Future of the Middle East and the End of Western Civilization, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1974, 1976] 1990), 219.

5. Walvoord , Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East, 227.

6. Joe Drape, "Ready or Not, The Rapture Didn't Come," AtlantaJournal/Con-

stitution (14 September 1988), 1A.

7. Drape, "Ready or Not, The Rapture Didn't Come," 14A.

8. Edgar Whisenant and Greg Brewer, The Final Shout: Rapture Report 1989

(Nashville, TN: World Bible Society, 1989).

9. Ed Hindson, "The End Is Near ... Or Is It?," World(24 November 1990), 12.

10. Quoted in Kenneth L. Woodward, "The Final Days Are Here Again," Newsweek

(18 March 1991), 55.

11. Paul Crouch, "Argentina on the Air," Praise the Lord (February 1993).

12. Floyd E. Hamilton, The Basis of Christian Faith: A Modern Defense of the Christian

Religion (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), 160.

13. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, The Truth About the Last Days' Temple (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996), 13.

14. Alfred Plummer, An Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Mat-

thew (Minneapolis, MN: James Family Christian Publishers, [1915] n.d.),

331-32.

15. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at this Time are Fulfilling in the World (London: J.F. Dove, 1754), 329.

16. Quoted in J. Marcellus Kik, An Eschatology of Victory (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1975), 83.

17. George Hill, "Predictions Delivered by Jesus," Lectures in Divinity (New York: Robert Carter, 1847), 103-104.

18. Jesus is said to be "the end [telos\ of the law" (Rom. 10:4). Jesus, through His life, death, resurrection, and ascension, brought to an end one age and

76

LAST DAYS MADNESS

inaugurated a new age based on His finished redemptive work. "Therefore the

Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ.... But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor" (Gal. 3:15—26, especially verses 24—25).

19. John F. Walvoord, The Prophecy Knowledge Handbook (Wheaton, IL: Victor

Books, 1990), 198—206. For fanciful interpretations of Bible prophecy

relating to rebuilding the temple, see Thomas Ice and Randall Price, Ready

to Rebuild: The Imminent Plan to Rebuild the Last Days Temple (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1992) and Peter and Patti Lalonde, The Edge of Time: The Final

Countdown Has Begun (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997), 41-52.

20. Don Stewart and Chuck Missler, The Coming Temple: Center Stage for the Final

Countdown (Orange, CA: Dart Press, 1991).

21. R. T. France, The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985), 337.

22. Milton S. Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics: A Study of the Most Notable Revelations

of God and of Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1898] 1988),

225.

23. Robert L. Thomas, "The 'Comings' of Christ in Revelation 2-3," unpublished

paper, n.d.).

24. Henry Alford, The New Testament for English Readers (Chicago, IL: Moody Press,

[1886] n.d.), 122.

25. Kik, An Eschatology of Victory, 92.

26. Eusebius Pamphilus, The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1988), 2:13, 62.

27. Ralph Woodrow, The Great Prophecies of the Bible (Riverside, CA: Ralph Woodrow Evangelistic Association, 1971), 54. See Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities

of the Jews in The Works of Josephus, trans. William Whiston (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1987), 20:5:1, 531.

28. Newton, On the Prophecies, 332-33.

29. Alexander Keith, The Evidence of the Truth of the Christian Religion Derived from

the Literal Fulfillment of Prophecy Particularly as Illustrated by the History of the Jews

(Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publication, n.d.), 59.

30. Newton, On the Prophecies, 333.

Chapter Six

SIGNS FOR ALL TO SEE

In each new prophecy book that hits the bookstores we are told that Bible

prophecy is being fulfilled before our eyes. The authors point to various

signs that they say are compelling evidence that Jesus' return is near. In

no other time in history, we are led to believe, have eschatological events

converged to prove that we must be living in the last days. William T. James

writes that "No previous generation has experienced the number, frequency

and intensity of signals so similar to things prophesied to be witnessed by

the generation alive at the consummation of human history."1 The history

of the world is the history of war and bloodshed. Plagues and famines have

been common place. Jesus clearly set a time frame for the signs that He said

would occur before He came in judgment against apostate Judaism: "This

generation will not pass away until all these things take place (Matt. 24:34). He could not have said it more definitely or more clearly. Even so, modern-day

prophecy writers dismiss His clear testimony and the facts of history and

propose that our generation being described. And yet, as we will see, all

the signs that Jesus said would take place before that first-century genera-

tion passed away came to pass between A.D. 30 and 70. Such testimony is

purposely ignored by today's prophecy writers. "Jesus' words about the signs

of the times just before His return at the time of Armageddon are becoming

reality before our eyes as we move through our daily lives. False christs, false

7 7

78

LAST DAYS MADNESS

prophets, wars and rumors of wars and all the other signals our Lord said

will be happening concurrently in birth-pang fashion convulse our world

with continuing regularity."2

Withought a doubt, the signs Jesus outlines in the Olivet Discourse were

familiar to and experienced by His first-century audience.

And you will be hearing of wars and rumors of wars; see that you are not

frightened, for those things must take place, but that is not yet the end. For

nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and in vari-

ous places there will be famines and earthquakes. But all these things are

merely the beginning of birth pangs. Then they will deliver you to tribula-

tion, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations on account of

My name. And at that time many will fall away and will deliver up one

another and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise, and will

mislead many. And because lawlessness is increased, most people's love will

grow cold (Matt. 24:6-12).

"Wars and Rumors of Wars"

There were to be "wars and rumors of wars" before the generation to whom

Jesus spoke would pass away. But how could there be wars and rumors of wars

during the era of the Pax Romana (Roman Peace), which began with the reign

of Augustus and his establishment of the "Age of Peace" in 17 B.C.? "Wars

and rumors of wars" can only be a sign during times of supposed peace! As

we will see, the Roman Peace was fragile, to say the least.

The Jews resisted the erection of the statue of Caligula in the temple;

and such was the dread of Roman resentment, that the fields remained

uncultivated. At Caesarea, the Jews and Syrians contended for the mastery

of the city. Twenty thousand of the former were put to death, and the rest

were expelled. Every city in Syria was then divided into two armies, and

multitudes were slaughtered. Alexandria and Damascus presented a similar

scene of bloodshed. About fifty thousand of the Jews fell in the former, and

ten thousand in the latter. The Jewish nation rebelled against the Romans;

Italy was convulsed with contentions for the empire; and, as a proof of the

troublous and warlike character of the period, within the brief space of two

years, four emperors, Nero, Galba, Otho, and Vitellius, suffered death.3

Signs For All To See

79

The Annals of Tacitus, covering the period from A.D. 14 to the death of

Nero in A.D. 68, describes the tumult of the period with phrases such as

"disturbances in Germany," "commotions in Africa," "commotions in Thrace,"

'insurrections in Gaul," "intrigues among the Parthians," "the war in Britain,"

and "the war in Armenia." Wars were fought from one end of the empire to

the other. With this description we can see further fulfillment: "For nation

will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom" (Matt. 24:7). Josephus

writes that Roman civil wars were so common in the empire that there was

no need to write about them in any great detail: "I have omitted to give an

exact account of them, because they are well known by all, and they are

described by a great number of Greek and Roman authors; yet for the sake

of the connection of matters, and that my history may not be incoherent, I

have just touched upon everything briefly."4 The Jews were often the target

of these wars. At Seleucia "more than 50,000 Jews were killed."5

"Famines"

Beginning with the book of Acts, we see that famines were prevalent in

the period prior to Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70: "Now at this time some

prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. And one of them named

Agabus stood up and began to indicate by the Spirit that there would certainly

be a great famine all over the world [oikoumene]. And this took place in the reign of

Claudius. And in the proportion that any of the disciples had means, each of them determined to send a contribution for the relief of the brethren living

in Judea" (Acts 11:27-29). The famine was dramatic evidence that Jesus'

prophecy was coming to pass in their generation just like He said it would.

The famine was so great that the church as far away as Corinth participated

in relief efforts (1 Cor. 16:1-5; Rom. 15:25-28). The entire Roman Empire

was affected. Futurist William T. James writes that "God's Word has much

to say about famine,"6 and yet he does not mention Acts 11:27-29. Why?

Is he afraid that his readers will ask why this passage is not a fulfillment of

what Jesus said would happen?

Contemporary secular historians such as Tacitus, Suetonius, and Josephus

mention other famines during the period prior to A.D. 70. In Tacitus we read

a description of famine conditions in A.D. 51 in Rome: "This year witnessed

many prodigies [signs or omens] ... [including] repeated earthquakes....

Further portents were seen in a shortage of corn, resulting in famine.... It

was established that there was no more than fifteen days' supply of food in

80

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the city [of Rome]. Only heaven's special favour and a mild winter prevented

catastrophe."7 Tacitus remembers the days when Italy "once exported food

for the army in distant provinces!"8

War is the number-one contributor to famine and its disastrous effects.

It is no accident that Jesus lists "famines" after "wars." Josephus reports on the miserable famine conditions brought on by the siege of Jerusalem by

Titus. The siege stopped the people from leaving the city and provisions

from entering. "Then did the famine widen its progress, and devoured the

people by whole houses and families; the upper rooms were full of women

and children that were dying by famine; and the lanes of the city were full of

the dead bodies of the aged; the children also and the young men wandered

about the marketplaces like shadows, all swelled with the famine, and fell

down dead wheresoever their misery seized them."9

Upon hearing the reports of these famines, could the disciples have dis-

missed them as having nothing to do with the words spoken by Jesus on

the Mount of Olives?

"Earthquakes"

Today's prophecy writers contend that it is the increase and magnitude

of modern earthquakes that make them significant for determining that

we are living in the last days. "The Lord obviously meant earthquakes of

unprecedented seismological dimension."10 Jesus simply says that "in vari-

ous places there will be famines and earthquakes" (24:7). He says nothing

about an increase in their number. Luke writes that "there will be great

earthquakes" (Luke 2:11). The historical record of earthquakes that occurred

before Jerusalem was destroyed in the first century fulfills Jesus' prophecy

to the letter. Two earthquakes are mentioned in Matthew: When Jesus was

crucified (27:54) and when the angel came down to roll the stone away from

the tomb where Jesus was buried (28:2). This second earthquake is said to

have been "severe." The Book of Acts records "a great earthquake" that shook

"the foundations of the prison house" (Acts 16:26). Three earthquakes are

mentioned prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. One is described

as "severe," and one is said to be "great." Were Jesus' words fulfilled? Yes.

Secular historians support the biblical record. "And as to earthquakes, many

are mentioned by writers during a period just previous to 70 A.D. There were

earthquakes in Crete, Smyrna, Miletus, Chios, Samos, Laodicea, Hierapolis,

Colosse, Campania, Rome, and Judea. It is interesting to note that the city

Signs For All To See

81

of Pompeii was much damaged by an earthquake occurring on February 5,

63 A.D."11 The number of earthquakes during this era is staggering. Josephus

describes an earthquake in Judea of such magnitude "that the constitution of

the universe was confounded for the destruction of men."12 He goes on to

write that this earthquake was "no common" calamity, indicating that God

Himself had brought it about for a special purpose.13 One commentator

writes: "Perhaps no period in the world's history has ever been so marked by

these convulsions as that which intervenes between the Crucifixion and the

destruction of Jerusalem."14 Since the generation between A.D. 30 and 70 is

past, there is no reason to attach prophetic significance to earthquakes in our

day as a fulfillment of Matthew 24:7. They are not signs of the imminency

of Jesus' return in our generation. But they were a prelude to the coming of

Jesus in judgment upon Jerusalem in the generation of the apostles.

"Signs in the Heavens"

Matthew's recording of the Olivet Discourse does not mention "terrors

and great signs from heaven." This phrase is found in Luke's gospel on the

same subject (Luke 21:11). It appears with Luke's discussion of earthquakes,

plagues, and famines; therefore, it is parallel to Matthew's account.

The appearance of comets in the sky was often taken as a warning of some

approaching calamity or a sign of change in existing political structures: "It is

a disorder of the heavens 'importing change of times and states,' as William

Shakespeare put it, and is bad news, especially for eminent persons."15 For

example, a comet appeared in the sky in 44 B.C., the year of Julius Caesar's

assassination. Another comet appeared in 11 B.C. This time it was thought

to have had something to do with the death of Marcus Agrippa, a Roman

statesman who died the year before. We know that the "star in the east"

was a sign of joy for the magi, but it was a bad omen for Herod who feared

political competition (Matt. 2:1-12).

Were there any "signs from heaven" prior to A.D. 70 that would be a

fulfillment of Luke 21:11? A comet appeared around A.D. 60 during the reign

of Nero. The public speculated that some change in the political scene was

imminent: "The historian Tacitus wrote: 'As if Nero were already dethroned,

men began to ask who might be his successor.'"16 Nero took the comet's

"threat" seriously. This is the man who murdered his mother, his two wives,

and most of his family, burned Rome, and used Christians as flaming torches.

He knew the intricacies of political intrigue. The appearance of a comet

82

LAST DAYS MADNESS

might just give somebody an idea. "Nero took no chances as another histo-

rian, Suetonius, related: 'All children of the condemned man, were banished

from Rome, and then starved to death or poisoned.' The policy worked like

a charm. Nero survived that comet by several years."17

Nero may have thought that he was finished with warnings from heaven.

Halley's Comet appeared in A.D. 66. Not long after this Nero committed

suicide. Historians have linked the appearance of Halley's Comet not only

with the death of Nero, but with the destruction of Jerusalem four years later.

A seventeenth-century print graphically depicts the phenomenon as it passes

over Jerusalem.18 The following caption accompanies the print: "Halley's

Comet of A.D. 66 shown over Jerusalem.... The Comet was regarded as an

omen predicting the fall of the city to the Romans which actually occurred

four years later."

In addition to Halley's Comet, Josephus recounts that "there was a star

resembling a sword, which stood over the city, and a comet, that continued a

whole year."19 Josephus goes on to describe other unusual phenomena. Here

is clear testimony that Jesus' words were fulfilled within a generation. None

of this historical data satifies the sensationalists. Chuck Missler concocts an

elaborate UFO-alien-demonic scenario that he says must take place in order

for Luke 21:11 to be fulfilled. Again, Jesus' words are stretched beyond their

intended meaning to avoid the obvious first-century fulfillment.20

"Tribulation"

No one can doubt that persecution followed the church soon after Pen-

tecost. Jesus warned His disciples that those who hated Him would hate

them as well (John 15:18; Matt. 23:34). From its inception the church

underwent relentless tribulation. The Book of Acts records many instances

of persecution. Peter and John were arrested and put in jail (Acts 4:3). They

were warned not to speak to any man in the name of Jesus (4:17). After

another arrest, they were again instructed not to teach in the name of Jesus.

But this time, upon their release, they were "flogged" (5:40) as a warning.

The tribulation worsened with the death of Stephen (7:54-60).

After this first wave of mistreatment, "a great persecution arose against the

church in Jerusalem; and they were all scattered throughout the regions of

Judea and Samaria, except the apostles" (8:1). Persecutions continued as Saul

was "breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord" (9:1). In

addition to the religious terrorism of Saul, "Herod the king laid hands on some

Signs For All To See

83

who belonged to the church, in order to mistreat them. And he had James the

brother of John put to death with a sword" (12:1-2). Herod, seeing that this

pleased the Jews, "proceeded to arrest Peter also" (12:3).

In time the crowds even turned on the disciples in frenzied persecution:

"Jews came from.. .Iconium, and having won over the multitudes, they stoned

Paul and dragged him out of the city, supposing him to be dead" (14:19).

Thomas Newton comments: "Some are 'brought before rulers and kings,'

as Paul before Gallio, (xviii. 12) Felix, (xxiv) Festus and Agrippa, (xxv)....

Some are beaten, as Paul and Silas: (xvi. 23).... But if we would look farther, we have a more melancholy proof of the truth of this prediction, in the

persecutions under Nero, in which (besides numberless other Christians) fell

those two great champions of our faith, St. Peter and St. Paul."21 Paul writes:

"Five times I received from the Jews thirty-nine lashes. Three times I was

beaten with rods, once I was stoned.... I have been on frequent journeys,

in dangers from rivers, dangers from robbers, dangers from my countrymen,

dangers from the Gentiles" (2 Cor. 11:24-26). "Tacitus says that Nero, for

the conflagration of Rome, persecuted the Christians, 'a race of men detested

for their crimes-! also see 1 Pet. ii.12; iii.16; iv.14—16."22 As Tertullian wrote,

"There was war against the very name" of Christ.23 As the testimony of the

Bible confirms, the disciples were delivered up to tribulation, and some were

killed (Matt. 24:9). The apostle John writes that he is a "fellow-partaker in

the tribulation" (Rev. 1:9).

None of this means that the church is presently exempt from tribulation:

"In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the

world" (John 16:33; see Rom. 5:3; 8:35; 12:12; 1 Thess. 1:6). But between

A.D. 30 and 70, the tribulation the church experienced was a fulfillment of

the specific prophecy outlined in Matthew 24:9.

Falling Away and Betrayal

While many today are looking for a future "falling away," there is no

doubt that the first-century church had to contend with betrayal and apos-

tasy. Those who once proclaimed the name of Christ went on to do harm

to the church they formerly claimed as their own. Paul stated: "All who are

in Asia turned away from me, among whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes"

(2 Tim. 1:15). Demas, who was said to have "loved this present world," de-

serted Paul (4:10). This does not seem to be an isolated event: "At my first

defense no one supported me, but all deserted me; may it not be counted

81 LAST DAYS MADNESS

our faith that He will do the same for His church in our day. If non-Christian

"folly [was made] obvious to all" in the first century (2 Timothy 3:9), can

we expect any less in our day?

"The one who endures to the end, he shall be saved" (Matt. 24:13).

The end of what? Jesus is answering questions about the destruction of the

temple and the "end of the age," the end of the Jewish dispensation, the Old

Covenant order. Remember, the disciples had just heard Jesus predict that the

temple was going to be left "desolate" (Matt. 23:38), and that these things

would happen to "this generation," that is, to the generation of Jews then liv-

ing in Israel (23:36). This is the end Jesus had in mind. Great social, religious,

and political upheavals would come upon the Roman Empire that would

engulf the first-century state of Israel. Those who endured to the end of this

conflagration would be saved; that is, they would not die in Rome's war with

the Jewish rebels. "The primary meaning of this seems to be, that whosoever remained faithful till the destruction of Jerusalem, should be preserved from

it. No Christian, that we know of, perished in the siege or after it."26

Even for those who interpret the "end" in Matthew 24:13 to be some

future "end," that future "end" is not the "end." A number of events supposedly follow the "end": the Great Tribulation, the Millennium, and the New

Heaven and New Earth. Each time "end" is used, the context specifies what

end is in view. In the case of the Olivet Discourse, the "end" is related to the

question regarding the destruction of the temple which took place within

the lifetime of the first-century church.

[A]s far as the disciples, good first-century Jews as they were, were

concerned, there was no reason whatever for them to be thinking about

the end of the space-time universe. There was no reason, either in their

background or in a single thing that Jesus had said to them up to that

point, for it even to occur to them that the true story of the world, or of

Israel, or of Jesus himself, might include either the end of the space-time

universe, or Jesus or anyone else floating down to earth on a cloud.27

The Apostle Paul tells us that the "ends of the ages" were not in the distant

future: "Now these things happened to them [the Israelites in the wilderness]

as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends

Signs For All To See 82

87

of the ages have come" (I Cor. 10:11). The "ends of the ages"—the end of the Old Covenant—had come upon the first-century church. In another place,

Paul describes the end of the Old Covenant era this way: "Having therefore

such a hope, we use great boldness in our speech, and are not as Moses,

who used to put a veil over his face that the sons of Israel might not look

intently at the end of what was fading away" (2 Cor. 3:12-13). The writer of Hebrews told his readers that "now once at the consummation of the ages

He was been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself" (Heb.

9:26). "Now" is equal to "the consummation of the ages." "Now" does not mean later or the distant future.

The New Testament describes the nearness of the Lord's coming and

the "end of all things," that is, the end of the distinctly Jewish era with the

shadows of the Old Covenant. These events were "near" for those Christians

who read the Book of Revelation (Rev. 1:3). There is no other explanation

except that time was running out for the shadows of the Old Covenant.

Forcing this verse and others like it to describe a period nearly two thousand

years in the future makes the interpreter conclude that biblical time texts are

meaningless. Jesus made it clear to the religious leaders of His day that the

kingdom of God would be taken away from them to be "given to a nation

producing the fruit of it" (Matt. 21:43). When would this happen? "And

when the chief priests and the Pharisees heard His parables, they understood

that He was speaking about them" (21:45). Their generation would experience the kingdom transfer. For them it was the "end."

"This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world for a wit-

ness to all the nations, and then the end shall come" (Matt. 24:14).

Robert Van Kampen, a prophecy author who believes the events out-

lined by Jesus in Matthew 24 are yet to be fulfilled, writes, "Christ tells

His disciples that only after the gospel is preached to all nations, 'then the

end shall come.'"28 Since the Bible clearly states that that the gospel "was

proclaimed in all creation under heaven" (Col. 1:23), then the end spoken of by Jesus is a past event for us. Earlier in his letter to the Colossians, Paul

describes how the gospel was "constantly bearing fruit and increasing in all

the world [kosmos]" (1:6). The faith of the Romans was "being proclaimed throughout the whole world [kosmos]" (Rom. 1:8), "to all the nations" (16:26).

These statements by Paul reveal a fulfillment of what Jesus told His disciples

83

83 LAST DAYS MADNESS

would be a prelude to the destruction of Jerusalem. "The Gospel had been

preached through the whole Roman world, and every nation had received its

testimony, before the destruction of Jerusalem: see Col. i. 6, 23; 2 Tim. iv.

17. This was necessary not only as regarded the Gentiles, but to give God's

people the Jews, who were scattered among the nations, the opportunity of

receiving or rejecting the preaching of Christ"29

In addition, we learn that Paul was making plans to go "to Spain" (Rom.

15:24,28). It is possible that a church already existed there. This would mean

that the gospel had nearly reached the western border of the Roman Empire

in Paul's day. This may explain why Paul quoted from Psalm 19:4: "But I say,

surely they have never heard, have they? Indeed they have: 'THEIR VOICE

HAS GONE OUT INTO ALL THE EARTH, AND THEIR WORDS TO THE ENDS OF

THE WORLD [oikoumene]'" (Rom. 10:18; cf. 2 Tim. 4:17). Luke records that

"all who lived in Asia heard the word of the Lord, both Jews and Greeks"

(Acts 19:10).

The Greek word translated "world" in Matthew 24:14 is oikoumene, "the inhabited earth." The same Greek word is used in Luke 2:1: "Now it came

about in those days that a decree went out from Caesar Augustus, that a

census be taken of all the inhabited earth." In the New American Standard Version, the marginal note in Luke 2:1 reads "the Roman empire" (also see

Acts 11:28, 24:5). The marginal reading of Luke 21:26—a verse parallel

to Matthew 24:14—is also translated as "inhabited earth." The translators

of the NASV have no such notation for Matthew 24:14, even though the

same Greek word (oikoumene) is used. Matthew 24:14 clearly shows that

the gospel would be preached throughout the Roman Empire before Jesus

returned in judgment upon Jerusalem. Thomas Ice writes of those who ad-

vocate a first-century application of Matthew 24:14: Are they "saying that

the gospel was preached before A.D. 70 in the Western hemisphere?"30 The

same question could be asked of Luke 2:1 and the geographical extent of

the Roman census: "Is Luke saying that Caesar Augustus sent out a decree

'that a census be taken of the Western hemisphere,' since oikoumene is used

in both places?"

But even if kosmos had been used in Matthew 24:14, we have seen from

Romans 1:8 and Colossians 1:6 that the "gospel of the kingdom" being

"preached in the whole world" was a pre-A.D. 70 fulfillment. Is there

any historical evidence outside the biblical testimony that the gospel did

reach the extreme parts of the Roman Empire, which Scripture describes

Signs For All To See

89

as the "inhabited earth"? Philip Doddridge made the following remarks

in The Family Expositor.

It appears, from the most credible records, that the gospel was preached

in Idumea, Syria, and Mesopotamia, by Jude; in Egypt, Marmorica, Mauri-

tania, and other parts of Africa, by Mark, Simon, and Jude; in Ethiopia, by

Candace's Eunuch and Matthias; in Pontus, Galatia, and the neighbouring

parts of Asia, by Peter; in territories of the seven Asiatic churches, by John;

in Parthia, by Matthew; in Scythia, by Philip and Andrew; in the northern

and western parts of Asia, by Bartholomew; in Persia, by Simon and Jude;

in Media, Carmania, and several eastern parts, by Thomas; through the

vast tract from Jerusalem round about unto Illyricum, by Paul, as also in

Italy, and probably in Spain, Gaul, and Britain; in most of which places

Christian churches were planted, in less than thirty years after the death

of Christ, which was before the destruction of Jerusalem.31

Prior to A.D. 70 the inhabited earth had heard the gospel ("all creation

under heaven") as Paul wrote in Colossians 1:23. This section of Matthew

24 was fulfilled within a generation, as Doddridge writes, "in less than thirty

years after the death of Christ," in direct fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy.32

Some commenators claim that the phrase "all the nations" governs the

extent of the gospel's expansion. Since all the nations had not been reached

prior to the destruction of the temple in A.D. 70, so the argument goes,

Matthew 24:14 has not been fulfilled. The Apostle Paul writes otherwise

in Romans 16:25-27:

Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and

the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery

which has been kept secret for long ages past, but now is manifested,

and by the Scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment

of the eternal God, has been made known to all the nations, leading to obedience of faith; to the only wise God, through Jesus Christ, be the glory

forever. Amen.

According to Paul, the gospel had "been made known to all the na-

tions" in his day. If the expression "all the nations" governs the extent of fulfillment in Matthew 24:14, then according to Paul, Matthew 24:14 has

been fulfilled.

85

85 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. William T. James, "Daniel's Last-Days Flood," Foreshadows of Wrath and Redemp-

tion, William T. James, gen. ed. (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1999), 7.

2. James, "Daniel's Last-Days Flood," 8.

3. Alexander Keith, The Evidence of the Truth of the Christian Religion Derived from

the Literal Fulfillment of Prophecy Particularly as Illustrated by the History of the Jews

(Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publication, n.d.), 59-60.

4. Flavius Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, in The Works of Josephus, trans. William Whiston (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1987), 4:9:2, 688.

5. Henry Alford, The New Testament fo r English Readers (Chicago, IL: Moody Press,

[1886] n.d.), 162.

6. James, "Famines Pestilences, Earthquakes," Foreshadows of Wrath and Redemption,

90.

7. Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome, trans. Michael Grant (London: Penguin Books, 1989), 271.

8. Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome, 271

9. Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, 5:12:3, 723.

10. James, "Famines, Pestilences, Earthquakes," 94. For an up-to-date analysis

of the claim that earthquakes are increasing in number and magnitude, see

Steven A. Austin and Mark L. Strauss, "Are Earthquakes Signs of the End

Times? A Geological and Biblical Response to an Urban Legend," Christian

Research Journal, 21:4 (1999), 30-39.

11. J. Marcellus Kik, An Eschatology of Victory (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1975), 93. See Alford, The New Testament for English Readers,

163.

12. Quoted in Thomas Scott, The Holy Bible Containing the Old and New Testaments,

According to the Authorized Version; with Explanatory Notes, Practical Observations,

and Copious Marginal References, 3 vols. (New York: Collins and Hannay, 1832), 3:108.

13. Quoted in Keith, Evidence, 60.

14. Edward Hayes Plumptre, "The Gospel According to St. Matthew," Ellicott's

Commentary on the Whole Bible, ed. Charles John Ellicott, 8 vols. (London:

Cassell and Company, 1897), 6:146.

15. Nigel Calder, The Comet is Coming!: The Feverish Legacy of Mr. Halley (London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1980), 12.

16. Calder, The Comet is Coming!, 12.

Signs For All To See 86

91

17. Calder, The Comet is Coming!, 13.

18. The print is reproduced in Asimov's Guide to Halley's Comet: The Awesome Story

of Comets (New York: Walker and Company, 1985), 6.

19. Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, 6:5:3, 742.

20. Chuck Missler, "Signs in the Sun, Moon and Stars," Foreshadows of Wrath and

Redemption, 99-113.

21. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at this Time are Fulfilling in the World (London: J.F. Dove, 1754), 339.

22. Alford, The New Testament for English Readers, 163. Emphasis in the original.

23. Tertullian, "The Apology," The Ante-Nicene Fathers, eds. Alexander Roberts and John Donaldson, vol. 3 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, [1885] 1986), ch. 2,

18-20.

24. Newton, On the Prophecies, 339.

25. Newton, On the Prophecies,, 340-41.

26. Alford, The New Testament for English Readers, 164.

27. N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996), 345.

28. Robert Van Kampen, The Rapture Question Answered: Plain and Simple (Grand Rapids, MI: Fleming H. Revell, 1997), 74.

29. Alford, The New Testament for English Readers, 164. Emphasis in original.

30. H. Wayne House and Thomas D. Ice, Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse?

(Portland, OR: Multnomah Press, 1989), 298.

31. Philip Doddridge, The Family Expositor, 6 vols. (Charlestown, MA: S. Etheridge, 1807), 2:365, note n.

32. Most futurist commentators, especially dispensationalists, do not discuss the

relationship between Matthew 24:14 and Colossians 1:23 and the use of

oikoumene instead of kosmos. See, for example, Stanley D. Toussaint, Behold the

King: A Study of Matthew (Portland, OR: Multnomah Press, 1981); William

Hendriksen, New Testament Commentary: Exposition of the Gospel According to

Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1973); John F. Walvoord,

Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1974); Arno C. Gae-

belein, The Gospel According to Matthew: An Exposition (Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, [1910] 1961).

Chapter Seven

THE TEMPLE OF DOOM

The temple of Israel will be rebuilt. Of that we have no doubt whatso-

ever."1 Orthodox Jews are planning for the day when they will once

again have their temple with a re-established priesthood. "Spurred by both

religious belief and nationalistic fervor and backed by the government, a

group of Israelis and Jews abroad are quietly planning the construction of the

third Jewish temple."2 Many of the temple utensils have been manufactured

and await the day when all will be as it was before the Romans destroyed

the temple in A.D. 70. Stories about rocks being supplied from quarries in

Indiana and underground temple construction make their way through the

Christian rumor mill. There is even talk about a prefabricated temple ready

to be constructed when the time is right.

But does any of this have anything to do with Bible prophecy? Rabbi

Leon Ashkenazi, a Jerusalem-based scholar, pointed to the war between

Iraq and the allies as the fulfillment of "many texts that speak of a conflict

between Babylonia and Rome and Greece."3 In his view, the "preparation

for the Messiah began with the Balfour Declaration in 1917, followed by

the 'unification' of Israel in 1967; it will be completed in 1992 with the

rebuilding of the temple."4 Nineteen-ninety-two has passed and the temple

remains a future hope. The Jews who look for a rebuilt temple are not search-

ing the Torah for their instructions but rather the Babylonian Talmud. Jews

93

94

LAST DAYS MADNESS

are even divided over the subject of a rebuilt temple. "Rabbinical advocates

of researching the new temple remain cautious. They consistently remind

their followers that their work is to prepare for the coming of the Messiah,

not to replace him."5

Does the Bible, especially the New Testament, predict that the temple will

be rebuilt? It does not. Why are Jews wanting to rebuild the temple? For the

same reason that the temple was maintained prior to its destruction in A.D.

70—apostate Jews do not believe that Jesus is the promised Messiah. If the

Jews once again build a temple and begin to offer sacrifices, this will only

confirm their rejection of the atoning blood of Jesus. It was this rejection

that led to the destruction of the temple that was standing in Jesus' day.

Because of the consistent futurizing of the events of Matthew 24, con-

temporary prophetic speculators who teach the imminency of the rapture

envision the need for a rebuilt temple. Supposedly in this rebuilt temple the Antichrist will set up a statue to be worshipped, the "abomination of desolation" that Jesus said would be "standing in the holy place" (Matt. 24:15).

As this chapter will demonstrate, this is a past event. The temple was still

standing in the "holy city" called Jerusalem (4:5; 27:53) when Jesus spoke

of the "abomination of desolation." The temple had been pointed out by

the disciples, the very temple that Jesus said would be left: desolate and the

same temple that Jesus walked away from (23:38). Jesus' disciples would

have immediately thought of the temple that they had pointed out to Him,

not a temple that had to be rebuilt. To propose that Jesus was describing a

rebuilt temple must be proven from Scripture. The New Testament mentions

nothing about a rebuilt temple. There is nothing in Matthew 24 that even

hints at the rebuilding of the temple. Why would Jesus confuse His listeners

and those of us who read His recorded prophecy by leaving out a crucial

detail like a rebuilt temple? It does not make sense.

What's Future Is Past

The key to the futurizing interpretation of Matthew 24 is the belief that

the seventieth week of Daniel 9:24—27 has been disconnected from the

sixty-ninth week. The seventieth week, according to dispensationalists, is

still future. It is during this "week," actually seven years, that the Antichrist

supposedly will make and break a covenant with the Jews (in the middle of

the week, that is, after three and a half years) and desecrate a newly rebuilt

The Temple of Doom

95

temple by proclaiming himself to be God and setting up a statue of himself

for the world to worship (2 Thess. 2).

Again, this prophetic scenario is dependent on splitting the seventieth

"week" (seven years) from the previous sixty-nine "weeks" (483 years) and inserting a "gap" of nearly two thousand years after the sixty-ninth "week"

and before the seventieth "week" of Daniel 9:24-27. There is nothing in

Daniel 9:24-27 that even hints that there will be a rebuilt temple. The

temple being discussed in Daniel 9:24-27, Matthew 24:15, 2 Thessalonians

2:4, and Revelation 11:1-2 is the temple that Jesus cleansed on at least two

occasions 0ohn 2:13-22; Matt. 21:12-17) and left for a future judgment

that history attests occurred in A.D. 70 (Matt. 23:38).

There is one major problem with the futurizing scenario that views the

seventieth week as not being fulfilled in the first century: There is no bibli-

cal warrant for stopping Daniel's prophecy of the seventy weeks after the

sixtyninth week. The idea of separation and the placement of an indeterminable gap

between the two sets of weeks is one of the most unnatural and nonliteral interpretations

of Scripture found in any eschatological system. This interpretation is taught by those who insist on a literal hermeneutic. If dispensationalists were consistent

in their literalism, they would never manipulate Scripture to fit an already

established prophetic system. The weeks form a unit without separation or

a gap. Interpreters who place a gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth

weeks of Daniel 9:24—27 should be challenged to produce a single Bible

verse that even implies such a division. Why is there no mention of this

"great parenthesis" either in the Bible or in nearly nineteen hundred years

of church history?

Futurism mandates that a temple must be rebuilt so the events of Matthew

24 can be fulfilled again! History records that the temple was destroyed in

A.D. 70, with the events of Matthew 24 preceding its demise. Not one verse in

the New Testament mentions the need for a rebuilt temple, a fact admitted by those who believe a future temple is necessary for prophecy to be fulfilled. Thomas

Ice and Timothy Demy write: "There are no Bible verses that say, 'There is

going to be a third temple."'6 Of course, there's a good reason for this. The

real temple of God in the New Testament is obviously the church of Christ

with Jesus as the "cornerstone" (1 Peter 2:7). The Old Testament prophecies

predicting a rebuilt temple were fulfilled in the post-exile period and in the

first coming of Christ.7 Some point to the temple of Ezekiel 40-48 as an

example of a prophecy that is yet to be fulfilled. But this passage is simply

96

LAST DAYS MADNESS

a visionary expression of the faithful remnant that returned after the exile

and the glorious future they would have.

With the exception of the Messianic section in ch. xlvii. 1-12 [of

Ezekiel], the fulfillment of all the rest of the prophecy belongs to the

times immediately after the return from the Chaldean exile. So must

every one of its first hearers and readers have understood it... Jeremiah

the prophet, whom Ezekiel follows throughout, ... had prophesied

that the city and temple should be restored seventy years after the date

of the Chaldean servitude, falling in the fourth year of Jehoiakim. Of

these seventy years, thirty-two had already elapsed at the time when our

prophecy was delivered. Ezekiel himself had announced, in ch. xxix.

13, that forty years after the desolation of Egypt, the nations visited

by the Chaldeans would return to their former state. And what is more

obvious, according to ch. xi. 16, the restoration is to follow in a brief

space after the destruction of the temple. Accordingly the first hearers

and readers could not but expect that, with respect to the restoration of

the temple and city, the word holds good which Habakkuk uttered (ch.

i. 5) with regard to the destruction, "I do a deed in your days;" and we

enter upon the interpretation with the presupposition that here also the

word of the Lord applies, "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall

not pass till all these things be fulfilled [Matthew 24:34]."8

By extension, Ezekiel's temple is a picture of the New Covenant under

which the church, made up of believing Jews and Gentiles, is the new temple.

Peter, in describing the church of his day, wrote: "You also, as living stones, are

being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual

sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 2:5). What could

be more clear? Christians—converted Jews and Gentiles from every tribe,

tongue, and nation—are "living stones" being joined together in a living

temple (Eph. 2:19-21; 1 Cor. 3:16; 6:19; 2 Cor. 6:16). This new edifice is

called "a holy temple in the Lord" (Eph. 2:21). In the previous chapter we

saw how Jesus abandoned the earthly temple of stone by walking away from

it and turning His back to it (Matt. 23:38). The physical temple, taken over

by the corrupt Pharisees and priests, would be left to them "desolate." It is

in this new temple made from "living stones" (1 Peter 2:5) that God's Spirit

dwells (Eph. 2:22). Scripture could not be more clear. The call for another

The Temple of Doom

97

temple simply energizes the spreading of last days madness and denies the

truth of the Bible.

Four Temples?

Those who believe that the Bible requires a rebuilt temple in fulfillment of

Bible prophecy actually teach the need for two rebuilt temples: "The Jewish people themselves speak of the possibility of two future temples. Christian

scholars who study both the Old and New Testaments see a third temple,

built upon Mt. Moriah, which will be desecrated by the man of great evil

(Antichrist). A concept of the Antichrist is also found in traditional writings

of Jewish scholars. He is called anti-messiah or the 'golem.' The third temple

will be of short duration. The final temple [the fourth], which will be built

in the Millennium under the auspices of the Messiah Himself, is described

in chapters 40 to 48 of Ezekiel."9

This supposed millennial temple is of special interest since it depicts

animal sacrifices "to make atonement" (Ezek. 45:15, 17, 20). The word

"atonement" is used in the Pentateuch to describe Old Testament propitia-

tory sacrifices, the very thing Jesus came to abolish through His own shed

blood (Lev. 6:30; 8:15; 16:6, 11, 24, 30-34; Num. 5:8; 15:28; 29:5; Rom.

3:25; 1 John 2:2; 4:10). The Book of Hebrews was written to show beyond

a shadow of a doubt that the entire Old Covenant system-with its priests,

sacrifices, ceremonies, and temple-has been done away with in Christ. No

mention is made in the Book of Hebrews that the temple that would be

destroyed in A.D. 70 must be rebuilt during a so-called future Great Tribu-

lation, or that a millennial temple must be built by Jesus. Such a millennial

temple would require Jesus to officiate over the very animal sacrifices that

He shed His blood to replace.

How does the futurist (dispensationalist) get around this obvious theo-

logical problem? The New Scofield Reference Bible understands the dilemma.

The editors of the 1909 version give two possible interpretations: "(1) Such

sacrifices, if actually offered, will be memorial in character.... (2) the refer-

ence to sacrifices is not to be taken literally." In the first case, nothing in the

text gives any indication that the sacrifices are "memorial in character." In

the second case, dispensationalism demands strict literalism. It is a pillar of

the system.10 But when a rebuilt temple with blood flowing during the sup-

posed millennial reign of Jesus on the earth obviously contradicts the clear

98

LAST DAYS MADNESS

teaching of the New Testament, dispensationalism rejects literalism. This is

convenient, but it is hardly convincing. The prophecy of Ezekiel's temple is

a picture of the restored covenant community that returned to the land after

the exile. This vision should not be projected nearly twenty-five hundred

years into the future into some earthly millennial kingdom where sacrifices

will be offered for atonement in the presence of the crucified Christ!

Planned Obsolescence

The earthly temple was designed as a temporary edifice that would no

longer be needed when the true temple of God, Jesus Christ, was manifested

on earth. Just like heaven is God's true throne and dwelling place and earth

is His footstool (Isa. 66:1), Jesus is the true temple with the earthly temple

being a mere copy of heaven (2 Sam. 22:7). God asks: "Where then is a

house you could build for Me?" (Isa. 66:1b). "The rebellious Jews believed

that they might construct the Temple as a place of rest for Yahweh. In that

Temple, however, He would have no place of rest nor would it be His sanc-

tuary. Those who would build a house influenced by such conceptions were

seeking to render the infinite finite, the eternal temporal, and the Creator

a mere creature."11

The New Testament situation is no different. Jesus is the true and abid-

ing temple. The earthly temple was designed with obsolescence in mind,

while the temple of His body was designed for permanency (John 2:13-22).

Even the city of Jerusalem is no longer considered to be a focal point of

worship (John 4:21-26; Gal. 4:21-31). Therefore, those religious lead-

ers who continued to offer animal sacrifices after Jesus offered Himself as

"the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world" 0ohn 1:29) were

offering the equivalent of "swine's blood" in the temple that would cease

to exist in A.D. 70 (Isa. 66:3c). "He who burns incense is like the one who

blesses an idol. As they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delights

in their abominations" (66:3e). Here we see that those priests who offered

the biblically prescribed Old Covenant sacrifices are said to "delight in their

abominations." Why did these sacrifices constitute an abomination?

If there is any historical reference, it is to those who, having returned

from exile, desired to serve God by means of their own appointment. The

reference may be in part to some who built the second Temple, but more

The Temple of Doom

99

fully it is to those who built Herod's temple and continued offering the

sacrifices even after the one true sacrifice had been offered. John 12:38

expressly applies Isaiah 53:1 to the unbelief of the Pharisees.12

In anticipation of the promised Redeemer, a warning was issued by God

through Isaiah to those who fail to recognize God's plan of salvation: "I

will choose their punishments, and I will bring on them what they dread"

(66:4a). The temple, earthly priesthood, and animal sacrifices were designed

to pass into oblivion when the promised High Priest, Jesus, offered Himself

as the perfect and final sacrifice. All other sacrifices, no matter how well

intentioned, would be an abomination in the light of the cross of Christ.

100

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. David Allen Lewis, Prophecy 2000: Rushing to Armageddon (Green Forest, AR: New Leaf, 1990), 131.

2. Steve Rodan, "Move to Build 3rd Jewish Temple in Jerusalem Stirs Resistance,"

Washington Post ( 25 November 1989), D11.

3. Kenneth L. Woodward, "The Final Days are Here Again," Newsweek (18 March 1991), 55.

4. Woodward, "The Final Days are Here Again," 55.

5. Rodan, "Move to Build," D11.

6. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, The Truth about the Last Days' Temple (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996), 13.

7. William Hendriksen, Israel in Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1968).

8. Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg (1802-69), The Prophecies of the Prophet Ezekiel

Elucidated, trans. A.C. Murphy and J.G. Murphy (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1869), 348-49.

9. Lewis , Prophecy 2000, 175.

10. Charles Ryrie, certainly a respected representative of dispensationalism, states,

"Dispensationalists claim that their principle of hermeneutics is that of literal

interpretation. This means interpretation which gives to every word the same

meaning it would have in normal usage, whether employed in writing, speak-

ing or thinking" ( Dispensationalism Today [Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1965], 86). Therefore, atonement must mean atonement. Blood sacrifices must mean

blood sacrifices. You cannot, using dispensationalism's view of literalism, turn

blood atonement into a memorial.

11. Edward J. Young, The Book of Isaiah, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1972), 3:518-19.

12. Young, The Book of Isaiah, 3:520.

Chapter Eight

THE ABOMINATION OF

DESOLATION

Futurists need a rebuilt temple in order to project the fulfillment of prophe-

cies related to the abomination of desolation to another time. Is this

what Jesus had in view in Matthew 24:15? A careful reading of Scripture

will show that the abomination of desolation mentioned by Jesus was an

event that would be fulfilled during the lifetime of His disciples. Jesus said,

"This generation"—the generation He addressed—"will not pass away until

a l these things take place" (24:34). One of the "things" was the "abomination of desolation ... standing in the holy place" (24:15).

The abomination of desolation is mentioned in one Old Testament book

(Dan. 9:27; 11:31; 12:11). The Book of Maccabees, a non-inspired book

written during the intertestamental period, mentions the abomination of

desolation and its relationship to Antiochus Epiphanes (168 B.C.) (1 Macc.

1:10-64; 4:36-59; 6:7; 2 Macc. 10:1-8). First-century Jews would have

been familiar with the theology and history surrounding the abomination

of desolation. There was no doubt in the minds of those who read and un-

derstood Jesus' words in Matthew 24:15 that the abomination of desolation

prophecy was fulfilled in events leading up to the temple's destruction in A.D.

70. The Apostle Paul would later address the concerns of the Thessalonians

101

102

LAST DAYS MADNESS

about the "day of the Lord" with a discussion of the man of lawlessness"

(2 Thess. 2). The man of lawlessness was a contemporary figure who was

identified with the "abomination of desolation."

The prophecy of Daniel concerning the appalling sacrilege had been

called to mind in the year A.D. 40 when Caligula laid plans to have an

image of himself set up in the Jerusalem Temple (see Philo, Legatio ad

Gaium; Josephus, Antiquities XVIII. viii. 2—9; Tacitus, History V.9). After that catastrophe was averted, Josephus found the fulfillment of Daniel in the

events of A.D. 66-70 (Antiquities X. xi. 7: "in the same manner Daniel also wrote about the empire of the Romans and that Jerusalem would be taken

and the Temple laid waste"). He refers to an ancient prophecy concerning

the desecration of the Temple by Jewish hands and found its fulfillment in

a whole series of villainous acts committed by the Zealots in the Temple

precincts from the period November 67 to the spring of 68.1

Further study on this important topic should leave no doubt that Matthew

24:15 was fulfilled in its entirety before the passing away of the generation

that heard Jesus' prophecy on the Mount of Olives. Again, the time text of

verse 34 compels us to look for a candidate within the time frame of the

generation that heard the prophecy.

"Therefore when you see the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION which was

spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the

reader understand)..." (Matt. 24:15).

There is an unbroken transition from verse 14 to verse 15 in Matthew 24.

By comparing Luke 21:20-21 and Matthew 24:15—18, we can pinpoint the

time when the abomination of desolation was to appear. Luke tells us, "When

you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is at

hand. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, and let those

who are in the midst of the city depart, and let not those who are in the

country enter the city" (Luke 21:20-21). Was Jerusalem ever surrounded by

armies prior to A.D. 70? Yes! Did Jesus' disciples flee the city? Yes!

When Roman legions besieged Jerusalem, the Jewish Zealots were

inflamed by predictions of apocalyptic rescue and maintained their resis-

The Abomination of Desolation

103

tance in the false expectation that God would supernaturally deliver the

city as He had done in the time of King Hezekiah (701 B.c.).... When

[the Christian Jews] saw the desolating abomination in the holy place,

they were to understand this as the signal to flee immediately from the

city and Judea. They should not expect God to deliver Jerusalem as the

prophets Joel (chapter 3), Daniel (12:1), and Zechariah (chapters 12

and 14) had envisioned. The reason should be clear: these apocalyptic

prophecies presuppose a faithful remnant of Israel on Mount Zion. But

this time the faithful remnant was the messianic flock that was called out

of the doomed city.2

While futurists (typically dispensationalists) generally acknowledge that

Luke is describing events prior to A.D. 70, they assert that Matthew is re-

counting a different series of events that are still future.3 For these futurists,

Matthew's abomination of desolation will appear in a rebuilt temple dur-

ing the so-called "seven-year tribulation period" after the pre-tribulational

rapture of the church. Only a preconceived theological system could ever

twist these verses in this way. It is obvious that all three gospel writers are

describing the same series of events and period of time.

Some commentators maintain that only some of Matthew's description of

the abomination of desolation was fulfilled in the Roman defilement of the

temple. "Yes, the Roman armies did defile the holy place with their acts of

emperor worship," they say. "But this did not happen in the 'holy of holies.'"

For these commentators, a future fulfillment remains when the antichrist will proclaim himself to be God while standing in a rebuilt temple. There is no

mention of the Antichrist in Matthew 24. The biblical doctrine of Antichrist

is very different from today's fanciful teaching on the subject.

An Abomination of Bloodletting

An abomination in the Old Testament was "related to the desecrating of

worship, either by outright false worship (Deut. 7:25; 27:15) or by a profana-

tion of true worship (Lev. 7:18; Deut. 17: l)."4 This definition fits the situation

leading up to the temple's desolation in A.D. 70 in a number of ways. While

there is little agreement on what the abomination was that brought on the

desolation, nearly all the older commentators are agreed that the desolation

occurred in the temple's destruction in A.D. 70. We do know, however, that

104

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the abomination that brings on the desolation happens sometime between

Jerusalem being "surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20) and the destruction

of the temple. Four events are put forth as possible "abominations."

The Zealots

Because of Israel's oppression under the Romans, the Zealots appeared

as advocates of political and religious freedom from the yoke of Roman op-

pression. We learn of the existence of the Zealots from the New Testament.

Jesus chose Simon the Zealot as one of His twelve apostles (Matt. 10:4;

Mark 3:18; Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13). Simon may have been a follower of this

sect that some say had its origin in A.D. 6 following the death of Herod the

Great. "The Zealots were nationalists, strong upholders of Jewish traditions

and religion; [who] ... became a principal cause of the Jewish War in which

Rome sacked Jerusalem."5

As hostilities grew between Rome and Judea, Zealot nationalism sharpened

into what one could call a "holy war." Depending on one's perspective (Jo-

sephus called them brigands and robbers), the Zealots were either assassins

or patriotic freedom fighters. The Zealots saw their chance for nationalistic

and religious revival by storming the temple. Their tactics, however, were

less than honorable.

The zealots had got possession of the Temple at an early stage in the

siege, and profaned it by these and other like outrages; they made the Holy

Place (in the very words of the historian) "a garrison and stronghold" of

their tyrannous and lawless rule; while the better priests looked on from

afar and wept tears of horror. The mysterious prediction of 2 Thess. ii.4

may point, in the first instance, to some kindred "abomination."6

At the outbreak of the Jewish War, the Zealots moved in and occupied

the temple area. They allowed persons who had committed crimes to roam

about freely in the Holy of Holies, and they perpetrated murder within the

temple itself. These acts of sacrilege climaxed in the winter of 67—68 with

the farcical investiture of the clown Phanni as high priest.7

It was in response to this specific action that the retired priest Ananus,

with tears, lamented: "It would have been far better for me to have died

before I had seen the house of God laden with such abominations and its

The Abomination of Desolation

105

unapproachable and hallowed places crowded with the feet of murderers"

(Wars, 4:3:10).8

The Zealots "went over all the buildings, and the temple itself, and fell

upon the priests, and those that were about the sacred offices."9 The Zealots

believed that "God would intervene directly" to vindicate their cause. "The

Zealots hoped to be able to overcome the power of Rome by the armed

force of eschatological Israel under the people's messianic leader, in a situ-

ation in which God would send them his supernatural help as he had done

when they had been led by Moses and Joshua."10 As history attests, this did

not happen. God's purpose was judgment upon the "city and sanctuary"

(Dan. 9:26) for the nation's rejection of the promised Messiah (John 1:11).

Eventually the surviving Zealots retreated to the mountain stronghold called

Masada. The Romans pursued them but were hindered in leading troops up

the mountain side. This obstacle was eventually overcome. By the time the

soldiers entered Masada the 960 rebels, many of whom were women and

children, had been killed by their own hand. Ten men had been selected

for the execution of the remaining men. First to be granted death were the

fathers and husbands who had just taken leave of their families. In rapid

order the executions were carried out until the last ten remained. This was

in May of A.D. 73.

The Idumeans

The Idumeans, who occupied the territory south of Judea, which had

been the ancient kingdom of Edom, came to Jerusalem at the behest of

Zealot leaders to participate in their revolutionary cause against the Ro-

mans. "With an army of some twenty thousand men and four generals, the

Idumeans marched to Jerusalem only to find the gates tightly locked and

guards on the walls."11 Not able to enter the city, the Idumeans made camp

outside the city walls. During an intense storm and the cover of night, the

Zealots "went to the gate nearest the Idumeans and began to saw the bars" to

open a passageway for the Idumeans to enter.12 Once inside, the Idumeans,

along with the Zealots, vented their fury on the city's occupants. Josephus

reports that the outer court of the Temple was deluged with blood with the

death of over eight thousand. The real target was the chief priest Ananus.

Ananus had on an earlier occasion tried to persuade the people to rise up

against the Zealots. Ananus and many other priests were killed, and their

106

LAST DAYS MADNESS

dead bodies were mocked by those who stood upon them. Their corpses

were cast into the streets. Josephus believed that it was this act that brought

on the judgment of God.

I should not mistake if I said that the death of Ananus was the begin-

ning of the destruction of the city, and that from this very day may be

dated the overthrow of her wall, and the ruin of her affairs, whereon they

saw their high priest, and the procurer of their preservation, slain in the

midst of the people.13

If Josephus believed that the destruction of the city was due to the execu-

tion of Ananus the high priest, is it not probable that God would take His

"vengeance" (Luke 21:22) on the city because of the death of His Son—the

Greater High Priest—Jesus (Hebrews 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:11, 17)? Jerusalem

was destroyed because there were many in Israel, provoked and led by the

religious leaders, who had years before "disowned the Holy and Righteous

One, and asked for a murderer" (Acts 3:14; cf. 2:23). They "put to death the

Prince of life" (3:15). In return God destroyed their city.

The Idumeans, having had enough of the atrocities, withdrew from the

city. This, however, did not stop the savagery of the Zealots. "Some feel that

it may have been at this point in time that the Christians left the city and

fled to Pella [Matthew 24:16]."14

The Romans

Eventually the temple was taken by the Romans and burned,15 an action

which Titus opposed but could not stop. While the sanctuary was still burn-

ing, "the soldiers brought their legionary standards into the sacred precincts,

set them up opposite the eastern gate, and offered sacrifices to them, there,

acclaiming Titus imperator (victorious commander) as they did so. The Ro-

man custom of offering sacrifices to their standards had already been com-

mented on by a Jewish writer [the Qumran commentator on Hab. 1:16] as a

symptom of their pagan arrogance, but the offering of such sacrifice in the

Temple court was the supreme insult to the God of Israel."16 This action by

the Romans must have been understood by the Jews as the fulfillment of

Daniel's vision when the burnt offering would cease and the abomination

of desolation would be set up (Dan. 9:27). What Caligula could not do in

A.D. 40, the Roman armies accomplished in A.D. 70.

The Abomination of Desolation 101

107

The representations of Caesar, and of the eagle, on the Roman stan-

dards were worshipped by the soldiers of that nation, and thus were, in

Hebrew phraseology, "an abomination."—With equal propriety is their

army described by the word "desolation." They plundered and devastated

without mercy, and, to use the indignant expression of a hostile chieftain,

"Where they have made a desert, they call peace" (Speech of Galgacus,

Tacitus; Life of Agricola 30).—They planted their standards before Jeru-

salem, several furlongs of land around which were accounted holy. The

Temple was more particularly called "the holy place" (Acts vi. 13); and

on the capture of the city, this prediction was fulfilled to the letter; for

the Romans brought "the Eagles" into the Temple and sacrificed to them

there. Out of respect to Jewish scruples, they had always before been left

at Cesarea by the Roman Governors.17

This Roman abomination was reminiscent of what Antiochus Epiphanes

did to profane the temple and altar more than two centuries before. On De-

cember 15, 168 B.C., Antiochus built a pagan altar on the site of the great

altar where sacrifices were made (2 Maccabees 6:1-13). Ten days later a

heathen sacrifice was offered on it. In 167 B.C. he set up a pagan statue in

the temple. Antiochus went even farther in forcing Jews to participate in his

abominations. Those who did not cooperate were killed: "Now Antiochus

was not satisfied either with his unexpected taking of the city, or with its

pillage, or with the great slaughter he had made there; but being overcome

with his violent passions, and remembering what he had suffered during

the siege, he compelled the Jews to dissolve the laws of their country, and

to keep their infants uncircumcised, and to sacrifice swine's blood on the

altar."18

The Roman abomination hypothesis is the most popular since it paral-

lels the actions of Antiochus Epiphanes. Luke's description of "Jerusalem

surrounded by armies"—Roman armies—(Luke 21:20) appears to point to

a Roman "abomination."

The Jews

It is likely, however, that Jesus had more in mind than the abominable

acts that took place in the temple by the Romans, Idumeans, or the "desecra-

tion of the temple by the Zealots in the winter of A.D. 67/ 8, shortly before

the Roman siege began."19 Antiochus, the Zealots, the Idumeans, and the

108

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Roman legions were not the ones who could defile the temple under the

terms of the New Covenant. Only someone posing as an official religious

representative of God could actually defile the temple. Israel's priesthood

was corrupt, and the sacrifices were an abomination since the priests denied

the atoning work of Christ. Earlier in Israel's history God threatened deso-

lation "because the Jews had defiled the temple with detestable things and

abominations."20 '"So as I live,' declares the LORD GOD, 'surely, because you

have defiled My sanctuary with all your detestable idols and with all your

abominations, therefore I will also withdraw, and My eye shall have no pity

and I will not spare'" (Ezek. 5:11).

The Jews of Jesus' day had turned the temple into a "house of merchandise"

(John 2:16) and a "robbers' den" (Matt. 21:13). When a priest inspected a

house and found it leprous, the house was to be torn down (Lev. 14:33-47).

Jesus, as the High Priest, after the order of Melchizedek (Heb. 5:6), inspected

the temple twice, found it leprous, and issued His priestly evaluation: "And

Jesus came out from the temple" (Matt. 24:1), as the priest "shall come out

from the house" (Lev. 14:38), and declared it "desolate" (Matt. 23:38), as

the priest declared a leprous house to be "unclean" (Lev. 14:44). A leprous

house could be cleansed in only one way: "He shall therefore tear down the

house, its stones, and its timbers, and all the plaster of the house, and he shall take them outside the city to an unclean place" (Lev. 14:45). When Jesus'

disciples pointed to the temple buildings after hearing of its desolation, Jesus

answered: "Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone

here shall be left upon another, which will not be torn down"( Matt. 24:2).

It was the priests, along with the scribes, elders, and Pharisees, who re-

jected Jesus as the Messiah (Matt. 26:57—68). Instead of choosing Jesus, they

"persuaded the multitudes to ask for Barabbas, and to put Jesus to death"

(27:20). With the true Lamb slain, the earthly temple could no longer operate

as a place of sacrifice. The action of the high priest, "standing in the holy

place" (24:15), continuing to offer sacrifices in the temple, was an abomina-

tion, a rejection of the work of Christ. James B. Jordan comments:

False worship is idolatrous worship. When the Jews rejected Jesus and

kept offering sacrifices, they were engaged in idolatry.... This was the

"wing of abominations" [Dan. 9:27] that took place in the Temple. It is

why the Temple was destroyed.

A full picture of this is provided in Ezekiel 8-11.... There you will see

The Abomination of Desolation

109

that when the apostate Jews of Ezekiel's day performed the sacrifices, God

viewed it as an abomination. He called the holy shrine an "idol of jealousy,

that provokes to jealousy" (8:3). The Jews had treated the Temple and the

ark as idols, and so God would destroy them, as he did the golden calf.

Ezekiel sees God pack up and move out of the Temple, leaving it empty

or desolate. Once God had left, the armies of Nebuchadnezzar swept in

and destroyed the empty Temple. (When we recognize that Ezekiel and

Daniel prophesied at the same time, the correlation becomes even more

credible.)21

Jesus' actions in Matthew 23:38 in proclaiming the temple "desolate" and

walking away from the structure are what God had warned about when He

saw abominations present: "Then the glory of the LORD departed from the

threshold of the temple and stood over the cherubim" (Ezek. 10:18). John

Calvin put forth a similar interpretation: God "deserted his Temple, because

it was only founded for a time, and was but a shadow, until the Jews so

completely violated the whole covenant that no sanctity remained in either

the Temple, the nation, or the land itself."22 As J. Marcellus Kik states, "The

real cause for the desolation was found in the spiritual fornication of the

Jews, especially their rejection of the Messiah."23

While disagreement remains as to what form the abomination took, Scrip-

ture makes it clear that it occurred soon after Jerusalem was surrounded by

armies. As history attests, Jerusalem was surrounded just prior to the temple's

destruction in the fall of A.D. 70. The abomination brought desolation.

Not the Real Thing

Those who look for a rebuilt temple to be destroyed during the "Great

Tribulation" or a millennial temple where Jesus will sit have a problem

with much of the Bible. The Book of Hebrews describes the temple, the

daily sacrificial system, religious feasts, the altar, the holy of holies, and

the priesthood as "a copy and shadow of the heavenly things" (Heb. 8:5).

Copies and shadows are not the real thing. With the death of Jesus, no

barriers separated the people from the holy of holies (Matt. 27:51). There

was no longer a need for an earthly priesthood to offer up animal blood

in atonement for sins. J.C. Ryle understood the meaning of the coming

of Christ when he wrote:

110

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jerusalem and the temple were the heart of the Old Jewish dispensa-

tion. When they were destroyed the Old Testament system came to an

end. The daily sacrifice, the yearly feasts, the altar, the holy of holies,

and the priesthood were all essential parts of revealed religion till Christ

came—but no longer. When He died upon the cross, their work was done:

they were dead, and it only remained that they should be buried. But it

was not fitting that this thing should be done quietly. The ending of a

dispensation given with so much solemnity at Mount Sinai might well be

expected to be marked with particular solemnity; the destruction of the

holy temple, where so many old saints had seen "shadows of good things

to come," might well be expected to form a subject of prophecy: and so it

was. The Lord Jesus specially predicts the desolation of the "holy place"

(verse 15). The Great High Priest describes the end of the dispensation

which had been put in charge to lead people to Himself.24

Jesus had accomplished His mission with His cry of "It is finished" (John

19:30). The people, especially the priesthood, were warned by God when

He tore "the veil of the temple ... in two from top to bottom" (Matt. 27:51)

that atonement would no longer be made in the temple. Jesus had told the

Samaritan woman that "an hour is coming when neither in this mountain, nor

in Jerusalem, shall you worship the Father.... But an hour is coming, and now

is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth; for

such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers" (John 4:21, 23).

"Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; let him who is on the

housetop not go down to get the things out that are in his house; and let him

who is in the field not turn back to get his cloak. But woe to those who are

with child and to those who nurse babes in those days! But pray that your

flight may not be in the winter, or on the Sabbath" (Matt. 24:16-20).

These verses allude to Lot and his family escaping the judgment of

Sodom. The acts of the people of Sodom were a type of abomination that

brought desolation to the city and those who chose to reside there despite

the warning God gave them through His messengers: "Behold, this was the

guilt of your sister Sodom25: she and her daughters had arrogance, abundant

food, and careless ease, but she did not help the poor and needy [see Mark

7:10-13; Matt. 23:23]. Thus they were haughty and committed abomina-

The Abomination of Desolation

111

tions before Me. Therefore I removed them when I saw it" (Ezek. 16:49-50).

When the temple's approaching desolation was evident to the Christians

still living in Jerusalem, it was time to head for the hills. They had been

expecting the temple's destruction. The New Testament is filled with time

texts that make it clear that the "end of all things was at hand" (1 Peter 4:7),

literally, "has come near."

Matthew 24:16-20 clearly presents first-century-Israel living conditions.

Most roofs in Israel were flat with an outside staircase (Mark 2:4; Acts 10:9).

They were commonly occupied (Deut. 22:8) and used for storage 0oshua

2:6) and rest in the evening (2 Sam. 11:2). Once Jerusalem was surrounded

by armies, not much time was left for a getaway. There was not even enough

time to go inside the house to carry away prized possessions.

[I]n the Oriental houses there are stairs on the outside of the house

landing in the court, from which one could escape into the street through

the porch. Occasionally, though not often, we are told of stairs which

come directly from the roof on the street side of the house into the

street below.26

In these verses, Jesus refers to the strict Sabbath laws that were operating in

first-century Israel (Matt. 12:2, 10; Mark 2:24; 16:1; Luke 23:56; John 5:9,

16, 18; 9:16). Acceptable distances for travel on the Sabbath were measured

in terms of a "Sabbath day's journey," approximately three-quarters of a mile

as determined by Pharisaical law (Acts 1:12).27 The Christians would have

been prohibited from traveling on the Sabbath by the religious leaders due

to the distorted travel restrictions imposed upon the populace. During the

Jewish and Idumean revolts against Rome (A.D. 66—70), Pella, a rock fortress

hidden in the hill country approximately sixty miles northeast of Jerusalem,

became a refuge for many fleeing Christians.

Luke tells us that the warning sign of the approaching desolation would

be "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20-21). How could armies surrounding a city give an opportunity for the people of the city to escape?

Escape was made possible because Cestius and his armies suddenly and

without warning withdrew from the temple area. As an eyewitness to the

events, Josephus writes, "Without any just occasion in the world."28 The Jews

saw the withdrawal as a sign of weakness and pursued the retreating army,

which gave the Jewish Christians the opportunity to escape unhindered.

112

LAST DAYS MADNESS

The translator of Josephus' Wars of the Jews supplies the following comment

on this odd series of events. Notice that he identifies this event as the time

of the "Great Tribulation":

There may another very important, and very providential, reason be here

assigned for this strange and foolish retreat of Cestius; which, if Josephus

had been now a Christian, he might probably have taken notice of also;

and that is, the affording the Jewish Christians in the city an opportunity

to calling to mind the prediction and caution given them by Christ about

thirty-three years and half before, that "when they should see the abomi-

nation of desolation" [the idolatrous Roman armies, with the images of

their idols in their ensigns, ready to lay Jerusalem desolate] "stand where

it ought not"; or, "in the holy place"; or, "when they should see Jerusalem encompassed with armies," they should then "flee to the mountains." By

complying with which those Jewish Christians fled to the mountains of

Perea, and escaped this destruction.... Nor was there, perhaps, any one

instance of a more unpolitic, but more providential conduct than this

retreat of Cestius, visible during this whole siege of Jerusalem; which yet

was providentially such a "Great Tribulation, as had not been from the

beginning of the world to that time; no, nor ever should be."29

Christian Jews heeded Jesus' warning long before the armies of Titus had

captured the city. Jews who were expecting messianic deliverance remained

in the city. Titus had been ordered by his father Vespasian to subdue Judea.

"Those within the city were not only prevented from escape by the enemy

but also by the Zealots within the city."30 The Jews who remained were

slaughtered. Estimates put the number killed at over one million! Thousands

more were taken into captivity as slaves (Luke 21:24). Forty years earlier

Jesus had given the warning to flee to the mountains when the holy city

was seen encompassed by armies. Those who believed the prophecy and

acted upon it escaped with their lives. Those who remained suffered untold

misery. Josephus recounts one incident that describes the horrible tribula-

tion of the period:

There was one Mary, the daughter of Eleazar, illustrious for her family

and riches. She having been stripped and plundered of all her substance and

provisions by the soldiers, out of necessity and fury killed her own sucking

The Abomination of Desolation

113

child, and having boiled him, devoured half of him, and covering up the

rest preserved it for another time. The soldiers soon came, allured by the

smell of victuals, and threatened to kill her immediately, if she would not

produce what she had dressed. But she replied that she had reserved a good

part for them, and uncovered the relics of her son. Dread and astonishment

seized them, and they stood stupefied at the sight.31

Centuries before God had warned Israel what would happen if they ever

renounced the covenant: "You shall eat the offspring of your own body,

the flesh of your sons and of your daughters whom the LORD your God

has given you, during the siege and the distress by which your enemy shall

oppress you" (Deut. 28:53; cf. verse 55; Jer. 19:9). This prophecy came to

pass during the Babylonian invasion. The siege from these foreign invad-

ers was so oppressive that "The hands of the compassionate women boiled

their own children; they became food for them... (Lam. 4:10; see 2:20; 2

Kings 6:24-31)."

Many people preferred death to undergoing the hardships brought on

by the Roman siege in A.D. 70. "For the days shall come upon you," Jesus

warned the Jews of His day, "when your enemies will throw up a bank before

you, and surround you, and hem you in on every side, and will level you to the ground and your children within you, and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation" (Luke 19:43-44). These verses and the description in Matthew 24

make it clear that Jesus was describing "a local event, one that was limited

to Palestine, and not descriptive of the second coming when the elect will

be taken up with Christ. At that time there will be no necessity for believers

to flee to the mountains."32

114

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. William L. Lane, Commentary on the Gospel of Mark (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974), 468-69.

2. Hans K. LaRondelle, The Israel of God in Prophecy: Principles of Prophetic Inter-

pretation (Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 1983), 197-98.

3. This is the view of Arno C. Gaebelein: "The record of this prediction of the

fall of Jerusalem under Titus is not at all given in Matthew twenty-four, but

we find that the Spirit of God has put that in the Gospel of Luke" (The Gospel

of Matthew: An Exposition [Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers (1910) 1961],

467).

4. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., "The Abomination of Desolation," Dispensationalism in

Transition, 4:10 (October 1991), 1.

5. D.A. Carson, "Matthew," The Expositor's Bible Commentary, gen. ed. Frank E.

Gaebelein, 12 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1984), 8:239.

6. Edward Hayes Plumptre, "The Gospel According to St. Matthew," A New

Testament Commentary for English Readers, ed. Charles John Ellicott, 3 vols.

(London: Cassell and Company, 1897), 1:147.

7. Flavius Josephus, The Wars of the Jews in The Works of Josephus, trans. William Whiston (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1987), 4:3;6-10 and 4:5:4,

671-672, 680.

8. Lane, Commentary on the Gospel of Mark, 469.

9. Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, 5:1:3, 697.

10. Martin Hengel, The Zealots: Investigations into the Jewish Freedom Movement in the

Period from Herod I until 70 A.D., trans. David Smith (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark,

[1976] 1989), 305.

11. Cleon L. Rogers, Jr., The Topical Josephus: Historical Accounts that Shed Light on

the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992), 160.

12. Rogers, The Topical Josephus, 161.

13. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 4:5:2, 679.

14. Rogers, The Topical Josephus, 162.

15. The Old Testament demanded that "the daughter of the priest" who "pro-

fanes herself by harlotry" shall be "burned with fire" (Lev. 21:9). Jerusalem had committed acts of harlotry with the nations, especially Rome (see John

19:15: "We have no king but Caesar!"). Israel had played the harlot many

times before: "You trusted in your beauty and played the harlot because of

your fame, and you poured out your harlotries on every passerby who might

be willing. And you took some of your clothes, made for yourself high places

The Abomination of Desolation

115

of various colors, and played the harlot on them, which should never come

about nor happen" (Eze. 16:15—16). When God came for Israel's redemption,

He was rejected and crucified. Instead of embracing the God of Israel, Israel

embraced Caesar as god. Israel was a harlot (Rev. 17—18).

16. F.F. Bruce, Israel and the Nations: From the Exodus to the Fall of the Second Temple

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1963), 224. As Bruce comments in a footnote

on the same page, "Josephus evidently recognizes the fulfillment of these

prophecies in the events of A.D. 70 (War, vi. 94, pp. 311, 316)."

17. John Forster, The Gospel-Narrative (London: John W. Parker, 1847), 304, note 12. Josephus writes: "And now the Romans upon the flight of the seditious

into the city, and upon the burning of the holy house itself, and all of the

buildings lying round about it, brought their ensigns to the temple, and set

them over against its eastern gate; and there did they offer sacrifices to them,

and there did they make Titus imperator, with the greatest acclamations of

joy" (Wars of the Jews, 6:6:1, 743).

18. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 1:1:2, 546.

19. R.T. France, The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985), 340.

20. J. Marcellus Kik, "Abomination of Desolation," The Encyclopedia of Christianity,

ed. Edwin H. Palmer, 4 vols. (Wilmington, DE: The National Association for

Christian Education, 1964), 1:19.

21. James B. Jordan, "The Abomination of Desolation: An Alternative Hypoth-

esis," in Gary DeMar, The Debate over Christian Reconstruction (Ft. Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1988), 240.

22. John Calvin, Commentaries on the Book of the Prophet Daniel, trans. Thomas My-ers, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1948), 2:390.

23. Kik, "Abomination of Desolation," 19.

24. J.C. Ryle, Matthew (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books [1856], 1993), 228-29.

25. Jerusalem is called "Sodom" in the Book of Revelation: "And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which mystically is called Sodom and

Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified" (Rev. 11:8).

26. James M. Freeman, Manners and Customs of the Bible (Plainfield, NJ: Logos International, 1972), 375.

27. A Sabbath day's journey "was a distance of 2,000 cubits or around one kilo-

meter, ingeniously reckoned by interpreting Ex. 16:29 ('let no one go out of

his place on the seventh day') in the light of Num. 35:5 (where the Levites'

pasturelands are defined by a radius of 2,000 cubits from any one of the six

116

LAST DAYS MADNESS

'cities of refuge')" (F.F. Bruce, The Book of the Acts, rev. ed. [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1988], 39).

28. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 2:19:1-9, 630-33. Others understand the "army"

to be that of the Zealots and Idumeans.

29. William Whiston, note b in Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 2: 19:6, 631-32.

30. J. Marcellus Kik, An Eschatology of Victory (Nutley, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1971), 113.

31. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at this Time are Fulfilling in the World (London: J.F. Dove, 17 54), 345-46.

32. Kik, An Eschatology of Victory, 115.

Chapter Nine

THE PAST GREAT

TRIBULATION

a A K essiah 1975? The Tribulation 1976?" This was the title of an ar-

IVJLticle that appeared in TheJack Van Impe Crusade Newsletter in April

of 1975. While Van Impe stated, "We do not believe in setting dates

concerning the return of Christ," he does believe that we can ascertain

the nearness of Jesus' return based on certain "signs." All we can know is

that He "is near."1

Van Impe and many like him base their assumptions on a misreading and

misdating of Jesus' Olivet Discourse. He wrote: "Jesus did say, 'When you

shall see all these things, know that it [or He] is near, even at the doors.' His

reference in that twenty-fourth chapter of Matthew is to false Christs, wars,

famines, pestilences, earthquakes and numerous other happenings."2

Salem Kirban has struck a similar prophetic chord. When he wrote Count-

down to Rapture in 1977, he was sure that the rapture was near. For Kirban,

the stage was "being set for this final world catastrophe which will culminate

in the Battle of Armageddon ... a battle where 200 million will die!"3 In

1977, when the Shah of Iran was still in power, this Islamic nation was the

prophetic bogeyman. Supposedly, with the infusion of aid from the United

States and the former Soviet Union, Iran was "to be a principal force in the

117

118

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Middle East."4 The increased militancy of mid-eastern dictatorships and seem-

ingly overnight revival of Islamic fundamentalism would "launch the Battle

of Armageddon. And the stage is being set... right now!"5 After listing how

the world has changed morally in past decades, Kirban concludes: "Those

of us familiar with Scripture can easily see the handwriting on the wall as

the way is prepared for the coming Antichrist.... Evidences that surround us

show us that this old world is on the verge of a nervous breakdown ... and

no amount of Valium can resolve the problem. Based on these observations,

it is my considered opinion, that the time clock is now at 11:59."6

As has been shown in previous chapters, the "signs" that contemporary date-setters use to justify their belief that the rapture is the next prophetic

event, followed by a great tribulation, the rise of antichrist, and Armaged-

don, are found in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. John F. Walvoord,

a leading spokesman for the theory that the events described in Matthew

24 are yet to be fulfilled, believes that the time is near for the rapture. In

an interview with USA Today, when asked if the prophetic clock is ticking,

Walvoord answered "Yes."7 Walvoord wrote in another context:

In the predictions that Christ made almost 2,000 years ago, He ac-

curately portrayed the progress in the present age. In [Matt. 24:]4-14 He

predicted at least nine distinctive features of the period: (1) false christs

(vv. 4—5); (2) wars and rumors of wars (vv. 6-7); (3) famines (v. 7); (4)

pestilence (v. 7, KJV); (5) earthquakes (v. 7); (6) many martyrs (vv. 8-10);

(7) false prophets (v. 11); (8) increase in wickedness with love growing

cold (v. 12); (9) worldwide preaching of the Gospel of the kingdom (vv.

13-14). Luke 21:8-24 records similar prophecies.8

Of course, these predictions describe conditions prior to the destruction

of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. That generation would not pass away until all these

things took place (Matthew 24:34). It is inappropriate therefore to interpret

them so that they are removed from their first-century context and their ob-

vious application to the then-existing temple and Jewish nation and project

them into the distant future.

In 1980 Hal Lindsey told his readers that "The decade of the 1980s could

very well be the last decade of history as we know it"9 Lindsey has been so sure that the end is near that in 1970 he wrote in The Late Great Planet Earth

that he believes the Antichrist "is alive today—alive and waiting to come

Madness The Past Great Tribulation

119

forth."10 The Middle East war against Iraq in early 1991, Lindsey told us,

was "'setting the stage' for that last, climactic war."11

Charles Ryrie, best known for the Ryrie Study Bible, expresses similar sentiments based on his understanding of Matthew 24. He writes that "Jesus said

that these coming days will be uniquely terrible. Nothing in all the previous

history of the world can compare with what lies in store for mankind. 'For

then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world

... and never to be equaled again'" (Matt. 24:21, NIV).12

Tim LaHaye believes in a future great tribulation based on passages of

Scripture that found their fulfillment in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D.

70. Because of his pre-tribulational rapture doctrine, he also believes that

"the church will be raptured before the Tribulation begins.. .."13 The deter-

mination on how near the rapture might be is based upon a faulty reading

of the signs outlined by Jesus in Matthew 24. While LaHaye does not set

a date for the rapture or for the great tribulation, he does tell us that "Jesus

is coming. Soon! Maybe today. Maybe tonight. Maybe before I draw my

next breath."14 Jack Van Impe is equally emphatic when he writes, based

on world conditions, "The Rapture is near, my friend . . . the signs are all

around us."15

Billy Graham writes that "the words of Christ in Matthew 24, in which

He spoke of the signs of the end of the age," along with other prophetic pas-

sages, "remain powerful and evocative images of what may lie just ahead."16

It is in this chapter of Matthew's gospel that Graham believes "Christ tells

precisely how the last days of planet Earth will unfold."17 It is Graham's

misinterpretation and misplacement of the time when the "signs" in Matthew

24 appear that leads him to this erroneous conclusion. Jesus was describing

events that would come upon that first-century generation.

A Past Great Tribulation

Can any of these modern-day predictions be justified by an appeal to

Matthew 24, especially verse 21? I do not believe they can. Authors who

promote such a scenario as being based on "Bible prophecy" ought to be

held accountable for their repeatedly mistaken predictions: "Anyone who

buys a prediction of a scriptural end-of-the-show schedule ought to ask for

a double-your-money-back guarantee if the interpretation turns out to be

a lot of hooey. Lindsey, John Walvoord and a whole string of evangelists

120

LAST DAYS MADNESS

would need a federal bailout."18

Is the great tribulation of Matthew 24 a description of a future seven-year

period where the Antichrist makes a covenant with Israel and then turns on

the jews, bringing about worldwide destruction?

"There will be a great tribulation, such as has not occurred since the begin-

ning of the world until now, nor ever shall" (Matt. 24:21).

One reason offered for the belief that the great tribulation is still a future

event is the seemingly unqualified statement in Matthew 24:21 concern-

ing a "great tribulation, such as has not occurred since the beginning of the world

until now, nor ever shall." This language is nearly identical to Ezekiel 5:9:

"And because of all your abominations, I will do among you what I have

not done, and the like of which I will never do again." Ezekiel 5:9 refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in the sixth century B.C. by the Babylonians, and

yet Bible commentators who hold out for a yet future great tribulation state

that "never again would God execute a judgment like this."19 But God did

execute a greater judgment in the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, and

dispensationalists claim that there will be yet an even greater tribulation

sometime in the near future. The language of Ezekiel 5:9 and Matthew

24:21 is obviously proverbial and hyberbolic.20

While the fall of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 was certainly a calamity for the

Jews, futurists argue, it was not the great tribulation that will take place on

a worldwide scale. The tribulation described by Jesus in Matthew 24 was lo-

cal, confined to Judea. Jesus condemns the scribes and Pharisees (chapter

23) and tells them that these judgments will come upon "this," that is, their

generation (23:36). He mourns over the city of "Jerusalem" (23:37), not the

world, and pronounces judgment upon the temple, leaving it, not a future

temple, "desolate" (23:38; 24:2).

The people live in houses with flat roofs (24:17). The Sabbath is still in

force with its rigid travel restrictions (24:20). In Mark's account of the Olivet

Discourse we learn that the disciples will be delivered "up to the courts,"

"flogged in the synagogues," and made to "stand before governors and kings"

(13:9). Jesus uses similar words in Matthew 10:17-18 when He sends the

twelve out as witnesses to Israel: "But beware of men, for they will deliver

you up to the courts, and scourge you in their synagogues; and you shall even be brought before kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to

Madness The Past Great Tribulation

121

the Gentiles." The Book of Acts records the fulfillment of Jesus' prediction

of religious and political tribulation (4:1-22; 5:17-40; 8:1-3; 12:1-9;

14:19-20; 16:22-23; 22:30-23:11) in the period before the destruction

of Jerusalem.21 The existence of these religious and political tribunals is

indicative of what life was like in first-century Judea. The tribulation had

reference to the Jews, the people of Judea (Matt. 24:16; Luke 21:20-24); it

was not a worldwide tribulation.22

Those who remained in Jerusalem up until the time of the temple's destruc-

tion had to be able to "see the abomination of desolation" (24:15). People

around the globe will have no such advantage if what Jesus is describing

here refers to a worldwide tribulation period. The only ones who can benefit

are those who can see the temple. The tribulation period cannot be global

because all one has to do to escape is flee to the mountains. Notice that Jesus

says "let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains" (24:16). Judea is not the world; it's not even the nation of Israel!

'And unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but

for the sake of the elect those days shall be cut short" (Matt. 24:22).

"Those days" refers to the tribulation period leading up to Jerusalem's

destruction. The sign of "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20) was

a warning to "the elect"—the Jewish Christians living in Jerusalem and its

environs—to leave the city so they would not be caught in the impending

conflagration. "No life would have been saved" refers to no life in Judea since

Judea is the geographical context. James Stuart Russell comments:

During the three years and a half which represent with sufficient accuracy

the duration of the Jewish war, Jerusalem was actually in the hands and

under the feet of a horde of ruffians, whom their own countryman [Josephus]

describes as 'slaves, and the very dregs of society, the spurious and polluted

spawn of the nation.' The last fatal struggle may be said to have begun

when Vespasian was sent by Nero, at the head of sixty thousand men, to

put down the rebellion. This was early in the year A.D. 70, and in August

A.D. 70 the city and the temple were a heap of smoking ashes.23

One of the first things we should recognize about Jesus' words is an

implied shortening of the tribulation that was coming. If God had allowed

122

LAST DAYS MADNESS

these "very dregs of society" to continue in their rebellion, not a single

soul would have been left alive in Jerusalem. But for the sake of the elect

the tribulation period was cut short. God also restrained the Romans from

venting their anger completely.

Luke identifies the tribulation period as being confined to the land of

Israel and the people living there in the first century: "Woe to those who

are with child and to those who nurse babes in those days; for there will

be great distress upon the land, and wrath to this people" (Luke 21:23). The land of Israel is in view, and "this people" refers to the Jews living in Israel

at the time when Jerusalem is "surrounded by armies" (21:20), an event that

occurred just prior to Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70. "The land should be taken in the restricted sense which we give the word, the country. —St Paul seems to allude to the expression, wrath upon this people, in Rom. ii.5-8 and 1 Thess. ii.16."24 This means that the intention of "no life would have been

saved" (24:22) refers to those living in Judea (24:16) at that time. If Jesus

is referring to the entire world, then how would fleeing to the mountains

help? Since Jesus offers a simple way to escape the coming judgment, the

judgment must be local.

"Then if any one says to you, 'Behold, here is the Christ,' or 'There He is,'

do not believe him. For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will

show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect.

Behold, I have told you in advance. If therefore they say to you, 'Behold, He

is in the wilderness,' do not go forth, or, 'Behold, he is in the inner rooms,'

do not believe them"(Matt. 24:23-26).

It's possible that the description of events in Matthew 24:23 is different

from the signs described by Jesus earlier when He said that many would come

in His name saying "I am the Christ" (24:5) and that "false prophets" would arise to "mislead many" (24:11). In all likelihood, Jesus is describing events

separated by an interval of time. Jesus gives the impression that His coming in

judgment would be near the end of that present generation. False Christs and

false prophets would appear soon after His ascension, "but that is not yet the

end" (24:6). As Roman oppression increased, the unbelieving Jews embraced

an increasing number of messianic figures hoping to be delivered. One of the

earliest was Simon, a man who "astonished them with his magic arts." He was

thought to be "what is called the Great Power of God" (Acts 8:10).

Madness The Past Great Tribulation 117

123

The Apostle Paul describes those in his day who acted like "Jannes and

Jambres," the two sorcerer high priests who "opposed Moses" (2 Tim. 3:8).

They were said to "oppose the truth, men of depraved mind, rejected as

regards the faith" (3:8). Jannes and Jambres used "great signs" in an attempt to mislead the people in Moses' day by using deception to duplicate the true

miracle of Aaron's rod turning into a serpent (Ex. 7:10-12).

The men Paul had in mind in his day were the same people Jesus warned

about in His Olivet Discourse. In fact, Paul himself was thought to be "the

Egyptian who some time ago stirred up a revolt and led four thousand

men of the Assassins out into the wilderness" (Acts 21:38). This incident is reminiscent of Jesus' words about those who will give support for a false

prophet claiming that "He is in the wilderness" (Matt. 24:26). Those who had rejected their Messiah at the "time of [their] visitation" (Luke 19:44),

the same people who wanted "to make Jesus king" to overthrow the tyrants

of Rome 0ohn 6:15), were still looking for a political savior right up until

the time of Jerusalem's destruction. Josephus writes:

A false prophet was the occasion of these people's destruction, who

had made a public proclamation in the city that very day, that God

commanded them to get upon the temple, and that there they should

receive miraculous signs of their deliverance. Now, there was then a

great number of false prophets suborned by the tyrants to impose upon

the people, who denounced this to them, that they should wait for

deliverance from God....25

Josephus describes how a star resembling a sword stood over the city.

He also chronicles the sighting of a comet showing its brightness for a full

year. Other inexplicable events are recounted, most of which were prob-

ably false but had the effect of persuading the people that their deliverance

was at hand: "A heifer, as she was led by the high priest to be sacrificed,

brought forth a lamb in the midst of the temple."26 No doubt false prophets

and false messiahs fabricated these stories to bolster their credibility with

the terrorized population.

"For just as the lightning comes from the east, and flashes even to the west,

so shall the coming of the Son of Man be" (Matt. 24:27).

124

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jesus would come "just as the lightning comes from the east," that is,

quickly and without warning. In the Bible, lightning often signifies the

presence of the Lord and His coming in judgment (Ex. 19:16; 20:18;

Job 36:30; Ezek. 21:15, 28; Zech. 9:14). God was not physically pres-

ent during any of these Old Testament comings, but His presence was

obvious, as the reaction of the people will testify: "And when the people

saw it, they trembled and stood at a distance" (Ex. 20:18). The lightning

and thunder did not terrify the people. They had seen such things before.

What frightened them was the reality that the Lord had come. What the

people saw was the manifestation of the Lord's coming even though

they did not actually see Him. In a similar way, lightning is associated

with the coming of the Lord in Deuteronomy 33:2: "The LORD came

from Sinai, and dawned on them from Seir; He shone forth from Mount

Paran, and He came from the midst of ten thousand holy ones; at His

right hand there was flashing lightning for them." Was God physically

present? He was not. Did He come? Most certainly! Jesus warned the

churches of Ephesus (Rev. 2:5), Pergamum (2:16), and Sardis (3:3) that

He would come in judgment if they did not repent. Were any of these

comings the second coming?

All of the signs listed in Matthew 24 have reference to the destruction

of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. While there is no doubt that many today look at

current world conditions and surmise that the rapture must be near, this

view is impossible based on what we've learned thus far. Jesus established

the time frame for Jerusalem's destruction—it would occur within a genera-

tion. Before forty years passed, Jerusalem would be "trampled underfoot

by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled" (Luke 21:24).

The "times of the Gentiles" refers to the four kingdom nations depicted

in Daniel 2. Rome is obviously the fourth and final kingdom to oppress

the Jews. With the destruction of the temple and the city of Jerusalem, the

"time of the Gentiles" is completed (see Rev. 11:2).

Claiming that the great tribulation is a past event is not meant to mini-

mize the realities of persecution that take place around the world in our

day. We will always have tribulation, tribulation that is overcome in Jesus

(John 16:33). Entry into the kingdom comes through "much tribulation"

(Acts 14:22). What we will not have is a rapture that will remove us where

tribulation is a reality.

Madness The Past Great Tribulation

125

The Wrath of the Lamb

Matthew 24:27 reveals that Jesus is somehow participating in Jerusalem's

destruction. This is exactly the point. When the temple was ransacked by

Nebuchadnezzar, we read that "the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his

hand, along with some of the vessels of the house of God" (Dan. 1:2). Nebuchadnezzar "besieged" Jerusalem, but God orchestrated the entire affair.

Who gave Jacob up for spoil, and Israel to plunderers?

Was it not the LORD, against whom we have sinned,

And in whose ways they were not willing to walk,

And whose law they did not obey?

So He poured out on him the heat of His anger

And the fierceness of battle;

And it set him aflame all around,

Yet he did not recognize it;

And it burned him, but he paid no attention. (Isa. 42:24-25)

Jesus came "like lightning" to set Jerusalem "aflame all around." If you recall, it was Titus, as God's representative agent, who set the temple on

fire and leveled the edifice. God calls Assyria the "rod of My anger, and the

staff in whose hands is My indignation" (Isa. 10:5). Assyria was sent by God

"against a godless nation ... to capture booty and to seize plunder, And to

trample them down like mud in the streets" (10:6).

In A.D. 70 Rome was sent by God to fulfill a similar task. "Our Lord

forewarns His disciples that His coming to that judgment-scene would be

conspicuous and sudden as the lightning-flash which reveals itself and seems

to be everywhere at the same moment."27

On His way to the cross, Jesus had prophesied what would happen to the

generation of Jews who rejected Him: "Daughters of Jerusalem, stop weeping for

Me, but weep for yourselves and f o r your children. For behold, the days are coming when they will say, 'Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bore, and

the breasts that never nursed.' Then they will begin TO SAY TO THE MOUNTAINS,

'FALL ON US, ' AND TO THE HILLS 'COVER US'" (Luke 23:28-30). Who brought

this judgment? As Jerusalem's destruction drew near for that generation, "they

said to the mountains and to the rocks, 'Fall on us and hide us from the pres-

ence of Him who sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb; for the great day 126

LAST DAYS MADNESS

of their wrath has come; and who is able to stand?" (Rev. 6:16-17). It was the

"wrath of the Lamb [Jesus]" that brought judgment to Israel. Luke 23:28-30

was fulfilled before that generation passed into oblivion. Remember, Jesus told

the "Daughters of Jerusalem" to "weep for yourselves and your children." No future generation was in view here. This is more evidence that the Book of Revelation

was written before Jerusalem was destroyed.28

"Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather" (Matt. 24:28).

The Greek word translated "eagle" in many Bible versions is best translated

"vulture" in this context. Did Jesus' disciples understand what He had in

mind when He uttered this seemingly cryptic saying? Being familiar with

the Hebrew Scriptures, they would have immediately recognized the words

of Jeremiah judging those who pervert God's covenant (Jer. 7:33).

Jesus was acting out in word and deed the prophecies given to Jer-

emiah centuries before. Notice the similarities between what Jeremiah

and Jesus did. Jeremiah was to "stand in the gate of the LORD'S house"

and proclaim God's Word to the people (Jer. 7:2; compare with Matt.

23:36; 24:1). The people were not to "trust in deceptive words, saying,

'This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of

the LORD'" (Jer. 7:4; compare with Matt. 24:2). The temple was meaning-

less without obedience: "Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel,

'Amend your ways and your deeds, and I will let you dwell in this place'"

(Jer. 7:3; compare with Matt. 24:5-11). The temple, the house "which is

called by My name," God says, has "become a den of robbers" (Jer. 7:11;

compare with Matt. 21:13; 24:15).

These deeds had led God to reject and forsake "the generation of His

wrath" (Jer. 7:29b; compare with Matt. 23:36; 24:34). How would this

rejection take place? Days would come when "the dead bodies of this people

will be food for the birds of the sly, and for the beasts of the earth; and no one will frighten them away. Then I will make to cease from the cities of Judah

and from the streets of Jerusalem the voice of joy and the voice of gladness,

the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride; for the land will

become a ruin" (Jer. 7:33-34). Later in Jeremiah, God revives His complaint

against His disobedient covenant people: "And I shall make void the counsel

of Judah and Jerusalem in this place, and I shall cause them to fall by the

sword before their enemies and by the hand of those who seek their life;

The Past Great Tribulation

127

and I shall give over their carcasses as food for the birds of the s k y and the beasts of

the earth" (Jer. 19:7; compare with Matt. 24:28).

The Jerusalem of Jesus' day, because of its dead rituals, was a carcass,

food for the scavenging birds, the Roman armies. This is an appropriate

description of Jerusalem's acts of abomination. In addition, we know that

tens of thousands 0osephus says over a million) were killed during the Ro-

man siege. Even the temple area was not spared. The Idumean and Zealot

revolt left thousands slaughtered in and around the temple. A single carcass

would render the city and temple area "unclean." According to Numbers

19:11-22, anyone touching the corpse of a human being is unclean: "Anyone

who touches a corpse, the body of a man who has died, and does not purify

himself, defiles the tabernacle of the LORD; and that person shall be cut off from Israel" (19:13). There was no life in Jerusalem since the Lord had departed.

As our High Priest, Jesus could no longer remain in the city because of its

defilement. It had to be burned with fire for purification.

Just as there is little life left once the vultures have gathered, so with

the destruction of the temple and the desolation of the city, the shadow of

heavenly things is no more. While the disciples pointed out the then-stand-

ing temple, it is up to Jesus' present disciples to point out the "temple of His

body" (John 2:21; cf. 1 Cor. 6:19) to those who would seek salvation, not

by the blood of bulls and goats, but by the lamb of God who takes away

the sins of the world.

128

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Jack Van Impe, "Messiah 1975? The Tribulation 1976?" The Jack Van Impe

Crusade Newsletter (April 1975), 1.

2. Van Impe, "Messiah 1975?," 1.

3. Salem Kirban, Countdown to Rapture (Irvine, CA: Harvest House, 1977), 12.

4. Kirban, Countdown to Rapture, 176.

5. Kirban, Countdown to Rapture, 177.

6. Kirban, Countdown to Rapture, 181, 188.

7. Barbara Reynolds interviews John Walvoord, "Prophecy Clock is Ticking in

Mideast," USA Today (19 January 1991), 13 A. According to dispensationalism, the prophecy clock does not start ticking again until after the rapture.

8. John F. Walvoord, The Prophecy Knowledge Handbook (Wheaton, IL: Victor

Books, 1990), 383.

9. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: Westgate Press, 1980), 8. Emphasis in original.

10. The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan [1970] 1973),

15.

11. "Artswatch," World(2 March 1991), 15.

12. Charles Caldwell Ryrie, The Living End: Enlightening and Astonishing Disclosures

about the Coming Last Days of Earth (Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell, 1976), 21.

13. Tim LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm: Why Christians Will Escape All the Tribula-

tion (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 1992), 60. This book has been republished as

Rapture Under Attack: Will Christians Escape the Tribulation? ( 1988).

14. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 14.

15. Jack Van Impe, The Great Escape: Preparing for the Rapture, the Next Event on

God's Prophetic Clock ( Nashville, TN: Word, 1998), 146.

16. Billy Graham, Storm Warning (Dallas, TX: Word, 1992), 25.

17. Graham, Storm Warning 25.

18. Hap Cawood, "If Buying Armageddon Theories, Insist on Money-back

Guarantee," Atlanta Constitution (9 February 1991), A19.

19. Ralph A. Alexander, "Ezekiel," The Expositor's Bible Commentary, Frank E.

Gaebelein, gen. ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1986), 6:773.

20. Also see William Greenhill, An Exposition of Ezekiel (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust, [1647-1667], 1994), 145^16.

21. David J. Palm, "The Signs of His Coming: An Examination of the Olivet

The Past Great Tribulation

129

Discourse from a Preterist Perspective" (Deerfield, IL: Trinity Evangelical

Divinity School, 1993), 12-13.

22. Any tribulation the Jews experience in other countries is not in view here. The

death of six million Jews at the hands of the Nazis did not take place in the

land of Israel. The great tribulation is a description of what happened to Jews

living in Israel in the first century. Over one million Jews died at the hands

of the Romans. Nothing will ever compare to it because of Israel's special

covenantal status. Here sin was great, therefore her judgment was great: "For

the iniquity of the daughter of my people is greater than the sin of Sodom,

which was overthrown as in a moment, and no hands were turned toward

her" (Lam. 4:2).

23. James Stuart Russell, The Parousia: A Study of the New Testament Doctrine of Our

Lord's Second Coming (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1887] 1999),

429. For a helpful discussion of the meaning of "no life," literally, "all flesh"

(Matt. 24:22), see Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., "The Great Tribulation is Future:

Rebuttal," in Thomas Ice and Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., The Great Tribulation: Past

or Future?—Two Evangelicals Debate the Question (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel,

1999), 190-91.

24. Frederick Louis Godet, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan [1887] n.d.), 2:267.

25. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6.5.2, 742-43.

26. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6.5.3, 742.

27. Russell, The Parousia, 76.

28. For the most comprehensive defense of a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation, see

Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation, 2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999).

Chapter Ten

SIGNS IN THE

HEAVENS

an you imagine 50-pound chunks of ice falling out of the sky? The

hailstones would rip through the roof of your house as though it were

paper. They would flatten your automobile. Where would you hide? How

could you be safe?"1 From 50-pound chunks of ice to piercing lead projectiles,

today's prophetic speculators continue to stretch the imagination and the

texts of Scripture to fit their contrived end-time scenarios. "The children of

David Koresh's doomsday cult were so prepared for the final battle between

good and evil that when bullets rained down on their commune seven weeks

ago [February 28, 1993], they believed it was a prophecy fulfilled."2

Pat Robertson saw prophetic significance in the Hale-Bopp comet that

could be seen with the naked eye in 1997, "one of the few times in recorded

history that a comet's appearance coincided with a lunar eclipse." He also

claims there might be something to the fact that "three recent eclipses of

the moon have coincided with Jewish feasts." Following research done by

Greg Killian, Robertson reports that "a Bible passage from Revelation may

be playing out in the heavens." Killian maintains "that in Jewish tradition,

the new moon represents the Messiah. Since last fall, the moon's path has

intersected the constellation Virgo (which depicts a woman) in a way similar

131

132

LAST DAYS MADNESS

to what is described in Revelation 12:1—2." Following Killian, Robertson

conjectures that "this scenario will culminate in 1999, when the moon moves

across Virgo in a position that depicts a baby moving through the birth

canal. Could this convergence be a prophetic fulfillment of that passage,

pointing to the Messiah's soon return." After speculating about what the

heavens reveal, Robertson closes with the obligatory "We must remember

that no man knows the day or the hour...." Still peering over the prophetic

edge, he then reminds us that Jesus instructed "us to look to the skies for

'signs' (Luke 21:25)."3

Because of heightened interest in things prophetic, the eyes of many

biblical soothsayers are looking to the heavens for signs that the end is

near. Today's talk about a stray planet or a wayward asteroid hitting Earth

brings to mind the sci-fi classic When Worlds Collide and the more current

Sudden Impact and Armageddon,4 Just as a spaceship was built to rescue a few dozen earthlings in a high-tech version of Noah's ark in When Worlds Collide,

prophecy teachers tell us that the church will escape the devastation of these

projectiles by means of the rapture. Hal Lindsey writes: "Without benefit of

science, space suits, or interplanetary rockets, there will be those who will

be transported into a glorious place more beautiful, more awesome, than we

can possibly comprehend.... It will be the living end. The ultimate trip."5

During World War II biblical references to falling heavenly bodies were

thought to be bombs dropping on the cities of Europe. Supposedly there

was even a Russian postage stamp to support the interpretation. The stamp

showed apocalyptic symbols—lightning and a hail of bombs falling on the

cities of Europe: "It is clear that this last judgment [Rev. 16:17-21] would

be manifested through aerial warfare, the hailstones weighing about a talent

(or 125 pounds, according to Thompson's Chain-Reference Bible), and the

cities falling in heaps, being an exact picture of what the nations are to-day

experiencing as a result of air raids."6

Here we have prophecy pundits, separated by a half century, who look at the

same Scripture text and make a contemporary application. We know that the

reference to World War II was misapplied and wrong But how do we know

that contemporary interpreters are any more correct? Why should we believe

that "50-pound chunks of ice falling out of the sky" are in our future?

For centuries theologians have tried to attach prophetic significance to

the appearance of comets and other happenings in the heavens. Increase

Mather managed "to find records showing that some 415 comets had ap-

Signs in the Heavens 126

133

peared 'since the world began.'"7 In addition to the inventory of comets, he

catalogued "the dates on which each comet had appeared, the intervals being

filled in with lists of wars, deaths of leaders, famines, floods and plagues."8

For example, he records that in A.D. 984 "A Blazing Star was seen. An

Earth-Quake, Wars, Plague, Famine followed. The Emperor and the Pope

died."9 In retrospect, these heavenly signs were no evidence that the return

of Christ was near. Like Mather, his correspondent John Richards saw their

importance as God's warning to a sinful world: "God is again threatening a

sinful world by tokens of His displeasure, a blazing star appearing again in

the heavens.... Great is the patience and long-suffering of God, that is so

often warning before He brings desolating judgments."10

The Jupiter Non-Effect

In 1982 there was to be an unusual alignment of the planets called the

Jupiter Effect. The planets would be in a straight line formation perpendicular

to the sun. This alignment—an event that occurs every 179 years accord-

ing to Gribbin and Plagemann in their book The Jupiter Effect—supposedly

exerts an uncommon gravitational pull on the planets. Hal Lindsey saw

eschatological significance in the Jupiter Effect. He wrote in 1980, "This

alignment causes great storms on the sun's surface, which in turn affect each

of the planets. The sun storms will not only affect our atmosphere, as was

previously mentioned, but they will slow down the Earth's axis slightly."11

This slowdown, according to Lindsey and his "author-experts," would mean

putting "a tremendous strain on the Earth's faults, touching off earthquakes."12

This new wave of earthquakes was to bring about great floods because dams

have been built over fault lines. In addition, we were to see "nuclear power

plant meltdowns at facilities built on or near the Earth's faults."13 What

happened? Nothing.

UFO Nonsense

Lindsey included a section on UFOs in his The 1980s: Countdown to

Armageddon and speculated that increased interest in UFOs fulfilled Jesus'

prediction that there will be "terrors and great signs from heaven" just before

His return (Luke 21:11).14 Such terrors and great signs from heaven, Lindsey

believes, are unidentified flying objects of the alien variety!

134

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Authorities now admit that there have been confirmed sightings of

unidentified flying objects. There are even some baffling cases where people

under hypnosis say they were taken aboard UFOs by beings from space.

Reports held in U.S. Air Force files reveal that whatever these flying ob-

jects are, they move and turn at speeds unmatched by human technology.

It's my opinion that UFOs are real and that there will be a proven "close

encounter of the third kind" soon. And I believe that the source of this

phenomenon is some type of alien being of great intelligence and power.

According to the Bible, a demon is a spiritual personality in a state

of war with God. Prophecy tells us that demons will be allowed to use

their powers of deception in a grand way during the last days of history

(2 Thessalonians 2:8-12). I believe these demons will stage a spacecraft

landing on Earth. They will claim to be from an advanced culture in

another galaxy.

They may even claim to have "planted" human life on this planet and

tell us they have returned to check on our progress.15

Did you notice Lindsey's progression of thought? First, he quotes a passage

from the Bible concerning sun, moon, and stars and how "the powers of the

heavens will be shaken." Nowhere does he try to learn how this language is

used elsewhere in Scripture. Second, he moves to an unsubstantiated belief

in UFOs. Third, without ever proving his case, he assumes that the Bible is

actually describing spacecrafts occupied by demons passing themselves off

as aliens from other planets. Fourth, he easily moves to a prediction that

"demons will stage a spacecraft landing on Earth." Fifth, we are supposed

to believe this scenario and the claims of geophysical disruptions based on

the "Jupiter Effect" because it's "all in the Bible."

Is it any wonder that Christians are confused over prophecy? How can the

average Christian pick up a Bible and come to these fantastic conclusions?

Does the Bible have UFOs and alien spaceships in mind when it describes

signs in the heavens? For example, Charles Ryrie, a noted dispensational

writer and author of the notes in the best selling Ryrie Study Bible, asks this question of the imagery in the Book of Revelation: "How do we make

sense out of all those beasts and thrones and horsemen and huge numbers

like 200 million? Answer: Take it at face value. If God intended to disclose

something to us in a book, then we can be confident He wrote it in such a

way as to communicate to us, rather than confuse us."16

Signs in the Heavens

135

But later Ryrie gives an example of the usefulness of his "face value"

hermeneutic in seeking the correct interpretation of Revelation 9:1—12 (the

locusts from the abyss): "John's description sounds very much like some

kind of war machine or UFO. Demons have the ability to take different

shapes, so it is quite possible that John is picturing a coming invasion of

warlike UFOs. Until someone comes up with a satisfactory answer to the

UFO question, this possibility should not be ruled out."17 The first readers

of this prophecy would have been utterly confused if this is what God was

communicating. In fact, nearly two-thousand years of Christendom would

have been confused.

Is this how we are to read the Book of Revelation? Is this interpreting

Scripture at "face value"? Belief in UFOs is a rather recent curiosity based

on evolutionary "science." Christians from time immemorial knew nothing

of such happenings. (Of course, if Erich Von Daniken is to be believed,

the Earth was visited by extraterrestrials centuries ago.)18 If UFOs are the

interpretative key to this section of Scripture, then God's Word would have

remained a mystery for millions of Christians for centuries.

Cobra Helicopters?

Not to be outdone, Hal Lindsey makes the locusts in Revelation 9 "Cobra

helicopters" in the following line of Vietnam-era logic:

I have a Christian friend who was a Green Beret in Viet Nam. When he

first read this chapter he said, "I know what those are. I've seen hundreds

of them in Viet Nam. They're Cobra helicopters!"

That may just be conjecture, but it does give you something to think

about! A Cobra helicopter does fit the composite description very well.

They also make the sound of "many chariots." My friend believes that the

means of torment will be a kind of nerve gas sprayed from its tail.19

In his more recent works, Lindsey contends that he has been able to

decipher the Apocalypse in a way that "many scholars of all Christian de-

nominations have either marveled over ... scoffed at ... or allegorized its

prophetic content into absurd historical allegories about the early Christian

era."20 Lindsey attempts to interpret the Book of Revelation as if its message

was hidden from those who first read the detailed prophecy. When Lindsey

136

LAST DAYS MADNESS

interprets the first three verses of the first chapter, he conveniently passes

over two key phrases: the events must "soon take place" (1:1) and the "time

is near" (1:3). He concentrates on the "hidden things"—the apocalyptic

elements—while dismissing what is explicit—the timing of the events.21

Has he really cleared things up for us? Has he been able to decipher the

"encrypted Biblical symbols"? You be the judge. After quoting Revelation

9:1-10 about "locusts that looked like horses prepared for battle," Lindsey

offers the following commentary:

Note that John keeps saying, "looked like, something like, re-

sembled, was like, etc." By these qualifying terms, John sought to

emphasize that he was aware of describing vehicles and phenomena far

beyond his first century comprehension. So he used symbols drawn from

1st century phenomena that "looked like" these marvels of science. Using

a mixed composite of things from the 1st century, he strove to represent

what he saw.

With that in mind, let's see if we can find the passage's meaning. The

vehicle's overall shape looked to John like a "locust." The general outer

shape of a helicopter is similar to that of a locust.

The phrase "horses prepared for battle" probably means "the attack

helicopters" were heavily armored. John had seen Romans drape armor

over their horses to protect them from arrows, lances and swords.

At this point John seems to switch to what he saw inside the machine.

The phrase "something like crowns of gold" most likely describes the

elaborate helmets worn by helicopter pilots. And "their faces resembled

human faces. .."—as John looked at the front of the helicopter, the face

of the pilot appeared through the front windscreen.22 The appearance of

something that looked like woman's hair could describe the whirling

propeller that looked like filmy hair. Remember, John had never seen

a large instrument spinning so fast that it couldn't be seen clearly. The

term teeth probably describes the weaponry projecting from the "chop-

per"—there is a monster six-barrel cannon suspended from the nose of

most attack helicopters today.23

And he accuses preterists of allegorizing Revelation's "prophetic content

into absurd historical allegories about the early Christian era." Many Christians

will be taken in by this so-called literal interpretation of the Bible. The same

Signs in the Heavens

137

passage, following Lindsey's methodology, could apply to the Middle Ages or

any era where horses were used in fighting wars. Interpreting "woman's hair"

as a "whirling propeller" is as far as one can get from a literal interpretation of the Bible. Did you notice that there was not mention of Vietnam? Lindsey's

arguments change with the times. He hopes no one will notice.

Will we get a similar reading when we allow the Bible to interpret itself?

In comparing Scripture with Scripture, there is no possible way to come to the

conclusions of Ryrie and Lindsey. While it's certainly exciting to read about

UFOs, aliens, spaceships, earthquakes, nuclear power plant meltdowns, and

any number of fantastic end-time scenarios, we should always ask ourselves this

basic question: What does the Bible mean when it describes falling heavenly

bodies? In addition, Jesus gave us the time frame for the fulfillment of the

events listed in the Olivet Discourse: All of these things, even the darkening

of the sun and moon and the falling of the stars from the sky, were fulfilled

within a generation. Is this possible? Let the Bible be your guide.

138

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Chuck Smith, "The Second Coming: Any Day Now," Charisma and Christian

Life (February 1989), 46.

2. Deborah Tedford and Kathy Fair, "Children Awaiting Doomsday Died,"

Atlanta Constitution (20 April 1993), A8.

3. Pat Robertson, "Signs in the Skies," Pat Robertson's Notepad (July/ August 1997), 1-2.

4. Numerous magazines and newspapers covered the story of Swift-Tuttle, a

comet that some say could strike the Earth in the year 2126, even though

the odds of such a strike are about 1 in 10,000. See Sharon Begley, "The

Science of Doom," Newsweek (23 November 1992), 56-60.

5. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1970]

1971), 137.

6. A.J. Ferris, When Russia Bombs Germany (London: Clarendon, [1940] 1941), 58.

Postscripts have been added at the end of chapters 2-6. The text of the first

edition was left intact. These postscripts attempt to show that the prophecies

set out in the September 1940 edition had been fulfilled.

7. Peter Lockwood Rumsey , Acts of God and the People, 1620—1730 (Ann Arbor,

MI: UMI Research, 1986), 103.

8. Rumsey, Acts of God and the People, 103.

9. Increase Mather, Cometographia, A Discourse concerning COMETS wherein the

nature of BLAZING STARS is enquired into: with an Historical Account of all the

COMETS which have appeared from the Beginning of the World, until this present

year,. ... (Boston: printed by S.G. for S.S., 1683), 60-61. Quoted in Rumsey,

Acts of God, 103.

10. A letter from John Richards, a Boston merchant who was serving as Colony

agent in London, to Increase Mather (1682). Quoted in Rumsey, Acts of God,

103.

11. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: Westgate Press, 1980), 31.

12. Lindsey, The 1980s, 31.

13. Lindsey, The 1980s, 31.

14. For a discussion of this theme in Lindsey's work, see Timothy Weber, Living

in the Shadow of the Second Coming: American Premillennialism, 1875—1982 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Academie, 1983), 218.

15. Lindsey, The 1980s, 34-35.

16. Charles C. Ryrie, The Living End: Enlightening and Astonishing Disclosures about the

Signs in the Heavens

139

Coming Last Days of Earth (Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell, 1976), 37.

17. Ryrie, The Living End, 45.

18. Erich Von Daniken, Chariots of the Gods?: Memories of the Future: Unsolved Mys-

teries of the Past, trans. Michael Heron (New York: G. Putnam's Sons, 1970)

and Gods from Outer Space: Return to the Stars or Evidence for the Impossible, trans.

Michael Heron (New York: G. Putnam's Sons, 1970). For a helpful treatment

of the UFO phenomenon, including an evaluation of Von Daniken, see Wil-

liam M. Alnor, UFOs in the New Age: Extraterrestrial Messages and the Truth of

Scripture ( Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1992).

19. Hal Lindsey, There's a New World Coming ( New York: Bantam Books, [1973]

1984), 124.

20. Hal Lindsey, Apocalypse Code (Palos Verde, CA: Western Front Ltd., 1997), 31.

21. Lindsey, Apocalypse Code, 33.

22. Notice that John writes that "their faces resembled human faces." Lindsey says that they are human faces.

23. Lindsey, Apocalypse Code, 42.

Chapter Eleven

SUN, MOON,

AND STARS

The tribulation described in Matthew 24 took place just prior to the

destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 upon the city and the people who

rejected the Messiah, the same city that Jesus wept over, and the same people

who said, "His blood be on us and on our children!" (Matt. 27:25). It was

this Jerusalem, that "kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her"

(23:37), that experienced this "great tribulation."

With this in mind, it's important to notice that verse 29 begins with,

"But immediately after the tribulation of those days." Whatever verse 29

means, it follows "immediately after" the tribulation described in verses

15-28. "'Immediately' does not usually make room for much of a time

gap—certainly not a gap of over 2000 years."1 Matthew uses "immediately"

to mean without delay or gaps in time (Matt. 3:16; 4:20, 22; 8:3; 13:5, 20;

14:22; 20:34; 21:12; 26:74). We should expect the word to have the same

meaning in 24:29.

Luke writes that certain signs would occur some time before the end, that

is, a number of years before Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70. Jesus warned

His disciples not to be "frightened" when they saw these signs (Matt. 24:6).

The "end [Jerusalem's destruction] does not follow immediately" after these

141

142

LAST DAYS MADNESS

early signs (Luke 21:9). The early signs that Matthew describes are merely

"the beginning of birth pangs" (24:8). The events of Luke 21:9 should be placed between verses 6 and 7 of Matthew 24.

When the tribulation of "those days" is completed, the end of the temple

and city is near. As the time for Jerusalem's judgment draws ever closer,

certain other signs would appear. These later signs are descriptive of the

fall of nations and kingdoms. "Jesus is declaring that, immediately after

the tribulation of those days surrounding Jerusalem's fall, believers would

witness the breakup of all that had seemed most permanent and durable

before. This great Day of the Lord would signal the end of the existing

dispensation."2

"But immediately after the tribulation of those days THE SUN WILL BE

DARKENED, AND THE MOON WILL NOT GIVE ITS LIGHT, AND THE STARS

WILL FALL from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken"

(Matt. 24:29).

As was said above, the darkening of the sun and moon and the falling of

the stars occurs "immediately after" the events of verses 15-28. No gap in

time is suggested or intimated. But how is it possible that the sun, moon,

and stars underwent radical changes in the first century without affecting

the earth in any way? Should we be looking for a future cosmic catastrophe

or does Jesus have something else in mind?

The Sun, Moon, and Stars

Should we expect the sun literally to be darkened and the moon to cease

reflecting the light from the sun? Will literal stars fall from heaven? With

God all things are possible; however, since Jesus' disciples did not ask about

the end of the world ( kosmos), and Jesus was not describing the end of the

physical world, we would do better to survey how the Old Testament uses

and applies this language than to allow our imaginations to run wild. Even

those expositors who believe the events described in Matthew 24:29-31 are

still future do not maintain that Jesus is describing the end of the world.

The Book of Revelation describes stars falling to the Earth (6:13; notice

the cross reference in the New American Standard Version: Matt. 24:29).

How can stars fall to the Earth and the Earth survive? Revelation 12:4 says

Sun, Moon, and Stars 143

that the tail of the "great dragon" (12:3) "swept away a third of the stars of heaven and threw them to the earth." Stars are much larger than Earth. One

star would vaporize our planet, let alone "a third of the stars of heaven." John

F. Walvoord quotes E.W. Bullinger approvingly: "It is impossible for us to

take this as symbolical; or as other than what it literally says. The difficulties

of the symbolical interpretation are insuperable, while no difficulties whatever

attend the literal interpretation."3 No difficulties whatever?

Stars as Meteorites?

A seemingly plausible explanation for Walvoord is that the "stars" are

actually meteorites. But if they are meteorites in Revelation 6:13 and 12:4,

then they are meteorites in Matthew 24:29. Again, "a third of the meteorites

of heaven" would have a devastating effect on our planet. Earth would cease

to exist. Scientists have speculated that a single meteorite threw up enough

debris upon impact with Earth that it "ended the reign of the dinosaurs....

The colossal energy released in its collision with Earth is now estimated to

be equal to the detonation of up to 300 million hydrogen bombs, each some

70 times bigger than the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima."4 Suppos-

edly these meteorites crash to earth during a seven-year period following

the rapture. Jesus would then be ruling over a burned out cinder during

the millennium since, according to dispensationalists, the "new heaven and

new earth" does not take place until after His millennial reign. Additionally, if the "stars" of Revelation 6:13, 12:4 and Matthew 24:29 are meteorites,

then this would mean that these passages are not to be interpreted "liter-

ally," an interpretive faux pas for the literalist. There is a better, more biblical, interpretive solution.

Stars as People and Nations

The language that Jesus uses is typical of Old Testament imagery where

stellar phenomena represent people and nations. The people of Israel were

represented as stars (Gen. 22:17; 26:4; Deut. 1:10). The flags of many na-

tions include the use of multiple stars (United States, Australia, Brazil, China,

Honduras, Iraq, New Zealand, Panama, Papua-New Guinea, Venezuela), a

single star (Cameroon, Cuba, Israel, Senegal, Suriname, Vietnam, Yemen,

Jordan, North Korea, Liberia), the moon and star (Algeria, Comoros, Mau-

ritania, Pakistan, Singapore, Tunisia, Turkey), the moon and sun (Malaysia),

and the sun 0apan, Malawi).

144

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Stars as the Religious and Civil State of Israel

The Old Testament is filled with solar, lunar, and stellar language depict-

ing great political and social upheaval. The rise of kingdoms is compared to

the brightness of the sun, moon, and stars. The brightness of these heavenly

bodies means that a nation is in ascendancy. When a nation is described as

falling—coming under the judgment of God—it is compared to the sun and

moon going dark and stars falling from the sky. We describe a person on the

way up as a "rising star." When a well-known person is found to have done

wrong, we say "his star is tarnished" or "his star has fallen."

Before the advent of speculative exegesis, most Bible commentators

who studied the whole Bible understood the relationship of collapsing-

universe language with the destruction of the religious and civil state of

the Jewish nation.

• "That is, the Jewish heaven shall perish, and the sun and moon of its glory and happiness shall be darkened—brought to nothing. The sun

is the religion of the [Jewish] church, the moon is the government of the

[Jewish] state, and the stars are the judges and doctors of both. Compare Isa. xiii. 10; Ezek. xxxii. 7, 8."5

• "The darkening of the sun and moon, the falling of the stars, and the

shaking of the powers of the heavens, denote the utter extinction of the

light of prosperity and privilege to the Jewish nation; the unhinging of

their whole constitution in church and state; the violent subversion of

the authority of their princes and priests; the abject miseries to which the

people in general, especially their chief persons, would be reduced; and

the moral or religious darkness to which they would be consigned."6

• "Thus it is that in the prophetic language great commotions and revolu-

tions upon earth, are often represented by commotions and changes in

the heavens."7

• "Our Saviour goes on, to set forth the calamities that should befall the

Jewish nation, immediately after the destruction of Jerusalem. So entire

was the subversion of their ecclesiastical and civil state, that it may be

metaphorically represented by the sun, moon, and stars, losing their

light, and all the heavenly bodies being dissolved.. .."8

• "In ancient Hieroglyphic writings the sun, moon, and stars represented

empires and states, with their sovereigns and nobility. The eclipse of these

luminaries was said to denote temporary national disasters, or an entire

Sun, Moon, and Stars

145

overthrow of any state. This is still an Eastern mode of writing, and there

are some classical examples of it. The Prophets frequently employ it, so

that their style seems to be a speaking hieroglyphic. Thus Isaiah describes

the destruction of Babylon, and Ezekiel that of Egypt—In accordance

with this prediction, Josephus gives an account of the persecution and

slaughter of the nobility and principal men in the city by the infuriated

Zealots, computing their number at twelve thousand."9

Is this speculation on the part of these commentators, or does the Bible

support their interpretation of stellar imagery?

Stars as Symbols of Kings and Kingdoms

Where in Scripture do we find nations compared to heavenly bodies? As

with all Bible study, it is best to start at the beginning. The first chapter of

Genesis gives us a clue as to why the Bible compares the sun, moon, and

stars to rulers and their kingdoms: The sun ("greater light") and the moon

("lesser light") are said to "govern the day" and "night" (Gen. 1:16). Can we find examples of the sun and moon being used as symbols of government?

In a dream Joseph saw "the sun and the moon and eleven stars ... bowing

down" to him (37:9). The sun, moon, and stars represented Joseph's father,

mother, and brothers. Joseph, being only "seventeen years old" (37:2), was

under the government of his father, mother, and older brothers. In reality,

they ruled over Joseph. Upon hearing about Joseph's dream, Jacob asked

him, "What is this dream that you have had? Shall I and your mother and your

brothers actually come to bow ourselves down before you to the ground?' (37:10).

Joseph's father and brothers immediately understood the significance of the

images in his dream. They were not looking for the sun, moon, and stars to

bow down before Joseph.

Stars are used as symbols of earthly rulers and governments in other

places in Scripture. Judges 5:19-20 is a good example. In verse 19 we read

that "kings came and fought." In verse 20 we read that "the stars fought

from heaven." Both verses are describing the same event in terms of Hebrew

parallelism. The stars are symbols of kings and their armies. Stars as we see

them in space were not fighting from heaven. Even Bible commentators who

insist on interpreting the Bible literally are not always consistent. Consider

how the following literalists interpret stellar phenomena:

146

LAST DAYS MADNESS

• "In ancient cultures these astronomical symbols represented rulers."10

• "The second dream involved celestial images—the sun, moon, and stars

being easily recognized for their significance for rulership."11

• "[A]lmost the same symbols appeared in the visions of the apostle John

(Revelation 12:1), again probably representing Israel and the twelve

tribes."12

New Testament Examples

The New Testament picks up on this imagery of Israel being represented

by the sun, moon, and stars. In the Book of Revelation we find a descriptive

image of a woman dressed in a rather unusual way. There is no mistaking

the stellar imagery: "And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed

with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of

twelve stars; and she was with child; and she cried out, being in labor and

in pain to give birth" (Rev. 12:1-2). This likeness is a picture of Israel in

her glory giving birth to the Messiah, the long-awaited Savior of Israel and

the world (Luke 2:29-32; cf. Isa. 54:1-3 and Gal. 4:26; contrast this with

rebellious Israel as the harlot in Ezekiel 16 and the "mother of harlots" in

Rev. 17). The following commentators (two of whom insist on a "literal

interpretation" of Revelation) interpret Revelation 12:1-2 in a non-literal

fashion; that is, the sun, moon, and stars represent something other than the literal sun, moon, and stars.

• "The sun, moon, and stars indicate a complete system of government

and remind the reader of Genesis 37:9. God had caused royal dignity

to rest in Israel in the line of David."13

• "The description of the woman as clothed with the sun and the moon

is an allusion to Genesis 37:9-11, where these heavenly bodies represent

Jacob and Rachel, thereby identifying the woman with the fulfillment

of the Abrahamic covenant. In the same context, the stars represent the

patriarchs, the sons of Jacob. The symbolism may extend beyond this to

represent in some sense the glory of Israel and her ultimate triumph over

her enemies."14

• "[The woman] is not simply Mary, the actual mother of Jesus; nor Mary's

ancestress Eve, whose offspring was to be the serpent's great enemy

(Gn. 3:15); nor even all mothers in the chosen line between them. For

regarded as a 'sign,' she is adorned with the splendour of sun, moon,

Sun, Moon, and Stars

147

and twelve stars, which in a parallel Old Testament dream (Joseph's in

Gn. 37:9-11) represent the whole family of Israel.... She is in fact the

church: the old Israel [Acts 7:38], 'the human stock from which Christ

came' (Rom. 9:5, Knox), and the new Israel, whom he has now left in

order to go back to his Father...."15

By combining the imagery of the sun, moon, and stars in Matthew 24:29,

Jesus describes Israel as a nation, drawing the symbolism from Genesis 37:9.

While the passage in Revelation 12 shows Israel in her glory—giving birth

to the Messiah—Matthew 24:29 depicts Israel in decline as the nation that

rejected her Messiah. The allusion in Matthew 24:29 is unmistakable: Israel's

judgment was to take place before that generation passed away.

Lights Out!

In speaking of the sun and moon going dark and stars falling (Matt.

24:29), Jesus describes the nation of Israel under judgment. Here is how one

writer depicts it: "The signs in the heavens, the darkening sun and the fall-

ing stars, refer to the falling Jewish dignitaries, casting down of authorities

and powers, long established, and signifies the darkness that settled upon

the Jewish state. The sun of the Hebrew temple was darkened, the moon

of the Jewish commonwealth was as blood, the stars of the Sanhedrin fell

from their high seats of Authority."16 Remember, Jesus wept over the city of

Jerusalem because He foresaw its destruction (Matt. 23:37-39).

The dispute over what this passage means does not center on God's abil-

ity to cause the sun and moon to go dark and the stars to fall. Rather, the

issue is what Jesus means by the use of this type of language. Only a study

of Scripture itself will tell us.

We might fill volumes with extracts showing how exegetes and writ-

ers of New Testament doctrine assume as a principle not to be questioned

that such highly wrought language as Matt, xxiv, 29-31 ... taken

almost verbatim from Old Testament prophecies of judgment on nations

and kingdoms which long ago perished, must be literally understood.

Too little study of Old Testament ideas of judgment, and apocalyptic

language and style, would seem to be the main reason for this one sided

exegesis. It will require more than assertion to convince thoughtful men

148

LAST DAYS MADNESS

that the figurative language of Isaiah and Daniel, admitted on all hands

to be such in those ancient prophets, is to be literally interpreted when

used by Jesus or Paul.17

Keep in mind that all the events in Matthew 24:1—34, including those events

in verse 29, took place within a generation of Jesus' making the prediction:

"This generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (24:34).

The downfall of a king and nation is like the darkening of the sun and

moon and the falling of stars from the sky. How do we know this? Isn't

this "spiritualizing" and "allegorizing"? Aren't we supposed to interpret the Bible literally? Actually, we are to interpret the Bible in the way the Bible

interprets itself. A wooden literalism is an impossibility, as nearly every Bible

commentator recogniznes.

In each verse of Matthew 24 we have looked to the Bible for our inter-

pretation. In each case the Bible is its own best interpreter, as we would

expect. Why should we stop with this method when we come to verses

that describe happenings to the sun, moon, and stars? The Bible is still our

best hermeneutical manual. How can we avoid seeing every earthquake and

astronomical phenomenon as a prelude to the end? Study the Bible and see

how it uses the language of the heavens:

The imagery of cosmic phenomena is used in the Old Testament to de-

scribe this-worldly events and, in particular, historical acts of judgment. The following passages are significant, not the least because of their affinities

with the present context [i.e., Matt. 24]: Isa. 13:10 (predicting doom on

Babylon); Isa. 34:4 (referring to "all the nations," but especially to Edom);

Ezek. 32:7 (concerning Egypt); Amos 8:9 (the Northern Kingdom of Is-

rael); Joel 2:10 (Judah). The cosmic imagery draws attention to the divine

dimension of the event in which the judgment of God is enacted. The use

of Joel 2:28-32 in Acts 2:15-21 provides an instance of the way in which

such prophetic cosmic imagery is applied to historical events in the present

(cf. also Lk. 10:18; Jn. 12:31; 1 Thess. 4:16; 2 Pet. 3:10ff.; Rev; 6:12-17;

18:1). Other Old Testament passages relevant to the interpretation of the

present context are Isa. 19:1; 27:13; Dan. 7:13; Deut. 30:4; Zech. 2:6;

12:10-14; Mal. 3:1. In view of this, Mark 13:24-30 may be interpreted

as a prophecy of judgment on Israel in which the Son of man will be

vindicated. Such a judgment took place with the destruction of Jerusalem,

Sun, Moon, and Stars

149

the desecration of the Temple and the scattering of Israel—all of which

happened within the lifetime of "this generation." The disintegration of

Israel as the people of God coincides with the inauguration of the kingdom

of the Son of man. Such an interpretation fits the preceding discourse and

the introductory remarks of the disciples. (Mk. 13: Iff. par.)18

The evidence for understanding such language figuratively is overwhelm-

ing. To come to any other conclusion is to reject the clear teaching of Scrip-

ture and to opt for the wild speculations of those who tout the supposed

prophetic mysteries of unidentified flying objects, demons masquerading

as aliens, and scientific crackpots who believe they can calculate the second

coming of Christ.

Old Testament Parallels

The only written revelation Jesus had and His disciples knew was what

we call the Old Testament. There are no secret codes in Scripture, contrary

to what books like The Bible Code insist.19 Nothing is hidden to the trained

student of the Old Testament Scriptures. When Jesus wanted to define

Himself, He pointed His disciples to the only reliable dictionary: "And

beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the

things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.... Now He said to them,

'These are My words which I spoke to you while I was with you, that all

things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets

and the Psalms must be fulfilled'" (Luke 24:27, 44).

The disciples were not left in the dark by Jesus' seemingly cryptic words

in Matthew 24. Their hearts burned within them as He spoke to them on

the Emmaus road, while He was explaining the Scriptures to them (Luke

24:32). When does your heart burn? When you read the latest prophetic

prognosticators and their speculations about the timing of the rapture based

on events in Europe, Russia, China, and Israel? Our hearts should burn when

we study God's Word for the correct interpretation of prophetic passages:

"Let God be found true, though every man be found a liar" (Rom. 3:4).

The language used by Jesus in Matthew 24 was familiar. The disciples

had heard it before. They knew what Jesus meant when He described the

sun and moon going dark and the stars falling from the sky. The end of a

nation was at hand.

150

142 LAST DAYS MADNESS

"Lights Out"for Babylon

Isaiah wrote that "the day of the LORD is coming," and when it comes,

The stars of heaven and their constellations will not flash

forth their light; the sun will be dark when it rises, and the

moon will not shed its light.

(Isa. 13:9-10)

This is a description of a localized judgment of a world power that existed

long ago. Who did God raise up to judge Babylon? "Behold, I am going to

stir up the Medes against them" (13:17a). This proves that the Babylon of long

ago is the object of judgment. The day of "destruction" which came from "the

Almighty" (13:6) is described with graphic expressions: "Hands will fall limp"

(13:7); "every man's heart will melt" (13:7); "they will writhe like a woman in labor" (13:8). When the day of the LORD comes, it will be "cruel, with fury

and burning anger, to make the land a desolation" (13:9). Even dispensational

scholar John Martin interprets Isaiah in a non-literal way:

The statements in 13:10 about the heavenly bodies (stars ... sun ...

moon) no longer functioning may figuratively describe the total turn-

around of the political structure of the Near East. The same would be

true of the heavens trembling and the earth shaking (v. 13), figures of

speech suggesting all-encompassing destruction.20

The disciples immediately recognized the source and meaning of Jesus'

words. They understood that Israel would come under a judgment similar

to that of Babylon.21 The language is identical. The interpretation should be equally identical. Jerusalem would be treated like the pagan nation of Babylon.

This is why Jesus appropriates and applies the Babylon language to Israel and

the Book of Revelation characterizes Israel as Babylon (14:8), "the enemy

of the true people of the covenant God."22

"Lights Out" for Egypt

The destruction of Pharaoh and Egypt is described in a similar way. It

is not coincidental that Jerusalem is said to be "Egypt" in Revelation 11:8.

Both in Egypt and Jerusalem God's faithful people were persecuted. The

Jerusalem of the first century sought to kill those who taught that Jesus was

Sun, Moon, and Stars

151

the promised redeemer.

And when I extinguish you,

I will cover the heavens, and darken their stars;

I will cover the sun with a cloud,

And the moon shall not give its light.

All the shining lights in the heavens

I will darken over you

And will set darkness on your land.

(Ezek. 32:7-8)

Egypt's conqueror was Babylon (32:11). This language is analogous to

the words Jesus used in Matthew 24:29. If the prophecy is not "literal" (us-

ing the modern sense of the word) for Babylon and Egypt, then we should

not expect it to be "literal" for Jerusalem.

"Lights Out"for Edom

While Scripture describes one nation bringing down the fortunes of an-

other nation, we know that God is behind it all. God is in heaven, but "His

sword" finds its way to earth through the terror of other kingdoms. Again,

descriptions of happenings in the heavens form the backdrop for national

upheaval in the description of the end of a political era.

And all the host of heaven will wear away,

And the sky will be rolled up like a scroll;

All their hosts will also wither away

As a leaf withers from the vine,

Or as one withers from the fig tree.

For My sword is satiated in heaven,

Behold it shall descend for judgment upon Edom,

And upon the people whom I have devoted to

destruction.

(Isa. 34:4-5)

God did not come down physically to mete out judgment upon Edom. But

the text states that His sword "shall descend for judgment upon Edom." Did

a sword come down from heaven? Did the host of heaven "wear away"? Was

ISO

144 LAST DAYS MADNESS

the sky "rolled up like a scroll"? Certainly not in literal terms. Again, such

language is simply a description of Edom's national judgment.

"Lights Out"for I srael

God had condemned Israel's disdain for things holy by informing the

people that He would reject their "festivals" and their "solemn assemblies"

(Amos 5:21). "Even though you offer up to Me burnt offerings and your

grain offerings, I will not accept them; and I will not even look at the peace

offerings of your fatlings" (5:22). In a word, the worship practices of Israel

had become an abomination in God's sight. Their deeds would bring on "the day of the LORD":

Alas, you who are longing for the day of the LORD,

For what purpose will the day of the LORD be to you?

It will be darkness and not light.

(Amos 5:18)

Again, God tells them:

"And it will come about in that day,"

declares the LORD GOD, "That I shall make the sun go down at

noon, and make the earth dark in broad daylight." (Amos 8:9) While this passage could be describing a solar eclipse, it is more natural

and biblical to see it as a description of divine displeasure and judgment.

Assyria had put Israel's political lights out while Babylon extinguished the

lights of Judah. Rome had eclipsed the political lights of Israel in Jesus' day.

Israel could do very little in its ecclesiastical and political courts without

Roman permission (John 18:31). Israel was a captive nation that had to live

within the confines of Roman law.

What was true in principle would become true in reality. Israel's entire

ecclesiastical and political systems were judged when Roman troops sacked,

looted, and burned the city.

If these cataclysmic events are correctly interpreted as applying to

Israel's defeat, then it is clear that immediately after their national di-

saster of 70 A.D., the once-exalted, unique theocracy of Israel went into

Sun, Moon, and Stars 145

153

permanent eclipse as God's light-bearers before the nations. (Study Heb.

12:25-29 as commentary on this transition.) Now the Church of Christ

occupies this glorious position (Phil. 2:15f.; John 8:12; Matt. 5:14ff.; I

Peter 2:9f.). Although Christianity would be established at a time when

kingdoms, thrones and religious systems would be thoroughly shaken,

it would be a Kingdom that shall never be shaken or replaced by any-

thing better this side of glory (Dan. 2:44; 7:14; Heb. 12:28). From the

viewpoint of Jesus' contemporaries, the loss of Judaism's glory would be

a world-shaking tragedy indeed, an eclipse. From God's point of view,

however, the removal of things that can be shaken in order to establish

a Kingdom that cannot be shaken is but to treat the former as obsolete.

What, for Him, was already growing old was ready to vanish away even

in the first century (Heb. 8:13; 12:27f.).23

The Old Covenant order ended in principle at the time of Jesus' death,

resurrection, and ascension. Jesus gave the nation forty years after this to

gather under God's "wings" by embracing the gospel message (Matt. 23:37).

Israel's refusal to repent and embrace its Messiah brought promised judg-

ment. Israel's star had fallen.

Stellar Signs of Blessing

When God wants to demonstrate Israel's obedience and her resultant

blessing, He also uses stellar language. But notice the difference: "And the

light of the moon will be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun

will be seven times brighter, like the light of seven days" (Isaiah 30:26).

This is just the Bible's way of saying that "the LORD binds up the fracture of

His people and heals the bruise" (30:26). God's sovereign mercy is poured

out on a repentant people. If the language was meant to be taken literally,

the earth would be burned to a crisp, especially when we read that the "sun

will set no more, neither will your moon wane" (60:20). Again, this type of

language is used to reflect God's mercy: "But you will have the LORD for an

everlasting light, and the days of your mourning will be finished" (60:20).

We can conclude that "immediately after the tribulation of those days"

(Matt. 24:29) national Israel no longer held the place of prominence for

the nations (Gen. 37:9; Deut. 4:6; Lam. 1.1; Ezek. 5:5; 16:14; Rev. 12:1;

17:18). Her brightness was eclipsed by another nation as Jesus had promised:

156

146 LAST DAYS MADNESS

17. Milton Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics: A Treatise on the Interpretation of the Old and

New Testaments {G rand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1890] 1974), 596.

18. Colin Brown, "Generation," The International Dictionary of New Testament Theol-

ogy, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1976), 2:38.

19. Michael Drosnin, The Bible Code (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997).

20. John A. Martin, "Isaiah," The Bible Knowledge Commentary, 1059.

21. This is further evidence that Jerusalem is "Babylon" in Revelation 17-18, not

a revived Roman empire. See Cornelius Vanderwaal, Hal Lindsey and Biblical

Prophecy (St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada: Paideia Press, 1978).

22. N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996), 354.

23. Fowler, The Gospel of Matthew, 4:482.

Chapter Twelve

THE RETURN

OF CHRIST

In The Daily Oklahoman, on July 25,1986, the following advertisement ap-

peared in the "Special Notices" section: "CHRIST IS COMING." The

advertisement was not simply stating the fact of Jesus' coming. It was a

warning that He was coming soon. Dates had been set. To back up the claim,

the man who placed the advertisement made some peripheral predictions.

He predicted that then-President Ronald Reagan was to be in Jerusalem

on May 15, 1988. The former president was to be killed in a U.S.S.R.

invasion attempt. Last days madness had struck again.

Dave Hunt, a popular end-times writer, asks this question about the

future coming of Christ: "How close are we?" He writes that there is

"compelling evidence for the soon return of Christ."1 Hunt's book ignores

passages which describe Jesus' coming as being "soon" and "near" for

those who read the prophecies, that is, those living in the first-century.

He reformulates the Bible's clear statements of nearness into a time frame

that makes Jesus' coming an "any moment rapture." Such a position strips

the Bible of meaning. "Soon" and "near" cannot mean an undetermined

period of time if one claims to interpret the Bible literally.

157

158

148 LAST DAYS MADNESS

History is a great teacher if we study and learn its lessons. Speculation

on when Jesus will return is a preoccupation that never seems to go away.

Conditions for Jesus' return always appear to be favorable. As one failed set

of predictions is discarded, a new but no wiser prophet surfaces to take up

the banner of prophetic certainty in the belief that past generations did not

have the right prophetic key. We are told that as we get nearer to the end

the signs become more clear.

Are There Any Signs?

In light of constant date setting, can Christians ever assert that Jesus'

return is near in our day? To ask it another way: Can we point to any signs

that would indicate that Jesus' coming is imminent for us? The answer is

no. If you wonder why generation after generation of prophetic speculation

has been off the mark, this is it. A series of signs that can be fit together in

puzzle-like fashion giving us a picture of when Jesus will return does not

exist. All attempts to make predictions, even a generalized prediction that "the

antichrist is most certainly alive" somewhere in the world today,2 or that one

"expects the Rapture to occur in his own lifetime,"3 or that "we live in the

generation that will see Armageddon,"4 are dangerous and unscriptural.

But what about the events described by Jesus in Matthew 24, Mark 13,

and Luke 21? As has been demonstrated in previous chapters, the events

rehearsed in the Olivet Discourse are signs leading up to and including the

destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. These chapters have nothing to do with

when Jesus will return at the final judgment.

So, then, when will Jesus return? The only "sign" the Bible gives us is the

fullness of the kingdom, "when He has abolished all rule and authority and

power. For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet" (1

Cor. 15:24—25). We know that Jesus is presently reigning over the universe

from heaven. Heaven is His throne and earth is His footstool (Isa. 66:1). He

will continue to reign in this manner until all His enemies are put under His

feet (Psalm 110:1; Acts 2:35). When this is accomplished, Jesus will return

to judge the living and the dead. It will be at that time when "the dead in

Christ shall rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up

together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and thus we shall

always be with the Lord' (1 Thess. 4:16-17). This verse—a favorite of those

who believe in a two-stage coming of Jesus prior to the establishment of an

The Return of Christ

159

earthly millennium—says nothing about a rapture, either pre-, mid-, or post-

tribulational. Not a word is said about an earthly, political millennium ruled

by Jews with Jesus reigning from Jerusalem in the midst of a rebuilt temple,

a reestablished priesthood, and a bloody sacrificial system. When the event

described in 1 Thessalonians 4:16—17 occurs, "we shall always be with the

Lord." Nothing else is said to follow this event. The entire futurist scenario

is based upon unproven assumptions that are read into this text.

The Coming of the Son of Man

How, then, do we interpret Matthew 24:30 and its reference to the Son

of Man coming "on the clouds of glory"? Which event does this verse de-

scribe? A future rapture, either pre-, mid-, or post-tribulational? The bodily

appearing of Christ with His saints to set up His earthly millennial kingdom?

The return of Christ to judge the living and the dead at the end of earthly

history just prior to a renovated universe? Jesus stated that the coming de-

scribed in Matthew 24:30 would occur before that generation passed away;

therefore, we are left to conclude that the prophecy has something to do

with the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and nothing to do with modern

speculation about a so-called rapture or the bodily return of Christ.

"And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the

tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING

ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory" (Matt. 24:30).

Part of the difficulty in interpreting this verse lies in the translation, a point

we will address below. In addition to translation problems, however, there is

a consideration of the direction of Jesus' coming. Is Jesus "coming down" to

rapture His church? Is He coming to Earth to set up His thousand-year millen-

nial kingdom? The passage says nothing about a rapture. There is no mention

of the establishment of a millennial kingdom after the period of tribulation

that was explained in such detail in the preceding verses of Matthew 24. Why

the particulars about the Great Tribulation and so few particulars about a so-

called rapture or an earthly millennial kingdom if these events immediately

follow His coming? Notice that there is no mention of a rebuilt temple or the

establishment of a future Israeli state. The silence is deafening.

Jesus' description of His coming in that generation differs little from the

160

150 LAST DAYS MADNESS

way Micah describes the coming of Jehovah to judge Samaria and Jerusalem

centuries before Jesus' incarnation.

Hear, O peoples, all of you; listen, O earth and all it contains. And let

the Lord GOD be a witness against you, the Lord from His holy temple.

For behold, the LORD is coming forth from His place. He will come down

and tread on the high places of the earth. The mountains will melt under

Him, and the valleys will be split, like wax before the fire, like water poured

down a steep place (Micah 1:2—4; compare Zech. 14:4).

The LORD is said to come "forth from His place" to "come down and

tread on the high places of the earth."5 In what way did this take place?

Was this a physical/bodily coming so the people actually saw Jehovah? Did

the mountains really melt? Did the valleys split? This coming of Jehovah in

judgment is directed against the two seats of government in Israel, Samaria

in the north and Jerusalem in the south, prior to the Assyrian and Babylonian

captivities. The New Testament uses nearly identical language to describe

Jesus' judgment-coming on Jerusalem in A.d. 70 (Matt. 24:29).

Coming on the Clouds

The cloud-language of Matthew 24:30 is similar to the imagery of

the previous verses and their description of the darkening of the sun and

moon and the falling of stars. What is the association of clouds with God?

First, God showed Himself by the physical presence of clouds, although

no one ever saw Him (e.g, Ex. 13:21; 14:24; 19:9; 20:21; 24:15; 33:9;

34:5; 1 Kings 8:12). Second, God's abode is described as a canopy of clouds

(Psalm 97:2). Third, God's mode of transportation is figuratively described

as a cloud chariot (104:3). Fourth, when God speaks, "He causes the clouds

to ascend from the end of the earth" (Jer. 10:13; 51:16). Fifth, the "day of

the LORD ... will be a day of clouds" (Ezek. 30:3; Joel 2:2). Sixth, God's

judgment of the wicked is described as the upheaval of the created order:

"In whirlwind and storm is His way, and clouds are the dust beneath His

feet" (Nahum 1:3). In each of the above examples, clouds are symbols of

God's presence.

In addition, there are verses which describe God " coming on the clouds":

"Behold, the LORD is riding on a swift cloud, and is about to come to

Egypt" (Isa. 19:1; cf. Psalm 104:3). This is no more "literal" than God rid-

The Return of Christ

161

ing a cloud chariot, abiding in a cloud canopy, or clouds moving when God

speaks. The image of God riding on a swift cloud depicts His sovereignty

over the nations.6

He makes the clouds His chariot;

He walks upon the wings of the wind;

He makes the winds His messengers;

Flaming fire His ministers.

(Psalm 104:3-4)

God does not physically appear on clouds, using them as "chariots." Nei-

ther does He literally walk upon "wings of the wind" or make "the winds

His messengers." The language describes judgment and retribution. Why

should anyone think it unusual to find similar language in the New Testa-

ment being interpreted in the same way?

Exaltation to Kingly Power

There is a third cloud motif in Scripture. The reference is found in Daniel

7:13-14, the passage that Jesus quotes in Matthew 24:30. Notice that the

coming of the Son of Man in Daniel 7 is not down but up! The Son of Man, Jesus, comes up "with the clouds of heaven" to "the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him."

In Daniel's vision, coming on the clouds means that the Son of Man

was coming onstage, into the scene. It is not a coming toward Daniel or

toward earth, but a coming seen from the standpoint of God, since Daniel

uses three verbs that all indicate this: "coming ... approached ... was led

to" the Ancient of Days. This is no picture of the Second Coming, because

the Son of man is going the wrong way for that. His face is turned, not

toward earth, but toward God. His goal is not to receive His saints, but to

receive His kingdom (Cf. 1 Peter 3:22; Luke 19:12; Acts 2:32-36; 3:22;

5:31; Col. 3:1; Rev. 3:21.).7

Jesus had Daniel 7 in mind as He described His enthronement: "The key

verse in Daniel 7:13 that predicts the triumph of the Son of Man represents

Him as coming into the presence of the Ancient of Days 'with the clouds of

162

152 LAST DAYS MADNESS

heaven,' a phrase that is repeated in Matthew 26:64; Mark 14:62; Revelation

14:14. Clouds are much more closely associated with the glory and throne

of God than they are connected with the earth."8

Being familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures, Jesus' disciples understood

the context of His words and grasped their meaning. Jesus spoke against

the backdrop of the Old Testament.

Our discussion of the meaning of Daniel 7:13 in its Old Testament

context led us to the conclusion that its keynote is one of vindication

and exaltation to an everlasting dominion, and that the "coming" of verse

13 was a coming to God [the Ancient of Days] to receive power, not a

"descent" to earth. When we studied Jesus' use of these verses, we found

that in every case this same theme was the point of the allusion, and, in

particular, that nowhere (unless here) was verse 13 [in Dan. 7] interpreted

of his coming to earth at the Parousia. In particular, the reference to

Mark 14:62, where the wording is clearly parallel to that in the present

verse [Mark 13:26], was to Jesus' imminent vindication and power, with

a secondary reference to a manifestation of that power in the near future.

Thus, the expectation that Jesus would in fact use Daniel 7:13 in the sense

in which it was written is amply confirmed by his actual allusions. He

saw in that verse a prediction of his imminent exaltation to an authority

which supersedes that of the earthly powers which have set themselves

against God.... Jesus is using Daniel 7:13 as a prediction of that author-

ity which he exercised when in AD 70 the Jewish nation and its leaders,

who had condemned him, were overthrown, and Jesus was vindicated as

the recipient of all power from the Ancient of Days.9

At His trial, Jesus told Caiaphas the high priest and the Sanhedrin that

they would see "the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven" (Matt. 26:64). When would this take place?

"The phrase ... 'from now on' means exactly what it says..., and refers not

to some distant event but to the imminent vindication of Jesus which will

shortly be obvious to those who have sat in judgement over him."10 What

did they "see"? Certainly not an event that was thousands of years in the

future. R. T. Wright comments:

Jesus is not, then, suggesting that Caiaphas will witness the end of the

space-time order. Nor will he look out of the window one day and observe

The Return of Christ

163

a human figure flying downwards on a cloud. It is absurd to imagine either

Jesus, or Mark, or anyone in between, supposing the words to mean that.

Caiaphas will witness the strange events which follow Jesus' crucifixion:

the rise of a group of disciples claiming that he has been raised from the

dead, and the events which accelerate towards the final clash with Rome,

in which, judged according to the time-honoured test, Jesus will be vindi-

cated as a true prophet. In and through it all, Caiaphas will witness events

which show that Jesus was not, after all, mistaken in his claim, hitherto

implicit, now at last explicit: he is the Messiah, the anointed one, the true

representative of the people of Israel, the one in and through whom the

covenant God is acting to set up his kingdom.11

At His ascension, Jesus had come up to the Ancient of Days "with the

clouds of heaven" to receive the kingdom from His Father (Mark 16:19;

Acts 1:9). Jesus' reception of the kingdom gave Him possession so that He

could do with it as He pleased. He had earlier stated that the kingdom

would be "taken away from" those who rejected Him and would "be given

to a nation producing the fruit of it" (Matt. 21:43). The church—made up

initially of believing Jews and later of believing Gentiles—is described by

Peter as a "holy nation" (1 Peter 2:9). It is this "nation" that is in possession of the kingdom by right of transfer. This covenant transfer is confirmed for

us at the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:54-56). Stephen's murderers objected

to being called "stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears" (7:51).

His words of condemnation had put them outside the covenant community

because they, too, persecuted and killed the prophets by publicly denounc-

ing the gospel message (7:52).

So Stephen saw Him, before his death by stoning (Acts 7:56), and

thus prophesied judgment on his murderers, at the very moment when

he prayed for their forgiveness. The priesthood stood on trial that day,

although the execution of their sentence was yet to come, on that awful

day in AD 70 when the priests were cut down at the altar as they steadily

continued their sacrifices.12

The church was persecuted by Jewish opposition for forty years after Jesus'

death, once again confirming what Jesus had prophesied. With the destruc-

tion of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, the truth was comprehended by the tribes of

164

154 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Israel (Rev. 1:7). The generation that Jesus said would not pass away until

all these things came to pass finally came to understand the implications

of their rebellion: Jesus is the one who was given "[D]ominion, Glory and

a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations, and men of every language might

serve Him" (Dan. 7:14). They were not to look for another (Matt. 24:26).

A Heavenly Throne

Jesus' coming to judge Jerusalem represented the passing of the Old

Covenant. Jerusalem would no longer be the center of worship (John

4:20-24) because Jesus fulfilled all that the temple and its glory repre-

sented (2:19). When the high priest heard Jesus identify Himself as the

"Son of Man" of Daniel 7:13-14, he "tore his robes, saying, 'He has blas-

phemed!'" (Matt. 26:65). Jesus had made it clear that He was the one who

would occupy David's throne in heaven! (Psalm 110:1; Matt. 22:44-45;

Acts 2:30-36).

God the Father raised Jesus "from the dead, and seated Him at His right

hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and

dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age, but also in the

age to come. And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave

Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness

of Him who fills all in all" (Eph. 1:20—23). The earthly temple in Jerusalem

was made obsolete by Jesus in His death, resurrection, and ascension. It

seems that the unbelieving high priest had a better understanding of Bible

prophecy than many present-day prophetic soothsayers.

The "coming of the Son of Man" is a depiction of the exaltation and en-

thronement of Jesus in heaven. Matthew 24:30 has nothing to do with the

rapture or any end-time scenario. Each time Jesus used the phrase, "the Son

of Man coming on the clouds," the reference had contemporary application.

N. T. Wright's summary puts the biblical imagery in perspective:

The Daniel text [quoted by Jesus in Matt. 24:30]... has nothing to

do with a figure 'coming' from heaven to earth. Despite the widespread opinion that this is what it 'must' mean in the gospels, there is no reason to suppose that on the lips of Jesus, or in the understanding of the

earliest traditions, it means anything other than vindication. It speaks

of exaltation: of one who, representing 'the people of the saints of the

most high', is raised up from suffering at the hands of the beasts and

The Return of Christ

165

given a throne to sit on, exercising royal power.13

A direct quotation from the Old Testament must be interpreted in terms

of its original context. Daniel 7:13-14 depicts the Son of Man going up,

approaching the Ancient of Days. Nothing could be more clear, contrary to

what prophetic sensationalists maintain.14

The Sign in Heaven

At first reading, many assume that Matthew 24:30 teaches that we should

expect to see Jesus "appear in the sky ... coming on clouds." Unfortunately,

we are working with a poor translation. Let's look at a word-for-word

translation from the Greek: "And then will appear the sign of the Son of

Man in heaven, and then will mourn all the tribes of the land and they [i.e., the tribes] will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with

power and great glory." The sign is that the Son of Man is enthroned in

heaven (Heb. 9:24).

Jesus was not telling His disciples that He would appear in the sky. The Greek word that is translated "sky" is best translated "heaven." Because of this ambiguous translation, some early commentators believed that a

visible sign would appear as a foreshadowing of what they believed to be

the soon return of Christ. They did not believe the sign itself was Jesus.

Jesus told His disciples that they would see a sign that proved He was in

heaven, sitting at His Father's right hand (Acts 2:30-36).

When the temple was destroyed, the localized place of worship went with

it. Jesus told the Samaritan woman that "an hour is coming when neither in

this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, shall you worship the Father" (John 4:21).

All Christians look to "the Jerusalem above" (Gal. 4:26) where Jesus was

"exalted to the right hand of God" (Acts 2:33). He now occupies David's

throne in the heavenly Jerusalem.

The fulfillment of the prophecies regarding a descendant of David sit-

ting on David's throne forever was realized in Jesus, David's Son (Matt. 1:1;

Luke 3:31; Acts 2:22-36). Isn't this similar to what Stephen saw? "Behold,

I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of

God' (Acts 7:56). Stephen saw Jesus enthroned in heaven. All Israel would

know it when the temple and holy city came under judgment, a judgment

that would take place in their generation. It would take forty years for the

rest of Israel to figure it out.

166

156 LAST DAYS MADNESS

The Land or the Earth?

The "coming" of "the Son of Man" is most often taught as a worldwide

event since Jesus states that "all the tribes of the earth will mourn" (Matt.

24:30). Again, most Bible translations do not capture the true meaning of

the Greek. A better translation is "tribes of the land," indicating that the

event is restricted to Israel since Israel is the topic of discussion. The Greek

word often translated "earth" can also be translated "soil" (Matt. 13:5, 8, 23), "ground" or "dirt" (25:25), "land" (countryside: 27:45), "Earth" (world: 16:10), or the "land of Israel" (2:6, 20—21), depending on the context.

Since "tribes" is used in conjunction with land in Matthew 24:30, "land [of

Judea]" is the best translation. If Matthew 24:30 refers to a future second

coming of Christ "the translation all the tribes of the earth, i.e., 'all the people of the world', is right. But if... the reference is to the conditions prevailing

when Jerusalem was being attacked, the translation should be 'all the tribes

of the land' (so Knox), i.e. the land of Judaea (cf. Zc. xii. 12)."15 The New Testament pattern follows the Old Testament pattern. The meaning of the

Hebrew word eretz

is simply "the land" and not "the earth" as in most English translations. For the most part, it refers to a specific stretch of land in a local, geographical,

or political sense. Often it means simply "the ground" upon which one

stands. As such, it is frequently used interchangeably with another com-

mon Hebrew word adama h (that is, "arable ground").... Not only does the Hebrew term eretz normally mean "land" as opposed to "the earth,"

but it usually refers specifically to the land promised to Abraham (Genesis

15:18). Certainly the term doesn't always denote "the promised land." It may be "the land" of Egypt (Exodus 1:7) or simply the place of one's birth, the "homeland" (Genesis 12:1). But most often in Genesis and throughout

the Pentateuch the term eretz refers to the promised land.16

Earlier in Matthew 24, Jesus warned His audience to flee "Judea" (24:16)

when they saw the "abomination of desolation" (24:15), or as Luke describes

it, "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20). Only those near enough

to the temple would be able to see the "abomination of desolation ... stand-

ing in the holy place." The Olivet Discourse was not a message to the world

(kosmos); it was a warning to the tribes of Israel that dwelled in the land as

part of that first-century generation.

The Return of Christ

167

The warning to all the tribes of the land that their city and sanctuary

were about to be reduced to rubble caused great mourning because they

understood that judgment was near. They must either repent and embrace

the Messiah or perish in the conflagration. The Jewish Christians left when

they saw "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20). No escape was

available to those determined to stay. We should remember that many of the

Jews rejected Jesus because He was not a political savior. They still believed

that a redeemer would come to deliver them from Roman oppression and

that if they forced the Romans into a confrontation, God would intervene

and save them. They were wrong. More than a million Jews died at the hands

of the Roman army. Their Savior had come, and they had crucified Him

forty years earlier. Again, the language of judgment is familiar to students of

the Old Testament: "And I will pour out on the house of David and on the

inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and supplication, so that they

will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as

one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him, like the

bitter weeping over a first-born" (Zech. 12:10).

How do we know that this is a reference to a first-century fulfillment?

Zechariah describes Messiah the King as "coming" to the "daughter of

Zion": "He is just and endowed with salvation, humble, and mounted

on a donkey, even on a colt, the foal of a donkey" (Zech. 9:9). This was

fulfilled during Jesus' earthly ministry (Matt. 21:5; John 12:15). Zechariah's

prophecy in 9:9 precedes the prophecy in 12:10. The price of Jesus' betrayal

as well as the potter's field where Judas was buried are described in Zechariah

11:13. These prophecies were also fulfilled during Jesus' earthly ministry

(Matt. 27:3-10; Acts 1:1,9), and they follow the prophecy of the mourning

of those who pierced Him. In addition, there is a description of what happens

when "the Shepherd" is struck: "the sheep" will be "scattered" (Zech. 13:7; cf. Matt. 26:31). Sandwiched between Zechariah 9:9, 11:13, and 13:7 are

the references that predict that those who pierced Him will mourn over their

misdeed (12:10). "Jesus' time connection is highly revealing: when the sign of

the Son of Man in heaven appears, then will Israel mourn, as if the cause of their desperation and sorrow were the appearing of the sign. The connection is

clear: those who assassinated God's Son would live to see the day when He

would be gloriously vindicated and the resultant heinousness of their crime

against Him appropriately exposed and punished."17

168

158 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Seeing the Son of Man

Those who pierced Jesus lived in the first century. This helps explain Rev-

elation 1:7 where the same wording is used. Those who "see" Him are "those

who pierced Him" (cf. John 19:7). John is telling us that those who pierced

Jesus experienced His covenant wrath. Revelation 1:7 must refer to a pre-A.D.

70 fulfillment, before that generation passed away (Matt. 16:27—28; 24:34).

Nineteenth-century commentator James Glasgow explains it this way:

"Every eye, and those who pierced Him, shall see Him." —The subject of the text is "the people of the land," viz. Judea; and it would be a direct misinterpretation, as well as false logic, to strain a term beyond its subject,

by applying it to the final judgment of all. That all men shall see Him,

we learn from other scriptures [2 Cor. v. 10]; but we must deal faithfully

with the text, and not force any word in order to make out a case. Truth

never requires this. That the land of Judea, in the prophetic sense, is the

subject, is evident from Zech. xii. 10; from which the words are taken,

both here and in John xix. 37.

"Those who pierced Him" are obviously those who had a hand in His

death. The text declares they shall see Him, employing for seeing the

verb optomai, already noticed, as not limited to ocular seeing. Though

those who pierced Him saw not His person after His ascension, yet they

saw His power bringing judgment on them, and making His cause pre-

vail in despite of their persecution, and they speedily saw their kingdom

terminated.18

Equating "seeing" with "understanding" is a common biblical metaphor. In John 12:40 Jesus quotes Isaiah 6:10 to explain why some have not believed

His message. Notice how "seeing" is equivalent to "understanding":

Render the hearts of this people insensitive, their ears dull, and their

eyes dim, lest they see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and repent and be healed (Isaiah 6:10).19

In quoting Isaiah, Jesus states that Jehovah "has blinded their eyes" 0ohn

12:40). This is not a physical blinding. The blinding is spiritual. To be blind

is not to understand; to see is to understand and believe. "To open their

eyes" is an expression used by the biblical writers to describe recognition

The Return of Christ

169

and understanding (Acts 26:18; cf. 1 Kings 8:29, 52; 2 Kings 2:16; 6:20;

19:16; Isa. 35:5; 42:7,16). The eyes of the disciples "were opened" by Jesus

and "they recognized Him" (Luke 24:31) is another example of equating

"seeing" with "understanding." David Chilton summarizes the text for us:

"The crucifiers would see Him coming in judgment—that is, they would

understand, that His coming would mean wrath on the land (cf. the use of the word see in Mark 1:44; Luke 17:22; John 3:36; Rom. 15:21)."20

170

160 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Dave Hunt, How Close Are We?: Compelling Evidence for the Soon Return of Christ

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1993), cover copy.

2. Dave Hunt, Glob a l Pea c e and the Rise of Antichrist (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1990), 5.

3. John Walvoord quoted in "The Final Days Are Here Again," Newsweek (18

March 1991), 55. John Walvoord believes that he will live to see the rap-

ture.

4. Hal Lindsey as quoted in Brad Miner, National Review (19 November 1990), 49.

5. Like the Greek word for earth (ge), the Hebrew word for earth (eretz) can also mean land, specifically the land of Israel.

6. Edward J. Young, The Book of Isaiah, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1969), 2:14.

7. Harold Fowler, The Gospel of Matthew, 4 vols. 0oplin, MO: College Press, 1985), 4:487.

8. Gleason L. Archer, Jr., "Response to the Posttribulation Rapture Position,"

The Rapture: Pre-, Mid-, or Post-Tribulational?, Richard R. Reiter, et al., (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1984), 215-16.

9. R.T. France, Jesus and the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House,

[1971] 1982), 235, 236. Emphasis added.

10. R.T. France, Matthew: Evangelist and Teacher (Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity Press, [1989] 1998), 315.

11. N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998), 525.

12. R.A. Cole, The Gospel According to Mark: An Introduction and Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1961), 229.

13. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God, 524.

14. Gary Hedrick, "Distress of Nations with Perplexity," Foreshadows of Wrath and

Redemption, William T. James, editor (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1999), 117.

15. R.V.G. Tasker, The Gospel According to St. Matthew (Grand Rapids, Ml: Eerdmans, 1961), 230.

16. John Sailhamer, Genesis Unbound: A Provocative New Look at the Creation Account

(Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 1996), 50.

17. Fowler, The Gospel of Matthew, 4:485.

The Return of Christ

171

18. James Glasgow, The Apocalypse Translated and Expounded (Edinburgh: T. & T.

Clark, 1872), 126-27.

19. John 12:40 reads: "He has blinded their eyes, and He hardened their heart; lest they see with their eyes, and perceive with their heart, and be converted,

and I heal them."

20. David Chilton, The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation

(Tyler, TX: Dominion Press, 1987), 66.

Chapter Thirteen

GATHERING

THE ELECT

Immediately after the destruction of the temple and the judgment of

Jerusalem, the Old Covenant age came to an end. The New Covenant

was realized in all its fullness. The author of Hebrews writes that God had

promised "Yet once more" to "shake not only the earth, but also the heaven"

(Heb. 12:26). "'Yet once more' ... denotes the removing of those things

which can be shaken, as of created things, in order that those things which

cannot be shaken remain" (12:27). God did this house cleaning in His

judgment coming in A.D. 70. The temple, priesthood, and animal sacrificial

system—"as of created things"—were gone forever. While the stones of

the temple were cast down, a new temple would be raised made of "living

stones ... being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer

up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 2:5).

This new spiritual edifice would consist of Jews and Gentiles "brought near

through the blood of Christ" (Eph. 2:13). Both groups (Jews and Gentiles)

"are no longer strangers and aliens" but "are fellow-citizens with the saints, and are of God's household, having been built upon the foundation of the

apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom

the whole building, being fitted together is growing into a holy temple in

173

174

163 LAST DAYS MADNESS

the Lord" (2:19-21). No longer is Jesus' message directed only to the "lost

sheep of Israel" (Matt. 10:6; 15:24); it now includes "the children of God

who are scattered abroad" (John 11:52). The nations began to recognize

Christ as King, not only of Israel but of the world. In context, Matthew

24:31 does not refer to the end of the world. Rather, it speaks of the spread

of the gospel to the nations and their eventual discipleship (28:18-20).

"And He will send forth His angels WITH A GREAT TRUMPET and THEY

WILL GATHER TOGETHER His elect from the four winds, from one end of

the sky to the other" (Matt. 24:31).

On Wings of Angels

Dispensationalists, taking a wooden literalism, teach that angels will pick

up Jews from around the world and bring them to Jerusalem. The note in

the Believer's Study Bible reads: "At the intervention of Christ from heaven, the elect will be gathered by the angels from the ends of the earth" (1380).

J. Dwight Pentecost takes a similar position:

During the Tribulation Israel will be scattered out of the land by

military invasions (Rev. 12:14-16), and the Israelites will flee and find

refuge among Gentile nations. Supernaturally God will bring people back

to the land through the instrumentality of angels, which will be the final

restoration anticipated in the Old Testament (Deut. 30:1-8).'

Thomas Ice also believes "that our Lord ... will use the agency of angels

to accomplish this task (rather than El Al airline!)."2 While with God "all

things are possible" (Mark 10:27), it is highly improbable that Jesus had

this interpretation in mind. Using the Old Testament as our guide, we learn

that when God "gathers His elect," angelic beings are not in view (Deut.

30:1-4; Isa. 11:12).

Angels as Gospel Messengers

The Greek word translated "angels" is the common word used for "mes-

sengers." God's prophets, messengers, and ministers, both in the Old and

Gathering the Elect

175

New Testament, are described as angels. Even dispensational prophecy

writer Ed Hindson recognizes this. "The term angel (Greek, angelos) means

'messenger.' God's angels are His divine messengers (Heb. 1:14; Rev. 1:1),

and His true prophets and preachers are called angels of the churches (Rev.

2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14)."3 In the Greek version of the Old Testament

(Septuagint or LXX), the Greek word angelos is translated numerous times

as "messenger": "And the LORD, the God of their fathers, sent word to

them again and again by His messengers, because He had compassion on His

people and on His dwelling place" (2 Chron. 26:15). The people continu-

ally "mocked the messengers of God, despised His words and scoffed at His

prophecies, until the wrath of the LORD arose against His people, until there

was no remedy" (26:16). These verses parallel the events leading up to the

destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Haggai is described as "the messenger

[angelos] of the LORD (Hag. 1:13). The priest in Malachi is designated a

messenger [angelos] of the LORD of hosts" (Mai. 2:7). John the Baptist is an

"angel," a messenger of God (Matt. 11:10; Mark 1:2; Luke 7:24, 27; cf. Mai.

3:1). Jesus "sent messengers [angeloi] ahead of Him" (Luke 9:52). The spies Joshua sent to Jericho are called "messengers" 0ames 2:25).

The Four Winds

These messengers in Matthew 24:31 call together God's people "from

the four winds," a reference to the four corners of the earth (Zech. 2:6;

13:29), and from one end of the sky to the other. This is a reference to the

entire horizon of the world (Psalm 22:27; Deut. 4:32; Matt. 28:18-20).

We should not be pressed to interpret "four winds" in a scientific fashion.

"Four winds" suggests a square world, as does "four corners of the earth" or

"land of lsrael" (Isa. 11:12; Ezek. 7:2; Rev. 7:1; 20:8). The Bible, speaking

in theological terms, depicts the earth as a house. Heaven is described in a

similar fashion 0ohn 14:2). None of this language suggests that the earth

is flat or a cube, something that a wooden literalism would demand. The

Bible alludes to the earth's circularity in Isaiah 40:22: '"It is he that sits

upon the circle of the earth'—'circle' being the translation of the Hebrew

khug sphere."4 By using this metaphor of the four winds, Jesus is telling us that the elect are gathered from everywhere, not limited to the land, or

house (Matt. 15:24), of lsrael (8:11).

We notice that the story in Acts begins in Jerusalem and ends in Rome.

176

165 LAST DAYS MADNESS

To the Jew, Jerusalem was the centre, while Rome was the "ends of the

earth" (see Acts 1:8; cf. Ps. of Solomon 8:15). To the Gentile, as one

suspects Theophilus (Acts 1:1) was, Rome was the hub of the inhabited

world. The author recounts how the gospel broke out of Jerusalem into

Judaea and from Judaea to Samaria and from Samaria to the Gentiles and

ultimately to Rome.5

The Old Testament description of Elam's judgment uses similar lan-

guage. "And I shall bring upon Elam the four winds from the four ends

of heaven, and shall scatter them to all these winds" (Jer. 49:36; also see

Dan. 7:2; 8:8; Rev. 7:1).

The Great Trumpet

The "great trumpet" of verse thirty-one is the call of the gospel. It refers

to Numbers 10:1-10 where silver trumpets were made to call the people

together for worship and to set them on their march. It also alludes to the

year of Jubilee, the year when the world reverts to its original owners, the

year when Satan is dispossessed and Christ reclaims the world (Acts 3:19-21).

"Now is THE ACCEPTABLE TIME" (2 Cor. 6:2). The Jubilee year was announced

by trumpets and signified the coming of Christ's kingdom (Lev. 25:8-17;

Luke 4:16—21; Isa. 61:1—3). The voice of the messengers of the gospel is

similar to the sound of a trumpet calling the people to repentance: "Cry

loudly, do not hold back; raise your voice like a trumpet, and declare to My

people their transgression, and to the house of Jacob their sins" (Isa. 58:1;

see Jer. 6:17; Ezek. 33:3-6; Rom. 10:18).

The gospel began to go out to the world at Pentecost, but throughout

the Book of Acts the gospel went "to the Jew first" (Rom. 1:16). With the

destruction of Jerusalem the gospel went out to the Gentiles in new fullness

and with the expectation that the nations—Gentiles—would be discipled

(Matt. 28:18-20).

Matthew 24:31 draws on Old Testament imagery: trumpet, four winds,

from one end of the sky to another. The trumpet is symbolic of a great work

about to commence, the great gathering of God's people into one new spiritual

nation. The word for "gather" is the Greek word sunagogue. A gathering of Jews met in a synagogue. Judaism, in its rejection of Christ, had become

a "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). The true synagogue of God—the

Gathering the Elect

177

church—is made up of believing Jews and Gentiles. The elect are scattered

around the world, "from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the

other" (cf. Matt. 28:18-20). God heralds the great ingathering of His elect

from every tribe, tongue, and nation by sending His gospel messengers into

the world (John 11:51-52; Rev. 7:9). History attests to the fact that Jesus'

elect have been and even now are being "gathered together" (Matt. 24:31)

as "a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own

possession... for you once were not a people, but now you are the people

of God ..." (1 Peter 2:9-10). Tasker offers a helpful summary of Matthew

24:31:

It was in fact only after the old order ended with the destruction of

the Temple that world evangelism by the Christian Church, now entirely

separate from Judaism, could be conducted in earnest. Not till then could

the trumpet of the gospel be sounded throughout the world. Not till then

could the Son of man, having 'visited' the old Israel in judgment, send his

angels (i.e. His messengers) to gather together his elect from the four winds, from

one end of heaven to the other, a result which could be obtained only when

the gospel had been preached to the whole world (29-31).6

"Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already become

tender, and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near; even so you

too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, right at the

door" (Matt. 24:32-33).

Hal Lindsey, author of The Late Great Planet Earth, believes these verses

refer to the 1948 national rebirth of lsrael.

The most important sign in Matthew has to be the restoration of the

Jews to the land in the rebirth of lsrael. Even the figure of speech "fig tree"

has been a historic symbol of national Israel. When the Jewish people,

after nearly 2,000 years of exile, under relentless persecution, became a

nation again on 14 May 1948 the "fig tree" put forth its first leaves.

Jesus said that this would indicate that He was "at the door," ready to

return. Then He said, "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (Matthew 24:34, NASB).

178

LAST DAYS MADNESS

What generation? Obviously, in context, the generation that would

see the signs—chief among them the rebirth of Israel. A generation in

the Bible is something like forty years. If this is a correct deduction,

then within forty years or so of 1948, all these things could take place.

Many scholars who have studied Bible prophecy all their lives believe

that this is so.7

Lindsey was not alone in coming to this conclusion. Chuck Smith, pastor

of Calvary Chapel and founder of the worldwide Calvary Chapel system of

churches, went a step further than Lindsey: "That generation that was living

in May 1948 shall not pass away until the second coming of Jesus Christ

takes place and the kingdom of God established upon the earth. How long

is a generation? Forty years on average in the Bible.... Where does that put

us? It puts us right out at the end. We're coming down to the wire."8

Without this interpretive keystone, the predictive elements in Lindsey's

prophetic blueprint are nothing more than scattered bricks on an unorga-

nized building site.

Hal Lindsey times the events of Matthew 24 on his belief that the "fig

tree" illustration in verses 32—33 refers to the restored nationhood of lsrael.

If the "fig tree" is a figure of a restored national Israel, then Lindsey might

have a case for a future fulfillment, although one must still deal with the

meaning of "this generation." On the other hand, if the fig tree illustration

has nothing to do with the re-establishment of national Israel, then Lindsey

and all who adopt his position are left with little support for their position,

especially in light of the rest of the New Testament which makes no men-

tion of restored covenantal status for the nation of lsrael. John Walvoord, a

dispensationalist, does not believe the fig tree represents Israel.

Actually, while the fig tree could be an apt illustration of Israel, it is

not so used in the Bible. In Jeremiah 24:1-8, good and bad figs illus-

trate Israel in the captivity, and there is also mention of figs in 29:17.

The reference to the fig tree in Judges 9:10-11 is obviously not Israel.

Neither the reference in Matthew 21:18-20 nor that in Mark 11:12-14

with its interpretation in 11:20-26, gives any indication that it is refer-

ring to Israel, any more than the mountain referred to in the passage.9

Accordingly, while this interpretation is held by many, there is no clear

scriptural warrant.

Gathering the Elect

179

A better interpretation is that Christ was using a natural illustration.

Because the fig tree brings forth new leaves late in the spring, the budding

of the leaves is evidence that summer is near. In a similar way, when those

living in the great tribulation see the signs predicted, they will know that

the second coming of Christ is near. The signs in this passage, accordingly,

are not the revival of lsrael, but the great tribulation.10

The parallel passage in Luke 21:29 shows that Jesus referred not only to

the fig tree but to "all the trees": "And He told them a parable: 'Behold the fig tree, and all the trees-, as soon as they put forth leaves, you see it and know for yourselves that the summer is now near. Even so you, too, when you

see these things happening, recognize that the kingdom of God is near'"

(Luke 21:29-30). Thus, it's not just the fig tree but trees in general whose

leaves herald the nearness of summer. The parable of the fig tree is used as

an analogy. When you see leaves on a fig tree, and for that matter, when you

see leaves on all the trees, you know that summer is near. In a similar way,

when you see certain signs, then know that Jesus is near, "right at the door"

(Matt. 24:33). Near to what? Near to fulfilling the promise He made about

coming within a generation to destroy the temple.

Dispensationalists like to speak of the "generation of the fig tree." This distorts the time indicators that are inherent in the parable of the fig tree.

Leaves come out in spring. This is an indicator that summer is near. A single

season is in view, not forty or fifty seasons. The leaves are the signs that

manifested themselves in the spring of A.D. 70. This can have nothing to

do with Israel's nationhood in 1948, the Six-Day War of 1967, or the first

steps toward Israel and Palestinian peace efforts in 1993.

The New Testament makes it very clear that the preferred symbols for

spiritual Israel are the vine (John 15:1—11), the olive tree (Rom. 11:16-24),

the lump of dough (11:16), and the flock (Isa. 40:11; Jer. 23:2; Matt. 26:31;

Luke 12:32; John 10:16; 1 Peter 5:2).

If, as Hal Lindsey and Chuck Smith claim, the sign that we should be

looking for is the re-establishment of Israel as a nation, why is its mean-

ing hidden in the cryptic fig-tree reference since Jesus used such detail to

describe what His disciples should not view as signs of the nearness of the

"end" (Matt. 24:4—14)? Furthermore, as the time was about to draw near for

the temple's destruction, Jesus was specific as to what they were to look for

in the way of signs: "Therefore when you see the ABOMINATION OF DESOLA-

180

169 LAST DAYS MADNESS

TION which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy

place (let the reader understand)" (24:15). Why would Jesus all of a sudden use a non-defined symbol to be the most important sign in determining the time

when the events of the Olivet Discourse are to take place?

Gathering the Elect

177

Notes

1. J. Dwight Pentecost, Thy Kingdom Come: Tracing God's Kingdom Program and

Covenant Promises Throughout History (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1990),

255.

2. Thomas Ice, "The Great Tribulation is Past: Rebuttal," in Thomas Ice and

Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., The Great Tribulation: Past or Future?—Two Evangelicals

Debate the Question (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1999), 158.

3. Ed Hindson, "False Christ's, False Prophets, Great Deception," Foreshadows

of Wrath and Redemption, William T. James, ed. (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1999), 33.

4. Samuel Eliot Morison, The European Discovery of America: The Northern Voyages

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 6.

5. Paul Barnett, Is the New Testament Reliable?: A Look at the Historical Evidence

(Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, [1986] 1993), 139.

6. R. V. G. Tasker, The Gospel According to St. Matthew: An Introduction and Com-

mentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1961), 227.

7. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970), 53-54.

8. Chuck Smith, Snatched Away (Costa Mesa, CA: Maranatha Evangelical Association of Calvary Chapel, 1976), 21. Quoted in Richard Abanes, End Time

Visions: The Road to Armageddon? (New York: Four Walls Eight Windows,

1998), 442, note 81.

9. Walvoord is clearly wrong about this. First-century Israel is the object of

Jesus' judgment discourse in Matthew 21:18-20 and Mark 11:12-14.

10. John F. Walvoord, Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come (Chicago, IL: Moody, [1974]

1980), 191-92.

Chapter Fourteen

THIS GENERATION

OR THIS RACE?

Several interpretive models are offered to avoid the inescapable conclu-

sion that "this generation" of Matthew 24:34 refers to the generation

to whom Jesus was speaking. Translating "this generation" as "this Jewish

race" has been a popular interpretation for many years. Adam Clarke in his

commentary on Matthew, first published in 1810 as part of a larger work

on the entire Bible, takes the position that the Greek word for "generation"

(genea) should be translated "race." He offers no exegetical support for his opinion. Not one cross-reference is listed. Even so, Clarke still maintains that

all the events prophesied by Jesus in Matthew 24 were fulfilled in the events

leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

This chapter contains a prediction of the utter destruction of the city

and temple of Jerusalem, and the subversion of the whole political con-

stitution of the Jews; and is one of the most valuable portions of the new

covenant Scriptures, with respect to the evidence which it furnishes of the

truth of Christianity. Every thing which our Lord foretold should come

on the temple, city, and people of the Jews, has been fulfilled in the most

correct and astonishing manner....1

183

184

LAST DAYS MADNESS

"Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things

take place" (Matt. 24:34).

With this verse we are brought full circle. In a straightforward manner,

Jesus makes it clear that all the events outlined in the preceding verses would

be fulfilled before the passing away of that first-century generation.

[T]he Saviour uttered these words in connection with the prophesied

distress of the Jewish people and the destruction of Jerusalem, His words

mean that, before the generation then living should have died out, these

things would occur. And this is what actually happened. Towards the end

of A.D. 70 (i.e., some forty years after Jesus uttered these words) every-

thing predicted by Him in verses 10-24 [of Luke 21] in connection with

the events before and during the destruction of Jerusalem was already

fulfilled—the temple was destroyed to the last stone, all Jerusalem was

a ruin, the Jewish people were slain by hundreds of thousands ... and

carried off into captivity.2

Matthew 24:34 is, in the words of J. Marcellus Kik, "the key to Matthew

Twenty-four."3 Luke's account of the Olivet Discourse confirms that the

generation Jesus had in mind was the generation to whom He was speak-

ing: "But keep on the alert at all times, praying in order that you may have strength to escape all these things that are about to take place, and to stand before the Son of Man" (Luke 21:36). Once we determine the meaning of

"you," we can resolve the meaning of "this generation." Clearly, Luke 21:36

refers to those to whom Jesus spoke, the same group Jesus told to "keep on

the alert" and to pray. Jesus confirmed the nearness of the unfolding of the

events by telling His listeners that the cataclysm was "about to take place."

Without a proper understanding of this key time text, prophetic forecasters

will always find Matthew 24 fertile ground for wild speculation.

Generation as "Race"

One way out of the time problem is to translate the Greek word genea as

"race" instead of "generation." Contemporary writers who translate genea as

"race" invariably support their view by claiming that the events described in

This Generation or This Race?

185

Matthew 24 were not fulfilled in A.D. 70. Arno C. Gaebelein writes: "Verse

34 has been a difficulty for many. The word generation does not mean the

people who were then living; it has the meaning of 'this race.' The Jewish

race cannot pass away till these things be fulfilled."4 In a footnote on "this

race," Gaebelein writes: "Same as 1 Pet. ii:9, 'a chosen generation,' i.e., class of peoples." A comparison of the Greek in 1 Peter 2:9 will show that genos

(race) is used, not genea (generation). Peter speaks of a chosen "race," not of a chosen "generation."

There are still some commentators who assert that genea should be trans-

lated "race" but offer little or no exegetical evidence to support their claim.

J. Dwight Pentecost, a dispensational premillennialist, calls the translation of

genea as "race" the "best explanation" without offering any exegetical defense.5

William Hendriksen, an amillennialist, puts up a weak exegetical argument for

genea being translated "race." The most serious flaw in Hendriksen's method is that he does not compare the use of genea in Matthew 24:34 with how

genea is used elsewhere in Matthew's gospel.6

Translating "this generation" as "this race of people" gained popularity through the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible. The New Scofield Reference

Bible (1967), retains a modified version of the note of the first edition. Since millions of Bible students have used the Scofield notes in their study of the

Bible, it is necessary that we make a thorough study of the position.

Following Scofield's lead, the text would read, the "nation or family of

Israel will be preserved 'till all these things be fulfilled.'" For Scofield, the

Greek word genea has the "primary definition" of "race, kind, family, stock, breed." If this is the proper translation and interpretation, Matthew 24:34

would be the only place in the Bible where genea has this meaning. To sup-

port his position, Scofield claims that all Greek lexicons agree that genea

means "race." Scofield writes:

The Greek word genea, translated "generation," means primarily (as does indeed the English word), "race, kind, family, stock, breed" (Webster); "An

age, race or generation of men" (Greenfield); "Men of the same stock, a

family" (Thayer). To so interpret, therefore, the passage in question is but

to give it its natural unforced meaning.7

Not all lexicons agree. Scofield lists Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon of

the New Testament as an authority in support of his contention that genea in ISO

174 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Matthew 24:34 should be translated "race." Thayer, contrary to Scofield,

puts forth the following definition for genea:"the whole multitude of men living

at the same time. Mt. xxiv. 34; Mk. xiii. 30; Luke i. 48."8 Thayer cites Matthew 24:34 and Mark 13:30 in support of translating genea as "generation."

Thayer does not apply the "race" translation to Matthew 24:34. A check of

other lexicons and theological dictionaries will show that genea is translated

"generation"—"those living at the same time"—not "race."

• "This generation is to be understood temporally."9

• "In Matt, it has the sense of this generation, and according to the first evangelist, Jesus expected the end of this age ... to occur in connection

with the judgment on Jerusalem at the end of that first generation (see

Mk. 9:1 and Matt. 16:18)."10

• "'Generation' is the most probable translation of genea."11

• "The meaning nation is advocated by some in Mt 24:34; Mk 13:30; Lk

21:23; but s[ee] also 2. 2. basically, the sum total of those born at the

same time, expanded to include all those living at a given time genera-

tion, contemporaries."12 In this lexicon, the most widely used today, Matthew 24:34 is employed as a reference in support of translating genea

as "generation," not "race."

The Greek word genos rather than genea is best translated "race" (see Mark 7:26; Acts 4:36; 7:19; 13:26; 17:28; 18:24; 2 Cor. 11:26; Gal. 1:14; Phil.

3:5; 1 Peter 2:9). "It seems unlikely that all three evangelists would have

failed to use this word if this was the idea they meant to convey."13

Even after considering all of this contrary evidence, some still claim

that genea should be translated "race." For example, Acts 2:40 is offered as support: "And with many other words he [Peter] solemnly testified and kept

on exhorting them, saying, 'Be saved from this perverse generation!'" Peter, a

Jew, is telling his fellow Jews to come to Christ because it is "this generation,"

the generation of which he is a part, that will encounter God's wrath when

the temple and city are destroyed. Why would Peter, a Jew, call his own race

"perverse"? There was nothing perverse about Jews as a race of people. Peter

remained an ethnic Jew after He became a Christian. As Matthew 24:22

and 24 state, only the elect—most of whom were Jews—would be saved

from the tribulation that was to occur before their generation passed away.

Hebrews 3:10 is sometimes used in support of translating genea as "race,"

This Generation or This Race?

187

but it actually refers to the single generation of Jews who wandered in the

wilderness for forty years: "Where your fathers tried Me by testing Me, and

saw My works for forty years. Therefore I was angry with this generation...."

This verse fits very well with genea being translated "generation" instead of "race," especially in light of the fact that a generation is forty years, the

amount of time that transpired between the Olivet Discourse in A.D. 30 and

Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70.

Nearly all Bible translations render genea as "generation." The King James, American Standard (1901), New English Bible, Revised Standard, New King

James, New Berkeley Version, the Jerusalem Bible, New International,14 and

the New American Standard translate genea as generation. If genea should be translated "race," then why don't translators translate it as "race"? Even Hal Lindsey admits that genea should not be translated "race."

ETERNITY: You don't think it would mean simply the race of people?

LINDSEY: No, because the context is not talking about a race but

about time. The context, and I've debated this with many people including

Earl Radmacher, is dealing with a general time or else it would have no

meaning at all. Only the third meaning of the word in the Greek lexicon

is "race." That's a very remote usage of that word.15

Generation does not mean "race" in English, as Scofield insists. Noah

Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language defines "generation"

as "a single succession in natural descent, as the children of the same parents;

hence an age. Thus we say, the third, the fourth, or the tenth generation. Gen xv. 16. The people of the same period, or living at the same time: 'O faith-less and perverse generation.' Luke ix." Noah Webster lists "race" as the sixth possible meaning. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1968 edition) lists

"race" last as a possible meaning. Contemporary usage also mitigates against

using "generation" as a synonym for race. When we speak of a "generation

gap," we do not mean a gap between races. A "generation gap" is an interval

of time that exists between two groups of people raised in different eras.

The Greek word genea, in its "natural unforced meaning," when comparing Scripture with Scripture, means "generation." And in the case of Matthew

24:34, the generation to whom Jesus was speaking. This means that the

prophecy delivered by Jesus on the Mount of Olives is now history.

ISO

176 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Adam Clarke, Clarke's Commentary, 3 vols. (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press,

[1810] n.d.), 3:225.

2. Norval Geldenhuys, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke (Grand Rapids, MI:

Eerdmans, 1951), 538-39.

3. J. Marcellus Kik, An Eschatology of Victory (Nutley, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1971), 59.

4. Arno C. Gaebelein, The Gospels and the Book of Acts in The Annotated Bible: The

Holy Scriptures Analyzed and Annotated (New York: Our Hope, 1917), 52.

5. J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1958] 1987), 281.

6. See William Hendriksen, Matthew: New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids,

MI: Baker Book House, 1973), 867-69.

7. C.I. Scofield's Question Box (Chicago, IL: The Bible Institute Colportage Association, n.d.), 72.

8. Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, rev. ed.

(New York: American Book Co., 1889), 112.

9. Friedrich Buchsel, "Genea," Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed.

Gerhard Kittel, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 10 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI:

Eerdmans, 1964), 1:665.

10. R. Morgenthaler, "Generation," New International Dictionary of New Testament

Theology, ed. Colin Brown, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1976),

2:37-38.

11. Colin Brown, "Generation," New International Dictionary, 2:38.

12. William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New

Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957), 153.

13. David J. Palm, "The Signs of His Coming: An Examination of the Olivet

Discourse from a Preterist Perspective" (Deerfield, IL: Trinity Evangelical

Divinity School, 1993), 21.

14. The New International Version, like the New American Standard, cites "race"

as an alternative translation with "generation" as the preferred translation.

15. Stephen Board interviews Hal Lindsey, "The Great Cosmic Countdown: Hal

Lindsey on the Future," Eternity (January 1977), 20.

Chapter Fifteen

THE PASSING AWAY OF

HEAVEN AND EARTH

When Jesus' disciples heard His frightening prediction about the destruc-

tion of the temple and the judgment of Jerusalem in their generation

(Matt. 23:36-39), they asked when this cataclysm would take place, what

signs would precede the event, and what sign would signify His coming "and

of the end of the age" (24:3). It is quite obvious that the disciples connected

Jesus' "coming" with the "end of the age." The "coming" of Matthew 24:3

refers to the coming of Jesus in judgment upon Jerusalem in A.D. 70. James,

as well as other New Testament writers, is clear about the nearness of Jesus'

coming: "the coming of the Lord is at hand" (James 5:8), at hand for those

who first read the epistle.

The destruction of the temple, and with it the priesthood and sacrificial

system, inaugurated a new era in which "the blood of Christ" cleanses our

"conscience from dead works to serve the living God" (Heb. 9:14). There-

fore, the expression "end of the age" refers "to the end of the 'Jewish age,'

i.e., the time of transference from a national to an international people of God,"1 what the Apostle Paul describes as the "ends of the ages." The "end"

had come upon the first-century church (1 Cor. 10:11).

189

190

178 LAST DAYS MADNESS

A similar phrase is used by the author of Hebrews: "But now once at

the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the

sacrifice of Himself" (Heb. 9:26). Jesus was manifested, not at the beginning,

but "at the consummation of the ages." The period between A.D. 30 and 70

is, as the apostle Peter describes it, "these last times" (1 Peter 1:20). As time

drew near for Jerusalem's destruction, Peter could say that "the end of all

things was at hand" (4:7). Milton Terry offers the following as a summary

of the meaning of the "end of the age":

It is the solemn termination and crisis of the dispensation which had

run its course when the temple fell, and there was not left one stone

upon another which was not thrown down. That catastrophe, which in

Heb. xii, 26, is conceived as a shaking of the earth and the heaven, is the

end contemplated in this discourse; not "the end of the world," but the termination and consummation of the pre-Messianic age.2

Notice that the disciples did not ask about the dissolution of the physical

heaven and earth or the judgment of the "world" ( kosmos), ideas foreign to the Bible. After hearing Jesus pronounce judgment on the temple and city

of Jerusalem (Matt. 23:37-39), His disciples ask about the end of the "age"

(aio n ). When did the "end" occur? The only proximate eschatological event that fits the "end of the age" framework is the destruction of Jerusalem in

A.D. 70. The disciples knew that the fall of the temple and the destruction

of the city meant the end of the Old Covenant order and the inauguration

of a new order. As Jews who were familiar with Old Testament imagery,

the disciples recognized the meaning of this restructuring language. Jesus

nowhere corrects or modifies their multi-faceted question.

The numerous New Testament time indicators demonstrate that Jesus did

not have a distant "end" in mind when He spoke of the "end of the age."

Charles Wright, in his commentary on Zechariah, offers the following help-

ful discussion of the meaning of the "end of the age":

The passing away of the dispensation of the law of Moses, which as

limited in great part to Israel after the flesh, might well be called the Jewish

dispensation, was justly regarded as "the end of the age" (... Matt. xxiv.

3). The Messiah was viewed as the bringer in of a new world. The period

of the Messiah was, therefore, correctly characterised by the Synagogue

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth 1 9 1

as "the world to come." In this signification our Lord used that expression

when he uttered the solemn warning that the sin against the Holy Ghost

would be forgiven "neither in this world (the then dispensation), neither

in the world to come" (Matt. xii. 32), or the new dispensation, when,

"having overcome the sharpness of death," Christ "opened the kingdom

of heaven to all believers."3

The "age to come," therefore, is simply a designation for the Christian

era, an era that was long ago prophesied by the prophets. Abraham, for

example, "rejoiced in order to see [Jesus'] day; and he saw it, and was glad"

(John 8:56). The old covenant with its attendant animal sacrifices and earthly

priesthood passed away when God's lamb, Jesus Christ, took away the sins

of the world.

Among Reformed preterist adherents, there is a great deal of agreement

with the above interpretation and the application of Matthew 24:1-34 to the

destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Among these same preterists, however, a

debate arises over a proposed shift in topics and eras with verses 35 and 36

being time transition verses. Numerous commentators claim that Jesus redirects His discussion from the Great Tribulation of A.D. 70 (Matt. 24:1-34) to a

distant coming that will result in the passing away of our present physical

"heaven and earth" (24:35).

J. Marcellus Kik writes in his highly regarded and influential commen-

tary on Jesus' Olivet Discourse, An Eschatology of Victory, that "many have recognized that with verse 36 a change in subject matter occurs. [Charles

H.] Spurgeon indicates this in his commentary on verse 36 [of Matt. 24]:

'There is a manifest change in our Lord's words here, which clearly indicates

that they refer to His last great coming to judgment.'"4 Kenneth L. Gentry,

author of many helpful works on prophecy, takes a similar view.5 While I

respect the work of these men, I do differ with them on their analysis of

Matthew 24:35 and following.

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth

Jesus does not change subjects when He assures the disciples that "heaven

and earth will pass away." Rather, He merely affirms His prior predictions

which are recorded in Matthew 24:29-31. Verse 36 is a summary and

confirmation statement of these verses.6 Keep in mind that the central focus

192

LAST DAYS MADNESS

of the Olivet Discourse is the desolation of the "house" and "world" of

apostate Israel (23:36). The old world of Judaism, represented by the earthly

temple, is taken apart stone by stone (24:2). James Jordan writes, "each time

God brought judgment on His people during the Old Covenant, there was

a sense in which an old heavens and earth was replaced with a new one:

New rulers were set up, a new symbolic world model was built (Tabernacle,

Temple), and so forth."7 The New Covenant replaces the Old Covenant

with new leaders, a new priesthood, new sacraments, a new sacrifice, a new

tabernacle (John 1:14), and a new temple 0ohn 2:19; 1 Cor. 3:16; Eph.

2:21). In essence, a new heaven and earth.

The darkening of the sun and moon and the falling of the stars, coupled

with the shaking of the heavens (24:29), are more descriptive ways of say-

ing that "heaven and earth will pass away" (24:35). In other contexts, when

stars fall, they fall to the earth, a sure sign of temporal judgment (Isa. 14:12;

Dan. 8:10; Rev. 6:13; 9:1; 12:4). So then, the "passing away of heaven and

earth" is the passing away of the old covenant world of Judaism led and

upheld by those who "crucified the Lord of glory" (1 Cor. 2:8).

John Owen (1616-1683) maintained that the "passing of heaven and

earth" in 2 Peter 3:5-7 had reference, "not to the last and final judgment of

the world, but to that utter desolation and destruction that was to be made

of the Judaical church and state" in A.D. 70.8 John Brown (1784-1858),

commenting on Matthew 5:18, follows the same methodology.

"Heaven and earth passing away," understood literally, is the dissolution

of the present system of the universe; and the period when that is to take

place, is called the "end of the world." But a person at all familiar with the

phraseology of the Old Testament Scriptures, knows that the dissolution

of the Mosaic economy, and the establishment of the Christian, is often

spoken of as the removing of the old earth and heavens, and the creation

of a new earth and new heavens.9

After surveying how this language is used throughout the Bible and in

Jewish literature, John Lightfoot applies the "passing away of heaven and

earth" to the "destruction of Jerusalem and the whole Jewish state.. .as if the

whole frame of this world were to be dissolved."10

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth

193

This and That

Commentators often argue that Matthew 24 contains both a discussion

of the A.D. 70 destruction of religious, social, and political Judaism as well as

a reference to a yet-future return of Christ. This supposed distinction is drawn

by contrasting "this generation" and "that day and hour." Gentry writes that

"there seems to be an intended contrast between that which is near (in verse 34) and that which is far (in verse 36): this generation vs. that day. It would seem more appropriate for Christ to have spoken of 'this day' rather than

'that day' if He had meant to refer to the time of 'this generation.'"11 Not at

all. We should expect to see "that" used for a time still in the speaker's future, whether that event is forty years or four thousand years in the future. "This

generation" refers to the present generation Jesus was addressing. "This" is

therefore the appropriate word for something present w hile "that" is the most appropriate word for something future. Arndt and Gingrich agree: "[T]his,

referring to something comparatively near at hand, just as ekeinos [that] refers to something comparatively farther away."12 "That day" would come in the

final destruction of the Jews who rejected their Messiah, a time still in the

future for Jesus' audience. John Gill writes:

But of that day and hour knoweth no man, &c.] Which is to be understood, not of the second coming of Christ, the end of the world, and the last

judgment; but of the coming of the son of man, to take vengeance on the

Jews, and of their destruction; for the words manifestly regard the date

of the several things going on before, which only can be applied to that

catastrophe, and dreadful desolation.13

Gill assumes that the previous context of the chapter governs the mean-

ing of "that day." As was pointed out above, Matthew 24:29 is a familiar

Old Testament description of the "passing away of heaven and earth," that

is, the end of a social, religious, and political system.

Adam Clarke offers a similar interpretation: "Verse 36. But of that day and

hour] [The Greek word] Ora is translated season by many eminent critics, and is used in this sense by both sacred and profane authors. As the day was not

known, in which Jerusalem should be invested by the Romans, therefore

our Lord advised his disciples to pray that it might not be on a Sabbath; and as the season was not known, therefore they were to pray that it might not

ISO

182 LAST DAYS MADNESS

be in the winter, ver. 20. See on Mark xiii 32."14

John Lightfoot's comments show that the only possible reference was to

the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70: "That the discourse is of the day of

the destruction of Jerusalem is so evident, both by the disciples' question,

and by the whole thread of Christ's discourse, that it is a wonder any should

understand these words of the day and hour of the last judgment."15

The Absence of Signs

Another reason offered in support of dividing the chapter at 24:35 is

that the signs that follow are of a general nature compared to specific signs

detailed in 24:1-34. There are two very good reasons for the absence of

signs. First, the signs have already been given. All the signs that were nec-

essary to understand the general timing of Jesus' return in judgment were

specified. Second, the topic changes from signs leading up to the temple's

destruction to watchfulness and expectation during the interim.

Those Days and That Day

Gentry writes that "we should notice the pre-transition emphasis on plural

'days' in contrast to the focus on the singular 'day' afterwards. 'This gen-

eration' involves many 'days' for the full accomplishment of the protracted

(Matt. 24:22) Great Tribulation." He states that in contrast to the "many

'days'" of the Great Tribulation, '"that day' of the future Second Advent will

come in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye (cp. 1 Cor. 15:52)." Notice,

however, that the Great Tribulation of Matthew 24:15-28 does not include

either the dissolution of the social, political, and religious world of the Jews

(24:29) or the "coming of the Son of Man" (24:30). The events of24:29-30

(the coming of Jesus in judgment before that first-century generation passes

away) follow "immediately after the tribulation of those days" (24:29). Such a distinction indicates that Jesus was pointing towards a certain day when

the temple and the city of Jerusalem would fall.

The description of the Great Tribulation leads up to the heart of the

discourse which is found in 24:29-31. This is why Matthew describes the

"coming of the Son of Man" as following the "days" of the Great Tribulation.

The "coming of the Son of Man" in 24:30 parallels the "Son of Man" who

comes up "to the Ancient of Days" in Daniel 7:13. This "coming" was not

a multi-day event; it happened on a certain day known only to the Father.

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth 195

The collapse of the social, religious, and political world of Israel (Matt.

24:29)—witnessed by tens of thousands as they saw their beloved city and

sanctuary turn to ashes amidst the flames—was evidence that the Son of

Man had come "up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him"

(Dan. 7:13; cp. Matt. 24:30).

fust Like the Days of Noah

To help His listeners better understand the timing and circumstances

of the events leading up to and including the destruction of the temple

before their generation passed away, Jesus draws on a familiar Old Testa-

ment judgment event—the flood. Jesus, teaching by analogy, shows how

the coming of the flood waters and His own coming are similar. In Noah's

time we read about "those days which were before the flood" and "the day

that NOAH ENTERED THE ARK" (Matt. 24:38). Similarly, there were days

before the coming of the Son of Man and the day of the coming of the

Son of Man. The same people were involved in both the "days before"

and "the day of" the Son of Man. Those who "were eating and drink-

ing" and "marrying and giving in marriage" were the same people who

were shut out on "the day that Noah entered the ark." Noah entered the

ark on a single day similar to the way Jesus as the Son of Man came on

the "clouds of the sky with power and great glory" (24:30), a day and

hour known only to the Father (24:36). "Some shall be rescued from the

destruction of Jerusalem, like Lot out of the burning of Sodom: while

others, no ways perhaps different in outward circumstances, shall be left

to perish in it."16

Jesus says that His coming "will be just like the days of Noah" (24:37).

The people were doing normal things—"eating and drinking" and "mar-

rying and giving in marriage." Jesus is telling his audience that life will be

going on as usual when He returns in judgment. People had no thought

of a coming judgment in Noah's day since there were no signs. Noah was

told to prepare for "things not yet seen' (Heb. 11:7). Jesus is not describing evil behavior like drunkenness and sexual sins like '"exchanging mates' or

'wife swapping,' contrary to what M. R. DeHaan and Jack Van Impe claim.17

"Marrying and given in marriage" is a phrase to describe, well, "marrying

and giving in marriage" (see Matt. 22:30). Families do it every day. Men

and women marry and parents give their daughters away in marriage. D. A.

Carson's comments are helpful:

196

184 LAST DAYS MADNESS

[T]hat the coming of the Son of Man takes place at an unknown

time can only be true if in fact life seems to be going on pretty much as

usual—just as in the days before the flood (v. 37). People follow their

ordinary pursuits (v. 38). Despite the distress, persecutions, and upheavals

(vv. 4-28), life goes on: people eat, drink, and marry. There is no overt

typological usage of the Flood as judgment here, nor any mention of the

sin of that generation.18

Support for Carson's interpretation can be found in Luke's account of

the time just before Sodom's destruction: "It was the same as happened in

the days of Lot: they were eating, they were drinking, they were buying,

they were selling, they were planting, they were building; but on the day

that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and

destroyed them all" (Luke 17:28). Buying, selling, planting, and building

describe life going on as usual without any regard to an impending judg-

ment. Are dispensationalists willing to say that these activities "connote moral

corruption"? Darrell L. Bock attempts this interpretation even though he

admits that the idea of "moral corruption . . . is not emphasized in Luke's

description."19 No one disputes that Noah and Lot lived in a time of moral

corruption that brought judgment. Jesus' point is that the people in Noah

and Lot's day went on with their lives as if the promise of imminent judg-

ment was a lie (see 2 Peter 3:3—4). The same is true of those who were told

that Jesus would return in judgment within a generation.

No Rapture Here!

Many futurists claim that the phrase "took them all away" (24:39) refers

to a rapture that is still in our future. On the contrary. "In the context of

24:37-39, 'taken' presumably means 'taken to judgment' (cf. Jer. 6:11

NASB, NRSV)."20 The phrase ties the judgment of the world in Noah's day

with the judgment of the Jews' world in Israel's day that took place with the

destruction of the city of Jerusalem and the temple. Who was taken away in

the judgment of the flood? Not Noah and his family. They were left behind

to carry on God's work. John Gill writes in his commentary on this passage:

"the whole world of the ungodly, every man, woman, and child, except eight

persons only; Noah and his wife, and his three sons and their wives...." were

taken away in judgment. And what does Gill say about those in the field?:

They shall be taken away "by the eagles, the Roman army, and either killed or

carried captive by them." The Bible gives its own commentary on the meaning

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth 197

of "took them all away" in Luke 17:27, 29: "Destroyed them all" is equivalent to "took them all away." Consider the meaning that dispensationalist John

Walvoord gives "took them away."

An argument advanced by Alexander Reese and adopted by [Robert]

Gundry is that the references in Matthew 24:40,41 should be interpreted

as referring to the rapture. These verses state, "Then shall two be in the

field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be

grinding at the mill; one shall be taken and the other left."

Here both Gundry and Reese violate the rule that the context should

determine the interpretation of a passage. Both Gundry and Reese

concede that the context deals with judgment such as characterized

the time of Noah. According to Matthew 24:39 those living at that

time "knew not until the flood came, and took them all away, so shall

also the coming of the Son of Man be." Those taken away were taken

away in judgment.

* * * * *

Claiming that those taken in verses 40 and 41 are taken away in the

rapture, Gundry in discussing the parallel passage in Luke 17:34—37 ig-

nores verse 37. There two are pictured in the same bed, with one taken and

the other left. Two are grinding together, and one is taken and the other

left. Two are in the field, one is taken and the other left. Then, in verse

37, the question is asked, "Where, Lord?" The answer is very dramatic:

"And He said unto them, Wherever the body is, there will the eagles be

gathered together." It should be very clear that the ones taken are put to

death and their bodies are consumed by the vultures. If the ones taken

are killed, then verses 40, 41 of Matthew 24 speak of precisely the same

kind of judgment as occurred in the flood where the ones taken were

taken in judgment.21

But like Reese and Gundry, Walvoord ignores the time texts that run

throughout Matthew 24—25, claiming that they refer to a distant coming of

Christ. Since there was a judgment where Jews were in fact "taken away in

judgment," it makes much more sense to place the timing of such an event

to the closest event, Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70.

Mix and Match

Luke 17:22-37 describes five Olivet-Discourse prophetic events that are

198

186 LAST DAYS MADNESS

identical to those found in Matthew 24. The difference between Matthew

24 and Luke 17 is in the order of the events, a characteristic of the passages

that few commentators can explain. Ray Summers writes:

This is a most difficult passage. The overall reference appears to be to

the coming of the Son of Man—Christ—in judgment at the end of the

age. Some small parts of it, however, are repeated in Luke 21 in refer-

ence to the destruction of Jerusalem (A.D. 70), and larger parts of it are in

Matthew 24, also in reference to the destruction of Jerusalem. The entire

complex cautions one against dogmatism in interpreting.22

Taking Matthew 24 as the standard, Luke places the Noah's ark analogy

(Matt. 24:3 7-39) before the events of Matthew 24:17-18 ("let him who is on

the housetop not go down"), verse 27 ("for just as the lightning comes from the

east"), and verse 28 ("wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather").

If the five prophetic events of Matthew 24 that are found in Luke 17:22-37

are numbered 1-2-3-4-5, Luke's numbering of the same events would be

2-4-1-5-3.23 While this is not positive proof of an A.D. 70 fulfillment for

chapters 24 and 25, it certainly adds credibility to the position.

After A Long Time

Another line of evidence offered by those who believe that events following

Matthew 24:34 refer to the personal and physical return of Jesus is the meaning

given to "after a long time" (24:48; 25:19) and the "delay" by the bridegroom (25:5). On the surface these examples seem to indicate that two different events

are in view, one near (the destruction of Jerusalem) and one distant (the second

coming of Christ). This is the view of Stephen F. Hayhow.

Both parables, the parables of the virgins (vv. 1-13), and the parable of

the talents (vv. 14—30), speak of the absence of the bridegroom/master,

who is said to be "a long time in coming" (v. 5) and "After a long time the

master of the servants returned..." (v. 19). This suggests, not the events of

A.D. 70 which were to occur in the near future, in fact within the space of

a generation, but a distant event, the return of Christ.24

Notice that the evil slave says, "My master is not coming for a long time"

(Matt. 24:48). The evil slave then proceeds to "beat his fellow-slaves and

eat and drink with drunkards" (24:49). But to the surprise of the "evil slave"

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth

199

the master returned when he least expected him (24:50). The master did not

return to cut the evil slave's distant relatives in pieces (24:51); he cut him in pieces. The evil slave was alive when the master left, and he was alive when

the master returned. In this context, a "long time" must be measured against

a person's lifetime. In context, two years could be a long time if the master

usually returned within six months.

The same idea is expressed in the parable of the "talents." A man entrusts

his slaves with his possessions (25:14). The master then goes on a journey

(25:15). While the master is gone, the slaves make investment decisions

(25:16-18). We are then told that "after a long time the master of those slaves

came and settled accounts with them" (25:19). In this context "a long time"

is no longer than an average lifetime. The settlement is made with the same

slaves who received the talents. In every other New Testament context, "a

long time" means nothing more than an extended period of time (Luke 8:27;

23:8; John 5:6; Acts 8:11; 14:3, 28; 26:5, 29; 27:21; 28:6). Nowhere does

it mean centuries or multiple generations.

The delay of the bridegroom is no different from the "long time" of the

two previous parables. The bridegroom returns to the same two groups

of virgins (25:1-13). The duration of the delay must be measured by the

audience.

This brief analysis helps us understand the "mockers" who ask, "Where

is the promise of His coming?" (2 Peter 3:3—4). Peter was aware that Jesus'

coming was an event that would take place before the last apostle died (Matt.

16:27-28; John 21:22-23). The doctrine of the soon return of Christ was

common knowledge (Matt. 24:34; 26:64; Phil. 4:5; Heb. 10:25; 1 John 2:18;

Rev. 1:1, 3). It is not hard to imagine that the passage of several decades

would lead some to doubt the reliability of the prophecy, especially as the

promised generation of destruction was coming to a close. The horrendous

events of A.D. 70 silenced the mockers.

Different Comings?

Is the "coming of the Son of Man" in Matthew 24:37 different in time and

kind from the "coming of the Son of Man" in verses 27 and 30? There is no

indication that Jesus is describing two comings separated by an indeterminate

period of time. What would have led the disciples to conclude that Jesus was

describing a coming different from the one He described moments before

200

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

when He uses identical language to describe both of them? Jesus does not

say "this coming of the Son of Man" or "that coming of the Son of Man" to distinguish two comings as He does with "this generation" and "that day."

Similarly, there is little evidence that the "coming of the Son of Man" in

Matthew 24:27, 30, 39, and 42 is different from the "coming of the Son

of Man" in 25:31. Compare 25:31 with 16:27, a certain reference to the

destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70:

"For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with

His angels; and will then recompense every man according to his deeds"

(Matt. 16:27).

"But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with

Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne" (Matt. 25:31).

These verses are almost identical. The timing of Matthew 16:27 is tied to

verse 28: "Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here

who shall not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."

"Recompensing every man according to his deeds" corresponds with "He will

sit on His glorious throne" to execute judgment among the nations (25:32).

But how was this universal judgment fulfilled in A.D. 70?

There is no indication that Matthew 25:31—46 describes a single event.

Rather, the passage describes a judgment over time, related to Jesus' domin-

ion as an "everlasting dominion" (Dan. 7:14). Jesus was "exalted to the right hand of God" where He rules until all His enemies are made a "footstool for

[His] feet" (Acts 2:33, 35). Paul writes that Jesus "must reign until He has

put all of His enemies under His feet" (1 Cor. 15:25). Milton Terry writes

that "the ideal of judgment presented in Matt, xxv, 31—46, is therefore no

single event, like the destruction of Jerusalem."25 Terry continues:

The Old Testament doctrine is that "the kingdom is Jehovah's, and he

is ruler among the nations" (Psalm xxii, 28). "Say ye among the nations,

Jehovah reigneth; he shall judge the peoples with equity. He cometh, he

cometh to judge the earth; he shall judge the world in righteousness, and

the peoples in his truth" (Psalm xcvi, 10-13). The day of judgment for

any wicked nation, city, or individual is the time when the penal visitation

comes; and the judgment of God's saints is manifest in every signal event

which magnifies goodness and condemns iniquity.26

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth 201

The King of glory is continually judging and reigning among the nations,

and He will not cease from this work until "He has abolished all rule and

all authority and power" (1 Cor. 15:24).

Finding a Solution

The solution in determining when certain prophetic events take place is

the presence of time indicators in context. The phrase "long time" has been

made to stretch over several millennia even though there is no indication of

such an extended period of time in Matthew 24:48 and 25:19. While all

admit that time indicators are present in Matthew 24—25, few are willing

to allow the words and the context to set the limits on how long a "long

time" is. The use of "long time" has no eschatological significance in other

New Testament contexts (Luke 8:27; 20:9; 23:8; John 5:6; Acts 8:11; 14:3,

28; 26:5, 29; 27:21; 28:6). For example, Herod "had wanted to see Jesus

for a long time" (Luke 23:8). The same can be said for the New Testament

use of "delay" (Luke 1:21; 18:7; Acts 9:38; 22:16; 25:17; Heb. 10:37; Rev.

10:6).

The parables of Matthew 24-25 are clear on the duration of the de-

lays—the two masters who go on a journey return to the same people they

left. There is no need to allegorize these parables to force them to depict a

distant coming of Christ. In addition, the delay of the bridegroom in the

parable of the ten virgins is not very long, unless the virgins are related to

Rip Van Winkle. The virgins get drowsy at dusk, and the bridegroom returns

at midnight (Matt. 25:6). How can this "delay" be turned into a span of time

nearly two thousand years in length?

202

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. R. T. France, The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1985), 337.

2. Milton S. Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics: A Study of the Most Notable Revelations

of God and of Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1898] 1988),

225.

3. Charles Henry Hamilton Wright, Zechariah and His Prophecies (Minneapolis, MN: Klock and Klock, [1879] 1980), 449.

4. J. Marcellus Kik, An Eschatology of Victory (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1975), 158.

5. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., "An Encore to Matthew 24," Dispensationalism in Transi-

tion (May 1993).

6. Henry Alford, The New Testament for English Readers (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, n.d.), 169.

7. James B. Jordan, Through New Eyes: Developing a Biblical View of the World

(Brentwood, TN: Wolgemuth & Hyatt, 1988), 167.

8. John Owen, The Works of John Owen, 16 vols. (London: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1965-68), 9:134.

9. John Brown, Discourses and Sayings of Our Lord, 3 vols. (Edinburgh: The Banner of Truth Trust, [1852] 1990), 1:170.

10. John Lightfoot, Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica:

Matthew— 1 Corinthians, 4 vols. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers,

[1859], 1989), 3:454.

11. Gentry, "An Encore to Matthew 24," 2.

12. William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New

Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 4th ed. (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1952), 600.

13. John Gill, An Exposition of the New Testament, 3 vols. (Paris, AR: The Baptist Standard Bearer, [1809] 1989), 1:296.

14. Adam Clarke, Clarke's Commenatary: Matthew-Revelation (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, [1824] n.d.), 234.

15. Lightfoot, Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica,

2:442.

16. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at This Time are Fulfilling in the World (London: J.F. Dove, 1754), 379.

The Passing Away of Heaven and Earth

203

17. Jack Van Impe, The Great Escape: Preparing for the Rapture, the Next Event on

God's Prophetic Clock (Nashville, TN: Word, 1998), 127.

18. D. A. Carson, "Matthew," The Expositor's Bible Commentary, gen. ed., Frank E. Gaebelein (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1984), 8:509. Also see N. T.

Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Pess, 1996),

365-66.

19. Bock, Luke: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1996), 2:1432-33.

20. Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), 115.

21. John F. Walvoord, The Blessed Hope and the Tribulation: A Historical and Biblical

Study of Posttribulationism (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1976), 89,90. Wal-

voord writes in another place: "Because at the rapture believers will be taken

out of the world, some have confused this with the rapture of the church.

Here, however, the situation is the reverse. The one who is taken, is taken in

judgment. This is in keeping with the illustration of the time of Noah when

the ones taken away are the unbelievers." (John F. Walvoord, Matthew: The

Kingdom Come [Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1974], 193).

22. Ray Summers, Commentary on Luke:Jesus, the Universal Savior (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1972), 202.

23. See the helpful chart in Edward E. Stevens, What Happened in A.D. 70? (Brad-ford, PA: Kingdom Publications, 1997).

24. Stephen F. Hayhow, "Matthew 24, Luke 1 and the Destruction of Jerusalem,"

Christianity and Society 4:2 (April 1994), 4.

25. Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics, 251.

26. Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics, 251.

Chapter Sixteen

AVOIDING

RAPTURE FEVER

The pretribulational rapture of the church has been described as the

next great eschatological event in God's prophetic timetable, an event

so significant that all Bible prophecy is dependent upon it taking place. But

Dave Hunt has called it "The Late Great Rapture Theory."1 He is lament-

ing the fact that many Christians are beginning to question whether the

Bible actually teaches that the church will be "caught up" prior to the Great

Tribulation.

Of course, as I hope to demonstrate, there is good reason to question this

relatively new doctrine. Hunt writes that "in the early 1970s the Rapture was

the most-talked-about topic in the church. [Hal] Lindsey had captured the

attention and imagination of his generation. Pastors preached about heaven

and Christians eagerly anticipated being caught up at any moment to meet

the Lord in the air."2 Hunt fails to make a distinction between teaching about

heaven and teaching about the rapture. The church knew nothing about

a pre-tribulational rapture prior to 1830. Are we to assume, using Hunt's

logic, that for eighteen hundred years the church was not preaching about

heaven? Hunt intimates the newness of the pre-tribulational rapture theory.

He says that J.N. Darby and C.I. Scofield "helped to make the pretribulation

205

206

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

rapture belief dominant for 100 years."3 What he does not say is that the

doctrine began in Darby's lifetime!

Why had Lindsey "captured the attention and imagination of his genera-

tion"? There is one simple answer: He set a date for the rapture, placing it

sometime between 1981 and 1988. Hunt tries to get Lindsey off the hook

by claiming that Lindsey did not intend for his readers to come to this

conclusion. Hunt states, "The Late Great Planet Earth had only suggested that Christ's statement concerning 'this generation' might possibly indicate a

fulfillment within 40 years from Israel's rebirth."4 Why did Lindsey's readers

think that he had set a date? Lindsey made the calculations. Hunt himself

has entered the Jesus-will-rapture-His-church-soon game.

In his book on the nearness of the pre-tribulational rapture, How Close

Are We?,5 Hunt offers what he believes is "compelling evidence for the soon return of Christ." While he has not set a date for the rapture, he has made

it clear that he believes that it is "near." This in itself is a remarkable admis-

sion. Futurists like Hunt have been telling us that the biblical terms "near,"

"shortly," and "quickly" are not to be interpreted literally, that these words do not mean what they seem to mean. They maintain that terms relating

to the timing of prophetic events only mean that Jesus could come at any

moment. Since nearly two thousand years have passed, and the rapture has

not taken place, can we not assume that Hunt's use of "soon" as he applies

it to this present generation should have a similar abstract meaning?

No Fear of the Bible

Tim LaHaye has been called a "prophecy expert." In his defense of

the pretribulational rapture in No Fear of the Storm, LaHaye writes that the

"Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is coming soon."6 Those who believe in a

pretribulational rapture teach that Jesus' could come at any moment. This is

nonsense. "Soon" means "near in time," before the generation of the apostles who were with Jesus passed away (Matt. 24:34). Sound Bible interpretation

cannot maintain that "near" (Matt. 24:32-33; Mark 13:28-29; Luke 10:9,

11; 21:31; Rev. 1:3; 22:10), "shortly" (Acts 25:4; Phil. 2:19, 24; 3 John

14; Rev. 1:1; 22:6),7 and "quickly" (Matt. 5:25; 28:7-8; Luke 15:22; 16:6;

John 11:29, 31; 13:47; Acts 12:7; 22:18; Rom. 9:28; Gal. 1:6; 2 Tim. 2:2;

Rev. 2:16; 3:11; 11:14; 22:7, 12, 20) can mean "any moment" when nearly

two thousand years have passed. Try substituting LaHaye's interpretation

Avoiding Rapture Fever

207

of "any moment" in these texts whenever "near," "shortly," and "quickly" are used in the Bible.

LaHaye wants to uphold "a belief in an authoritative, Holy Spirit-inspired,

inerrant Bible."8 This is certainly a worthwhile goal in an age of unbelief. But

this goal cannot be attained by asserting that what Jesus really meant when

He said He would come before that first-century generation passed away was

that He "could come for His church at any time"9 in a pre-tribulational rapture,

even after the passage of nearly two millennia. Such a position is impossible to

hold for anyone who believes "in an authoritative, Holy Spirit inspired, inerrant

Bible." For LaHaye, anyone who does not believe that the Bible teaches a pre-

tribulational rapture is interpreting the Bible "figuratively or as an allegory."10

This is a harsh accusation, especially coming from an advocate of a position

that was not taught until 1830. Moreover, it seems rather presumptuous to

advocate a doctrine that does not have a single verse to support it, something

LaHaye and other dispensationalists willingly admit!

One objection to the pre-Tribulation Rapture is that no one passage

of Scripture teaches the two aspects of His Second Coming separated by

the Tribulation. This is true. But then, no one passage teaches a post-trib

or mid-trib Rapture, either.11

There is a very good reason for this lack of biblical support for any future

rapture view: The entire futuristic scenario as concocted by pre-, mid-, and

post-tribulationalists is based on verses that have already been fulfilled!

None of these attempts to predict the proximity of the rapture is new. In

1970, Hal Lindsey's The Late Great Planet Earth hit the bookstores and shook

the Christian publishing industry. It has been described as "the bestselling

non-fiction book of the decade, selling more than 18 million copies world-

wide." Since 1970 "more than 25 million copies have been printed in 30

languages."12 The book continues to sell well.13 "Things sensational" would

be a more appropriate description.

What made The Late Great Planet Earth so successful? First, it was written

in a popular style, much like a work of fiction. Second, it got into the predic-

tion game, "interpreting" current events in the light of Bible prophecy with

rock-solid certainty. Third, it took a "crystal ball" approach to interpretation

by giving readers a sense of being able to gaze into the future. In fact, the

final chapter in The Late Great Planet Earth is "Polishing the Crystal Ball."

208

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

"This Generation"

Lindsey's date for the rapture is tied to the meaning he gives "this genera-

tion" in Matthew 24:34. For Lindsey, "a generation is something like forty

years."14 By adding forty years to 1948, the year Israel regained nationhood

status, he arrives at 1988. But Lindsey believes in a pretribulational rapture.15

and thus believes that the rapture occurs seven years before Jesus returns to set up His earthly millennial kingdom. This means that the rapture should

have occurred, using Lindsey's calculations, sometime around 1981 with

1988 being the year of the Second Coming and the establishment of Jesus'

earthly millennial reign. If Lindsey calculated that the rapture was to occur

at the very end of the forty-year generation, then he was still wrong, since

1988 has come and gone.

Just in case his prediction proved to be wrong, Lindsey covered himself

with phrases like " if this is a correct deduction," "something like forty years,"

"forty years or so" and "could take place" (emphasis added). Lindsey's prophetic guesses, however, were not considered guesses by his readers. Many took

the rebirth of Israel and the forty-year generation scenario as date setting.

They set their sights on what they believed to be the assured return of Christ

sometime before 1988. Now that 1988 has passed, prophetic readjusting

has taken place.

A Clouded Crystal Ball

Gary Wilburn, in his review of the film version of The Late Great Planet

Earth, agrees that the 1948-88 scenario is the keystone to Lindsey's multi-

million best-seller. "The world," as Wilburn evaluates Lindsey's logic, "must end within one generation from the birth of the State of lsrael. Any opinion

of world affairs that does not dovetail with this prophecy is dismissed."16 In

The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon, Lindsey leads his readers to a pre-1990

climax of history, although he continues to evade certainty: "I believe many

people will be shocked by what is happening right now and what will hap-

pen in the very near future. The decade of the 1980s could very well be the last

decade of history as we know it;"17 The rapture did not occur as Lindsey said it would, based on the 1948-88 timetable and a forty-year generation. The

decade of the '80s is over.

Avoiding Rapture Fever

209

"Hero or Bum"?

While Lindsey did not assure his readers that we would not see the nineties,

his intimations led many Christians to believe that the rapture was near and

the Battle of Armageddon was around the corner. In an interview published

in Christianity Today in April 1977, Ward Gasque asked Lindsey, "But what if you're wrong?" Lindsey replied: "Well, there's just a split second's difference between a hero and a bum. I didn't ask to be a hero, but I guess I have

become one in the Christian community. So I accept it. But if I'm wrong

about this, I guess I'll become a bum."18

Lindsey has since revised his thinking on the length of a generation.

Subsequent to the publication of The Late Great Planet Earth, Lindsey wrote

that he did not know "how long a Biblical generation is. Perhaps some-

where between sixty and eighty years. The state of Israel was established

in 1948. There are a lot of world leaders who are pointing to the 1980s

as being the time of some very momentous events. Perhaps it will be then.

But I feel certain that it will take place before the year 2000."19 In an article

entitled "The Eschatology of Hal Lindsey," published in 1975, Dale Moody

wrote, "If the 'Great Snatch,' as Lindsey repeatedly calls the rapture, does

take place before the Tribulation and by 1981,I will beg forgiveness from

Lindsey for doubting his infallibility as we meet in the air."20 It is Lindsey

who needs to apologize, and yet he continues to speak and write on the

topic of eschatology. Moreover, many Christians consider him to be an

authority on the subject. His views remain the standard in many churches,

Bible schools, and seminaries.

Rapture-Again!

When the crisis in the Middle East began with Saddam Hussein's invasion

of Kuwait in 1990, the prophecy pundits shifted into high gear once again

with a barrage of new books psyching up the church with their assured belief

that the rapture was near. Millions of Christians began to suffer the ravages

of last days madness. Iraq, under the leadership of Saddam Hussein, was seen

by one writer to be the ancient empire of Babylon restored.21 John Walvoord

revised his Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East to address what he believed

was "a scenario leading to the world's final war."22 Brad Miner, a writer for

National Review, asked Hal Lindsey, "Is the end of history beginning in the ISO

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

Gulf?" Lindsey replied, "That's what everybody wants to know. I've never

named a day or time, but I can tell you this: Prophecy is on fast forward. I

do believe we live in the generation that will see Armageddon."23

Newspaper Exegesis

We are living in a heightened era of what Greg L. Bahnsen has described

as "newspaper exegesis," that is, reading the Bible through the lens of cur-

rent events. "The newspaper has no prerogative to challenge God's word

of truth. Nor do those who read the newspapers."24 Of course, prophetic

prognosticators try to convince their supporters that current events are be-

ing read in light of the Bible. But this claim has often been made with less

than satisfactory results:

All the scripture texts claimed as proof that the coming of Jesus Christ

must now be close at hand have also been confidently so used in former

generations. Not a few Christians in the past have been erroneously con-

vinced that their age must witness the end. When the Teutonic barbarians

overturned Rome and reduced a stable world to chaos in the fifth century

A.D., many in the Church despairingly drew the wrong conclusion that the

world could have no future. Even larger numbers did so at the approach

of the year 1000, believing that the closing millennium would end the

world. In the gloom of the fourteenth century such tracts appeared as The

Last Age of the Church, and in terms very similar to that old title a great

number have written since.25

Predicting the end (or the pre-tribulational rapture) based on current

events is a risky business, as history surely attests and the Bible warns

against. The typical Christian appeals to current events to support his belief

that the rapture is near. But past failed predictions also were tied to current

events, events which were read back into the Bible. Each time the end was

predicted with confidence.

What Saith the Scriptures?

Marvin Rosenthal, a prominent and respected advocate for evangelizing

the Jews, states that he could no longer hold to a belief in a pre-tribulational

Avoiding Rapture Fever

211

rapture because he could not find biblical support for the position. What

saith the Scriptures? Rosenthal observed that in John Walvoord's The Rapture

Question fifty arguments for pre-tribulationalism were offered, but no biblical text was given that explicitly taught the position:

Not once, among fifty arguments, does this godly Christian leader cite

one biblical text that explicitly teaches pretribulation rapturism—not once.

This was not an oversight. The reason for the omission of any pretribula-

tion Rapture texts is clear. There are none. Walvoord's own comment helps

substantiate that fact. He wrote, "It is therefore not too much to say that

the Rapture question is determined more by ecclesiology [the doctrine of

the Church] than eschatology [the doctrine of the last things]." In other

words, he is saying that verses which deal with the church must be used

to prove an issue that relates to the prophecy. There simply is no explicit

exegetical evidence for pretribulation rapturism.26

This is a bombshell. There is not one explicit verse to support a position

that millions of Bible-believing Christians hold with unbending reverence.

In the first edition of The Rapture Question, John Walvoord had to confess

that evidence for either a pre-tribulational or a post-tribulational rapture

was not explicitly taught in the Bible. "He deleted this statement in later

editions of the book."27 Why? It certainly was not because he found a verse

that without question supported either position.

Rapture or Resurrection?

Dispensationalists take Bible passages that refer to the general resurrection

and apply them to what they call "the rapture." Dave Hunt states that "Christ's promise to take His own to heaven [in the rapture] has no significant place

in [the] future plans" of those who believe that the world that God created

is important.28 The "promise" that Hunt has in mind is the pre-tribulational

rapture. But the rapture is not the Bible's blessed hope. Instead, the clear

teaching of Scripture is that Christians find hope in the promise that when

they die they will go to heaven to be with the Lord (Phil. 1:21).

The resurrection, not the rapture, is the hope of the church. Paul was

on trial "for the resurrection of the dead" (Acts 24:21), not the rapture of

the church. Paul is emphatic: "But if there is no resurrection of the dead,

212

LAST DAYS MADNESS

not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our

preaching is vain, your faith also is vain" (1 Cor. 15:13—14). No such defense

is made of a supposed pretribulational, mid-tribulational, post-tribulational,

or pre-wrath rapture.

The error of rapture fever has obscured the Bible's focus: the resurrection

of Jesus and the resurrection of the saints. Paul's goal was to "attain to the

resurrection from the dead" (Phil. 3:11), not the rapture of the church. The

Christian message hinges on the reality of the resurrection, not the rapture

of the church. The unbiblical pre-tribulational rapture doctrine obscures and

distorts this message. Without the resurrection the Christian message is just

one religious point of view among countless others. The pre-trib rapture

doctrine is an unnecessary, unbiblical, and unhistorical diversion from the

central truth of the Christian faith.

Avoiding Rapture Fever

213

Notes

1. Dave Hunt, Whatever Happened to Heaven? (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1988), chapter 3. A more appropriate title for this book would be, Whatever Happened

to the Pretribulational Rapture? No one is disputing the reality of heaven.

2. Hunt, Whatever Happened to Heaven, 63.

3. Hunt, Whatever Happened to Heaven, 64.

4. Hunt, Whatever Happened to Heaven?, 67.

5. Dave Hunt, How Close Are We?: Compelling Evidence for the Soon Return of Christ

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1993).

6. Tim LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm: Why Christians Will Escape All the Tribulation

(Sisters, OR: Multnomah Press, 1992), 10.

7. Philippians 2:19, 24 and 3 John 14 are interesting. Paul writes in Philippi-

ans 2:19: "I hope in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy to you shortly." "Shortly"

obviously means "soon." But Paul is not sure if it will happen as he plans,

so he qualifies the expectation with "I hope." Similar qualifiers are found in

Philippians 2:24 and 3 John 14. No such qualifiers accompany Revelation

1:1 and 22:6. In fact, God states that "the things" outlined in Revelation" must

shortly take place" (1:1).

8. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 16.

9. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 16.

10. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 17.

11. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 69.

12. Gary Friesen, "A Return Visit," Moody Monthly ( May 1988), 30.

13. Books with doomsday themes began selling well in 1990 due to fears that

Saddam Hussein would drag the world into a fiery Armageddon. "Zondervan

Publishing House announced that sales of Hal Lindsey's 1970 multimillion

seller 'The Late Great Planet Earth,' now in its 108th printing, shot up 83

percent between August and September [1990]. 'Often times we see during

a crisis that people more actively turn toward God and things spiritual,'

Zondervan executive Paul Van Duinen said" (National International Religion

Report [22 October 1990], 1).

14. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970), 54.

15. For a discussion of the various rapture theories, see Richard R. Reiter, et al.,

The Rapture: Pre-, Mid-, or Post-Tribulational? (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1984).

16. Gary Wilburn, "The Doomsday Chic," Christianity Today (27 January 1978), 214

LAST DAYS MADNESS

2 2 .

17. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: Westgate Press, 1980), 8.

18. W. Ward Gasque, "Future Fact? Future Fiction?," Christianity Today (15 April 1977), 40.

19. Gasque, "Future Fact? Future Fiction?," 40.

20. Dale Moody, "The Eschatology of Hal Lindsey," Review and Expositor (Summer 1975), 278.

21. Charles H. Dyer, The Rise of Babylon: Sign of the End Times (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1991). Notice that no question mark follows the subtitle. This is a

book of prediction.

22. Cal Thomas, "Time for Armageddon?" Marietta Daily Journal (January 1991).

23. National Review (19 November 1990), 49.

24. Greg L. Bahnsen, "The Prima Facie Acceptability of Postmillennialism," The

Journal of Christian Reconstruction, Symposium on the Millennium, ed. Gary

North, 3:2 (Winter 1976-77), 53-55.

25. Iain Murray, The Puritan Hope: Revival and the Interpretation of Prophecy (London: Banner of Truth Trust, 1971), xix.

26. Marvin Rosenthal, The Pre-Wrath Rapture of the Church: A New Understanding

of the Rapture, the Tribulation, and the Second Coming (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1990), 280.

27. William Sanford LaSor, The Truth About Armageddon: What the Bible Says About

the End Times (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1982), 134.

28. Hunt, Whatever Happened to Heaven?, 44.

Chapter Seventeen

NO EVIDENCE

FOR A RAPTURE

Objections to a pre-tribulational rapture are certainly not unique to this

writer. The doctrine has been criticized since its inception in the early

part of the nineteenth century. As you consider some of the texts used to

support the doctrine, ask yourself this question: Is it self-evident that these

texts teach a pre-tribulational rapture, that is, that the church will be taken

off the earth prior to a future great tribulation? The arguments used by

adherents of the pre-tribulational rapture position are complex, since no

single verse actually teaches the doctrine. The complexity of these arguments

requires that we consider the strongest texts in support of the position. It

should be kept in mind that the entire pre-tribulational scheme is based on

a faulty interpretation of Daniel 9:24—27. The dispensationalist maintains

that the last seven years (the seventieth "week") is still future and that the

rapture will inaugurate this final week (seven years) of the seventy weeks (490

years). This supposedly will give God the opportunity to deal exclusively

with Israel as a nation again.

Revelation 4:1

Let's begin our study of the pre-tribulational rapture doctrine by taking

a close look at Revelation 4:11

215

216

LAST DAYS MADNESS

After these things I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven,

and the first voice which I had heard, like the sound of a trumpet speaking

with me, said, 'Come up here, and I will show you what must take place

after these things.

John Walvoord, an ardent believer in the pre-tribulational rapture, imports

an already-constructed pre-tribulational rapture theory into texts that say

nothing about the church being taken to heaven. His exposition of Revela-

tion 4:1 is evidence of this:

It is clear from the context that this is not an explicit reference to the

Rapture of the church, as John was not actually translated [raptured]; in fact

he was still in his natural body on the island of Patmos. He was translated

into scenes of heaven only temporarily. Though there is no authority for

connecting the Rapture with this expression, there does seem to be a

typical representation of the order of events, namely, the church age first,

then the Rapture, then the church in heaven.1

If one takes Walvoord's position, then Rosenthal is correct: There is no

verse that explicitly teaches the doctrine!2 All of the texts used to support the rapture theory presuppose the validity of the theory, a theory that does

not have a single text to support it. The doctrine has been constructed before

texts have been evaluated.

This unsound approach to Bible interpretation has done little to dissuade

the adherents of the various rapture theories. Grant R. Jeffrey, for example,

begins with Revelation 4:1 as one of the' five definitive indications supporting the pretribulation Rapture."3 Here's how the argument goes for those who

see the rapture of the church in this verse:

• The voice that John heard was "like the sound of a trumpet speaking."

• When Jesus returns to rapture His church, He will do so "with the

trumpet of God" (1 Thess. 4:16).

• Since a trumpet is used just prior to the rapture in 1 Thessalonians 4:16,

we should assume that a rapture is in view when "a door [is] stand-

ing open in heaven," presumably to receive the raptured church (Rev.

4:1-2).

No Evidence for a Rapture

217

• The church is no longer mentioned in the Book of Revelation; therefore,

the church must have been raptured.

•John's being directed to "Come up here" is a depiction of the rapture

in the same way that the church will be "caught up" at the time of the

pre-tribulational rapture. Jeffrey writes, "When John was 'in the Spirit'

... he was 'Raptured up' to Heaven...."4

This is absurd exegesis to be sure, but it is standard dispensational teaching.5

As has been noted, the pre-tribulational rapture doctrine assumes that

the seventieth week of Daniel is separated from the sixty-ninth week and

is yet to be fulfilled. The dispensational interpretation also assumes that the

Book of Revelation was written about a time period in the remote future

rather than for the people for whom events were to happen "shortly" (Rev.

1:1). For the readers of the prophecy in the first century, "the time is near"

(1:3). The Book of Revelation was written before A.D. 70. Its purpose was

to describe events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem.

The evidence for a pre-A.D. 70 date is overwhelming.6 For one thing, the

temple was still standing when John received the Revelation and wrote it

down for the "seven churches" (Rev. 11:1-2), churches that were in exis-

tence in John's day. Jesus assured the first readers of Revelation that He

would be coming "quickly" (2:16; 3:11; 22:7, 12, 20). Those who claim to

hold a literal interpretation want to avoid the obvious conclusion of these

verses—the prophecy is describing events that refer to the first-century

church. This does not mean that the Book of Revelation has no meaning for

today's church. The crucifixion occurred before the destruction of Jerusalem

in A.D. 70, and no one claims that Christ's death has no meaning for today.

Numerous events in the Old Testament are history, but they have meaning

and application for our day as well: "Now these things happened to them as

an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon whom the ends

of the ages have come" (1 Cor. 10:11).

But let's get back to the supposed evidence for a pre-tribulational rapture

in Revelation 4:1. First, John didn't hear a trumpet. He heard a voice "like

the sound of a trumpet speaking." Second, it is fallacious to argue that the absence of a reference to the church indicates its rapture (absence from the

earth). Hal Lindsey states, "Since the Church is mentioned nineteen times

in the first three chapters under divine outline of 'the things which are,'

and since the Church is not mentioned or implied as being on earth even

218

LAST DAYS MADNESS

once after the statement 'Come up here, and I will show you what must take

place after these things' I conclude that it is the end of the Church age that is meant here, and that the Church is in heaven thereafter until it returns as

the bride of Christ in Revelation 19:7-14."7 Notice that no text states this.

These are Lindsey's conclusions.

Let's test Lindsey's hypothesis. The first three chapters of Revelation deal with

churches, assemblies of saints in Asia Minor in the first century: the church in

Ephesus (2:1), the church in Smyrna (2:8), the church in Pergamum (2:12), the church in Thyatira (2:18), the church in Sardis (3:1), the church in Philadelphia (3:7), and the church in Laodicea (3:14). After chapter three, Jesus (1:1) deals with those who make up the church—the "saints" (5:8; 8:3,4; 11:18; 13:7,10;

14:12; 16:6; 17:6; 18:24; 19:8). In the first three chapters, local churches are

addressed, not the church generally. After chapter three the "saints," individuals who make up the seven churches in Asia Minor and elsewhere, are referred

to. Is there exegetical evidence for this interpretation? Yes. "To the church of

God which is at Corinth, to those who have been sanctified in Christ Jesus, saints

by calling with all who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus

Christ, their Lord and ours" (1 Cor. 1:2; cf. 6:1-6; 14:33; 2 Cor. 2:1). Is Paul

describing two groups of people? No! The saints constitute the church.

It takes amazing hermeneutical manipulation to create a doctrine where

none exists. Lindsey's view must be read into the text. He begins with his pre-

tribulational rapture theology (still not documented by arguments from Scripture)

and forces it on a verse that must be twisted to prove what he claims it teaches.

Nothing like what Lindsey believes can be found in Revelation 4:1.

Let's continue by applying Lindsey's hermeneutical logic to other passages.

The words church and churches appear just once in the Book of Hebrews (12:23) and twice in 2 Corinthians (1:1 and 2:14): "The church is not mentioned as

such in Mark, Luke, John, 2 Timothy, Titus, 1 Peter, 2 Peter, 1 John, 2 John, or

Jude, and not until chapter 16 of Romans. Unless we are prepared to relegate

large chunks of the NT to a limbo of irrelevance to the Church, we cannot

make the mention or omission of the term 'church' a criterion for determining

the applicability of a passage to saints of the present age."8

Is Bible interpretation based on word counts? The same reasoning pro-

cess has been taken with the Book of Esther by liberal scholars: "There

can be no doubt that the historicity and canonicity of Esther has been the

most debated of all the Old Testament books. Even some Jewish scholars

questioned its inclusion in the Old Testament because of the absence of

No Evidence for a Rapture

219

God's name."9 If word counts are to be so heavily relied upon then Lindsey

refutes his own argument. He finds the Antichrist all over the Book of

Revelation, but the word is nowhere to be found.

If chapters 4-19 are not about the church, then what group of people

would Jesus as the true author of Revelation have in mind? The dispensation-

alist believes that these passages describe the time of the great tribulation,

when Israel, not the church, is in view. But word-count exegesis leaves us

in something of a dilemma since the word Israel only appears once after the

supposed rapture of the church, and not until Revelation 7:4! One would

think that if the church is in view in the first three chapters because the

words church and churches are used nineteen times, then shouldn't we expect to find the word Israel used more than once after chapter three if this entire seven-year period is about Israel? The word Israel does appear in 21:12, but

the word churches appears in 22:16. Revelation 22:16 demonstrates that the

entire book is "for the churches," not just the first three chapters.

A glaring inconsistency can be found in Tim LaHaye's defense of an any-

moment rapture based on Revelation 4:1. He states that the "first-century

church believed in the imminent return of Christ, possibly during their

lifetime."10 He means by this that first-century Christians and Christians

thereafter believed that Jesus could come at any moment. But later in the

same book he writes, "Chapter 1 is the introduction; chapters 2 and 3 [of

Revelation] cover the church age, using seven historical churches to describe the entire age. (For example, the church in Ephesus is the only one that refers to apostles because the first-century church alone included apostles.)"11

Chuck Smith, another popular prophecy writer, pushes the same idea while

maintaining that Jesus' coming is always imminent, that is, that He could

come at any moment. But like LaHaye, he contradicts himself when he

writes that "each of these seven churches ... represents a particular period

of Church history. For instance, the church at Smyrna represents the Church

of the second through fourth centuries—a time when persecution was hor-

rible and as many as six million Christians were executed for their faith. The

church at Pergamum represents the beginning of the church-state system

that developed under Constantine. And so on."12

How could Christians believe that Jesus could come at any moment and

also believe that He would not come until the last of the seven representative

churches (Laodicea) appeared? This destroys the dispensationalist's doctrine

of imminency, the any-moment rapture of the church. It also destroys literal-

220

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

ism since the seven churches are purported to represent seven distinct periods

of the church age, not individual churches. William Hendriksen comments

on the seven churches/seven ages view:

The notion that these seven churches describe seven successive peri-

ods of Church history hardly needs refutation. To say nothing about the

humorous—if it were not so deplorable—exegesis which, for example,

makes the church of Sardis, which was dead, refer to the glorious age of

the Reformation; it should be clear to every student of Scripture that there

is not one atom of evidence in all the sacred writings which in any way

corroborates this thoroughly arbitrary method of cutting up the history

of the Church and assigning the resulting pieces to the respective epistles

of Revelation 2 and 3.13

According to dispensationalists, the rapture is a two-stage event: Jesus

comes for His saints before the seven-year tribulation period and with His

saints at the end of the tribulation period to defeat antichrist and set up the

millennial kingdom (Revelation 19). But there is no mention of the church

in Revelation 19 following Jesus on His "white horse" (19:11). The "armies

of heaven," not the church, follow Jesus on their "white horses" (19:14).

If dispensationalists maintain that the "armies of heaven" are the church or

saints, then this only shows that the word church does not have to appear

for it to be present. A final point needs to be made. Dispensationalists teach

that Jesus coming on "a white horse" in Revelation 19 is the second coming.

Robert L. Thomas is a representative of this popular position:

This picture climaxes the NT emphasis on the second coming of

Christ as the fulfillment and vindication of the Christian hope (e.g., Matt.

13:41—42; 25:41; Rom. 2:5; 2 Thess. 1:7-8, 9-10; 2:8) .... It answers

specifically to the theme verse of Rev. 1:7 which tells of the worldwide

audience this event will have (cf. Matt. 24:27-31). . . . In fact, this is

the only event in Revelation that corresponds to that coming narrowly

construed to refer to Christ's personal coming.14

In Acts 1:9—11 we are told that "a cloud received Him out of their

sight" (1:9). No horse was involved. "This Jesus, who has been taken up

from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him

No Evidence for a Rapture

221

go into heaven" (1:11). Jesus did not go into heaven on a horse, and He will

not return on a horse.

Like the dispensational hermeneutical methodology in general, the pre-

tribulational rapture doctrine is a gigantic hoax. Because the pretribulational

rapture is a pillar of the dispensational system, we should expect to find

proof of its existence in clear texts. Even one text would suffice. There is

not a single passage that clearly and dogmatically supports a pretribulational

rapture. If so many people believe the pre-tribulational rapture doctrine,

why is it that no verse can be appealed to that explicitly teaches it? Most

pre-tribulationists have never been challenged to produce a verse.

1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

In a debate on eschatology with Dave Hunt, I challenged him to point

to one verse that taught a pre-tribulational rapture. He immediately ap-

pealed to 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. Read it for yourself. The idea of a

pre-tribulational rapture must be assumed by the reader and imposed on the

text. Sound biblical interpretation, however, requires textual proof before a

doctrine can be formulated.

Most postmillennialists and amillennialists see 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 as

relating to the general resurrection of the saints. The text simply describes the

raising of those who are "in Christ." No mention is made of the church being

raptured either before or after a tribulation period. Nothing in the text even

points to a tribulation period. Anthony Hoekema, an amillennialist, rejects

the idea that the Apostle Paul was teaching a pre-tribulational rapture:

What this passage clearly teaches is that at the time of the Lord's return

all the believing dead (the "dead in Christ") will be raised, and all believers

who are still alive will be transformed and glorified (see 1 Corinthians

15:51-52); then these two groups will be caught up to meet the Lord in

the air. What these words do not teach is that after this meeting in the

air the Lord will reverse his direction and go back to heaven, taking the

raised and transformed members of the church with him. The passage

does not breathe a word of this. To be sure, verse 17 ends with the words,

"and so we shall always be with the Lord." But Paul does not say where

we shall always be with the Lord. The idea that after meeting the Lord

in the air we shall be with him for seven years in heaven and later for a

thousand years in the air above the earth is pure inference and nothing

ISO

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

more. Everlasting oneness with Christ in glory is the clear teaching of

this passage, not a pretribulational Rapture.15

Non-premillennialists do not deny the rapture as such (even though the

word is not found in Scripture); they only deny the dispensationalists' version

of it. Not only is the Bible on the side of those who view the rapture as the

general resurrection, so are eighteen hundred years of church history: "As an

established view, it can be traced back to J.N. Darby and the Plymouth Breth-

ren in the year 1830. Some scholars, seeking to prove error by association,

have attempted (perhaps unfairly) to trace its origin back two years earlier to

a charismatic, visionary woman named Margaret MacDonald."16 Even pre-

tribulational dispensationalists admit the novelty of the position:

It is scarcely to be found in a single book or sermon through the pe-

riod of 1600 years! If any doubt this statement, let them search ... the

remarks of the so-called Fathers, both pre and post Nicene, the theological

treatises of the scholastic divines, Roman Catholic writers of all shades of

thought, the literature of the Reformation, the sermons and expositions

of the Puritans, and the general theological works of the day. He will find

the "mystery" conspicuous by its absence.17

Here is a dispensationalist admitting that there is "scarcely" any historical

evidence to support the position. He's too generous. There is no evidence.

So where does a dispensationalist get this doctrine? Tommy Ice, a fervent

proponent of dispensationalism, writes that the theory is based on "deduc-

tion":

A certain theological climate needed to be created before premillennial-

ism would restore the Biblical doctrine of the pretrib Rapture. Sufficient

development did not take place until after the French Revolution. The

factor of the Rapture has been clearly known by the church all along;

therefore, the issue is the timing of the event. Since neither pre nor posttribs

have a proof text for the time of the Rapture (unless the promise made to the church in Rev. 3:10 is an exception which promises deliverance—the

Rapture—from the future tribulation before the seven-year period be-

gins),18 then it is clear that this issue is the product of a deduction from

one's overall system of theology, both for pre and posttribbers.19

No Evidence for a Rapture

223

What an admission! A pillar doctrine of dispensationalism does not have

a single text to prove it.20 Dispensationalism's process of "deducing" the

rapture theory is this: First, create the system; second, create the doctrines

to make the system work; third, claim to have restored "the Biblical doctrine

of the pretrib Rapture," which is based on a "deduction from one's overall

system of theology" because there are no verses that teach it; fourth, imply

that the early church, the "apostles of the apostles," knew nothing of this

foundational doctrine. Bizarre. Millions of Christians today hold to a system

of interpretation (dispensationalism) that does not have one verse to prove

one of its foundational doctrines, the pre-tribulational rapture of the church,

the concept that makes dispensationalism dispensational. This system of

interpretation is a theological house of cards.

Hoping to seek historical validation for the pre-tribulation rapture, dis-

pensationalists have turned to an obscure and questionable source, Pseudo-

Ephraem (probably a seventh-century composition). While the sermon On

the Last Times, the Antichrist, and the End of the World claims to be authored by Ephraem of Nisibis (306-373), no one really knows who wrote it or when

it was written. Even so, pre-tribulationists believe that it contains "two proto-

rapture statements."21 An appeal to Pseudo-Ephraem is an act of desperation

by those in need of historical support since they have no biblical support

for their position.

Titus 2:13

Dave Hunt, in How Close Are We?, maintains that "Paul called the Rapture

'that blessed hope"' (Titus 2:13).22 There is no mention of a rapture, either

pre-, mid-, or post-tribulational in this passage. Hunt, as a pre-tribulationist,

asserts that "the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior" is a

description of Jesus' coming at the end of the seven-year tribulation period

while the "blessed hope" is the rapture of the church prior to the tribulation

period. The belief that Titus 2:13 describes two comings must be read into

the passage. Paul was "awaiting our blessed hope" which was "the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ." Even John Walvoord

believes that Titus 2:13 describes only one event.23

What is this "blessed hope"? It was the "appearing of the glory" of Jesus.

We have come across this language before in Matthew 16:27: "For the Son

of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels..." (Matt.

16:27; cf. Mark 8:38). When did this happen? "Truly I say to you, there are

224

188 LAST DAYS MADNESS

some of those standing here who shall not taste death until they see the Sod

of Man coming in His kingdom" (Matt. 16:28). Jesus had His generation in

mind, not a distant generation.

Notice that Titus 2:13 describes the "appearing of the glory of our great

God and Savior, Jesus Christ." Paul does not say that Jesus will appear, only

that "the glory" will appear. There is a significant difference in meaning.

Peter writes in a similar fashion:

Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal among you, which

comes upon you for your testing, as though some strange thing were hap-

pening to you; but to the degree that you share the sufferings of Christ,

keep on rejoicing; so that at the revelation of His glory, you may rejoice

with exultation (1 Peter 4:12-13).

First, Peter writes that his readers were personally involved in a "fiery

ordeal." This was not some future event. Second, not only were they ex-

periencing a "fiery ordeal," but they would "rejoice with exultation" at the

"revelation of His glory." There is no indication that a long period of time

exists between their "fiery ordeal" and the "revelation of His glory." In this same chapter Peter writes that "the end of all things is at hand' (1 Peter 4:7), at hand for those reading his letter in the first century. What was this "end"

that was "at hand"? Jay Adams' comments summarize the argument:

[First] Peter was written before A.D. 70 (when the destruction of

Jerusalem took place).... The persecution (and martyrdom) that these

(largely) Jewish Christians had been experiencing up until now stemmed

principally from unconverted Jews (indeed, his readers had found refuge

among Gentiles as resident aliens).... [H]e refers to the severe trials that

came upon Christians who had fled Palestine under attack from their

unconverted fellow Jews. The end of all things (that had brought this

exile about) was near.

In six or seven years from the time of writing, the overthrow of Jeru-

salem, with all its tragic stories, as foretold in the Book of Revelation and

in the Olivet Discourse upon which that part is based, would take place.

Titus and Vespasian would wipe out the old order once and for all. All

those forces that led to the persecution and exile of these Christians in Asia

Minor—the temple ceremonies (outdated by Christ's death), Pharisaism

No Evidence for a Rapture

225

(with its distortion of O.T. law into a system of works-righteousness) and

the political stance of Palestinian Jewry toward Rome—would be erased.

The Roman armies would wipe Jewish opposition from the face of the

land. Those who survived the holocaust of A.D. 70 would themselves be

dispersed around the Mediterranean world. "So," says Peter, "hold on; the

end is near." The full end of the O.T. order (already made defunct by the

cross and the empty tomb) was about to occur.24

Third, if the "revelation of His glory" were a depiction of a pre-tribulational

rapture that is yet to occur, how would this distant event comfort those who

were involved in a "fiery ordeal" nearly two thousand years ago? In death

they saw Jesus "face to face" (1 Cor. 13:12; 2 Cor. 5:8). Did they not behold

the fullness of His glory at that time? In another context, the Apostle Paul

writes, "For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy

to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us" (Rom. 8:18). The New American Standard translation does not catch the full meaning of this

passage. Following Robert Young's Literal Translation of the Bible, we read,

"For I reckon that the sufferings of the present time are not worthy to be

compared with the glory about to be revealed in us." Whatever the glory is, it was "about to be revealed" (see Rev. 2:10; 3:2, 10; 10:4; 12:4; 17:8). Peter

tells his readers that the "Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you" (1 Peter

4:14). This was a present condition, not something that the people in Peter's day would have to wait for in a future rapture.

If the "appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ"

(Titus 2:13) is neither a distant event nor the bodily return of Christ, then

what is it? The "appearing of the glory" is the coming of the fullness of the

New Covenant promises as outlined in the gospel. The Old Covenant came

with glory "which fades away" (1 Cor. 3:7, 10-11, 13). The New Covenant

has come with even more glory (3:8). "For if the ministry of condemnation

has glory, much more does the ministry of righteousness abound in glory.

For indeed what had glory, in this case has no glory on account of the glory

that surpasses it. For if that which fades away was with glory, much more

that which remains is in glory" (3:9-11).

With the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 the Old Covenant that had

faded in glory was obliterated. The gospel is the new glory which those

who are still attached to the fading glory of the Old Covenant do not see.

"And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing,

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

in whose case the god of this world [lit., age] has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ,

who is the image of God" (2 Cor. 4:3—4).

The blessed hope, therefore, is the coming of the fullness of the gospel in

the "glory of Christ." This fullness was accomplished with the obliteration of

the symbols of the Old Covenant: the temple, priesthood, and sacrificial system.

1 Corinthians 15

This section of Scripture falls into the same category as 1 Thessalonians

4:16-17. Again, no one denies that Christians are going to be raised; the

dispute is over when the event happens. The passage makes no mention

of a "secret rapture," or Jesus coming "for His saints" before a future great tribulation and then later returning "with His saints" after the great tribulation. Nowhere in 1 Corinthians 15 will you find a discussion of the great

tribulation or an earthly millennial reign of Christ. The pre-tribulational

rapture must be read into 1 Corinthians 15. The chapter deals with resur-

rection not rapture: first, the resurrection of Jesus; second, the resurrection

of Christians. Without the resurrection of Jesus there will be no resurrec-

tion of Christians. The resurrection of believers comes just before the end:

"But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who

are Christ's at His coming, then comes the end, when He delivers up the

kingdom to the God and Father, when He has abolished all rule and all

authority and power" (15:23-24). This "resurrection of the dead" occurs

after the period of the kingdom (there must be something to deliver up)

and just before "the end."

How do premillennialists fit an earthly millennium into these two verses?

You guessed it. There are gaps inserted to divide the passage into three

events: the pre-tribulational rapture, the coming of Christ seven years later,

and the resurrection of unbelievers at the end of the Millennium. Again,

these "gaps" or "intervals" must be read into the text. John 5:28—29 states very clearly that believers and unbelievers will be raised at the same time,

not separated by a thousand years.

Christians must refuse to be guided by the latest interpretive trends or

to be swayed by current events. The Bible is the Christian's guide, not the

conjectures of self-appointed prophecy "experts," the latest newspaper head-

lines, or the movements of national boundaries. The Bible is our starting

point regardless of what we think is going on in the world.

No Evidence for a Rapture

227

The only question is whether the Bible actually teaches these things.

If it does, then "let God be true but every man a liar" (Rom. 3:4). The

newspaper has no prerogative to challenge God's word of truth. Nor do

those who read the newspapers. As faithful disciples of Christ, we are to

trust God as the sovereign controller over human history, "who works all

things after the counsel of His own will" (Eph. 1:1), declaring the end

from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying,

"My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose" (Isa.

46:10), so that "none can stay his hand" (Dan. 4:35). With the Psalmist

we should declare, "Whatever the Lord pleases, he does, in heaven and

on earth" (115:3).25

Returning to a true understanding of the Bible and its application to

presentday conditions will bring about great revival and reformation to a

world languishing in the pit of despair and darkness. Jesus is the answer. It

is in the world that God calls sinners to Himself.

228

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. John F. Walvoord, The Revelation of Jesus Christ (Chicago: Moody, 1966) 103.

2. For a critique of Walvoord's position of John's "translation" as a type of

rapture, see Robert H. Gundry, The Church and the Tribulation (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1973), 68-9.

3. Grant Jeffrey, Armageddon: Appointment with Destiny (Toronto: Frontier Research, 1988), 135.

4. Jeffrey, Armageddon, 136.

5. See Hal Lindsey, The Rapture (New York: Bantam Books, 1983), 88-91.

6. See Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation,

2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999).

7. Hal Lindsey, The Rapture, 90.

8. Gundry, The Church and the Tribulation, 78. Also see Gundry's First the Antichrist

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1997), 84-87.

9. Edward G. Dobson, "Esther," Liberty Bible Commentary, eds. Edward E. Hindson and Woodrow M. Kroll (Lynchburg, VA: The Old-Time Gospel Hour, 1982),

909.

10. Tim LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm: Why Christians Will Escape All the Tribulation

(Sisters, OR: Multnomah Press, 1992), 65.

11. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 74.

12. Chuck Smith with David Wimbish, Dateline Earth: Countdown to Eternity (Old Tappan, NJ: Chosen Books, 1989), 28-29.

13. William Hendriksen, More Than Conquerors: An Interpretation of the Book of

Revelation, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1940] 1982), 60.

In his Dateline Earth, Chuck Smith identifies the Church of Sardis with the

Protestant Reformation because the Protestant Church celebrated Christmas.

"Should Christians stop celebrating on December 25?," Smith asks. "Not

at all. We enjoy glorious liberty as children of God to celebrate or not to

celebrate, as we choose" (33). So why wasn't this true for those who started

celebrating Christmas on December 25?

14. Robert L. Thomas, Revelation 8-22: An Exegetical Commentary (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1995), 382.

15. Anthony A. Hoekema, The Bible and the Future (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1979), 168.

16. Marvin Rosenthal, Pre- Wrath Rapture of the Church: A New Understanding of the

Rapture, the Tribulation, and the Second Coming ( Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1990), 54. For a study on the preDarbyite source of the pre-tribulational

rapture, see Dave MacPherson, The Incredible Cover-Up (Medford, OR: Omega,

No Evidence for a Rapture

229

[1975] 1980 and The Rapture Plot (Simpsonville, SC: Millennium III Publish-

ers, 1995). John L. Bray disputes the Darbyite and MacDonald sources. He

has traced its origin to Morgan Edwards, Two Academical Exercises on Subjects

Bearing the Following Titles: Millennium, and Last-Novelties (Philadelphia, PA: Dobson and Lang, 1788). See Bray's Morgan Edwards and the Pre-Tribulation

Rapture Teaching (1788), Lakeland, FL: John L. Bray Ministries, 1995) for

documentation on this theory.

17. H.A. Ironside, The Mysteries of God ( New York: Loizeaux Brothers, 1908), 50.

18. Notice what Revelation 3:10 says: "Because you have kept the word of My

perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing, that hour which is

about to come upon the whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth" This passage was written nearly two thousand years ago. The "hour of testing" was

"about to come upon the whole world [Greek, oikoumene. the inhabited earth]."

This means not long after the time it was spoken. That hour of testing was

the conflagration leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, the

tribulation period from which Christians were warned to "flee," which they

did (Matt. 24:16).

19. Thomas D. Ice, "The Origin of the Pretrib Rapture: Part II," Biblical Perspec-

tives (March/April 1989), 5. Emphasis added.

20. Ice and Demy attempt to get around this admission in The Truth About the

Rapture ( Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996).

21. Timothy J. Demy, "Pseudo-Ephraem," Dictionary of Premillennial Theology, gen. ed.

Mai Couch (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1996), 329. Also see Demy and Thomas

D. Ice, "The Rapture and an Early Medieval Citation," Bibliotheca Sacra (July/September 1995), 306-17 and Grant R Jeffrey, "A Pretrib Rapture Statement in

the Early Medieval Church," gen. eds. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, When the

Trumpet Sounds (Eugene, OR Harvest House, 1995), 105-125. For a refutation

of Demy, Ice, and Jeffrey, see Gundry, "'Pseudo-Ephraem' on Pretrib Preparation

for a Posttrib Meeting with the Lord" in First The Antichrist, 161—88.

22. Hunt, How Close Are We?, 199.

23. John F. Walvoord, The Prophecy Knowledge Handbook: All the Prophecies of Scripture

Explained in One Volume (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1990), 496-97.

24. Jay E. Adams, Trust and Obey: A Practical Commentary on First Peter (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1978), 129-30.

25. Greg L. Bahnsen, "The Prima Facie Acceptability of Postmillennialism," The

Journal of Christian Reconstruction, Symposium on the Millennium, ed. Gary

North, 3:2 (Winter 1976-77), 54.

Chapter Eighteen

WHO'S GOT

THE NUMBER?

The attempt to identify the number of the Beast has entered the com-

puter age. No longer does one need a keen mathematical mind to make

the calculations. A computer program has been developed so we can all

learn who the Beast is in the privacy of our own homes. Any number of

people, places, or events can receive the dreaded number. Here's how it

works: Place the diskette into the floppy disk drive. Type "666" at the "A"

prompt. Press the "Enter" key. A screen appears with these words: ENTER

WORD OR PHRASE TO DECODE. Who or what is cursed with the

dreaded number 666? "New York" is 666. "A War in Iraq" is 666. "Bush's War" is 666. Millions of children around the world will be heartbroken to

learn that "Santa Claus" is also 666. This is no joke. A computer program

called "666: Ancient Mystery Code Revealed!" exists. There's a book that

goes with it: 666: The Final Warning!1 The author's conclusion?

Again, the goal of this book was to share with the readers what I

personally feel the Lord has shown me over a period of twelve years as I

studied His Word regarding the End-Time events and the possible key players

involved. Does this "prove" that Ronald Wilson Reagan is the pre-destined

231

232

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Antichrist, and that Pope John Paul II will become the Fake Prophet? In my opinion, the " evidence shown in this book is overwhelmingly in favor of their being "history's prime candidates' for these " unholy'' positions.2

This book identifies Ronald Reagan as the Beast and Pope John Paul

I as the false prophet of Revelation 13. Of course, the author leaves his

speculations open to adjustment. If Reagan stays in retirement "at what was

formerly 666 Saint Cloud Road, and only speaks at 'after lunch and after

dinner' events, then he can not be the fulfillment of the Antichrist,"3 Will Reagan's "fatal wound" (Alzheimer's Disease) be healed (Rev. 13:3, 12,

14) in order for him to qualify for beast status? This is the way speculative

prophecy always seems to work. A person is the Antichrist until it is proved

that he is not the Antichrist. When an Antichrist candidate does not turn

out to be the Antichrist, "adjustment theology" takes over. For example, "in a pamphlet on Armageddon theology, Jimmy Swaggart notes that all the

world's dictators—Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, Hitler, Stalin—acted in

the spirit of the Antichrist but could not rival his supreme evil."4

In 666: The Final Warning! we learn that television will be used by Satan

to "tell us" his "good news," thus setting the stage for Antichrist. Here's how the theory is developed:

Did you ever notice that the symbol Te, and the words Levi and Sion

are found in the word television? Te is the chemical symbol for tellurium

which is "a rare, white nonmetallic chemical element." The Latin word

is tellus, which means the earth!5 Satan comes to the earth as an Angel of

Light, and he will tell (tellus) his "good news" (his gospel); the same lie that Levi said would bring the Messiah back to earth upon Mount Sion!

Sion is the Greek word for the Hebrew name Zion where Jesus, the real Messiah, will touch down upon his return to earth. This will usher in the

real NEW AGE ... THE LORD'S KINGDOM ON EARTH! Television

is a means of "mind control" as well as an image converter. Many, at the threat of death under this instrument of Satan, will worship the image of

the Beast! Will Satan use TeLevi-Sion to usher in his kingdom on earth? There

is no doubt about it!6

The sad fact is that there are probably many people who will fall for this

"logic" Using a similar line of argumentation, we can make a few deductions

Who's Got the Number?

233

of our own. When Jesus came down from the Mount of Transfiguration,

He told His disciples, " Tell the vision to no one until the Son of Man has risen from the dead" (Matt. 17:9). So, prior to the resurrection, television

was prohibited, but now that Jesus "has risen from the dead," television is

permitted. As you know, television is made up of two words—the Greek

word tele (far) and the Latin word vision (to view)—meaning "viewing from afar" or "viewing at a distance."

Speaking of television, it seems that Barney is the Beast of Revelation

13. Literary scholar Kathryn Lindskoog sent the following to her friends

via the Internet to show how almost anyone or anything can be made to

read 666.7

Given: Barney is a cute purple dinosaur

Prove: Barney is really the Antichrist in disguise

1. Start with the given:

C U T E P U R P L E D I N O S A U R

2. Change all the U's to V's (which is proper Latin anyway):

CVTE PVRPLE DINOSAVR

3. Extract all Roman numerals in the phrase:

CVVLDIV

4. Convert these into Arabic values:

100 5 5 50 500 1 5

5. Add all the numbers:

666

This is why it is important to pay attention to time texts and theological

context when interpreting the Bible. The significance of 666 is found in the

Bible, not in television or newspapers.

The Candidates

Keep in mind that many today mistakenly use Antichrist and Beast interchangeably. Generally, a Christian hears the word Antichrist and thinks of

the Beast in the Book of Revelation. Ed Hindson lists ten titles that he says

234

LAST DAYS MADNESS

identify the Antichrist, eleven if you count his inclusion of "false Christ"

(Greek, pseudochristos).8

For centuries the papacy was the unanimous Antichrist candidate.9 The

papal system was identified as "both the 'man of sin' and the Babylonian

whore of which Scripture forewarns (2 Thess. 2; Rev. 19). In the conviction

of the sixteenth-century Protestants, Rome was the great Anti-Christ, and

so firmly did this belief become established that it was not until the nine-

teenth century that it was seriously questioned by evangelicals."10 Why was

the Roman Church, best represented by the papal leadership, identified as

the Antichrist? First, such an identification is based on a faulty reading of

2 Thessalonians 2:4, where Paul said that the "man of lawlessness" would

set himself up in the "temple of God," which was seen as a reference to the

church (1 Cor. 3:16-17; 6:19; Eph. 2:20; 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Peter 2:5). The

Roman Catholic Church, since prior to the Reformation, was considered to

be a false church and its religious leaders impostors. The Antichrist was a

religious charlatan who would rule over an apostate church. The best can-

didate, it seemed, was the papacy.

Second, individual popes (e.g., Leo X) and the papal succession (papacy)

were thought to be viable candidates because of the various Latin titles (e.g.,

Viatrius Filii Dei = "in place of the Son of God") used to describe them and their offices. There are two possible meanings for the prefix anti: "against" and

"in the place of." The papal leadership, as the "vicar of Christ," was viewed as a counterfeit Christ, a religious leader who took an authority position

"in the place of Christ."11

Third, Irenaeus (A.D. 130-200) put forth the view that the name of the

first ruler of the Roman Catholic church was Latinus. In Greek his name is

spelled lateinos. "In the Greek letter evaluation system the following works out nicely: 1=30, a=l, t=300, e=5, i=10, n=50, o=70, s=200. The total is

666. The mark of the Beast is the Latin church; the Roman Catholic system

which is opposed to true Christianity."12

Even an enemy of the papacy like Martin Luther came in for a numerical

drubbing. Here's how it's done: "Take the name Martin Luther and Latinize

the surname to get MARTIN LUTERA. Now let the letters from A to I represent the numbers from 1 to 9 (considering I and J interchangeable, as was

the custom then), the letters K to S represent the numbers from 10 to 90

(by multiples of 10) and the letters from T to Z represent the numbers from

100 to 700 (by multiples of 100)."13 The result? M(30) + A(1) + R(80)

Who's Got the Number?

235

+ T(100) + 1(9) + N(40) + L(20) + U(200) + T(I00) + E(5) +R(80) +

A(1) = 666.

As one might suspect, political figures from the time of Nero have been

easy targets of the dreaded triple six. Napoleon was always a favorite:

There were plenty of people ... [in the 1800s] who took Napoleon to

be Antichrist. Mrs. [Hester Thrale] Piozzi noted that many were saying

that he was "the Devil incarnate, the Appollyon mentioned in Scripture."

She believed that his name in the Corsican dialect was N'Apollione,

"the Destroyer," and "he does come forwards [sic] followed by a Cloud

of Locusts from ye bottomless Pit." She learned from the ladies of her

village in Wales that Napoleon's titles, translated into Roman numerals,

totaled 666.14

In our own century we have been assured on numerous occasions of the

identity of the Beast. Hitler's hatred of the Jews and his numbering of them

made him a prime candidate. Hitler, however, did not mark the Jews with

666; rather, each Jew was given a different number similar to a serial num-

ber. The next step was to determine if Hitler's name fit the 666 designation.

Lo and behold, it did! By converting the English alphabet into numerical

equivalents starting with A= 100, B= 101, C= 102, etc., we get the following:

H=107,1=108, T=119, L=111, E=104, R=117. The result is 666. But

why not start with A=1, B=2, C=3, etc., as in Hebrew and Greek?

Hitler may be dead, but he has been resurrected recently as a candidate

for the Beast/Antichrist. Robert Van Kampen believes there are two pos-

sible Antichrist candidates—Nero and Hitler.15 Since Van Kampen believes

that the Book of Revelation was written in A.D. 95, nearly thirty years after

the death of Nero, he dismisses Nero as a viable candidate for the Beast.

In his dismissal of Nero, Van Kampen does not discuss those texts which

describe the events in Revelation as taking place "shortly" (1: 1).16 He jumps

two thousand years in the future in search of a person who Revelation tells

us was "near" in John's day (1:3).

Without question, Hitler best meets all the requirements to be the An-

tichrist ... and he certainly was the historical embodiment of Antichrist's

supremely evil nature although the early church was convinced that Nero

was the Antichrist.17

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

According to Van Kampen, Hitler will be "resurrected" to serve Satan as

the Beast/Antichrist: "Who is Antichrist? Can we in fact identify who he

actually is, or will be? Perhaps the most startling fact concerning Antichrist

is that he is (or will be) a dead man brought back to life, whose 'fatal wound

was healed' (Rev. 13:3)."18 Van Kampen hedges a bit by asserting that "we

cannot be dogmatic about" Hitler being the Beast of Revelation 13, but "it

would be hard to imagine that any other man could better fit the Scripture's

description of this diabolical world leader."19

A booklet published in 1940 identified Mussolini as the Antichrist. The

author stated that he fulfilled forty-nine prophecies of the Antichrist.20

"Many will recall widespread preaching during the World War II era that

Mussolini or Hitler was the Antichrist. Since the slogan VV IL DUCE was

widely used by Mussolini, and because the Roman numeral value of the

slogan/title is 666, many were sure of positive identification."21 Henry

Kissinger,22 Anwar Sadat,23 and, as we saw, even Ronald (6) Wilson (6) Rea-

gan (6). There was passing speculation that the attempted assassination of

Reagan and the wound to the head of James Brady might be the prelude to

the fulfillment of the prophecy of Revelation 13:3 where one of the heads

of the Beast "had been slain, and his fatal wound was healed." If you fol-

lowed the newscasts after the assassination attempt, you will recall that Dan

Rather of CBS actually reported that Brady was dead. He then asked for

a moment of silence. "Miraculously," Brady was reported to be alive. This

story of prophetic fulfillment never got very far once people realized that

Brady suffered severe brain damage.

Mikhail Gorbachev still serves as a strong candidate.24 Since Antichrist

supposedly makes a covenant with Israel, the belief that Gorbachev could be

the Antichrist was reinforced by newspaper stories that showed him being

welcomed to Jerusalem by Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. Gorbachev was

talking like a man of peace, another attribute of Antichrist. At Ben-Gurion

International Airport Gorbachev said: "I won't hide that I have deep feel-

ings and honor toward this nation." Foreign Minister David Levy made the

following Antichrist-like statement: "We have been waiting for the day we

could receive a great man whose actions and struggle have left their imprint

on the entire world arena."25

In the January 4, 1993, issue of Time magazine many readers noticed that

Time's "Man of the Year," Bill Clinton, had horns. By covering up the "T,"

the "I," and the "E," one could see the then President-elect with a neatly Who's Got the Number?

237

cropped set of horns made from the points of the "M." One caller to Time's

news desk "pointed out that Clinton is the 66th 'Man of the Year,'" just

short by 600. As all Bible students know, the number of the Beast is 666,

not three 6s (Rev. 13:18). This shows, as Time spokesman Robert Pondiscio

tells it, that "Time is in league with the devil."26

There is nothing new in any of this. "David Brady ... gives well over a

hundred varying interpretations of the number 666, some based on Hebrew,

some on Greek, some on Latin, which have been confidently proposed."27 And

Brady was only dealing with British writers between 1560 and 1830!28

"Newton's Gift"

The number 666 has long fascinated theologians and mathematicians.

Maybe the interest in the number has something to do with the attainment

of wisdom and understanding since to "calculate the number of the Beast"

will reward the diligent (Rev. 13:18).

Wallace John Steinhope is the physicist in Paul Nathan's fictional "Newton's

Gift." In this story Steinhope has an intense desire to travel back in time to help

Isaac Newton with the tedium of calculations by putting a modern calculator

in his hands. Steinhope invents a knapsack-sized time machine and travels to

England in 1666 to bestow on Newton a pocket calculator.

Newton, however, is afraid of the calculator, particularly its glowing

red digital display: "As the Lord is my savior, is it a creation of Lucifer?

The eyes of it shine with the color of his domain."

"You cannot deny your own eyes," Steinhope responds. "Let me show

you it works. I'll divide two numbers for you with just the punch of a few

buttons." Steinhope entered, at random, 81,918 divided by 123. When

the answer lit up, Newton fell to his knees and started to pray. Then he

got up, grabbed a hot poker from the fireplace, and swung it at Steinhope,

who barely escaped back to the space-time coordinates of today.29

Why the violent reaction? Steinhope had made an unfortunate choice of

numbers: 81,918 divided by 123 happens to be 666, the number of the

Beast. This fictional story of superstition unfortunately seems to describe

many people today. For example, Mary Stewart Relfe teaches that we are

presently using the 666 system in monetary transactions. The 666 prefix,

238

LAST DAYS MADNESS

according to Relfe, is attached to credit cards like VISA and MasterCard.30

However fallacious her reasoning,31 she maintains that the mark of the Beast

is just around the corner.

Number, Number, Who Had the Number?

But what meaning would any of these theories have had for Christians

reading the Book of Revelation in the first century? The first readers were

to have "understanding" to "calculate the number of the Beast" (Rev. 13:18).

The Beast must have been a contemporary of the first-century readers. We

can have the same "understanding" by studying the history of the period.

We don't have to speculate on the identity of some future Beast. While Dave

Hunt, Hal Lindsey, Salem Kirban, and others believe that the Antichrist is

alive somewhere in the world today, the Bible says that he is buried some-

where in the world today.

Who's Got the Number?

239

Notes

1. Gary D. Blevins, 666: The Final Warning! (Kingsport, TN: Vision of the End Ministries, 1990).

2. Blevins, 666, 460. Emphasis in original.

3. Blevins, 666, 461.

4. Ed Dobson and Ed Hindson, "Apocalypse Now?: What Fundamentalists

Believe About the End of the World," Policy Review (Fall 1986), 20.

5. Terra is the Latin word for "earth."

6. Blevins, 666, 394.

7. Robert G. Clouse, Robert N. Hosack, and Richard V. Pierrard, The New Mil-

lennium Manual: A Once and Future Guide (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books,

1999), 171.

8. Ed Hindson, Approaching Armageddon: The World Prepares for War With God

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997), 202—203. An antichrist is someone

who denies that Jesus has come in the flesh (1 John 2:22; 2 John 7). A false

Christ is someone who claims to be the Messiah. The terms are not neces-

sarily synonymous.

9. Samuel J. Cassels, Christ and Antichrist or Jesus of Nazareth Proved to be the Messiah

and the Papacy Proved to be the Antichrist (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publication, 1846) and Christopher Hill, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century

England (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 1-40.

10. Iain Murray, The Puritan Hope: Revival and the Interpretation of Prophecy (London: Banner of Truth Trust, 1971), 41.

11. For some, the Pope remains a candidate for the Antichrist. Pope John Paul II

has been called the "man of sin" and "the Beast." See J.P. Slavin, "Pope runs into hostility in Jamaica," Atlanta Journal/Constitution (11 August 1993), A2.

Dave Hunt attempts to revive this view in his A Woman Rides the Beast: The

Roman Catholic Church and the Last Days (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1994).

12. Ray Summers, Worthy is the Lamb: An Interpretation of Revelation (Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1951), 176.

13. Paul Hoffman, Archimedes' Revenge: The Joys and Perils of Mathematics (New York: Norton, 1988), 22.

14 Clarke Garrett, Respectable Folly: Millenarians and the French Revolution in France

and England (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975), 211.

15. Robert Van Kampen, The Sign of Christ's Coming and the End of the Age (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 1999), 223-225.

240

L A S T DAYS M A D N E S S

16. Van Kampen cites portions of Revelation 1:1 and 3. He conveniently leaves

out the words "shortly" and "near", the crucial time texts. See Van Kampen, The Sign of Christ' s Coming and the End of the Age, 32.

17. Van Kampen, The Sign, 224-25.

18. Van Kampen, The Sign, 201.

19. Van Kampen, The Sign, 208.

20. See Ralph Woodrow, Great Prophecies of the Bible, (Riverside, CA: Ralph

Woodrow Evangelistic Association, 1971), 148.

21. David A. Lewis, "The Antichrist: Number, Number, Who's Got the Number?"

(no publishing information). For another attempt at identifying Mussolini as

the Antichrist, see the discussion of the works of Leonard Sale-Harrison in

Robert G. Clouse, "The Danger of Mistaken Hopes," in Handbook of Biblical Prophecy, eds. Carl E. Armerding and W. Ward Gasque (Grand Rapids, MI:

Baker Book House, [1977] 1978), 33-36.

22. Salem Kirban, Kissinger: Man of Peace? (Huntingdon Valley, PA: Salem Kirban, 1974).

23. Mary S. Relfe, When Your Money Fails... the " 666 System" Is Here (Montgomery, AL: Ministries, 1981), 143-45.

24. Robert W. Faid, Gorbachev! Has the Real Antichrist Come? (Tulsa, OK: Victory House, 1988).

25. "Gorbachev hailed as friend of Israel," Atlanta Constitution (15 June 1992), A5.

26. For a humorous treatment of the Time cover, see Gary DeMar, "Here-We-Go-

Again Eschatology," Biblical Worldview (February 1993), 10-11.

27. Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, The Book of Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), 154 note 3.

28. David Brady, The Contribution of British Writers between 1560 and 1830 to the

Interpretation of Revelation 13: 16— 18 ( the Number of the Beast): A Study in the His-

tory of Exegesis (Mohr: Siebeck, Tubingen, 1983).

29. Hoffman, Archimedes' Revenge, 18.

30. Mary Stewart Relfe, When Your Money Fails an d The New Money System ( Mont-

gomery, AL: Ministries, 1982).

31. For a helpful analysis of Relfe's 666 madness, see William M. Alnor, Soothsayers

of the Second Advent (Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell, 1989), 82-86.

Chapter Nineteen

TECHNOLOGY AND

THE MARK

OF THE BEAST

In the February 12, 1994 issue of the San Jose Mercury News, Richard

Scheinin reported on the "Red Lion Bible Conference" in Southern

California. Speakers included Hal Lindsey, John Walvoord, Peter and Paul

Lalonde, and a group of lesser known prophetic speculators. Scheinin does

a good job in explaining Peter Lalonde's beliefs about Bible prophecy and

its tenuous link with the computer age:

Never before has electronic technology existed to assist the anti-

Christ—"the beast" of Scripture—to rise to power by instantaneously

spreading his false messages and causing "the Earth and them which dwell

therein to worship" him, as Revelation says.

And never before, insists Lalonde, has technology existed to create the

cashless economy that many Christians believe is described in Revelation: a

prediction borne out in credit cards, smart cards and proposals for national

identification cards. Or to allow the anti-Christ to imprint the dreaded "mark

of the beast" in the right hands or foreheads of all people, "both small and

great, rich and poor, free and slave," as Revelation predicts.

241

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

According to Lalonde, the "mark of the beast" is now possible because

of "technological feasibility" since microchips can now be implanted in

animals to monitor their locations if they stray from home. Will implants

be accepted, Lalonde muses, to thwart child abductions? Lalonde wants us

to believe that before the advent of computer chips, the Book of Revelation

remained a closed book.

On or Under?

Peter and Paul Lalonde spell out their views on technology and Bible

prophecy in Racing Toward the Mark of the Beast. When the authors deal with

the way technology can be misused, the book is worthy of our attention.

Unfortunately, the Lalondes force Revelation 13:17-18 into a modern con-

text by trying to make it conform to the latest technological advances. They

write: "As always, God is way ahead of the latest biometric engineers, smart

card developers, and global communication systems planners. . . . For the

first time in history, the technology to easily fulfill this incredible prophecy

exists."1 Nonsense. The technology existed in the first century to accom-

plish what literalists maintain is required to fulfill the prophetic particulars

of Revelation 13:16-18. A simple mark, for example, a tattoo or a brand,

could easily be made on the forehead and hand. Branding has been used

for centuries to identify slaves, idolaters, and property.

We read in 3 Macc. ii. 29, of Ptolemy Philopater, that he ordered the

Jews of Alexandria to be forcibly enrolled, and when enrolled, to be

marked with a red-hot brand on their body, with the sign of Bacchus the

Ivyweaver. And Philo mentions idolaters who confessed their idolatry by

branding themselves with indelible marks.2

A "certain man clothed in linen with a writing case" went through the

city of Jerusalem to "put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and

groan over all the abominations which are being submitted in its midst"

(Ezek. 9:4). There's nothing high-tech about this. The mark was given

for divine protection, similar to the marks given in the Book of Revela-

tion (7:3; 9:4; 14:1).

Technology and the Mark of the Beast

243

Adding to the Bible

The Lalondes, in an attempt to make Revelation 13:16-18 conform to

the latest advances in technology, must add to the text. In an advertisement

for their This Week in Bible Prophecy television program, they write: "The Mark of the Beast—it's one of the clearest and most dramatic prophecies

in the Bible. It states simply that in the last days that no man will be able to

buy or sell unless he has the mark IN his right hand or forehead." The "IN"

apparently refers to an embedded microchip or something similar placed

under the skin. Their emphasis is on the word "IN."

The Greek preposition epi is used in Revelation 13:13, not ev, to describe where the mark was to be placed. Epi is best translated as "on" or "upon."

This is why the passage states that the mark is to be given " on their right hand, or on their forehead" (13:16), not "in their right hand, or in their forehead." If Jesus had wanted to say "in," He would have used the Greek

preposition en.

The Lalondes prey on the ignorance of Christians who have not studied

the Bible for themselves. Their sensationalistic rhetoric serves as a substitute

for sound hermeneutics. Their interpretation of Revelation 13:18 forces us

to believe that the message of the "mark of the beast" has been unintelligible

for nearly two thousand years since computer chips and scanning technol-

ogy are late-twentieth century innovations. Those who teach this foolishness

ignore some very clear biblical realities.

• The time texts indicate that the events recorded in the Book of Revela-

tion "must shortly take place" (1:1). In addition, those who first read

the prophecy were assured that "the time is near," near for them (1:3).

• Those who first read "the words of the prophecy" are said to be "blessed"

(1:3). What kind of blessing comes to people who cannot understand

what they are reading because the prophecies describe conditions in a

super-technological society?

• How high-tech does a society have to be for people "to be given a mark

on their right hand or on their forehead" (13:16)? Either you have the

mark or you don't. Who needs a computer or laser technology for this?

Low-tech methods of screening a population can be quite effective,

as the men of Gilead found out (Judges 12:4-7). During the reign of

Caesar Augustus Rome was able to tax the entire empire (Luke 2:1—4).

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

There was nothing high-tech about the numbering system Hitler used

on the Jews to identify and "catalog" them.

Is It Visible?

A more fundamental question needs to be asked, however: Is the "mark

of the beast" a visible mark? Consider that none of today's prophetic techno-

sensationalists compare the mark that is given to the 144,000 by the "Lamb"

in Revelation 14:1 with the mark given by the "beast" in 13:16. The marks

have to be the same. Will Jesus implant a micro-chip in the foreheads of the

144,000? There are other considerations as well. Are the "beast" and the

"lamb" (literal animals) doing the numbering? Should we look for a beast

that literally comes "up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads"

(13:1)? Is there a literal land beast that has "two horns like a lamb" and speaks

"as a dragon" (13:11)? Those who insist on literalism are very selective in

what they choose to interpret literally. Insisting that the "mark of the beast"

is actually a "computer chip" is not a literal interpretation.

It is not at all clear that John is thinking of a literal brand visible on

the person of the worshippers of the beast. The seal of God placed on the

forehead of the 144,000 (7:3) is surely not meant to be a visible mark; it is

a symbolic way of expressing divine protection (see Isa. 44:5). The mark

of the beast may be intended to be a parody on the mark of God.3

John D. Hannah, Chairman and Professor of Historical Theology at Dallas

Theological Seminary, offers a similar perspective on Exodus 13:9:

Like the Passover ([Exodus] 12:26-27), the Feast of Unleavened Bread

had great educational value in the home (13:8-9). The feast was like a

sign on their hand or forehead, that is, it was a continual reminder

of God's mighty deliverance from Egypt. Some orthodox Jews today

interpret that passage (and Deut. 6:8; 11:18) literally and bind passages

of the Law (viz., Ex. 13:2-10; Deut. 6:4-9; 11:13-21) on their arms and

foreheads in small pouches, so-called phylacteries, though this was prob-

ably not God's intention.4

John J. Davis writes that "Many feel that the expressions found in [Exo-

dus 13]:9, 16 are not to be interpreted literally but refer alone to symbolic

Technology and the Mark of the Beast

245

action."5 Not a single commentator I consulted thought the actions were

to be taken literally.6 Similar commentary is offered by Elmer Towns, also

a dispensationalist, on Deuteronomy 6:8 where he states that "these verses

are still carried out literally by many orthodox Jews.... The intent of this

passage," Towns continues, "is that the Word of God should be hidden in a

person's heart and should constantly be a source of devotion and obedience

to the Lord."7 The comments of Keil and Delitzsch are especially helpful:

"The line of thought referred to merely expresses the idea, that the Israelites

were not only to retain the commands of God in their hearts, and to confess

them with the mouth, but to fulfill them with the hand, or in act and deed,

and thus to show themselves in their whole bearing as the guardians and

observers of the law."8

A Symbolic Mark

Every Jew would have understood that a mark on the hand or the fore-

head was an identification of loyalty, ownership, and heart-felt allegiance to

Jehovah. This is made clear when we read the instructions that were given

to the Israelites as they were about to depart from Egypt: "And it shall serve

as a sign to you on your hand, and as a reminder on your forehead, that the

law of the LORD may be in your mouth; for with a powerful hand the LORD

brought you out of Egypt" (Exodus 13:9; see Deut. 6:8).

These signs were not literal marks on the skin—one cannot literally

wear the observance of a festival on one's body—but were spiritual, visible

only to God. (The phylacteries of the Jews in a later period were based on

a materialistic interpretation of this passage.) As His Old Testament people

were marked on hand and head as a sign of their covenant with the Lord

who brought them out of slavery and made them a nation, so are those

who give allegiance to the beast marked with his name.9

Throughout the Book of Revelation marks given on the hand and head are

symbolic. Commentators do not usually claim that when God gives a mark to

set apart His people that the mark is visible to the eye. For example, in Revela-

tion 3:12 we read: "He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple

of My God, and he will not go out from it any more; and I will write upon him

the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem,

which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name."

246

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Is writing God's name and the name of the New Jerusalem an external

tattoo or brand of those who overcome? Is being a "pillar in the temple" of

God to be understood literally as well? Robert Thomas concludes correctly

that the "pillar" language is "clearly metaphorical."10 Thomas intimates that writing God's name on "he who overcomes" is also metaphorical. "To have

'the name of My God,'" Thomas writes, "was equivalent to belonging to

God, being endowed with divine power (Moffatt). This sets the overcomer

in utter contrast with the assumptions of the present Jewish persecutors

(Beckwith)."11 Having the "name of the city of My God" written upon the

overcomer meant the right of citizenship in the new Jerusalem. "Christ's

'new name' symbolizes the full revelation of His character promised to the

overcomer at Christ's second advent."12

What then is the solution to this seemingly enigmatic passage? Like

much of Revelation, its familiar symbols are meant to represent familiar concepts. This is why Revelation must be read against the backdrop of

the Old Testament. As Ferrel Jenkins writes: "The book of Revelation

is the most thoroughly Jewish in its language and imagery of any New

Testament book. This book speaks not the language of Paul, but of the

Old Testament prophets Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel."13 The beasts, both

sea and land, the mark on the hand or head, and the number 666 should

be interpreted in light of the Old Testament, similar to the way Sodom

(11:8), Egypt (11:8), Jezebel (2:20), Balaam (2:14), and Babylon (14:8;

16:19; 17:5; 18:2, 10, 21) are interpreted. Understanding the way the

Old Testament uses and applies marks, it is not that difficult to determine

what John is describing in Revelation 13. Whoever carried the mark of

the beast would be protected by Satan, and whoever carried the mark of

the Lamb would be protected by God. Those who identified with Rome

against Jesus Christ died in the destruction of Jerusalem when Titus and

his army swept in to destroy the temple and the city.

Bar Codes and the Mark of the Beast

If not computer chips, why not bar codes? Since 1973 bar codes have

been used to identify products for pricing, controlling inventory, tracking

baggage at airports, and making the check-out line at the local supermarket

move faster. In fact, the bar code is ubiquitous, an ever-present reminder

that technology has invaded every area of our life. But is the bar code the

Technology and the Mark of the Beast 247

dreaded numbering system outlined in Revelation 13? Gary H. Kah thinks

so: "It will only be a matter of time before humans are tattooed with a similar

mark to the codes in the supermarket."14 Others believe that it is a precursor

to a more ominous computer chip implant.

Before evaluating the Bar Code=666 theory, we should spend some time

explaining the function of the bar code. The technical name for the bar code

is the Universal Product Code, or UPC for short. The symbol is designed to

be read by an optical scanner, a device that measures and interprets reflected light patterns.

The UPC symbol does not contain the price of a product purchased. The

price is actually in the computer that corresponds to the code on a product.

This allows a store to change the price without changing the code. When a

store wants to change a price of a product, a computer operator simply calls

up the Item Number in the computer and changes the corresponding price.

Every time a product with the code is processed, the cash register logs the

new price. Before the advent of the UPC symbol a store employee would

have to change the price on every item, a very time consuming, inefficient,

expensive, and messy job.

The UPC bar code consists of twelve digits grouped into four numbers

separated by Guard Bars (more about these later). When used to identify

merchandise to be purchased the first digit identifies the product. A 3, for

example, means drug and certain health-related products. The next five digits

are the Manufacturer ID Number. The following five digits are assigned by the

manufacturer to represent the product, the Item Number. The final digit is the

check digit. It signals the computer if one of the other digits is incorrect.

How It Works

The logic of the UPC bar code follows the logic of the computer, a binary

rather than the base-ten Arabic system. The computer reads yes/no, on/off,

commands. The bars on the UPC bar code, both black and white, represent

1s (black) and 0s (white), the essence of the binary numbering system. The

1s and 0s are converted into Arabic numbers based on where they are placed

in a series. Any base-ten number can be converted into a binary number of

1s and 0s and vice versa. Here's how it works. Beginning with the number

1, each subsequent number is doubled: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256,

512, 1,024, 2,048, ad infinitum. Different places represent different pow-

248

LAST DAYS MADNESS

ers of two. For example, the binary number for 4 would be 001 (0+0+4).

The binary number for 12 would be 0011 (0+0+4+8). The 0 is an "off"

switch while the 1 is an "on" switch. The binary number for 666 would be

0101100101 (0+2+0+8+16+0+0+128+0+512).

The UPC bar code is a visual representation of the binary numbering

system. The light that reads the black and white bars reads them as binary

Is and 0s which in turn converts them to Arabic numerals for the cash

register receipt. The UPC bar code has adapted the binary system to fit its

particular needs. The binary code for the Manufacturer ID Number and

the Item Number are different from the standard binary numbering system

explained above, although they operate on the same principle of on/ofF

bar readings. For example, the Manufacturer ID Number three is 0111101

while the Item Number three is 1000010, converse images of one another.

As you can see by the manufacturer's number three with its four Is in a

row, the thickness of the black line representing the number is wide. The

three on the product side has two very thin black lines separated by a wide

white bar, the four 0s.

But where does 666 come in? The Manufacturer ID Number and the

Item Number are bound and divided by three longer bars of two lines

each called "Guard Bars." The Left-Hand Guard Bar separates the Number

System Character from the Manufacturer ID Number. The Right-Hand

Guard Bar separates the Item Number from the Check Character. The

Tall Center Pattern separates the Manufacturer ID Number from the Item

Technology and the Mark of the Beast

249

Number. It is these three bars that are said to register as 6-6-6. There

are a number of problems with this theory. The Guard Bars are not 6s.

The Manufacturer ID Number for 6 is 0101111 while the Product item

Number is 1010000. The Left Guard Bar and the Right Guard Bar are

101. The Tall Center Bar is 01010.

Those who maintain that the UPC symbol is a clever way of marking all

of us with 6-6-6 have confused the Item Number 6 with the Guard Bars

because they look identical to the eye. But they are not identical to the

machine. The machine also reads white spaces. Notice that the Tall Center

Bar separating the manufacturer's ID Number from the Item Number has

two extra white bars. Even if the Left and Right Guard Bars are 6s (101),

the Center Bar is a different number (01010). It is impossible to get 666

out of this configuration. But let's suppose that the three Guard Bars are 6s.

How does this fit with Revelation 13:18 where the number is six-hundred

and sixty-six, not simply three consecutive 6s?

Attempts to force the Bible to speak of nuclear detonation, UFOs, Co-

bra helicopters, computer chips, and bar codes are an exercise in futility.

Moreover, such approaches demean the character of the Bible by turning it

into a crystal ball rather than a revelation of God's character and His special

word to His people.

Buying and Selling

The control of economic transactions drives modern claims of a one-world

government controlled by the antichrist during the great tribulation. This

sensationalistic but popular view is outlined by Thomas Ice and Timothy

Demy in their The Coming Cashless Society.

Using every means at his disposal, including the technology of a cash-

less society, the Antichrist and his demands will bring the world into its

greatest-ever moral and economic turmoil. Such chaos will make the stock

market crash of 1929 look like a minor economic adjustment.

Revelation 13:16, 17 is the biblical point of entry for discussion of

the cashless society, a one-world government, global economics, and

biblical prophecy.15

Having gone out on a limb with this prediction, the authors come back

to biblical reality and write, "The Bible does not specifically predict comput-

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

ers, the Internet, credit cards, or any of the other trimmings that facilitate

the modern electronic banking system."16 In fact, Revelation 13:16-17 is

not describing the control of financial transactions but rather access to the

temple controlled by the Jewish anti-Christian religious establishment. The

key to interpreting the passage is the prohibition "to buy or to sell" (13:17)

if a worshipper does not have the mark of the beast.

Buying and selling are controlled by the temple leadership and are used to

regulate access to the temple (Matt. 21:12). Buying and selling, properly under-

stood, are worship-related rituals (Isa. 55:1). "This is established in [Revelation]

3:18 (and compare 21:6). When those who refuse the mark of the Beast are not

allowed to buy and sell, it means that they are expelled from the synogogue and

Temple. The merchants of the land in Revelation 18 are those who worshipped

at the Temple and synagogue."17 Jesus foretold this: "They will make you out-

casts from the synagogue; but an hour is coming for everyone who kills you

to think that he is offering service to God" (John 16:2).

Early in the church's history the disciples went to the temple to preach

the gospel (Acts 5:20-21,24,42; 24:12). At first, they were welcomed (Acts

2:46). Peter and John frequented the temple during "the hour of prayer"

(Acts 3:1). Jewish Christians continued to use the temple, even participating

in some of its rituals (Acts 21:26). After the temple officials learned that

these Jews were preaching that Jesus was the Messiah—the lamb of God

who takes away the sin of the world—they were shut out of the temple

(21:26-30).

These events help explain the theological meaning of buying and selling

in Revelation 13:17. During Jesus' ministry, the temple officials were "selling"

and worshippers were "buying" access to the temple (Matt. 21:12). Their

"buying and selling" turned "God's house" into a "robbers' den" (21:12—13).

Only those Jews who aligned themselves with the priests, the sacrificial

system, and the temple would be allowed to enter the temple for worship. If

they did not have the mark of the beast, that is, if they did not align them-

selves with what the temple now represented, they could not "buy or sell"

in order to offer the appropriate sacrifices. To take the "mark of the beast"

meant a person denied that Jesus was the Messiah, the true temple of God,

the only sufficient sacrifice. Of course, Christian Jews avoided the mark of

the beast and showed their true allegiance to Jesus, "having His name and

the name of his father written on their foreheads" (Rev. 14:1).

Technology and the Mark of the Beast

251

The "World Wide Web''

and the Mark of the Beast

It was only a matter of time before the Internet became an apocalyptic

feature in modern-day prophetic speculation. Zola Levitt writes in his April

1999 ministry newsletter that after attending a prophecy conference that he

"started looking into the Hebrew language and certain computer designa-

tions." Levitt is correct about the Hebrew language, and I would add, the

Hebrew Bible. The New Testament cannot be understood without under-

standing the Old Testament, especially Revelation. But like any interpretive

key, it can be misused. Levitt attempts to make a link between the World

Wide Web and 666:

To begin with, the familiar symbol for the Internet, World Wide Web

or "www", would be rendered in Hebrew as vav, vav, vav (the Hebrew

alphabet does not have a "w" and Hebrew speaking people us the vav, or V, in place of our "w"). The interesting part is that since Hebrew letters

also have numerical values (Hebrew speakers do not prefer Arabic numer-

als), we have a number of the letter vav. Since it is the sixth letter of the alphabet, the expression "www", in Hebrew, is 666.

Like the majority of prophecy writers who claim to be experts on the sub-

ject, Levitt, who should know better, seemingly is unaware that the number

for the mark of the beast is six hundred and sixty-six, not three sixes.

Dispensationalists are notorious for playing the interpretive game of "sounds

like." The Hebrew word "Rosh" in Ezekiel 38-39 is said to be modernday

Russia since Rosh sounds like Russia. What should we make of the "wilderness

of Sin" (Ex. 16:1; 17:1; Num. 33:11) since sin sounds like Sin?

Yahoo Hermeneutics

Levitt doesn't stop with identifying the World Wide Web as the Beast

of Revelation. Step two in sound-alike exegesis is to identify the popular

search engine Yahoo! as the Antichrist. Levitt reasons:

Finally, the popular search engine, Yahoo, is an important Hebrew word

repeated often in the Scriptures. The name Yahweh is shortened to Yah in names; and hu, in Hebrew, stands for the pronoun "he." Thus, "Yahoo"

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

on the end of a name in Hebrew, such as Netanyahu, means "he ... God"

in English. In the case of Netanyahu, since netan means "gift," his entire name means "He is the gift of God." The prophets Isaiah (Yeshayahu) and

Jeremiah (Yirmeyahu) also hud yahu on the ends of their names. These were

meant in complimentary terms, but in the case of the Antichrist, yahoo

by itself expresses exactly his counterfeit: "he is God."

As in both cases (www) and (Yahu), Hebrew is being used as the bridge

language. Unlike Latin and Greek, there are not many Hebrew words that

make up the English language. Words which do make it into English are

most often given their proper singular Hebrew definition, for example, ko-

sher and kibbutz. These words mean what they mean in Hebrew because

the design of the language is so different in structure from that of English.

Hebrew words are not used as prefixes and suffixes as are Latin and Greek

words (e.g., anti, ante, post, contra, bene, etc.).

The same can be said for a language like Chinese. Low Mein is a Chinese

dish served in most Chinese restaurants. You won't find a Chinese equivalent

of High Mein. The Chinese word Low does not mean what low means in

English even though their sounds are identical. The same is true of Hebrew.

There are probably numerous Hebrew words that sound a lot like English

words, but there is no meaningful association. Even English has words that

are pronounced alike but have different meanings (homophones):

• to, too, two

• reign, rain, rein

• sea, see

Then there are words that are spelled the same way but have different

meanings (homonym):

• bat (animal and wooden club)

• ball (sphere and dance)

Yahoo! has at least two meanings in English: a western expression of ex-

citement and Jonathan Swift's designation of a race of brutes in his satirical

Gulliver's Travels (1726). You can decide which fits Zola Levitt's interpretive

idiosyncracies.

Technology and the Mark of the Beast

253

Notes

1. Peter Lalonde and Paul Lalonde, Racing Toward the Mark of the Beast: Your Money,

Computers, and the End of the World (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1994), 87

and 103.

2. Henry Alford, The New Testament for English Readers (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, n.d.), 1889.

3. George Eldon Ladd, A Commentary on the Revelation of John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, [1972] 1987), 185.

4. John Hannah, "Exodus," The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, eds.

John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985),

130.

5. John J. Davis, Moses and the Gods of Egypt: Studies in Exodus, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1986), 163.

6. John I. Durham, Word Biblical Commentary: Exodus (Waco, TX: Word, 1987),

178; W.H. Gispen, Bible Student's Commentary: Exodus (Grand Rapids, MI:

Zondervan, 1982), 133, 135; R. Alan Cole, Tyndale Old Testament Com-

mentaries: Exodus (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1973), 114; James

G. Murphy, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The Book of Exodus with a

New Translation (Minneapolis, [1866] 1979), 141; C.F. Keil and F. Delitzsch,

Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Pentateuch, trans. James Martin, 3 vols.

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1951), 2:36-37; Philip C. Johnson, "Exodus,"

The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, eds. Charles F. Pfeiffer and Everett F. Harrison (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1962), 63; Hywel R. Jones, "Exodus," The New

Bible Commentary: Revised, eds. Donald Guthrie and J. A. Motyer (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1970), 128.

7. Elmer L. Towns, "Deuteronomy," Liberty Bible Commentary: Old Testament, eds.

Edward E. Hindson and Woodrow Michael Kroll (Lynchburg, VA: The Old-

Time Gospel Hour, 1982), 338.

8. Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Pentateuch, 2:37.

9. J. E. Leonard, Come Out of Her, My People: A Study of the Revelation to John (Chicago, IL: Laudemont Press, 1991), 105.

10. Robert L. Thomas, Revelation 1-7: An Exegetical Commentary (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1992), 292.

11. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 293.

12. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 293.

13. Ferrel Jenkins, The Old Testament in the Book of Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1976), 22.

254

LAST DAYS MADNESS

14. Gary H. Kah, En Route to Global Occupation (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House, 1991), 12.

15. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, The Coming Cashless Society (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996), 69-70.

16. Ice and Demy, The Coming Cashless Society, 85.

17. James B. Jordan, A Brief Readers Guide to Revelation (Niceville, FL: Transfiguration Press, 1999), 19.

Chapter Twenty

IDENTIFYING

THE BEAST

If the Beast of Revelation is a historical figure with a past, then it should

not be too difficult to discover who he was once we survey the biblical

evidence. But this is exactly what present-day date setters say they do. There

is a difference, however. It's not enough to come up with a plausible solution to the identity of 666; what is required is "a relevant solution"1

First, the Book of Revelation was written before the destruction of Jeru-

salem, which all of history attests happened in A.D. 70. Revelation makes it

clear that the events described therein were to happen "shortly" (Rev. 1:1).

In verse 3 Jesus states that "the time is near." John is said to be a "fellow-partaker in the tribulation and kingdom and perseverance which are in Jesus"

(1:9). John is told to write "the things which [he has] seen, and the things

which are, and the things which shall take place after these things" (1:19).

The things which "shall take place" follow on the heels of "the things which

are," that is, events that were going on in John's day. Many commentators

want to project "the things which shall take place" into the far distant future.

This is an untenable position because the text literally should read, "the

things which are about to occur after these things." Furthermore, the Book of Revelation ends with these words: '"These words are faithful and true'; and 255

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show to

His bond-servants the things which must shortly take place" (22:6). Again, the angel tells John that "the time is near" (22:10). Jesus says that He is "coming quickly" (3:11 and 22:20). The book begins and ends with statements that

the time was near for those who first read the Revelation.2

Second, when Revelation was written the temple was still standing. John

is told to measure "the temple of God, and the altar, and those who wor-

ship in it" (11:1). It is highly unlikely that this is a description of a future

rebuilt temple since the New Testament, including the Book of Revelation,

says nothing about a rebuilt temple. The Old Testament describes plans to

rebuild the temple (Ezra 1:2-4; 3:7-13), and it also mentions its completion

and dedication 515 B.C. (5:1-6:22). This temple was still operating when

Herod gained control of Jerusalem in 37 B.C. Herod dismantled this rebuilt

temple so he could build a new one that would be associated with his name

and reign. Work began around 20 B.C., and while it was operating within

a decade, it was not completed until A.D. 64, only six years before it was

destroyed by the Romans.

Futurists claim that when the New Testament describes an event taking

place in the temple sometime in the future it is speaking of a rebuilt temple.

They cannot produce a single verse to prove their case. While it is impossible

to be certain of the exact date when Revelation was written, it is clear that

it was written before A.D. 70:

All that can be asserted is that the book was written before the

destruction of Jerusalem, and the burning of the Temple. This is clear

from the beginning of the eleventh chapter. The Temple is there spoken

of as still standing, in language which closely resembles, and indeed

directly refers to, the language of our Lord in his great eschatologi-

cal discourse [Matthew 24]. Such language, and the whole sequel of

it, would have been unreal and misleading if, at the time when it was

penned, nothing remained of the Temple and city of Jerusalem but heaps

of bloodstained stones.3

The temple that John sees is not a heavenly temple because "the court

which is outside the temple ... has been given to the nations" (Rev. 11:2;

see Luke 21:24). There is no temple in heaven (Rev. 21:22). Flesh and blood

worshipers occupy the temple. The holy city "will be tread under foot... for

Identifying the Beast

25 7

forty-two months" (11:2), the precise time the Romans occupied Jerusalem.

The "temple" resides in the "holy city." The holy city is Jerusalem.

Third, the judgment visions of Revelation 4—19 apply "to the historical

turmoil which came to a head shortly after John wrote. The fulfillment of

the majority of its prophecies would then apply to the very beginning of

Christianity, rather than to its conclusion."4 This turmoil would include the

first Roman persecution of Christianity (A.D. 64—68), the Jewish War with

Rome (A.d. 67-70) as described in detail by the Jewish historian for the

Romans, Flavius Josephus, the death of Christianity's most infamous perse-

cutor, Nero Caesar, in A.D. 68, the Roman Civil Wars (A.D. 68-69), and the

destruction of Jerusalem and the temple in A.D. 70.

Two First-Century Candidates

The time parameters of Revelation limit who the Beast can be. Since

the events of Revelation were "near" (Rev. 1:3) for those who first read

the prophecy, the list of Beast candidates must also be near in time to the

original audience. Revelation 13 describes two beasts: a sea beast (Rome)

and a land beast (Israel).

A Political Candidate: Nero

The enigmatic 666 fits very well with the construction of Nero's name,

his beastly character, the time in which he ruled, and his anti-Christian edicts

leveled against the church. Keep in mind that we need more than a plausible

candidate; we need a relevant candidate. The first readers of Revelation were

told to "calculate the number of the Beast, for the number is that of a man;

and his number is six hundred and sixty-six" (13:18). Since the Book of

Revelation was written to a first-century audience, we should expect the

first-century readers to be able to calculate the number with relative ease.

They would have had few candidates from which to choose. The Roman

emperor would have been their most likely political choice.

As was explained earlier, ancient numbering systems use an alpha-numeric

method. This is true of the Latin (Roman) system that we still use today: I= 1,

V=5, X=10, L=50, C=100, D=500, M=1000. The same is true of Greek

and Hebrew. Since the Book of Revelation is written in a Hebrew (Aramaic)

context by a Jew with numerous allusions to the Old Testament, we should

expect the solution to deciphering the meaning of 666 to be Hebraic. "The

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

reason clearly is that, while he writes in Greek, he thinks in Hebrew, and the thought has naturally affected the vehicle of expression."5

Is there anything in the Bible, especially in Revelation, that hints at this

use of both Greek and Hebrew? The "angel of the abyss" is described in two

ways: "His name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in the Greek he has the name

Apollyon" (Rev. 9:11). Something similar is done with "Har-Mageddon" (Hill

of Megiddo) or "Ar-Mageddon" (City of Megiddo) (16:16). In John's gospel,

the place where Pilate sat down to judge Jesus was called "The Pavement."

John calls attention to its Hebrew name "Gabbatha" (John 19:13). In the

same chapter, John writes how Pilate had an inscription placed on the cross

above Jesus' head written in "Hebrew, Latin, and in Greek" (19:20). Going

from Greek to Hebrew was normal. Americans who try to find a contem-

porary solution to the 666 problem invariably use English.

When Nero Caesar's name is transliterated into Hebrew, we get Neron

Kesar (nrwn qsr. Hebrew has no letters to represent vowels). "It has been documented by archaeological finds that a first century Hebrew spelling of

Nero's name provides us with precisely the value of 666. Jastrow's lexicon

of the Talmud contains this very spelling."6 When we take the letters of

Nero's name and spell them in Hebrew, we get the following numeric values:

n=50, r=200, w=6, n=50, q=100, s=60, r=200 = 666. "Every Jewish

reader, of course, saw that the Beast was a symbol of Nero. And both Jews

and Christians regarded Nero as also having close affinities with the serpent

or dragon.7... The Apostle writing as a Hebrew, was evidently thinking as

a Hebrew.... Accordingly, the Jewish Christian would have tried the name

as he thought of the name—that is in Hebrew letters. And the moment that he did this the secret stood revealed. No Jew ever thought of Nero except as

'Neron Kesar."'6 Those who read John's account of the Beast probably had come to this conclusion even before they made their calculation.

Subsequent Christian history supports the view that Nero was the Beast.

"All the earliest Christian writers on the Apocalypse, from Irenaeus down

to Victorinus of Pettau and Commodian in the fourth, and Andreas in the

fifth, and St. Beatus in the eighth century, connect Nero, or some Roman

Emperor, with the Apocalyptic Beast."9

There is a curious variation on 666. Some manuscripts read 616. Why

would a copyist make such a number change? "Perhaps the change was

intentional, seeing that the Greek form Neron Caesar written in Hebrew

characters (nrwn qsr) is equivalent to 666, whereas the Latin form Nero

Identifying the Beast

259

Caesar ( nrw qsr) is equivalent to 616."10 Keep in mind that there were no copy machines in the first century. If you wanted a copy of a book, you

had to copy it by hand. No matter how carefully a scribe worked, mistakes

were inevitable. Some mistakes occurred when a scribe was making a copy

of a known copy. He might have thought the copy was mistaken and that

it was up to him to correct it. A Greek or Latin copyist might have thought

that 666 was an error because Nero Caesar did not add up to 666 when

transliterated into Latin. He then changed 666 to 616 to conform to the

Latin rendering since it was generally accepted that Nero was the Beast. In

either case, a Hebrew transliteration nets 666, while a Latin spelling nets

616. Nero was the "man" and 666 was his number.

A Religious Candidate: Jewish Priesthood

Following the methodology of letting Scripture interpret Scripture, there is

another possible solution in identifying the number "six hundred and sixtysix"

(Rev. 13:18). The number is found in three places in the Old Testament: 1

Kings 10:14; 2 Chronicles 9:13; Ezra 2:13. For our purposes, the references in

1 Kings 10:14 and 2 Chronicles 9:13—parallel accounts—shed some light on

the choice of 666 for the "beast coming up out of the earth" (Rev. 13:11). The

land beast, Israel, promotes the efforts of the sea beast and can only operate under

the direction and authority of the sea beast. We are told that the land beast "had

two horns like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon" (13:11). The land beast is not

the dragon, but he speaks "as a dragon." We learn from Jesus that the religious

leaders who opposed Him were in league with the devil, the dragon: "You are

of your father the devil, and you meant to do the desires of your father. He was

a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there

is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature; for

he is a liar, and the father of lies" 0ohn 8:44). The apostate Jews are described

as a "synagogue of Satan" (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). The land beast is in league with the

sea beast against the Christians of the first century. The land beast wants the sea

beast to protect its corrupt religion against the religion of the lamb.

There is nothing new in this scenario since the apostate Jews turned to

the Roman civil state to have Jesus put to death (John 18:31). In a final

denouncement of their promised Messiah, the Jewish religious leaders cried

out, "We have no king but Caesar" (John 19:15). Acts tells a similar story

of Jewish collaboration with the Romans to persecute the Bride of Christ,

the church (e.g., Acts 24:1-9).

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Solomon's Number

The jews had seen six hundred and sixty-six before. Prior to Solomon's

slide into apostasy, a description of his reign is given. One of the things said

about him is that "the weight of gold which came in to Solomon in one year

was 666 talents of gold" (1 Kings 10:14). From the number of shields (300)

to the price of a horse imported from Egypt (150 shekels), we find round

numbers, except when the number of gold talents is mentioned.

From the point where 666 talents of gold is mentioned, we read of Solo-

mon's apostasy. First, Solomon violates the law regarding the accumulation

of horses, chariots, wives, and gold (1 Kings 10:26; see Deut. 17:16-17).

The law of Deuteronomy 17 forbad the king to multiply gold, women,

and horses, but here we see Solomon do all three. In Revelation, the re-

ligious rulers of the "land" are called kings, the "kings of the land." The apostasy of the High Priest, and of the religious leaders of Israel, is thus

linked to Solomon's sin. As Solomon lost his kingdom when the northern

tribes rebelled after his death, so the Land Beast will lose his kingdom

permanently when Jerusalem is destroyed.11

Second, Solomon sells himself to foreign interests. It is here that we see

a parallel with Revelation 13. In their rejection of their Messiah, the Jews

committed spiritual adultery with the nations (Rome) in the way that Solo-

mon committed adultery with the nations surrounding him: "Now Solomon

loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite,

Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, from the nations concern-

ing which the LORD had said to the sons of Israel, 'You shall not associate

with them, neither shall they associate with you, for they will surely turn

your heart away after their gods.' Solomon held fast to these in love. And

he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines, and

his wives turned his heart away" (1 Kings 11:1—3). James Jordan sums up

the connection between Solomon and the apostate character of the Church's

enemy in Revelation 13:

The number of the name (character) of the Sea Beast, then, means

"apostate Solomon; apostate Jew." It is Solomon, not free under Yahweh's

rule, but enslaved to Gentiles through illicit trade, the idol worshipping

wiles of his women, and his lust for gold.12

Identifying the Beast

261

So which is it, Nero or Solomon? It's possible that the number refers to

both since the Sea Beast (Rome under Nero) and the Land Beast (Israel as the

"synagogue of Satan") cooperate in their desire to see the Church destroyed.

Those Jews who rejected Jesus—the heir to David's throne—embraced the

apostasy of Solomon who did not follow after his father David.

While this interpretation does not answer all the questions we might

have concerning this passage, it gets us started in terms of biblical theology

rather than newspaper exegesis. The luxury that pre-tribulationalists have

in their interpretive system is that the Beast and his mark do not appear

until after the so-called rapture. They can speculate all they want as to the Beast's identity since they can never be proven wrong because, according to

their theory, we will not be here. Popular dispensational author John Hagee

writes: "This information about how to identify the Antichrist [Beast] is of no

practical value to the Church since we will be watching from the balconies

of heaven by the time he is revealed."13 This means that all dispensational prophecy books are pure speculation because they can never be tested against

the events of history.

If an event does not transpire as predicted, these writers can always say

that the prophecy will not be fulfilled until after the rapture, an event that is

always near. While this is a convenient way to interpret the Bible, the approach

in no way deals honestly with texts that clearly describe prophetic events as

happening within the lifetime of those who first read the prophecy.

Preterists, those who believe certain prophecies have already been fulfilled

because of the incidence of time indicators, must defend their position against

the events of history. Futurists, unless they predict a specific date or identify

a specific person, can never be judged as false prophets. They usually mask

their predictions with words like "could be" and "might take place."

While turning to 1 Kings 10 may seem unusual in trying to derive the

meaning of 666, it is no more unusual than those who assert that the Beast

(Antichrist) is alive somewhere in the world today. At least 1 Kings 10 is

God's Word. Christians have more assurance of getting something right by

appealing to the Bible than reading a daily newspaper.

188

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Milton Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics: A Study of the Most Notable Revelations of God

and of Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1898] 1988), 401.

2. On the dating issue, see Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the

Book of Revelation, 2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999). One reviewer of Before Jerusalem Fell wrote: "Anyone wishing to date Revelation late must answer some of the excellent arguments which Gentry has advanced. He has

given late-date advocates a challenge for future study" (Thomas D. Lea, Criswell

Theological Review [1992], 115). For a similar opinion, see Steve Gregg, ed.

Revelation: Four Views—A Parallel Commentary (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson,

1997), 15, 18.

3. F.W. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1882), 412.

4. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., The Beast of Revelation (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), 85.

5. R.H. Charles, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John,

2 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1920), 1:cxliii.

6. Gentry, The Beast of Revelation, 34. See Charles, A Critical and Exegetical Com-

mentary on the Revelation of St. John, 1:367.

7. "The Sibyllists had already spoken of Caligula as Beliar (Cam. iii. 63), and as a serpent. The stories of the serpent which had crawled from Nero's cradle,

and of his serpent-amulet... would add significance to the symbolism" (Far-

rar, Early Days of Christianity, 471, note 1).

8. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 471. In a footnote, Farrar writes: "I am not sure that a Jew would not have tried Hebrew letters at once" (471, note 2).

9. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, All.

10. Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (London: United Bible Societies, 1971), 751-52.

11. James B. Jordan, A Brief Reader's Guide to Revelation (Niceville, FL: Transfiguration Press, 1999), 36.

12. James B. Jordan, "The Beasts of Revelation (4)," Studies in the Revelation (April 1996), 2.

13. John Hagee, Beginning of the End: The Assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and the Com-

ing of Antichrist (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1996), 135. This does not

stop the author from making a prediction: "This so-called man of peace, this

Son of Satan, this false messiah, the Antichrist, is probably alive right now

and may even know his predestined demonic assignment."

Chapter Twenty-One

IDENTIFYING

ANTICHRIST

Hal Lindsey wrote in 1970 that he believed that the antichrist was alive

somewhere in the world. He repeated this belief in 1977 when he wrote

that it was his "personal opinion" that "he's alive somewhere now. But he's

not going to become this awesome figure that we nickname the Anti-Christ

until Satan possesses him, and I don't believe that will occur until there is

this 'mortal wound' from which he's raised up."1 In 1980 he restated this

conviction by writing that "this man [antichrist] is alive today—alive and

waiting to come forth."2 Although Lindsey believes the antichrist is alive

somewhere in the world today, and actually has been since at least 1970, he

has stated that "we must not indulge in speculation about whether any of the

current world figures is the antichrist."3 Anyway, determining the identity of

the antichrist does not really matter since Lindsey and others believe "that

Christians will not be around to watch the debacle brought about by the

crudest dictator of all time."4

Not to be outdone, Dave Hunt voices a similar opinion: "Somewhere,

at this very moment, on planet Earth, the antichrist is almost certainly

alive—biding his time, awaiting his cue. Banal sensationalism? Far from

it! That likelihood is based upon a sober evaluation of current events in

relation to Bible prophecy. Already a mature man, he is probably active in

263

188

250 LAST DAYS MADNESS

politics, perhaps even an admired world leader whose name is almost daily

on everyone's lips."5 Salem Kirban wrote in 1977 that "those of us familiar

with Scriptures can easily see the handwriting on the wall as the way is

prepared for the coming Antichrist."6

Lindsey, Hunt, Kirban, and many others share a belief that is strikingly

similar to that of fortuneteller Jeane Dixon. Dixon claimed to have received a

divine vision on February 5,1962, about a coming world religious-political

ruler; her "prophecy" resembles the modern doctrine of antichrist: "A child,

born somewhere in the Middle East shortly before 7 A.M. (EST) on Febru-

ary 5, 1962, will revolutionize the world. Before the close of the century

he will bring together all mankind in one all-embracing faith. This will

be the foundation of a new Christianity, with every sect and creed united

through this man who will walk among the people to spread the wisdom

of the Almighty Power."7 "Mrs. Dixon claims that this man's influence will

be felt in the early 1980s and that by 1999, the ecumenical religion will

be achieved."8 Why should we believe present-day prophetic prognostica-

tors when we have been offered assurances of the identity of the antichrist

numerous times over the centuries?

Saint Martin of Tours, who died in A.D. 397, wrote of the coming antichrist

whose reign would signify the last days. His prediction sounds strangely

familiar. "Non est dubium, quin antichristus.... There is no doubt that the antichrist has already been born. Firmly established already in his early years,

he will, after reaching maturity, achieve supreme power."9 Now go back and

reread the quotations of Lindsey and Hunt. Christians should repudiate the

writings of anyone who speculates that the antichrist is a contemporary

figure. Such speculation is biblically unsound, as will become evident as we

survey the passages used to make the identification.

Why all the confusion over who the antichrist is? The confusion arises

because of two misconceptions: (1) treating divergent biblical references as

if they all refer to the same person thereby creating a composite figure that

is not found in Scripture; and (2) mistaking the time period in which these

divergent figures are to appear.

The Composite Modern-Day Antichrist

Before we begin to sort through this confusion, let's first establish what

generally passes as the modern understanding of antichrist. The antichrist of

Identifying Antichrist

265

today's speculative theology combines the characteristics of Daniel's "prince

who is to come" and other features from the Book of Daniel (9:26; 7:7-8,

19-26; 8:23-25); elements from Matthew and Daniel's "abomination of

desolation" (Matt. 24:15; Dan. 9:27); Paul's "man of lawlessness" (2 Thess.

2:3); John's "antichrist" language (1 John 2:18,22; 4:3; 2 John 7); and John's

"beast" (Rev. 13:11-18).

This futurized composite antichrist supposedly will make himself known

after the rapture of the church during the seven-year tribulation. It is specu-

lated that he will arise out of Europe since he arises out of the midst of the

"ten horns" on the head of the "fourth beast" (Dan. 7:7-8, 19-26). Others believe that he is Jewish.10 This "fourth beast" with its "ten horns" is said to be a revived Roman Empire. This is the same beast that rises out of the sea

of Revelation 13 (verses 1-10). Some believe the beast or antichrist must be

a Jew since he will come "up out of the earth" or land (Rev. 13:11). Others

believe that since he arises out of the sea, a designation for Gentile nations,

he must be a Gentile (cf. Isaiah 57:20).

The modern antichrist is pictured as a charismatic political figure, the

perfect media man. In the 1960s John F. Kennedy seemed to fit all the cri-

teria for a modern-day antichrist, and his mortal head wound clinched it for

many gullible Christians. The antichrist purportedly will have the eloquence

of a Winston Churchill (Rev. 13:5) and the raw emotion and crowd appeal

of an Adolf Hitler (Dan. 7:20; 8:23).

The conjecture which surrounds this figure continues with amazing detail

based on scant biblical evidence. The antichrist will come to prominence as part

of a ten-nation confederation approximating the land area of the old Roman

Empire. Initially he will gain control through war, subduing three of the pow-

ers in the confederation. Some speculate that the ten-nation confederation will

begin with thirteen. Once he secures power, he will pursue avenues of peace

like Adolf Hitler (Dan. 8:25). His talk of peace will be attractive to an apostate

Christianity (1 Thess. 5:3). As with Hitler who made peace with the "Holy See"

of Rome, these overtures of peace will act like sedatives on the people.

In his speech of March 23, 1933, to the Reichstag when the legisla-

tive body of Germany abandoned its functions to the dictator, Hitler paid

tribute to the Christian faiths as "essential elements for safeguarding the

soul of the German people," promised to respect their rights, declared

that his government's "ambition is a peaceful accord between Church

266

LAST DAYS MADNESS

and State" and added—with an eye to the votes of the Catholic Center

Party, which he received—that "we hope to improve our friendly relations

with the Holy See."11

As a man of peace, the antichrist will make a covenant with the Jews

guaranteeing them peace and security in their own land. In the middle of

the covenant period, he will break the covenant and turn on the Jews. He

will then make war with the Jewish saints and will overcome them (Rev.

13:17; Dan. 7:21). Of course, during this three-and-one-half year period of

time two thirds of the Jews living in Palestine will be killed (Zech. 13:8-9).

Since he hates God, the antichrist will blaspheme God and His tabernacle

(Rev. 13:6).

As a counterfeit Christ, the antichrist will be given great powers by

the devil to try to duplicate Jesus' work. He will even seek to match the

resurrection; the antichrist will seem to have suffered a mortal blow to

the head but will then be miraculously resurrected. Lindsey says that he

"does not believe it will be an actual resurrection, but it will be a situation

in which this person has a mortal wound. Before he has actually lost life,

however, he will be brought back from this critically wounded state.

This is something which will cause tremendous amazement throughout

the world."12 This is highly doubtful. The world would not be amazed.

A vast majority would consider it a trick. They've seen too much of the

magician David Copperfield. The antichrist will immediately become an

object of worship (Rev. 13:3-8) and will set himself up as God in the

temple in Jerusalem (2 Thess. 2:4). The false prophet will erect an image

or idol to the antichrist. He will then cause the statue to come alive and

to speak (Rev. 13:14-15).

According to this elaborate scenario, the world will be living under a

tyranny directed by Satan through his beast-antichrist and false prophet.

Each and every person will be stamped with the dreaded 666! This recipe

for disaster will eventually lead to Armageddon where all the nations of

the world will be brought against Israel. Only the return of Christ will save

Israel and the world.

When tested against sound biblical interpretation, will such a theory

hold up? The issue of timing invalidates the entire modern antichrist theory.

Is it possible that what was prophecy is now history? Could the beast of

Revelation 13 and his attendant number 666 be referring to a well-known

Identifying Antichrist

267

historical figure who played a prominent role during the time in which the

Book of Revelation was written?

As we will see, the modern doctrine of antichrist is an amalgamation of

biblical concepts and events that either are unrelated or find their fulfillment

in past events. This is why confusion persists. Modern antichrist hunters are

pursuing a figure who no longer exists. Let's look at the biblical evidence.

The Biblical Antichrist

First, we must find a biblical definition of antichrist. The word "antichrist"

appears only in John's epistles (1 John 2:18, 22; 4:3; 2 John 7). "What is

taught in these passages constitutes the whole New Testament doctrine of

Antichrist."13 John's description of antichrist is altogether different from the

modern image. John's antichrist is

•Anyone "who denies that Jesus is the Christ" (1 John 2:22).

•Anyone who "denies the Father and Son" (1 John 2:23).

•"Every spirit that does not confess Jesus" (1 John 4:3).

• "Those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh.

This is the deceiver and the antichrist" (2 John 7).

None of what John writes relates to the modern doctrine of the antichrist

as previously outlined. John's antichrist doctrine is a theological concept

related to an apostasy that was fomenting in his day. John did not have a

particular individual in mind but rather individuals who taught that Jesus

Christ is not who the Bible says He is:

In one word, "Antichrist" meant for John just denial of what we should

call the doctrine, or let us rather say the fact, of the Incarnation. By what-

ever process it had been brought about, "Christ" had come to denote for

John the Divine Nature of our Lord, and so far to be synonymous with

"Son of God." To deny that Jesus is the Christ was not to him therefore

merely to deny that he is the Messiah, but to deny that he is the Son

of God; and was equivalent therefore to "denying the Father and the

Son"—that is to say, in our modern mode of speech, the doctrine—in

fact—of the Trinity, which is the implicate of the Incarnation. To deny

that Jesus is Christ come—or is the Christ coming—in flesh, was again

268

LAST DAYS MADNESS

just to refuse to recognize in Jesus Incarnate God. Whosoever, says John,

takes up this attitude toward Jesus is Antichrist.14

Is this interpretation possible? Aren't we supposed to look for a future

apostasy out of which the antichrist will arise? As the New Testament makes

clear, apostasy was rampant almost from the church's inception. The apostasy

about which John wrote was operating in his day. Paul had to counter a "dif-

ferent gospel" that was "contrary" to what he had preached (Gal. 1:6-9). He

had to battle "false brethren" (2:4, 11-21; 3:1-3; 5:1-12). He warned the

Ephesian church leadership that "men will arise, speaking perverse things,

to draw away the disciples after them" (Acts 20:28-30). Theological insur-

rection came from within the Christian community.

Many people prior to Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70 questioned and

disputed basic Christian doctrines like the resurrection (2 Tim. 2:18); some

even claimed that the resurrection was an impossibility (1 Cor. 15:12).

Strange doctrines were taught. Some "Christians" prohibited marriage (1

Tim. 4:1-3). Others denied the validity of God's good creation (Col. 2:8,

18-23). The apostles found themselves defending the faith against numerous

false teachers and "false apostles" (Rom. 16:17-18; 2 Cor. 11:3-4, 12:15;

Phil. 3:18-19; 1 Tim. 1:3-7; 2 Tim. 4:2-5). Apostasy increased to such an

extent that Paul had to write letters to a young pastor who was experiencing

these things firsthand (1 Tim. 1:19-20; 6:20-21; 2 Tim. 2:16-18; 3:1-9,

13; 4:10, 14—16). In addition, entire congregations fell to apostasy:

One of the last letters of the New Testament, the Book of Hebrews, was

written to an entire Christian community on the very brink of wholesale

abandonment of Christianity. The Christian church of the first generation

was not only characterized by faith and miracles; it was also characterized

by increasing lawlessness, rebellion, and heresy from within the Christian

community—just as Jesus foretold in Matthew 24.15

The Book of Revelation recounts such heretical teachings: "evil men" (2:2),

"those who call themselves apostles" but who are found to be "false" (2:6), a revival of "the teaching of Balaam" (2:14), those "who hold the teaching

of the Nicolaitans" (2:15), the toleration of the "woman Jezebel ... who

leads" God's "bond-servants astray, so that they commit acts of immorality

and eat things sacrificed to idols" (2:20). The apostasy was alive and well

on planet earth in the first century (2 Thess. 2:3).

Antichrist is simply any belief system that disputes the fundamental

teachings of Christianity, beginning with the person of Christ. These anti-

christs are "religious" figures. The antichrist, contrary to much presentday

speculation, is not a political figure, no matter how anti- (against) Christ

he might be. The modern manufactured composite antichrist is not the an-

tichrist of 1 and 2 John: "Putting it all together, we can see that Antichrist is a description of both the system of apostasy and individual apostates. In other words, antichrist was the fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy that a time of great

apostasy would come, when 'many will fall away and will betray one another

and hate one another. And many false prophets will arise, and will mislead

many' (Matt. 24:10-11)."16

In addition, you will not find the word antichrist in the Book of Revela-

tion. This is significant since the John who defines antichrist for us in his

first two letters is the same John who penned the Book of Revelation.

It is remarkable that a word so "characteristic of the School of John"

does not appear in the Apocalypse, where it might have served the writer's

purpose in more than one passage. That the conception of a personal

Antichrist existed among the Christians in Asia in the first century is

certain from 1 John ii. 18.17

Second, according to the Bible antichrist is not a single individual. John

wrote, "Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is

coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it

is the last hour" (1 John 2:18). "He calls them just 'Antichrists,' and he sets

them over against the individual Antichrist of which his readers had heard

as the reality represented by that unreal figure."18 It is possible that the early

church "heard" that one man was to come on the scene who was to be the

antichrist. John seems to be correcting this mistaken notion: "John is adduc-

ing not an item of Christian teaching, but only a current legend—Christian

or other—in which he recognizes an element of truth and isolates it for the

benefit of his readers. In that case we may understand him less as expound-

ing than as openly correcting it—somewhat as, in the closing page of his

Gospel, he corrects another saying of similar bearing which was in circula-

tion among the brethren, to the effect that he himself should not die but

should tarry till the Lord comes [John 21:18-23]."" In a similar manner,

270

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the people in Jesus' day had "heard" certain things that were only partially

true. Jesus corrected them in their misreading of the Bible (Matt. 5:21, 27,

33, 38, 43).20

Third, whether there was to be only one or many antichrists, John made

it clear that "it is the last hour" for those who first read his letters (1 John 2:18). How do we know this? John said, "Even now many antichrists have

arisen." And in case you did not get his point, he repeated it: "From this we know that it is the last hour." John did not describe a period of time thousands of years in the future. It was the "last hour" for his contemporaries. Keep in mind that Jesus had told His disciples years before, John among them,

that their generation would see the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem

(Matt. 24:1-34). John, writing close to the time when this prophecy was to

be fulfilled, described its fulfillment in the rise of "many antichrists," that

is, many who preach and teach a false religious system, the denial that Jesus

had come in the flesh (2 John 7). The apostle's knowledge about coming

antichrists was probably taken from Matthew 24:24: "For false Christs and

false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to

mislead, if possible, even the elect."

They had heard that "the spirit of antichrist" was coming. For them, "now it is already in the world" (1 John 4:3). Antichrists had arrived. It is inappropriate to look for a contemporary rising political leader and describe him as

the antichrist. Such a designation cannot be supported from Scripture. Does

this mean that the spirit of antichrist cannot be present in our day? Not at

all. It does mean, however, that a figure called the antichrist cannot be alive

somewhere in the world today. Having said this, we still must conclude that

John had the time prior to Jerusalem's destruction in mind when he described

the theological climate surrounding the concept of the antichrist.

An antichrist, therefore, is anyone who "denies that Jesus is the Christ" and anyone "who denies the Father and the Son" (1 John 2:22). "Every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; and this is the spirit of antichrist" (1

John 4:3). "For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver

and the antichrist" (2 John 7).

Identifying Antichrist 257

271

Notes

1. "The Great Cosmic Countdown: Hal Lindsey on the Future," Eternity (January 1977), 80.

2. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: West-

gate Press, 1980), 15.

3. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970),

113.

4. Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth, 113.

5. Dave Hunt, Global Peace and the Rise of Antichrist (Eugene, OR: Harvest House,

1990), 5.

6. Salem Kirban, Countdown to Rapture (Irvine, CA: Harvest House, 1977),

181.

7. Quoted in Robert Glenn Gromacki, Are These the Last Days? (Schaumburg, IL:

Regular Baptist Press, 1970), 90.

8. Gromacki, Are These the Last Days?, 90.

9. Quoted in Otto Friedrich, The End of the World: A History (New York: Coward,

McCann and Geoghegan, 1982), 27.

10. Jerry Falwell believes that when the antichrist appears during "the tribulation

period he will be a full-blown counterfit of Christ. Of course, he'll be Jew-

ish. Of course he'll pretend to be Christ." (Quoted in Sonja Barisic, "Jewish

Leaders Say Falwell Evokes Anti-Semitism," Atlanta Journal/Constitution [16

January 1999], A4).

11. William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany

(New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960), 234.

12. Lindsey, Late Great Planet Earth, 108.

13. Benjamin B. Warfield, "Antichrist," in Selected Shorter Writings of Benjamin B.

Warfield, John E. Meeter, ed. (Nutley, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1970),

1:356.

14. Warfield, "Antichrist," 360-61.

15. David Chilton, Paradise Restored: A Biblical Theology of Dominion (Tyler, TX:

Institute for Christian Economics, 1985), 108.

16. Chilton , Paradise Restored, 111.

17. Henry Barclay Swete, The Apocalypse of St John: The Greek Text with Introduction,

Notes, and Indices (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1906), 1xxv.

18. Warfield, "Antichrist," 359.

19. Warfield, "Antichrist," 357.

20. Gary DeMar, "You've Heard It Said" (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1991).

Chapter Twenty-Two

THE MAN OF

LAWLESSNESS (I)

Many believe that 2 Thessalonians 2 describes the end times leading

up to the rapture of the church, the revealing of antichrist, and the

second coming. Tim LaHaye, a representative of this perspective, writes:

"Second Thessalonians 2:1-12 contains the rapture, Tribulation, and Glo-

rious Appearing all in one chapter, the only time I find this in the Bible."1

While LaHaye claims to be certain, there are many who have gone before

him who are not quite so confident.

Augustine was one of the first to admit that parts of 2 Thessalonians 2

are perplexing: "I frankly confess I do not know what [Paul] means."2 New

Testament Greek scholar Marvin Vincent was puzzled enough to give the

chapter only a cursory study: "I attempt no interpretation of this passage

as a whole, which I do not understand. The varieties of exposition are

bewildering."3 The renown Greek linguist A.T. Robertson finds that "the

whole subject is left by Paul in such vague form that we can hardly hope to

clear it up."4 P.J. Gloag, in his comments on the "Man of Sin" in the Pulpit Commentary, acknowledges that "there is an obscurity in the language" that

"could not have been so great to those to whom the apostle wrote, for he

had previously instructed his readers in the nature of the occurrence (ch.

ii. 5, 6); but our ignorance of these instructions renders the passage to us

273

274

LAST DAYS MADNESS

enigmatical and difficult to understand."5 Gary W. Demarest writes that 2

Thessalonians 2:1-12, "is undoubtedly one of the most difficult in all of

Paul's writings. It has given rise to more speculative and diverse interpreta-

tions than any other section of Paul's letters."6

While there are some things in 2 Thessalonians that we do not know, there

is a great deal we can figure out by putting the pieces together. By comparing

Scripture with Scripture, Paul's man of lawlessness will be revealed.

The Coming of the Lord

Is "the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" a reference to the Second

Coming, that is, an event that is still in our future, or is it a coming in

judgment upon first-century Jerusalem that would be the event to bring

the "last days" to a close (2 Thess. 2: l)?7 The word translated "coming"

in verse 1 is the Greek word parousia, best translated as "presence" in other contexts (2 Cor. 10:10; Phil. 2:12). "The term itself does not mean 'return'

or 'second' coming; it simply means 'arrival' or 'presence.' Applying it to

Christ's coming from heaven in a sense changes what the word connotes."8

N. T. Wright agrees:

The word 'parousia' is itself misleading, anyway, since it merely means

'presence'; Paul can use it of his being present with a church, and no-

body supposes that he imagined he would make his appearance flying

downwards on a cloud The church expected certain events to happen

within a generation and happen they did, though there must have been

moments between AD 30 and 70 when some wondered if they would

and in consequence took up the Jewish language of delay. Jerusalem fell;

the good news of Jesus, and the kingdom of Israel's God, was announced

in Rome, as well as in Jerusalem and Athens.9

Translating parousia. as "coming" is not at all improper, however, since the Bible's use of "coming" does not always mean bodily presence, as so many

Old and New Testament passages make clear. In addition, we know that the

Bible clearly states that "the coming [parousia] of the Lord" was said to be "at hand," that is, "near" to Christians living prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (James 5:8). How could James have told his readers to "be patient

... until the "coming of the Lord" if the Lord's coming was not "near" for The Man of Lawlessness (I I)

275

them? James bases his call for patience upon the fact that the Lord's coming

was near, near for those who first read his letter. "James clearly believed, as others of his time did, that the Coming of Christ was imminent. Since, then,

there is not long to wait, his plea for patience is greatly reinforced."10

So then, our understanding of 2 Thessalonians 2:1 must be considered

within the time frame of the parousia which was said to be "near" for the

first-century church. As we will see, Paul was not countering the belief that

the Thessalonians were under a false impression that Jesus' coming was near.

The nearness of Jesus' coming—a coming in judgment upon Jerusalem—was

an accepted New Testament doctrine. Rather, Paul was correcting their

misconception that the Day of the Lord had already taken place.

Confusion exists over the meaning of the New Testament doctrine of

"coming" because Bible readers have been taught that "coming" always means the bodily return of Jesus. James Macknight's comments are helpful:

In the prophetic writings of the Jews (2 Sam. xxii. 10, 12; Psalm xcvii.

2-5; Isa. xix. 1) great exertions of the Divine power, whether for the

salvation or destruction of nations, are called the coming, the appearance, or

the presence of God Hence it was natural for the apostles, who were Jews,

to call any signal and evident interposition of Christ, as Governor of the

world, for the accomplishment of his purposes, his coming and his day.

Accordingly, those exertions of his power and providence, whereby he

destroyed Jerusalem and the temple, abrogated the Mosaic institutions,

and established the Gospel, are called by the apostles his coming and day,

not only in allusion to the ancient prophetic language, but because Christ

himself, in his prophecy concerning these events, recorded [in] Matt,

xxiv., has termed them the coming of the Son of Man, in allusion to the ...

prophecy of Daniel, of which his own prophecy is an explication; Dan

vii. 13. 'I saw in the night visions, and behold, one like the Son of Man

came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of Days. And

they brought him near before him. 14. And there was given him domin-

ion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages

should serve him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall

not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.' This

prophecy, the Jewish doctors with one consent interpreted of their Mes-

siah, and of that temporal kingdom which they expected was to be given

him. Farther, they supposed he would erect that temporal kingdom by

276

LAST DAYS MADNESS

great and visible exertions of his power for the destruction of his enemies.

But they little suspected, that [they] themselves were of the number of

those enemies whom he was to destroy, and that his kingdom was to be

established upon the ruin of their state. Yet that was the true meaning of

'the coming of the Son of man in the clouds of heaven.' For, while the

Jewish nation continued in Judea, and observed the institutions of Moses,

they violently opposed the preaching of the Gospel, by which the Messiah

was to reign over all people, nations, and languages. Wherefore, that the

everlasting kingdom might be effectually established, it was necessary

that Jerusalem and the Jewish state should be destroyed by the Roman

armies. Now, since our Lord foretold this sad catastrophe in the words

of the Prophet Daniel, Matthew xxiv. 30, 'And they shall see the Son of

man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory;' and

after describing every particular of it with the greatest exactness, seeing

he told his disciples, ver. 34 'This generation shall not pass till all these

things be fulfilled;' can there be any doubt that the apostles (who, when

they wrote their epistles, certainly understood the true import of this

prophecy), by 'their master's coming' and by 'the end of all things,' which

they represent as at hand, meant his coming to destroy Jerusalem, and put

an end to the institutions of Moses?"

Macknight cites numerous New Testament passages to support his view

that verses referring to the "near" coming of Christ point to His coming in

judgment upon Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and the establishment of "his spiritual

kingdom over all people, nations, languages, and not his coming to put an

end to this mundane system" (Matt. 16:28; 1 Cor. 10:11; Phil. 4:5; Heb.

9:26; 10:25; James 5:7-8; 1 Peter 4:7; 1 John 2:18).12

The Presence of the Lord in the New Testament

God's presence was a sign of blessing because of Israel's special covenantal

status (Isa. 55:3; Jer. 1:19). God's departure was a sign of judgment. For the

nations, God's presence was a sign of judgment because of their wicked-

ness. Because of Israel's abominations, God's presence left the temple (Ezek.

5-11). Israel was then treated like the nations and would hide from and

lament His presence in the future.

In similar fashion, because of Israel's rejection of the Messiah and the

persecution of His church, Christ's bride, God would make His presence

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

277

known to Israel in the form of judgment. God rejected His once-covenanted

people and their temple of stone because of the nation's rejection of the

promised Son of Man (Matt. 23:38; 24:1). Like Ezekiel (Ezek. 8), Jesus

inspected the temple, found it filled with abominations (Matt. 21:12—13),

and left it desolate (23:38). He returned in A.D. 70 to inspect the temple for

a final time and found it full of abominations. His presence now abides with

a new people of God constructed as a "spiritual house," the true temple of

God (1 Peter 2:4-10; cf. 2 Cor. 6:14-18).

In effect, Christ's parousia in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 is the fulfillment of the

promise that the presence of Christ will reside with the true Israel forever

(Rom. 2:28-29; 9:6; 10:12; Gal. 6:15-16; Phil. 3:3; Col. 3:11; Heb. 8:8,

10). Remember, during His earthly ministry Jesus "came out from the temple"

(Matt. 24:1), foretold its destruction (24:15-34), and returned in A.D. 70 to

destroy it (22:7). A new covenant nation arose from the ashes of the temple:

"Therefore I say to you [speaking to the chief priests and the elders], the

kingdom of God will be taken from you, and be given to a nation producing

the fruit of it. And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but

on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust" (21:43—44).

There is no doubt that Jesus' "coming" in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 should be

attributed to the first century since the time indicators ("has come," "now,"

"already") leave no room in this passage for a coming in the distant future

(e.g., Matt. 16:27-28; 24:29-31; 26:64; Heb. 10:37; James 5:7-8; Rev.

2:5, 16; 3:11). Jesus' coming in A.D. 70 was a coming in judgment upon an

apostate nation.

"Our Gathering Together"

Tim LaHaye states, "The 'gathering together to Him' refers to the Rapture,

the event when He welcomes His church to be with Him."13 The Greek

word for "gather" (episunagogue) is not a word employed by Paul to indicate the rapture (1 Thess, 4:17). For those who claim that it is, we must ask why

Paul would use a different word in his second letter to clear up a supposed

misunderstanding about what the Thessalonians thought he meant concern-

ing "our being caught up" in his first letter? Why didn't Paul write, "With

regard to our being caught up to Him"? The answer is quite obvious: Paul is

discussing two separate events.

Episunagogue is used in only one other place in the New Testament (Heb.

278

LAST DAYS MADNESS

10:25), although cognates are found elsewhere (Matt. 23:37; Mark 13:37;

Luke 17:37). In Hebrews 10:25 the word clearly refers to an assembly of

Christians on earth, not a "catching up" (rapture) to heaven. Why should

the word suddenly change meaning in 2 Thessalonians 2:1? The gathering

together of God's people has a specific meaning.

Ever since the time of Isaiah xi. 11 and xxvii. 13 Israelites had cherished

the hope that their brethren who had been led away in captivity or were

dispersed in foreign lands would be gathered together into Palestine to

share in the glories of the Messianic Kingdom.... The idea had passed

over into Christian Apocalyptic. In Heb. x.25 the word is used for the

ordinary gathering on the Lord's Day.14

The related Greek word sunagogue, from which we get the word synagogue,

is used frequently in the New Testament and means to assemble in a group.

"For where two or three have gathered together in My name, there I am in their

midst" (Matt. 18:20; cf. 2:4; 3:12; John 6:13; 11:47; 11:52; 20:19; Acts

4:27, 31; 14:27; 15:30; 20:8; 1 Cor. 5:4; Rev. 16:14, 16; 19:17, 19; 20:8).

There is no indication that the rapture is in view in any of these passages.

The gathering is horizontal and earthly, not vertical and heavenly. Jesus

wanted to "gather" the children of Israel "together the way a hen gathers

her chicks under her wings" (Matt. 23:37). This is not a description of a

rapture. God will "gather" together those who embrace Him as the Messiah

and "scatter" those who reject Him (21:44). This is done in terms of the

call of the gospel.15 The process of this "gathering" was made possible after

the death of Jesus and the gospel's embrace of the nations (28:18-20). A

commentary on this use of the meaning of "gather" can be found in Jesus'

encounter with the chief priests and Pharisees:

Therefore the chief priests and the Pharisees convened a council, and

were saying, "What are we doing? For this man is performing many signs.

If we let Him go on like this, all men will believe in Him, and the Romans

will come and take away both our place and our nation." But a certain

one of them, Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, said to them, "You

know nothing at all, nor do you take into account that it is expedient for

you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation

should not perish." Now this he did not say on his own initiative; but

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

279

being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for

the nation; and not for the nation only, but that He might gather together into

one the children of God who are scattered abroad (John 11:47—52).

Notice the relationship between "scattered abroad," "gather together," and

"one." Those "scattered abroad" are the "other sheep"—Gentiles—Jesus spoke of in John 10:16. A full exposition on this new covenant idea is found in

Ephesians 2:11—22. Gentiles were "separate from Christ, excluded from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise" (2:12).

Those who are "in Christ," who "formerly were far o f have been brought nea r (2:13). Jesus has "made both groups one" (2:14), making "the two into one new man" (2:15), reconciling "them both in one body to God through the cross" (2:16). Jesus "CAME AND PREACHED PEACE TO YOU WHO WERE FAR

AWAY, AND PEACE TO THOSE WHO WERE NEAR" (2:17). "Both" have access in

"one Spirit to the Father" (2:18). Gentile Christians are "no longer strangers and aliens but are fellow-citizens with the saints, and are of God's household"

(2:19). There is "one new man," "one body," and a new "holy temple in the Lord" in Christ (2:21). The new "household" is the "church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15).

Those who deny Christ are "members" of the "household" of Beelzebul

(Matt. 10:25). A similar reference is made in the Book of Revelation where

a gathering of apostate Jews is described as a "synagogue of Satan" (Rev.

2:9; 3:9). Their synagogues were false gathering places since the redemptive

work of Messiah Jesus nullified the Old Covenant order.

With the coming destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, Christians

would henceforth be "gathered together" in a separate and distinct "assembly" ( episunagoge, the Church is called a synagogue in James 2:2). After the Temple's destruction, God would no longer tolerate going up to the

Temple to worship (it would be impossible!), as Christians frequently did

prior to A.D. 70.16

Prior to the destruction of the temple and its services, the synagogues

(Acts 13:5,14; 14:1; 15:21) and temple (21:26-36) were still frequented by

Christians. The period between A.D. 30 and 70 was a transitional time for the

transference from the Jewish exclusive Old Covenant to the inclusive New

Covenant comprised of Jews and Gentiles. There had to be a new synagogue,

280

LAST DAYS MADNESS

a new gathering of the people of God made up solely of believers in the

Messiah where "in Christ neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means

anything" (Galatians 5:6). Peter describes this new group of believers in terms

previously reserved for Old Covenant Israel: "But you are a CHOSEN RACE,

A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God's OWN POSSES-

SION, that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you

out of darkness into his marvelous light; for you once were NOT A PEOPLE,

but now you are THE PEOPLE OF GOD; you had NOT RECEIVED MERCY but

now you have RECEIVED MERCY" (1 Peter 2:9-10).

Such a future gathering had been predicted in the Old Testament: "The

LORD GOD, who gathers the dispersed of Israel, declares, 'Yet others I will

gather to them, to those already gathered'" (Isaiah 56:8). This gathering

began immediately after the ascension of Jesus and continues throughout the

church era. With the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 there

no longer would be any confusion as to the makeup of the new temple, the

"new people of God."

The Time Element

In his description of the man of lawlessness, Paul makes it clear that he

had a contemporary figure in mind. First, he tells the Thessalonians that

"the mystery of lawlessness is already at work" (2 Thess. 2:7).

Second, the Thessalonians knew what was presently restraining the man

of lawlessness: "And you know what restrains him now" (2:6). Paul does not write, "You know what will restrain him." In addition, Paul affirms that "only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way" (2:7). While

there is a great deal of speculation on the identity of the restrainer, from these

time-text passages we know that he was restraining in Paul's day. Without

ever being able to identify the man of lawlessness we can conclude that he

appeared and disappeared in the first century.

It is highly unlikely, if we take the futurist position, that the restrainer could

have been active in Paul's day and throughout history, since the restraint was

only necessary when the man of lawlessness was alive. If the man of lawless-

ness was not alive when Paul wrote, then why did he clearly state that the

Thessalonians knew what and who was restraining the man of lawlessness?

Benjamin B. Warfield summarizes this section of 2 Thessalonians 2 for us:

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

281

The withholding power is already present. Although the Man of Sin is not

yet revealed, as a mystery his essential "lawlessness" is already working—"only until the present restrainer be removed from the midst." He expects him to

sit in the "temple of God," which perhaps most naturally refers to the literal

temple in Jerusalem, although the Apostle knew that the out-pouring of God's

wrath on the Jews was close at hand (I Thess. ii. 16). And if we compare the

description which the Apostle gives of him with our Lord's address on the

Mount of Olives (Mt. xxiv), to which, as we have already hinted, Paul makes

obvious allusion, it becomes at once in the highest degree probable that in the

words, "he exalteth himself against all that is called God, or is worshipped, so

that he sitteth in the sanctuary of God showing himself that he is God," Paul

can have nothing else in view than what our Lord described as "the abomina-

tion of desolation which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in

the holy place" (Mt. xxiv. 15); and this our Lord connects immediately with

the beleaguering of Jerusalem (cf. Luke xxi. 20).17

Third, the Thessalonians thought that the day of the Lord had come. Paul

exhorts his readers: Do not be "quickly shaken from your composure or be

disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect

that the day of the Lord has com e " (2 Thess. 2:2).

Paul was not correcting a belief of the Thessalonians that the day of the

Lord was "near" or "at hand," as some translations have it (e.g., KJV and ASV).

If so, Paul would have been contradicting himself and the rest of the New

Testament since they state that the day of the Lord was near (e.g., Rom. 13:12;

James 5:8; Rev. 1:1, 3). "All the Apostles believed that the day was near (1

Cor. xv. 51; James v. 8, 9; 1 Pet. iv. 7; 1 John ii. 18; Rev. xxii. 20), and their

watchword was 'Maranatha,' 'the Lord is near.'"16 Those who hold a futurist

perspective understand the implications of what Paul writes concerning the

nearness of the day of the Lord. This is why a number of them force the

text to read "is near" instead of the more accurate "is present." The Greek word translated "is present" is found in six places in the New Testament in

addition to 2 Thessalonians 2:2. In each case, "present" and not "near" is the best translation (Rom. 8:38; 1 Cor. 3:22; 7:26; Gal. 1:4; 2 Tim. 3:1; Heb.

9:9. "Is near," therefore, is not in keeping with the meaning of the word.

Some commentators hold the meaning to be that the day of the Lord

was on the very point of occurring. The verb, however, does not mean

282

LAST DAYS MADNESS

"to be at hand" but rather "to be present." It is sometimes contrasted to verbs expressing the future idea (e.g., Rom. 8:38; 1 Cor. 3:22). Moreover,

Paul could, and did, say that the Parousia was "at hand" (with a different

Greek expression, Phil. 4:5). It seems that the verb ought to be given

its usual sense here, rather than to have the idea of imminence imported

into it.19

E.J. Bicknell writes that "'is now present' ... is the only possible translation of the Greek.... Attempts are made to soften down the translation because of

the difficulty of seeing how any one could suppose that the Day of the Lord

had actually arrived."20 This means that LaHaye and other dispensationalists

are incorrect when they identify 2 Thessalonians with the pre-tribulational

rapture ("our gathering together to Him") since not one Christian at Thessalonica had been raptured). Remember, the Thessalonians believed that the day of the

Lord had come. It was believed to be a past event (2:2).

Furthermore, the passage cannot be describing the Second Coming since

the Thessalonians believed they had received "a message or a letter" that had

been sent to them by Paul informing them, to repeat the point, that "the

day of the Lord has come (2:2). If they had thought that either the rapture

or the Second Coming had taken place—as per Paul's supposed message or

letter—would they not have asked themselves why Paul had not been rap-

tured? How could Paul have written a letter after the rapture or the Second

Coming if he was no longer on the earth?21

The Day of the Lord

The Bible describes numerous "days of the Lord," not all of which refer

to the Second Coming of Christ or the dissolution of the physical heavens

and earth. Isaiah wrote, "Wail, for the day of the LORD is near!" (Isaiah 13:6).

He continues with, "Behold, the day of the LORD is coming, cruel, with fury

and burning anger, to make the land a desolation; and He will exterminate

its sinners from it" (13:9). This was "the oracle concerning Babylon," the

Babylon of the Old Testament, the Babylon that suffered divine retribution

(13:1). For Babylon, the "day of the LORD" is past.

The "day of the LORD" was to draw "near on all the nations" (Obad.

1:15), all the nations then in existence. Zephaniah states that "the day of

the LORD is near" (Zeph. 1:7). This is restated in verse 14: "Near is the great

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

283

day of the LORD, near and coming very quickly." For those of us who read

this, this particular "day of the LORD" is past. The "day of the LORD" came to Israel in the sacking of Jerusalem by Babylon in 586 B.C. John Walvoord,

a futurist, makes a valuable comment about the multi-faceted character and

application of the "day of the Lord":

The "Day of the Lord" is an expression frequently used in both the

Old and New Testaments to describe any period of time during which

God exercises direct judgment on human sin. The Old Testament records

a number of times when Israel endured a day of the Lord, lasting a few

days or, in some cases, several years.22

The "day of the Lord" was a day of God's judgment and vengeance. As

a result, there could be many such days. Luke describes the destruction of

Jerusalem in A.D. 70 as "days of vengeance" (Luke 21:22), the fulfillment of

Isaiah 61:2: "The day of vengeance of our God" (also see 63:4). In the case

of 2 Thessalonians 2 the "day of the Lord" that the Thessalonians thought

had already come was God's judgment upon the Old Covenant order lo-

calized in Jerusalem that occurred in A.D. 70 (John 4:21; Gal. 4:25). John

Lightfoot writes that "the Scripture and the apostle had spoken of 'the day

of the Lord's coming;' when he should come to take vengeance of the Jew-

ish nation, for their wickedness and unbelief."23 Paul described this coming

judgment in his first letter to the Thessalonians. He reminded them that it

was the apostate Jews who "killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets.... They

are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, hindering us from speaking

to the Gentiles that they might be saved; with the result that they always fill

up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost"

(1 Thess. 2:15-16; cf. Matt. 23:31-32, 35-36; John 3:36).

This was a first-century indictment of a single generation of Jews. God's

wrath was vented in A.D. 70. "We have no right to lay the sins of the Jews

of the first century or any other century on Jewish people today."24 Un-

fortunately, those who believe that these passages address a future Jewish

holocaust during a so-called Great Tribulation inadvertently keep the fires of

anti-semitism alive.25 Paul's "day of the Lord" is past (1 Thess. 5:2). "While they are saying, 'Peace and safety!' then destruction will come upon them

suddenly like birth pangs upon a woman with child; and they shall not

escape" (5:3; cf. Matt. 24:15-25). The Thessalonians had been warned of

284

LAST DAYS MADNESS

this coming judgment: "But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day

should overtake you like a thief" (5:4). Paul had told the Thessalonians that

certain indicators were available to them that would prepare them for the

"day of the Lord" that was fast approaching.

If the "day of the Lord" refers to the dissolution of the physical heavens

and earth, again, how could the Thessalonians have thought that it had al-

ready come? There is no way they could have missed it. Supposedly the end

of the world will occur when the physical "elements will be destroyed with

intense heat, and the earth and its elements will be burned up" (2 Peter 3:10),

events that will be impossible to ignore. In fact, no one will be on earth to

witness these events since, according to dispensationalists, they follow the

earthly millennium. Dispensationalists try to get around this timing factor

by giving a specialized meaning to the "day of the Lord." Literalism is once

again abandoned for the sake of a preconceived system of theology. When

Paul "speaks of a coming day of the Lord (2 Thess. 2.2), the passage cannot

be referring to the end of the space-time universe. It envisages the possibility

that the Thessalonians might hear of the great event by letter."26

Dispensationalists have a difficult time reconciling the diverse ways "day

of the Lord" is used by Paul in 1 Thessalonians 5:2, 2 Thessalonians 2:2

and by Peter in 2 Peter 3:10. They tell us that while the Thessalonian "day

of the Lord" refers to events prior to the thousand years of Revelation 20:4,

Peter's "day of the Lord" refers to events following the thousand years. How can these "days" be reconciled? Consider this improbable solution: "That

day begins immediately after the Rapture of the church and ends with the

conclusion of the Millennium."27 Dispensationalists insist on interpreting

the Bible literally. What happened here?

The "day of the Lord" has now become a thousand years using dispensa-

tional hermeneutics! Does this mean that the "thousand years" of Revelation

20 constitute a single day? It is obvious that Paul (1 Thess. 5:2) and Peter (2

Peter 3:10) are speaking of the same day since they both use the metaphor

"like a thief in the night."28 Using 2 Peter 3:8—where it is said that "with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day"

—every time we do not like the implications of clear time texts is nothing

less than irresponsible.

A final question must be asked: Why would the Thessalonian church have

been concerned that the destruction of Jerusalem (the "day of the Lord") had

occurred? The answer is quite simple. The Thessalonians were concerned

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

285

about fellow Christians who they believed had gone through a terrible tribu-

lation. While they rejoiced that their persecutors would be taken out of the

way, "they had cause to 'rejoice with trembling,' as their Lord had plainly

intimated that it was to be a season of severe trial to his friends, as well as

fearful vengeance against his enemies."29 They themselves had experienced

tribulation (1 Thess. 1:6), so they had some idea what Christians in Jerusa-

lem might experience during "a great tribulation, such as has not occurred

since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever shall" (Matt. 24:22).

The churches showed concern for one another (1 Cor. 16:1-3). It is even

possible that the Thessalonians, many of whom were Jews (Acts 17:1-9),

had relatives living in Jerusalem at the time. The only word they had was a

false report that the day of the Lord, that is, the destruction of Jerusalem, had

come. They heard nothing further about the fate of their fellow Christians.

They were understandably concerned. Paul assures them that the day of the

Lord had not come, Jerusalem was still standing, and certain events had to

transpire before the city and temple would be destroyed.

286

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Tim LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm: Why Christians Will Escape All The Tribulation

(Sisters, OR: Multnomah/Questar, 1992), 73.

2. Augustine (354—430), The City of God in A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, ed. Philip Schaff, vol. 2 (Grand Rapids,

MI: Eerdmans, 1983), Book XX, chap. 19, page 437.

3. Marvin R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, 4 vols. (Peabody, MA:

Hendrickson Publishers, [1887] n.d.), 4:67, note.

4. A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, 6 vols. (Nashville, TN:

Broadman Press, 1930), 4:51.

5. P.J. Gloag, "II Thessalonians," The Pulpit Commentary, eds. H.D.M. Spence and Joseph S. Exell (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, n.d.), 50.

6. Gary W. Demarest, The Communicator's Commentary: 1, 2 Thessalonians; 1, 2

Timothy; and Titus (Dallas, TX: Word, 1984), 116.

7. For a brief survey of those who hold that 2 Thessalonians 2 describes events

leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, see Henry

Alford, The Greek Testament, 4 vols. (5th ed.; Cambridge, England: Deighton,

Bell, and Co, 1871), 3:62-63.

8. Ben Witherington II l, Jesus, Paul and the End of the World: A Comparative Study in

New Testament Eschatology (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), 152.

9. N. T. Wright, The New Testament and the People of God (Minneapolis, MN:

Fortress Press, 1992), 463.

10. C. Leslie Mitton, The Epistle of James (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1966),

186-87. See Matt. 24:32; 26:18; John 2:13; 6:4; 7:2; 11:55 for the way

"near" is used.

11. James Macknight (1721-1800), A New Literal Translation from the Original

Greek of all the Apostolical Epistles with Commentary, and Notes, Philological, Criti-

cal, Explanatory, and Practical ( New York: M.W. Dodd, [1795] 1850), 423.

12. Macknight, A New Literal Translation, 560.

13. LaHaye, No Fear of the Storm, 73.

14. E.J. Bicknell, The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians (London: Methuen and Co, 1932), 73.

15. Bob Gundry, First the Antichrist: Why Christ Won't Come before the Antichrist Does

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1997), 176-84.

16. Kenneth L. Gentry, He Shall Have Dominion (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian

Economics, 1992), 386-87.

17. Benjamin B. Warfield, "The Prophecies of St. Paul," in Biblical and Theological

The Man of Lawlessness (I)

287

Studies, ed. Samuel G. Craig (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed,

1968), 472.

18. F.W. Farrar, Texts Explained or Helps to Understand the New Testament (Cleveland, OH: F.M. Barton, 1899), 178.

19. Leon Morris, The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), 216. Geerhardus Vos writes: "The rendering 'is

at hand' seems a compromise due to doctrinal motives" (The Pauline Eschatology

[Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1952], 95, note 1).

20. Bicknell, The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians, 74.

21. For a similar discussion of this point, see N. T. Wright, "Jerusalem in the New

Testament," P.W.L. Walker, ed., Jerusalem Past and Present in the Purposes of God

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994), 64.

22. John F. Walvoord, Prophecy: 14 Essential Keys to Understanding the Final Drama

(Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1993), 114-15.

23. John Lightfoot, The Whole Works of the Rev. John Lightfoot, ed. John Rogers

Pitman, 13 vols. (London: J.F. Dove, 1822), 3:231.

24. Demarest, The Communicator's Commentary, 62.

25. Hal Lindsey falls into this trap. See his poorly reasoned The Road to Holocaust

(New York: Bantam Books, 1989), 220, where he describes the Jewish ho-

locaust in A.D. 70 as a "picnic" compared to a supposed super holocaust that

will kill billions of people, including two-thirds of the Jews living in Israel

during the tribulation period.

26. Wright, The New Testament and the People of God, 460.

27. Constable, "1 and 2 Thessalonians," The Bible Knowledge Commentary, 705.

Extending the "day of the Lord" over a thousand years seems to be a standard

feature of dispensationalism. See J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come: A Study in

Biblical Eschatology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, [1958] 1987), 230-31.

28. Some commentators apply 2 Peter 3:10—the passing away of "heaven and

earth"—to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. See John Owen, Works,

16 vols. (London: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1965-68), 9:134-38; John

Brown, Expository Discourses on the First Epistle of the Apostle Peter, 3 vols. (Edinburgh: William Oliphant, 1866), 3:84—85; John Brown, The Discourses and

Sayings of Our Lord, 3 vols. (London: Banner of Truth Trust, [1852] 1967),

1:171—74; John Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud

and Hebraica: Matthew—1 Corinthians, 4 vols. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson

Publishers, [1859], 1989), 3:451-54.

29. Brown, Expository Discourses on the First Epistle of the Apostle Peter, 3:86.

Chapter Twenty-Three

THE MAN OF

LAWLESSNESS (II)

The Reformers, almost without exception, believed that the papal sys-

tem was the antichrist, with the individual popes reflecting the spiritual

application of Paul's description of the Man of Lawlessness of 2 Thessalo-

nians 2.1 The papal antichrist view was written into the confessions of that

era. The Westminster Confession of Faith (1643—47) declared that "There is

no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ; nor can the Pope of

Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, the son of perdi-

tion, that exalteth himself in the Church against Christ, and all that is called

God" (25.7). Some who dared to make their views known were burned at

the stake. Leroy Froom writes:

In the centuries just preceding the Reformation an ever-increasing

number of pious persons began openly to express the conviction that

the dire prophecies concerning Antichrist were even then in the process

of fulfillment. They felt that the "falling away" had already taken place.

They declared that Antichrist was already seated in the churchly temple

of God, clothed in scarlet and purple. Numerous individuals of influence

spoke mysterious things about seven-hilled Rome, and solemnly pointed

the finger at the Roman church as the predicted Man of Sin, which had

289

274

274 LAST DAYS MADNESS

now become a historical reality.2

While the Reformers were correct in their judgment of Roman Catholic

doctrine, they, too, ignored the time indicators outlined by Paul in 2 Thes-

salonians 2. The time texts, the present restraining, and the "mystery of

lawlessness already at work," restricts the passage's time of fulfillment to

the first century. Since the destruction of Jerusalem is in view, the papacy

cannot be in the picture. Nisbett's comments are important:

Various are the interpretations of the learned, concerning the man of

sin and the son of perdition, &c. some referring to Simon Magus [Acts

8:9-24],3 some to Mahomet [i.e., Muhammad], and some to the Popes of

Rome and their clergy. But if it be allowed, that the Apostle is speaking

of the destruction of Jerusalem; the supposition of the two last, cannot

be admitted, as being wholly foreign to the purpose, and in many other

respects highly improbable.4

There are at least three possible first-century, pre-A.D. 70 candidates: a

political figure (Nero or a representative of the Roman government), a re-

ligious figure (Phannias or another member of the priesthood), or a zealot

(John Levi Gischala).

Political Man of Lawlessness

Some conjecture that the man of lawlessness was a political figure, possibly

Nero, or a representative of Rome, Titus. Titus did in fact enter the temple

area. The deification of the Roman emperors was well known to the Jews

of the first century. Reservations about using the tribute coin were tied to

deification of the emperors (Matt. 21:15-22).

The emperor's image on the coin was contrary to the second command-

ment.... [T]he inscription on Tiberius' coin read 'TI[berius] CAESAR

DIVI AUG[usti] F[ilius] AUGUSTUS,' or, in translation, "Tiberius Caesar

Augustus, son of the deified Augustus." The inscription was virtually an

ascription of deity to the reigning emperor, which would insult the reli-

gious conviction of any Jew that no man could claim to be God.5

Caligula (A.D. 37—41) proposed that Tiberius should be deified. In A.D. 40

Caligula began to seek worship for himself. Caligula ordered that a statue

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

291

of Zeus with his own features be placed in the Temple in Jerusalem, and

demanded also that he be worshipped at Rome.6 A national revolt was averted

at the last moment by his own death. Caligula openly sat in the Temple of

Jupiter. During the reign of Claudius (A.D. 41-54), writers often referred

to him as "our god Caesar." In Book 12 of the Sibylline Oracles, Nero (A.D.

54-68) is called "terrible and frightful," "a terrible snake," one engaged in

"making himself equal to God."7 Nero "styled himself 'divi Claudi filius' [son of the deified Claudius]."8 Some believe that Nero was the man of lawlessness

and Claudius the "restrainer."9 Nero never sat in the temple.

Titus, as a representative of the Roman Emperor, was acclaimed impera-

tor—victorious commander—by the Roman soldiers while Jerusalem went up

in flames. The act of destroying the "temple of God" would have given him

delusions of power and status never dreamed of by mortal men. Moreover,

pagan worship took place on the temple grounds. "When the temple area

was taken by the Romans, and the sanctuary was still burning, the soldiers

brought their legionary standards into the sacred precincts, set them up op-

posite the eastern gate, and offered sacrifices to them there.. .."10 This act of

worship might have been a prelude to a more specific fulfillment. There are

examples of Old Testament civil leaders assuming the role of "gods" (Isa.

14:4, 12-14, 22; Ezek. 28:2, 6, 11-12; Dan. 11:36).

Some commentators believe that Paul's use of enigmatic language was

designed to hide references to a Roman man of lawlessness, and thus is

further evidence that a Roman is in view. Supposedly Paul feared Roman

reprisals so he wrote in cryptic terms so as not to turn the Empire against

the congregation at Thessalonica. Rome would have had little interest in the

affairs of a small congregation of Jews in Asia Minor. Moreover, Paul had

no fear of Rome. He spoke boldly in the presence of Rome's representa-

tives (Acts 25:11). As a Jew, Paul would have styled himself after the godly

prophets of the Old Testament. These prophets leveled judgments against

specific nations without fear: Babylon (Isaiah 13), Moab (15-16), Edom,

Syria, Damascus (17), Ethiopia (18) Egypt (19), Tyre (23), to cite a few

examples. Many paid the ultimate price for boldness and faithfulness (Heb.

11:35-40), as did Peter (John 21:18-19) and Paul.

A Priestly Man of Lawlessness

While a Roman political figure is a plausible solution, I believe it fails

to account for Paul's methodology: He always wrote against the backdrop

276

276 LAST DAYS MADNESS

of the Old Testament. What seems to be mystery and enigma is actually a

restatement of Old Testament themes often missed by readers who are un-

familiar with the Old Testament. Since Paul, "a Hebrew of Hebrews" (Phil.

3:5), was living in the "last days" of the Old Covenant (1 Cor. 10:11), we

should expect him to use Old Covenant terminology when speaking of its

dissolution. When 2 Thessalonians 2 is compared with the Old Testament

a number of literary similarities can be found: "presence of our Lord" (Lev.

10:2; 16:1; Deut. 29:15), "coming" (Isa. 13:9), "gather" (Isa. 40:11; Jer.

31:8; Micah 2:12; Zeph. 3:20; Zech. 10:8), "day of the Lord" (Isa. 13:6,

9; Lam. 2:22; Ezek. 7:19; 13:5; 30:3; Joel 1:15), "apostasy" (Jer. 2:19; 5:6;

8:5; 14:7), "breath of his mouth" (Isa. 11:14), "deluding influence" (1 Kings 22:19—22), etc. In addition, as was suggested previously, we should expect

Paul's perspective to fall in line with the prophecies outlined by Jesus in the

Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24; Mark 13; Luke 21). Moreover, the theological

setting suggests a Jewish "falling away" that was already in operation in the

first century (Heb. 3:12-15; 4:11; 6:4-8; 10:26-31, 37-39; 12:25-29).

The Jewish converts and "God-fearing Greeks" of Thessalonica (Acts

17:1-4) would have immediately picked up these Old Covenant allusions

and their application to the present Jewish apostasy. "The apostasy here

described is plainly not of a civil, but of a religious nature; not a revolt

from the government, but a defection from the true religion and worship, 'a

departing from the faith,' (1 Tim. iv. 1,) 'a departing from the living God,'

(Heb. iii. 12) as the word is used by the apostle in other places."11

Jewish Opposition to the Gospel

The apostles were persecuted by the Jews soon after Pentecost (Acts

4:1-31; 5:17-42; 7:54—60). After his conversion, Paul experienced similar

persecution at the hands of the Jews (9:29; 13:50; 14:2, 19), especially by

the Jews of Thessalonica (17:1-15). Some of the Jews who heard Paul's mes-

sage became "jealous and taking along some wicked men from the market

place, formed a mob and set the city in an uproar" (17:5).

The Jews were everywhere the jealous, malignant and energetic enemies

of the Gospel. At Antioch, Thessalonica, Corinth, and in every principal

city, they kindled opposition and persecution. In one of the latest of his

epistles Paul writes: "Beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers, be-

ware of the [circumcision]" (Phil. 3:2). At first it was not the empire, nor

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

293

Paganism that made deliberate, organized opposition to Christianity. As

Pilate would have released the Saviour but for the Jewish hierarchy, so the

imperial authorities regarded the church with indifference and contempt,

except when its industrious Jewish enemies succeeded in exciting their

suspicion or their fear.... During our Lord's ministry it was the Jews who

were primarily "his adversaries" (Luke 13:17); it was the same during the

ministry of the apostles.12

This opposition came from three groups: (1) those Jews who denied that

Jesus was the Messiah; (2) those Jews who were "zealous for the law," that is, the Mosaic ceremonial ordinances (Acts 21:20), insisting that these Old Covenant

customs should be retained as a condition for salvation; and (3) those Jews

who neglected "the commandment of God" while keeping their man-made

"tradition" (Mark 7:8-9). Jews who had rejected their Messiah outright had

apostatized from the one true faith (Ephesians 4:5). They had rejected the faith

of believing Israelites such as Mary, Joseph, Elizabeth, Zacharias, Simeon (Luke

2:34-35), Anna (2:36-38), Nicodemus (John 3; 19:39), Joseph of Arimathea

(John 19:38), the apostles, the disciples, the "three thousand" (Acts 2:41),

the "five thousand" (Acts 4:4), and Paul himself (Acts 9). They were vocal

antagonists of the gospel. The man of lawlessness is akin to a traitor, a Judas.

A synonym for the "man of lawlessness" is the "son of destruction" (2 Thess.

2:3), the title given to describe Judas (John 17:12).

Jewish Apostasy

The Greek word apostasia has two meanings in biblical literature: politi-

cal revolt and religious defection. The Septuagint, the Greek translation

of the Hebrew Scriptures, uses apostasia to describe both a political revolt

(Ezra 4:12, 15, 19; Neh. 2:19; 6:6) and a religious defection (Joshua 22:22;

Jer. 2:19; 2 Chron. 29:19; 33:19). H. Wayne House attempts to prove that

apostasia means a "departure from earth," i.e., a rapture.13 House does admit, however, that "the case is not conclusive" (286). If apostasia does mean a

"physical or spatial departure," then it best fits an A.D. 70 scenario. Jesus told His first-century audience that when they saw the abomination of desolation,

they were to "flee to the mountains" (Matt. 24:16). We could then interpret

Paul in this way: "Let no one in any way deceive you, for the judgment on

Jerusalem will not come until Christians living in Judea flee to the mountains

first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed..." (2 Thess. 2:3).

294

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Josephus uses apostasia to characterize the Jewish revolt against the

Roman government.14 If Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is using apostasia to

describe a political revolt, then this also neatly fits the historical context

of the Jewish rebellion against Roman authority that is known in history

as the "Jewish War."

The New Testament also uses apostasia to describe a religious rebellion.

For example, Jews who questioned the sufficiency of Jesus' death to pay the

penalty for sin believed that forsaking the customs of Moses—especially

circumcision—was "apostasy" (Acts 21:21). Unfortunately, most translations

do not translate the Greek word apostasia in Acts 21:21 as "apostasy." Here is a literal rendering of Acts 21:21:

Now the [believing Jews] have heard reports about you, how you

teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to commit apostasy against

Moses, telling them to stop circumcising their children and not to follow

the customs [of Moses].

For the Judaizers apostasy was a rejection of the customs of Moses

which they believed were a condition for salvation even if one embraced

Jesus as the Messiah. It was this controversy that was settled at the first

church council in Jerusalem (Acts 15:1-35). For Paul, apostasy was fol-

lowing the customs of Moses as a condition for salvation. Of course,

Paul's definition of apostasy is the correct one. Paul told Timothy that

"in later times some will fall away [apostasontai] from the faith" (1 Tim.

4:1). These apostates would reject the counsel of the apostles and claim

that Gentiles who embrace Jesus as the Messiah must be circumcised and

directed "to observe the Law of Moses" (Acts 15:5). These "doctrines of

demons"—apostasies—had already shown themselves in the first-century

church (Col. 2:16, 23; cf. 1 Tim. 4:3). F.F. Bruce writes that the first-century

Christians "must withstand the temptation to return to Judaism; that was

the sin of apostasy which by its very nature was irremediable, for (as they

had already acknowledged) there was no other name in the world but

the name of Jesus in which salvation could be found. Not only was such

apostasy sin; it was folly."15

Jesus warned about an approaching apostasy that His disciples would

have to confront (Matt. 7:15, 22; 24:5, 10-12, 24). Paul cautioned the

church at Ephesus, that after his departure, "savage wolves will come in

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

295

among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves men will

arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them" (Acts

20:29-30). This adds another dimension to the apostasy—Jews who were

first attracted to the gospel, but after learning that it did not maintain Old

Covenant ceremonials, rejected it (Heb. 6:4-8). Notice that Paul warns the

Ephesians that this departure from the faith will affect them. The apostates

will come "from among your own selves," Paul warns.

The Corinthian church is warned about "false apostles, deceitful work-

ers" who "disguise themselves as apostles of Christ" (2 Cor. 11:13). Paul

describes them as "servants" of "Satan" (11:14-15). Those in Galatia were disturbed by those who "want to distort the gospel of Christ" (Gal. 1:7).

The entire church was disturbed by "false brethren" who were desirous to

bring Christians "into bondage" to the law (2:4).

The church at Rome was warned to keep an eye "on those who cause

dissensions and hindrances contrary to the teaching which" they had

learned. Paul's admonition is to "turn away from them." Through their

"smooth and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the unsuspecting"

(Rom. 16:17-18). Paul becomes more specific when he tells the Philip-

pians to "beware of the dogs, beware of the evil workers; beware of the

false circumcision" (Phil. 3:2). They are "enemies of the cross of Christ,

whose end is destruction" (3:18).

Personal counsel was given to Timothy to "instruct certain men not to

teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealo-

gies, which give rise to speculation rather than furthering the administration

of God which is by faith" (1 Tim. 1:3-4). Again, Paul has unbelieving Jews

in mind since they are those who want "to be teachers of the Law" (1:7).

Even by Timothy's day some had "suffered shipwreck in regard to their

faith" (1:19). Of course, apostasy had been predicted by the Holy Spirit

who explicitly said "that in later times some will fall away from the faith,

paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons" (4:1). Deceit

and unsound doctrine were present in Timothy's day: "O Timothy, guard

what has been entrusted to you, avoiding worldly and empty chatter and

the opposing arguments of what is falsely called 'knowledge'—which some

have professed and thus gone astray from the faith" (6:20-21).

Timothy was given further instructions to "preach the word; be ready in

season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and

instruction. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine;

296

LAST DAYS MADNESS

but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves

teachers in accordance to their own desires; and will turn away their ears

from the truth, and will turn aside to myths" (2 Tim. 4:2-4). Who are these

people who distort the faith? "For there are many rebellious men, empty

talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, who must be silenced

because they are upsetting whole families, teaching things they should not

teach.... This testimony is true. For this cause reprove them severely that

they may be sound in the faith, not paying attention to Jewish myths and com-

mandments of men who turn away from the truth.... They profess to know God,

but by their deeds they deny Him, being detestable and disobedient, and

worthless for any good deed" (Titus 1:10-11, 13-14, 16).

Peter describes a similar apostasy: "But false prophets also arose among the

people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly

introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them,

bringing swift destruction upon themselves" (2 Peter 2:1).

John's epistles describe a contemporary apostasy, those who denied that

Jesus had come in the flesh (1 John 2:22). False prophets were prevalent

in John's day (4:1). "For many deceivers have gone out into the world,

those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This

is the deceiver and the antichrist" (2 John 7). John makes it clear that for

the first-century church it was the "last hour" (1 John 2:18). He offers

the following evidence to support his claim: "They went out from us, but

they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have

remained with us; but they went out, in order that it might be shown that

they all are not of us" (2:19).

Jude warns the "beloved" (verse 1) to "contend earnestly for the faith....

For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand

marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace

of our God into licentiousness and deny our holy Master and Lord, Jesus

Christ" (verses 3—5). Jude then recounts several judgment periods in Israel's

history (verses 5-17). These "certain persons" are those who "were spoken

beforehand by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ" (verse 17). Their ap-

pearance in Jude's day is evidence that it was "the last time" (verse 18). The

"mockers" who "crept in unnoticed" were alive in Jude's day. They would

meet the same fate as those mockers described in verses 5-17. When would

this take place? The judgment had to be leveled against them personally

since Jude compares their fate to Old Covenant "mockers" (verses 5-17).

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

297

This means the judgment had to be near.

[I]n this interpretation, the apostasy is obviously the great apostasy of

the Jews, gradually filling up all these years and hastening to its completion

in their destruction. That the Apostle certainly had this rapidly complet-

ing apostasy in his mind in the severe arraignment that he makes of the

Jews in I Thess. ii. 14—16, which reached its climax in the declaration that

they were continually filling up more and more full the measure of their

sins, until already the measure of God's wrath was prematurely ... filled

up against them and was hanging over them like some laden thunder-

cloud ready to burst and overwhelm them,—adds an additional reason

for supposing his reference to be to this apostasy—above all others, "the"

apostasy—in this passage.16

Taking into account the way these Jews aligned themselves with Rome to

crucify Jesus (John 19:12-15) and their relentless persecution of the early

church (Acts 13:50; 14:1-7), there does not seem to be a more prominent

example of apostasy anywhere else in the annals of history. "The 'falling

away' then refers to that of Jews after the ascension of Christ, rather than

that of the Church in the end of this age."17

Jesus did not bring a new way of salvation; therefore, any Jew who re-

jected Him as the Messiah was an apostate (Galatians 1:6-24). Jesus was the

fulfillment of all that the Jews had read about and hoped for (Luke 24:44).

Therefore, those Jews who rejected Jesus made up the great apostasy. "To

be more definite, the principle denounced by the apostle is that of Pharisaic

Judaism; its historic embodiment we are to find in the Jewish hierarchy and

religious leaders of the century following the crucifixion.... No other his-

toric embodiment of sin ... so fully and accurately answers to the terms of

the prophetic description."18

Prevalence of Jewish Lawlessness

If the "apostasy" arose from the midst of Judaism, is it not possible that the

man of lawlessness is also a Jewish figure of the first century?19 A number of

indicators in the text give us reason to believe that a particular man is in view.

First, as we have already observed, Paul's language is pulled directly from

Jesus' prophetic pronouncements, biblical vocabulary, and theological themes

from the Old Testament. All of these suggest a covenantal interpretation.

298

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jesus had dealt with the "mystery of lawlessness" during His ministry:

•"Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men"

(Mark 7:8).

• "You nicely set aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradi-

tion" (7:9).

•"Invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed

down; and you do many things such as that" (7:13).

• "Now the chief priests and the whole Council kept trying to obtain false

testimony against Jesus, in order that they might put Him to death"

(Matt. 26:59).

While the Jews purported to be keepers of the law, these texts and many

more like them show that their deeds were contrary to the law, the very

essence of lawlessness, for "sin is lawlessness" (1 John 3:4).

Second, the Thessalonians were Jews and "God-fearing Greeks" (Acts

17:1—4). They would have understood and applied the covenantal language

to their era since "the mystery of lawlessness was already at work" (2 Thess.

2:7). The Thessalonians would have been looking for a contemporary figure.

In fact, they knew who it was since Paul writes: "And you know what re-

strains him now" (2:6).

Third, persecution came by way of the Jews, stirred up by the priests (Acts

9:14; 22:30; 25:2, 15; 26:10, 12). When Paul was struck by the high priest

Ananias, Paul called him a "whitewashed wall," accusing him of lawlessness:

"And do you sit to try me according to the Law, and in violation of the Law

order me to be struck?" (Acts 23:3).

The Bible records the blasphemous expression of lawlessness uttered by

the priests in rejecting Jesus and turning Him over to the pagan State of

Rome to be crucified: "We have no king but Caesar," the religious leaders

cried out (John 19:15). They also demonstrated their perverted application

of the law in the stoning of Stephen and showed their rejection of the New

Covenant as they took their places of false authority in the temple (Acts

7:54—60). Prior to his conversion, Paul participated in this "lawlessness"

with full support of "the high priest" (22:5). John Lightfoot writes that

"'The mystery of iniquity was already working,' when the apostle wrote this

Epistle, which cannot possibly be understood but of the Jewish nation; and

so it is explained again and again [1 John, ii. 18, and iv.3, and 2 John, ver.

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

299

7, &c.]."20 Paul must have spoken about this many times when he described

his experiences with the Jews.

Fourth, lawlessness must be understood in covenantal terms. Jesus in-

augurated "the new covenant in" His "blood" (Luke 22:20; 1 Cor. 11:25;

Heb. 12:25). Any deviation from New Covenant precepts is apostasy. An

Old Covenant example will demonstrate this point. Nadab and Abihu, the

sons of Aaron, "offered strange fire before the LORD, which He had not

commanded them" (Lev. 10:1). Fire was an integral part of the sacrifice (2:2).

Their lawless deed was that they offered a type of fire that was contrary to

the law. This means that the priests were "men of lawlessness." They did what

God "had not commanded them." Their judgment was by fire that "came

out from the presence of the LORD" (10:2; cf. 2 Thess. 2:8). Jerusalem was

destroyed by "fire" (Matt. 22:7) that was sent by the "king" (cf. Luke 3:9; 2

Thess. 1:7; Heb. 12:29; Rev. 8:5).

Similarly, the high priest who served in the temple prior to its destruction

in A.D. 70 offered "strange" sacrifices that violated the provisions of the New

Covenant that is now defined by Jesus' blood and no longer by the blood

of "bulls and goats" (Hebrews 10:4). The sin of the high priest was akin to

that of Nadab and Abihu. He was the man of lawlessness as defined by the

provisions of the New Covenant. Animal sacrifices were detestable to God in

light of the sacrifice of His only begotten Son (cf. Isa. 1:11; 65:1-11). The

following is a description of God's attitude to continued animal sacrifices

in light of the finished work of Jesus:

He who kills an ox is like one who slays a man; he who sacrifices a

lamb is like the one who breaks a dog's neck; he who offers a grain offer-

ing is like one who offers swine's blood; he who burns incense is like the

one who blesses an idol. As they have chosen their own ways, and their

soul delights in their abominations, so I will choose their punishments,

and I will bring on them what they dread. Because I called, but no one

answered; I spoke, but they did not listen. And they did evil in My sight,

and chose that in which I did not delight (Isa. 66:3—4).

The priests who continued to offer sacrifices in the temple were acting

like Nadab and Abihu. Their fire was "strange" and their sacrifices detest-

able because Jesus was God's sacrificial lamb whom they scorned and later

slaughtered by turning Him over to the Romans to be crucified. When Jesus

300

LAST DAYS MADNESS

came in judgment upon Jerusalem and the temple and put an end to the

system of sacrifices that the Jews sought to maintain, He brought it all "to

an end by the appearance of His coming" (2 Thess. 2:8).

Fifth, prior to Jesus' description of events leading up to the destruction of

the temple in A.D. 70 (Matt. 24), He denounced the lawless religious lead-

ers who " seated themselves in the chair of Moses" (23:2). Paul did the same (Acts 23:3). Of course, there is no "chair of Moses." To sit in Moses' chair

is to assume the authority of Moses. When Jesus sat at the right hand of

His Father (Acts 2:34; Heb. 1:13; 8:1), He assumed a position of authority

equal to His Father.

The idea that rulers, either ecclesiastical or civil, are described as "god"

or "gods" has a rich Old Testament history.

Then the anger of the LORD burned against Moses, and He said, "Is

there not your brother Aaron the Levite? I know that he speaks fluently.

And moreover, behold, he is coming out to meet you; when he sees you, he

will be glad in his heart. And you are to speak to him and put the words

in his mouth; and I, even I, will be with your mouth and his mouth, and

I will teach you what you are to do. Moreover, he shall speak for you to the

people; and it shall come about that he shall be as a mouth for you, and you shall

be as God to him" (Ex. 4:14-17; cf. Psalm 82:1, 6; John 10:34).

The Hebrew term for "gods" ( elohim) in Psalm 82:6, for example, is a

reference to those who exercise judicial authority in God's name. "The passage refers to the judges of Israel, and the expression 'gods' is applied to them in

the exercise of their high and God-given office."21 To be brought before a

judge was like being brought before God because the judge represented God.

The word translated "God" in Exodus 21:6 (from the Hebrew elohim) is re-

ferring to a judge who acts in God's name. This can be seen in Ex. 22:8-9.

The word translated "judge" is actually elohim, the same Hebrew word often translated as "god" or "gods."

With this background in mind, it is clear that in Matthew 23:2, Jesus

is describing the way the religious leaders used their "legislative seat'22 to

distort the law and to enslave the people (23:4, 15). In effect, they were

renegade "gods," serving as corrupt magistrates (John 10:34—35; cf. Psalm

82:6). As the gospels make clear, the religious leaders of Jesus' day declared

themselves to be gods in a humanistic sense, determining the meaning of

The Man of Lawlessness (II) 301

the law without regard to the Word of God (cf. Isa. 14:4, 12-14, 22; Ezek.

28:2, 6, 11-12; Dan. 11:36).23 They set up their traditions above the com-

mandments of God, thus nullifying God's law (Matt. 12:2,10-12; 15:1-14;

23:23; Mark 3:4; John 7:19). Jesus describes them as those who "outwardly

appear righteous to men, but inwardly [they] are full of hypocrisy and law-

lessness" (Matt. 23:28).

The religious leaders, led by the high priest, had so perverted the law that

they despised the "objects of worship," in effect, exalting themselves "above every so-called god or object of worship" (2 Thess. 2:4): "Woe to you blind

guides, who say, 'Whoever swears by the temple, that is nothing; but whoever

swears by the gold of the temple, he is obligated.... And 'Whoever swears

by the altar, that is nothing, but whoever swears by the offering upon it, he is

obligated'" (Matt. 23:16, 18). Is this language not similar to what Paul says

about the man of lawlessness as he is described in 2 Thessalonians 2:4?:

"He takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God."

Lightfoot comments that this happened

to the very letter; their scribes, in the temple of God itself, sitting and set-

ting up their traditions above the commands of God [Matt. xv.6]. But how

they exalted themselves against every thing called God, or the magistracy,

and those that were set over them, we may observe in such passages as

these,—"They despise government" [2 Pet. ii. 10], "They despise domin-

ion, and speak evil of dignities" [Jude, ver. 8], and in their own stories to

endless examples.24

The man of lawlessness was the principal religious leader of Israel—the

high priest who officiated over Jewish law and did not concern himself with

using the law in a God-honoring way (Matt. 26:57-68). All of the lawless

deeds of those priests who sent Jesus to His death and persecuted His bride,

the church, had reached their climax by the time the temple was destroyed

in A.D. 70 (23:32—36). In addition, the defilement of the temple was the

result of their lawless acts.

The zealots had got possession of the Temple at an early stage in the

siege, and profaned it by these and other like outrages; they made the Holy

Place (in the very words of the historian [Josephus]) "a garrison and strong-

hold" of their tyrannous and lawless rule; while the better priests looked on

302

LAST DAYS MADNESS

from afar and wept tears of horror. The mysterious prediction of 2 Thess.

ii.4 may point, in the first instance, to some kindred "abomination."25

Josephus describes how the Zealots dismantled the biblically prescribed

method of choosing priests and "ordained certain unknown and ignoble

persons for that office." Their choice for high priest was Phannias. "Yet did

they hail this man, without his own consent, out of the country, as if they

were acting a play upon the stage, and adorned him with a counterfeit face;

they also put upon him the sacred garments, and upon every occasion in-

structed him what he was to do. This horrid piece of wickedness was sport

and pastime with them, but occasioned the other priests, who at a distance

saw their law made a jest of, to shed tears, and sorely lament the dissolution

of such a sacred dignity."26 William Whiston, the translator of Josephus's

Works, writes that we do not "meet with any other so much as pretended

high priests after Phannias, till Jerusalem was taken and destroyed."27

John Bray offers another first-century candidate who fits Paul's descrip-

tion of the man of lawlessness. John Levi of Gischala, Bray writes, "was

the key man in the destruction of Jerusalem, the greatest instigator of the

tribulation upon the Jews in the city, and an 'abomination' himself as he 'sat'

in power in the Temple itself. And he was the cause of the ceasing of the

daily sacrifices three and one half years after Vespasian came against the city.

So far as the people were concerned, he had taken the place of God in the

Temple!"28 Following Josephus, Bray offers compelling historical evidence

for his opinion, everything from murder to defilement of the temple. Mireille

Hadas-Lebel recounts John's lawless deeds:

Crimes against men were accompanied by what Josephus considered

crimes against God. John of Gischala was especially guilty of these latter.

Early in the siege he had used timber intended for the Temple to construct

war machines. Next, he had all the sacred vessels melted down, including

precious vases offered by the emperor Augustus and his wife. Then he

had dipped into the Temple reserves of oil and wine.29

John Levi of Gischala is a likely candidate since the people living in

Jerusalem followed his every move. His occupation of the temple followed

the surrounding of Jerusalem by armies. Those who believe that Paul is

describing an event that requires a rebuilt temple miss the simple fact that

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

303

the Thessalonians would have had no such notion in mind as they read

Paul's letter.

Whether the man of lawlessness was Phannias, John of Gischala, or some

other first-century personage, we know that he was alive when Paul wrote

his epistle because the Thessalonians knew who and what restrained him

in their day.

The Restrainer

Paul refers to "what restrains" the man of lawlessness (2 Thess. 2:6) and

"he who now restrains" him (2:7). The Thessalonians were certainly aware

of the what and the who of this restraint, but for us they remain a mystery.

We can only offer an educated guess. The futurists are left with a similar

puzzle, as Gregory P. Allen's list of possible candidates indicates: The Ro-

man Empire, orderly human government, gentile dominion, the Jewish state,

contemporary eschatological speculation, the Roman emperor, Satan, the

gospel, the church, the Holy Spirit, the archangel Michael. Allen's choice is

the archangel Michael.30 As I hope to demonstrate, the first-century Roman

government was the likely restrainer of Jewish persecution against Chris-

tians (Acts 22-28). The restraint was in operation for decades. The Jews,

for example, were "not permitted to put anyone to death" (John 18:31). We

know that the restraint had to be in geographical proximity to the temple,

and thus the restrainer resided in Jerusalem.

The "What"

The "what" is likely the Roman civil government that, for the most part,

kept the Jewish hierarchy from persecuting the infant Jewish Christian

church. Roman restraint meant that the high priest could no longer use his

judicial authority to call for imprisonment, persecution, and death of Chris-

tians (Acts 4:1-22; 5:17—42; 7:54—60). In time, however, the disturbances

incited by the Jews at the directive of the high priest were affecting the Ro-

man social order. Rome began to step in to halt the civil unrest (22:22-30;

23:1-22). When the Sanhedrin met to council to put James the brother of

Jesus to death, King Agrippa "wrote in anger to Ananus, and threatened that

he would bring him to punishment for what he had done; on which king

Agrippa took the high priesthood from him."31 Here we see that Agrippa is

restraining the excesses of the priesthood in protection of the church.

304

LAST DAYS MADNESS

The Romans foiled a plot to assassinate Paul by restraining the Jews and

providing safe passage for him to be moved to Caesarea (23:12—22). Claudius

Lysias sent the following letter to "governor Felix": "When this man [Paul]

was arrested by the Jews and was about to be slain by them, I came upon

them with the troops [using them as a restraining force] and rescued him,

having learned that he was a Roman" (Acts 23:27).

At this point in time Rome insisted that the Jews make all charges against

the Christians in Roman courts (23:30). Paul makes his defense before Felix

(24), Festus (25), Agrippa (26), and eventually Caesar (27-28), all Roman

authorities. The Jews are forced to comply with the Roman edict: "And

after five days the high priest Ananias came down with some elders, with a

certain attorney named Tertullus; and they brought charges to the governor

against Paul" (24:21). Here is a direct reference as to how Rome was acting

as a civil restrainer. The remarks of F.F. Bruce on the role Rome may have

played are helpful:

[I]f Paul had the imperial power and the emperor in mind, he was

not thinking necessarily of Claudius [Caesar] himself, although some

have envisaged a play on the idea of'restraint' and the name Claudius.32

And he was certainly not looking forward to Nero, Claudius's stepson and

eventual successor, as the 'man of lawlessness', for Nero at this time was

only thirteen years old. Paul was thinking much more of his own experi-

ence of Roman justice, which encouraged him to think of the empire as

being—temporarily, at any rate—a safeguard against the unruly forces

which endeavored to frustrate the progress of the gospel. On the strength

of this experience he could write of the imperial authorities several years

later— when Nero had already been emperor two years and more—as

'ministers of God' [Rom. 13:4, 6]; on the strength of this experience, too,

he confidently appealed towards the end of A.D. 59 to have his case trans-

ferred from the jurisdiction of the procurator of Judaea to the emperor's

court in Rome.33

F.W. Farrar makes a similar observation when he writes, "Up to the tenth

year of Nero's reign the Christians had many reasons to be grateful to the

power of the Roman Empire. St. Paul, when he wrote from Corinth to the

Thessalonians, had indeed seen in the fabric of Roman polity, and in Claudius,

its reigning representative, the 'check' and the 'checker' which must be re-

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

305

moved before the coming of the Lord."34 He continues by describing how

the "Roman politarchs of Thessalonica had treated him with humanity. He

had been protected from the infuriated Jews in Corinth by the disdainful

justice of Gallio."35 Bicknell offers this helpful summary:

We may point to the encouragement and protection afforded to St.

Paul at Paphos by the proconsul (Acts xiii) and by his Roman citizen-

ship at Philippi (Acts xvi. 37-9). Soon after writing this Epistle he was

acquitted by Gallio at Corinth (Acts xviii. 12-17). All this suggests that

at the moment he had every ground for regarding the Roman empire as

well disposed to himself and to Christianity, and as willing to protect

him against the hostility both of the Jews and of pagan mobs stirred up

by the Jews, in whom he may well have seen evidence of the working

of Satan.36

Since Scripture is our guide, and the Book of Acts continually puts the

local agencies of the Roman Empire forward as the consistent restrainer of

Jewish aggression against the church, and Paul writes to the Thessalonians

that "you know what restrains him now," Rome is the likely candidate.

The "Who"

If the force of Roman authority is what restrains, then who is the restrainer?

This question is much more difficult to answer since we have to single out

an individual with a name. The following is merely suggestive of a possible

solution.

If the restrainer (neuter) is the force of Roman civil authority, then it is

most likely that the restrainer (masculine) is a representative of that authority.

Someone like King Agrippa would fit the requirements since he was the one

who stopped the Jews from further bloodletting after the death of James, the

brother of Jesus. It was Agrippa who "had the prerogative of appointing the

Jewish high priests. He did his best to prevent the outbreak of the Jewish

war against Rome in AD 66."37 When his attempt to stop the revolt failed,

he became a staunch supporter of the Romans throughout the war.38 Was it

at this point that King Agrippa was removed as the restrainer of the "man

of sin," the high priest?

Putting forth Herod Agrippa as the restrainer is an opinion based on the

available historical evidence. We may never know who Paul had in mind.

306

LAST DAYS MADNESS

What we do know, however, is that the people in Thessalonica knew who

he was (2 Thess. 2:6).

The End of the Man of Lawlessness

When "that lawless one" is revealed, "the Lord will slay" him "with the breath of His mouth and bring [him] to an end by the appearance of His coming" (2 Thess. 2:8). Paul uses descriptive language from the Old Testament

to describe the judgment of this usurper of God's authority. Paul's language

is reminiscent of Isaiah 11:4: "And He will strike the earth with the rod of

His mouth, and with the breath of His lips He will slay the wicked." Notice

that in its Old Testament context that Jehovah does not appear in bodily

form. The language is obviously meant to be interpreted figuratively since

God does not have a mouth or lips. Similar language is found in Hosea 6:5:

"Therefore I have hewn them in pieces by the prophets; I have slain them by

the words of My mouth." Corresponding language is found in Isaiah 30 as

a description of the coming judgment on Assyria. Notice that God's "lips,"

"tongue," and "breath" are connected with real judgment:

Behold, the name of the LORD comes from a distant place;

Burning is His anger, and dense is His uplifting;

His lips are filled with indignation,

And His tongue is like a consuming fire;

And His breath is like an overflowing torrent, Which

reaches to the neck,

To shake the nations back and forth in a sieve, And to put

in the jaws of the peoples the bridle which leads to ruin.

*****

And the LORD will cause His voice of authority to be heard.

And the descending of His arm to be seen in fierce anger,

And in the flame of a consuming fire,

In cloudburst, downpour, and hailstones.

* * * * *

The breath of the LORD, like a torrent of brimstone, sets

it afire.

(Isa. 30:27-28, 30, 33)

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

307

The Lord's arm is said "to be seen" (30:30) and the Lord's "breath" causes a

"fire" (30:33). Isaiah's figurative language is little different from the way Paul describes the judgment-end of the man of lawlessness in 2 Thessalonians 2:8.

Signs and False Wonders

What do we make of the activity of Satan that manifests itself "with all

power and signs and false wonders" (2 Thess. 2:9)? There is certainly enough

evidence to support the view that false Christs had made their appearance

with numerous "signs and wonders" during the period before Jerusalem's

fall (Matt. 24:24). Paul warned Timothy to be on the lookout for those who

used "false wonders" to deceive the people, men like "Jannes and Jambres,"

the Egyptian high priests who "opposed Moses" (2 Tim. 3:8). Remember,

God had identified Jerusalem with "Egypt," the place "where their Lord was

crucified" (Rev. 11:8). It seems likely that any number of the corrupt Jews

adopted Egyptian pagan practices. These religious impostors were said to

"oppose the truth, men of depraved mind, rejected as regards the faith" (2

Tim. 3:8). This language is similar to that used by Paul in 2 Thessalonians

2:12: They "did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness." In

both cases Paul has unbelieving Jews in mind.

Is there any historical evidence that the Jews used "signs and wonders"

to deceive the people? Josephus writes:

And now these impostors and deceivers persuaded the multitude to follow

them into the wilderness, and pretended that they would exhibit manifest

wonders and signs, that should be performed by the providence of God....

Moreover, there came out of Egypt about this time to Jerusalem, one that

said he was a prophet, and advised the multitude of the common people

to go along with him to the Mount of Olives.... He said farther, that he

would show them from hence, how, at his command, the walls of Jerusalem

would fall down; and he promised that he would procure them an entrance

into the city through those walls, when they were fallen down.39

In another place Josephus tells of a false prophet "who had made a public

proclamation in the city ... that God commanded them to get up upon the

temple, and that there they should receive miraculous signs of their deliv-

erance."40 Josephus writes of "a star resembling a sword, which stood over

308

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the city, and a comet that continued a whole year." There was "a heifer, as

she was led by the high priest to be sacrificed, brought forth a lamb in the

midst of the temple."41

Eschatological expectation intensified as Jerusalem's war with Rome came

to a head. Many believed that the Messiah would return to deliver them.

False prophets took advantage of this spurious expectation and deceived

many. God had sent them "a deluding influence so that they might believe

what is false in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the

truth, but took pleasure in wickedness" (2 Thess. 2:11-12). This passage

parallels 1 Kings 22:19-22 where Ahab is enticed to go up and fall at Ra-

moth-Gilead. In like manner, first-century Israel was enticed to go up and

fight against the Romans and fall at Jerusalem.

Conclusion

Based on this brief survey of 2 Thessalonians 2, we can conclude that

Paul is not describing a future Antichrist who will make a covenant with

the Jews during a period popularly described as the Great Tribulation. Such

a view is pure speculation that has no basis in biblical fact. Paul's man of

lawlessness was revealed in his day, and, in B. B. Warfield's words, God has

"blown him away."42

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

309

Notes

1. Christopher Hill, Antichrist in Seventeenth-Century England (London: Oxford

University Press, 1971), 1-40.

2. Leroy Froom, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers: The Historic Development of

Prophetic Interpretation, 4 vols. (Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald, 1948),

2:66. See Ralph Woodrow, Great Prophecies of the Bible (Riverside, CA: Ralph

Woodrow Evangelistic Assoc., 1971) for an able defense of this position.

3. This is the view of Henry Hammond, A Paraphrase, and Annotations Upon all

the Books of the New Testament, Briefly Explaining all the Difficult Places thereof,

7th ed. (London: John Nicholson, [1653] 1702), 609.

4. N. Nisbett, An Attempt to Illustrate Various Important Passages in the Epistles, &c.

of the New Testament from Our Lord's Prophecies of the Destruction of Jerusalem, and

from some Prophecies of the Old Testament (London: Simmons and Kirby, 1787)

88—89. Nisbett's book has been reprinted as The Prophecy of the Destruction

of Jerusalem (Lakeland, FL: John L. Bray Ministry, Inc., 1992), 27.

5. Merrill C. Tenney, New Testament Times ( Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1965),

152.

6. Tenney, New Testament Times, 115.

7. Quoted in Kenneth L. Gentry, Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation,

2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999), 77.

8. Miriam T. Griffin, Nero: The End of a Dynasty (New Haven, CT: Yale University

Press, 1984), 96.

9. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., He Shall Have Dominion (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1992), 383-93.

10. F.F. Bruce, Israel and the Nations: From the Exodus to the Fall of the Second Temple (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1963), 224.

11. Thomas Newton, Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been

Fulfilled, and at this time are Fulfilling in the World (London: J.F. Dove, 1754),

389.

12. William Arnold Stevens, "The Man of Sin," Baptist Quarterly Review (July 1889), 340.

13. See "Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3: Apostasy or Rapture?," eds. Thomas

Ice and Timothy Demy, When the Trumpet Sounds ( Eugene, OR: Harvest House,

1995), 262-96.

14. Flavius Josephus, "The Life of Flavius Josephus," in The Works of Josephus, trans. William Whiston (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1988), 4.

310

LAST DAYS MADNESS

15. F.F. Bruce, The Spreading Flame: The Rise and Progress of Christianity from its First Beginnings to the Conversion of the English (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1958),

152.

16. Benjamin B. Warfield, "The Prophecies of St. Paul," in Biblical and Theological Studies, ed. Samuel G. Craig (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and reformed,

1968), 474.

17. Bruce E. Hoyt, "What About the Antichrist?" The Presbyterian Journal (17 May 1978), 8.

18. William Arnold Stevens, "Commentary on the Epistles to the Thessalonians,"

An American Commentary on the New Testament, ed. Alvah Hovey (Philadelphia,

PA: American Baptist Publication Society, 1887), 92. For a description of the

growing first-century rift between the Jewish church and Pharisaic Judaism,

see Paul Barnett, Behind the Scenes of the New Testament (Downers Grove, IL:

InterVarsity Press, 1990), 162-63, 181, 189, 208-9.

19. Some who see the apostasy as being Jewish in nature understand the man

of lawlessness to represent the Jewish nation, especially its religious leaders.

While this interpretation has some merit, it does not satisfy the way "man"

is used in the Bible.

20. John Lightfoot, The Whole Works of the Rev. John Lightfoot, ed. John Rogers

Pitman, 13 vols. (London: J.F. Dove, 1822), 3:232.

21. Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1971),

525.

22. John Lightfoot, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica:

Matthew— 1 Corinthians, 4 vols. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, [1859]

1989), 2:289. Emphasis in original.

23. For a discussion of how the Bible uses "gods" as judges, see Gary DeMar

and Peter Leithart, The Reduction of Christianity: A Biblical Response to Dave Hunt

(Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1988), 77-83.

24. Lightfoot, Whole Works, 3:233.

25. Edward Hayes Plumptre, "The Gospel According to St. Matthew," A New

Testament Commentary for English Readers, ed. Charles John Ellicott, 3 vols.

(London: Cassel and Company, 1897), 3:147.

26. Flavius Josephus, Wars of the Jews in The Works of Josephus, 4:3:6-8, 671.

27. William Whiston in Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, 671, note b.

28. John Bray, The Man of Sin of II Thessalonians 2 (Lakeland, FL: John Bray Min-

istries, 1997), 26. See Paul L. Maier, Josephus: The Essential Writings (Grand

Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1988), 347—54 for a discussion of John Levi.

The Man of Lawlessness (II)

311

29. Mireille Hadas-Lebel, Flavius Josephus: Eyewitness to Rome's First-Century Conquest of J udea, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Macmillan, [1989] 1993), 165.

30. Gregory P. Allen, "The Identity of the Restrainer in 2 Thessalonians 2:2-7"

(Multnomah School of the Bible, n.d.).

31. Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews in The Works of Josephus, 20:9:1, 538.

32. If there is an enigmatic reference to Claudius in the Latin claudere, is it possible that Paul had "Claudius Lysias" in mind (Acts 23:26)? It was Claudius Lysias

who restrained the Jews and kept them from completing their assassination

plot.

33. F. F. Bruce, New Testament History (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books/ Doubleday,

[1969] 1972), 310. Also see F.F. Bruce, The D e fence of the Gospel in the New

Testament( Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1959), 65.

34. F.W. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity (New YorK: E.P. Dutton, 1882),

12.

35. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity, 12.

36. Bicknell, The First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians, 76.

37. F.F. Bruce, "Herod," The New Bible Dictionary, ed. J.D. Douglas (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, [1962] 1973), 523. Also see Bruce, The Spreading Flame,

154.

38. Harold W. Hoehner, "Herod, Herodian Family," Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, ed. Walter A. Elwell, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1988),

1:972.

39. Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews, 20:8:6, 536. Emphasis added.

40. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6:5:2, 741.

41. Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6:5:3, 742.

42. Warfield, "The Prophecies of St. Paul," 471.

Chapter Twenty-Four

ARMAGEDDON

THEOLOGY

Armageddon! The name is synonymous with mass destruction, car-

nage, and unrivaled bloodshed. Talk of Armageddon and the assurance

of its imminency is not new. S.D. Baldwin wrote about the coming of Arma-

geddon in his day in Armageddon: or the Overthrow of Romanism and Monarchy;

the Existence of the United States Foretold in the Bible. This was in 1854!1 Baldwin believed that events in his day proved that Armageddon was near.

Speculation over Armageddon theology was a topic of discussion during the

presidency of Ronald Reagan: "I sometimes believe we're heading very fast for

Armageddon," Reagan told Jerry Falwell in 1981.2 The political left shuddered

when they read about Reagan's "Armageddon theology," thinking he might

believe himself to be God's instrument to make prophecy come true by un-

leashing a military attack against the "evil empire" of the former Soviet Union.

According to today's prophecy pundits, there will be, there must be, a "Battle of Armageddon" culminating in the near-destruction of Israel and the rest of the

human race. Former President Reagan made it clear that he was familiar with

the popular books on the subject, as the following quotations demonstrate:

•In 1981 Reagan discussed Armageddon with Senator Howell Heflin

and said, "Russia is going to get involved in it."3

313

314

LAST DAYS MADNESS

•In the December 6, 1983, issue of People magazine, Reagan said,

"[T]theologians have been studying the ancient prophecies—what would

portend the coming of Armageddon—and have said that never, in the

time between the prophecies up until now, has there ever been a time

in which so many of the prophecies are coming together. There have

been times in the past when people thought the end of the world was

coming, but never anything like this."4

• In October 1983, Reagan told Tom Dine of the American-Israel Public

Affairs Committee: "You know, I turn back to your ancient prophecies

in the Old Testament and the signs foretelling Armageddon, and I find

myself wondering if we're the generation that's going to see that come

about. I don't know if you've noted any of those prophecies lately, but

believe me, they certainly describe the times we're going through."5

• "This may be the generation that sees Armageddon."6

In his second debate with Walter Mondale, however, Reagan gave a

rather vague response when Marvin Kalb asked about Armageddon. "Reagan

acknowledged a 'philosophical' interest in Armageddon, and noted that 'a

number of theologians' believed 'the prophecies are coming together that

portend that.'"7 Talk of Armageddon cooled as East-West relations thawed.

Any change in the political status of Israel, the Palestinians, and the Arab

nations could renew talk about the rapture and Armageddon.

An entire book has been written on the subject of modern prophetic

speculation and the Armageddon scenario. Grace Halsell takes on the

TV evangelists and their talk of Armageddon and their belief in the

inevitability of nuclear war. She claims these men "preach that only a

nuclear war will bring Christ back to earth. Convinced that God has

fore-ordained that precisely those of us living in this generation must

wage the battle of armageddon, they tell their millions of listeners that

we can do nothing to prevent the ultimate holocaust. Arms negotiations,

they insist, are useless and any talk of peace is 'heresy.'"8 This is not an

accurate picture of the Armageddon scenario since Christians will not be

around when the supposed Battle of Armageddon ensues. The theory is

that Christians will be "raptured" before the "Great Tribulation" period commences. If this is true, then why all the speculation about this supposed end-time battle?

Armageddon Theology

315

Dispensationalists have always taught that there are no prophetic events

prior to the rapture. This means that current events are irrelevant when it comes

to speculating when the rapture will occur. But if they can produce evidence

that Armageddon might be near, then the rapture must be imminent. John F.

Walvoord, former professor of systematic theology and president of Dallas

Theological Seminary until 1986, "is sincerely convinced that many current

events have fulfilled the necessary prophecies on the 'Armageddon Calendar'

so that the Rapture of the saints is imminent."9 While dispensationalists say

no one can predict the timing of the rapture, they seem to go out of their way

to speculate on Armageddon.

• "The prophecies of the Bible indicate why mankind is facing this present

crisis, the events which will culminate in the final Battle of Armageddon

and the tremendous promises of the Messianic Age which await fulfillment

at the return of Christ."10 This author evaluates current events ("this present

crisis") and concludes that Armageddon is around the corner. If Armaged-

don is around the corner, then the rapture must be just ahead.

• "I do not want to linger here on the who, what, why, how, or when of

Armageddon. I will simply state my own belief that it is near."11

• Ed Hindson asserts that we are "approaching armageddon" while telling

us that "there are no specific time indicators of when" the event will take

place.12 If this is true, then how do we know that we are approaching

armageddon?

What sort of time frame is "near"? If you recall how dispensationalists

interpret "near," "soon," and "quickly," Armageddon could be two thousand years away.

The Illusion of Peace

Not to be outdone, there are those who see peace as the great enemy.

While books on the Armageddon theme flood the market, there are a few

authors who concern themselves with talk of peace by world leaders:

"And now, at long last, the prospect of a peace such as the world has never

known before seems to have metamorphosed from an impossible dream to

a realistic hope. In fact, the nations of the world will indeed establish an

316

LAST DAYS MADNESS

unprecedented international peace, and probably fairly soon.13 Of this we

are certain, because it has been foretold in the Bible for thousands of years

that it would occur in the 'last days.'"14

So which is it? Should we be concerned about war or peace? On one

hand, we hear people addressing the Armageddon issue. On the other hand,

concern is voiced over the New World Order with its promises of peace and

security. Should we fight the New World Order by clamoring for war? Or

should we fight the machine of war by calling for peace? What is a Chris-

tian to do? The solution for many is ail imminent rapture that will take the

church out before a decision has to be made either way. Convenient, but

certainly not biblical.

Most people are concerned about the prospects for war. This is why Arma-

geddon talk puts many on edge, especially when such talk is tied to prophetic

inevitabilities. If war is in fact a prophetic inevitability, then what can anyone

possibly do to avert it? Could we be messing with God's prophetic timetable

by sending soldiers to force combatants to consider avenues of peace? But

when all the signs seem to point toward an Armageddon showdown, at the

last minute some adjustment has to be made to explain why the rapture or

Armageddon did not come as promised.

• "God is sovereign and may accelerate or postpone 'the appointed time.'"

Here Grant Jeffrey seems to be saying that we really don't know any-

thing about timing because ultimately all these decisions are God's to

make. But he does not leave well enough alone when he postulates that

"the year A.D. 2000 is a probable termination date for the 'last days.'"

Jeffrey goes out even further on the prophetic limb by claiming that

Jesus may begin His kingdom on October 9, 2000.15

• In Magog 1982 Canceled, David A. Lewis claims that while Russia had set

a date for the invasion of Israel and had stockpiled two billion dollars'

worth of arms in Lebanon, it was Israel that "saved the whole world

from a bloodbath" through its invasion of Lebanon in 1982.16

Like every other prediction, speculations about the nearness of Armaged-

don have been wrong time and time again. Some unforeseen set of circum-

stances always forces the prognosticators to make periodic adjustments.

Why? The Armageddon scenario is fraudulent from start to finish. There is

no future Armageddon battle.

Armageddon Theology

317

Har-Mageddon or Ar-Mageddon?

The word "Armageddon" appears only once in the Bible as Har-Mageddon

or Ar-Mageddon (Rev. 16:16). This is why it's surprising to read one prominent

Bible teacher write that "the prophets have described it more specifically as

the final suicide battle of a desperate world struggle centered in the Middle

East."17 This author makes it seem as if the Battle of Armageddon is a doc-

trine about which all the prophets wrote. The term is absent from the Old

Testament, and, as I hope to demonstrate, so is the modern conception of

the doctrine. Yet most Christians are convinced that the Bible has much to

say about this future cataclysmic battle.

Armageddon has reference to a place: The mount or mountain (bar) of

Megiddo or the city (ar) of Megiddo. The "city of Megiddo" may be the

better translation. This is the position taken by John Albert Bengel in his

Gnomon of the New Testament (1742) and other New Testament commenta-

tors.18 A number of battles were fought at Megiddo: Barak and Deborah

overthrew the armies of the Canaanite king, Jabin, and the Midianites 0udges

5:19), and King Josiah was killed by Pharaoh Neco (2 Kings 23:29). Mod-

ern advocates of the Armageddon doctrine have combined these and other

Megiddo battles into one great future "Great Tribulation" conflict where

the Antichrist will bring all the nations of the world into a final war against

Israel. While this interpretation of Revelation 16:16 is popular, a close look

at Scripture will show that it is an untenable doctrinal position. Revelation

is describing a past battle between first-century Rome and Israel: "The no-

tion that Armageddon refers to some great cataclysm of the world's affairs

in the future is hardly warranted."19

Megiddo: Israel's Waterloo

It is useless to try to understand Revelation 16:16 (or any passage for that

matter) until we first determine how the Old Testament applies to the New

Testament text. Megiddo is a symbol of war between rival kings and king-

doms. In one case, Israel is the victor (Judges 5:19). In another instance, Israel

is the vanquished (2 Kings 23:29). To which battle does Revelation 16:16

refer? It depends on the identity of the guilty party. Since apostate Israel is the

object of God's wrath in Revelation, the Josiah incident is more appropriate.

God had warned King Josiah not to go to battle against the Egyptians. The

318

LAST DAYS MADNESS

king refused to heed God's warning, and at the battle of Megiddo Josiah was

mortally wounded (2 Chron. 35:20-25). It is this Megiddo event that was

burned into Israel's collective memory (Jer. 25:10).

Following Josiah's death, Judah's downward spiral into apostasy, de-

struction, and bondage was swift and irrevocable (2 Chronicles 36). The

Jews mourned for Josiah's death, even down through the time of Ezra (see

2 Chronicles 35:25), and the prophet Zechariah uses this as an image of

Israel's mourning for the Messiah.20

Israel remembered Megiddo as a place where God vented His divine wrath

against rebellion, whether exhibited by Israel or a foreign power. God brought

the nations of the world against first-century Jerusalem as He had promised

(Matt. 22:7; 24:34). Rome, as an "empire of nations" (Syria, Asia Minor, Pal-

estine, Gaul, Egypt, Britain, and others)21 representing all the nations of the

world (see Luke 2:1), came up against Jerusalem and destroyed her:

By the time of Christ, the Caesars ruled a territory so vast that they

could almost equate it with the known world. Spreading outward in all

directions from the sea that the Romans called Mare Nostrum, it extended

roughly two thousand miles from Scotland south to the headwaters of

the Nile and about three thousand miles from the Pillars of Hercules

eastward to the sands of Persia. Its citizens and subject peoples numbered

perhaps eighty million. One of the last and least important acquisitions

of the giant empire was the coastal strip sometimes known as Palestine

or Israel, actually the four disparate territories of Judea, Samaria, Galilee

and Peraea.22

There were those in Israel who actually attempted to fight against this

world empire and, like King Josiah, met their "Waterloo." This great battle

was fought by Rome (the Beast) against the "great city," Jerusalem, where

the Bible tells us Israel crucified her Lord (Rev. 11:8). This may explain why

the battle is described as the "City [Heb: ar] of Megiddo." The battle does not take place on the plains of Megiddo but in the city of Jerusalem.

Similar to the way Old Testament figures are used in Revelation to de-

scribe Israel 0ezebel: 2:20; Sodom: 11:8; Egypt: 11:8; and Babylon: 14:8),

Megiddo represents God's decisive battle against the city that rejected and

Armageddon Theology

319

killed His Son (Matt. 21:38-39; 22:7). It no more takes place in Megiddo

than Jerusalem is literally Sodom, Egypt, and Babylon. Jerusalem had taken

on the characteristics of these wicked cities. "This figure in the text of the

apocalypse was employed not for the physical location but for the battle

imagery. The deepest affliction of Jerusalem could be symbolized in no

stronger terms of mourning, as prophesied by Zechariah in chapter 12:11:

'In that day shall there be a great mourning in Jerusalem, as the mourning

of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megiddon.'"23

A study of the context of Rome's battle with Israel indicates that the plain

of Megiddo was in view as was the city of Jerusalem. This only reinforces

an A.D. 70 fulfillment.

Josephus tells us that when Titus left Egypt with orders from his fa-

ther [Vespasian] to subdue the Jews that he returned "to Caesarea, having

taken a resolution to gather all his other forces together at that place."

Bear in mind that Caesarea was within sight of Mt. Carmel, the moun-

tain of Megiddo, and that those armed forces coming from the northern

regions must pass through Megiddo before reaching the appointed place

of gathering. Titus stayed in the regions around Caesarea until most of

the forces from the north arrived, and then moved on to Jerusalem for

the "battle of the great day of God Almighty."24

So then, whether we understand this battle to be a symbolic war with

Israel, using the Megiddo imagery to show God's covenantal judgment, or

to be another literal Megiddo battle, the war is over.

How do we know that Israel met her "Waterloo" at this juncture in history?

First, Jesus told His disciples that the tribulation period would occur within

their lifetime (Matt. 24:1-34). Second, the Book of Revelation describes

events in the first century. The time was "near" (1:1, 3; 3:11; 22:7, 10, 12,

20). Third, Jesus had warned the representatives of Israel that judgment

would come upon the city and sanctuary. Many in Israel had "disowned the

Holy and Righteous One, and asked for [the] murderer [Barabbas] ... and

put to death the Prince of life" (Acts 3:14—15). For this, Israel received her

just punishment: "His blood be on us and on our children," the Jews cried

out to Pilate (Matt. 27:25). The armies of Rome came "and destroyed those

murderers, and set their city on fire" at the symbolic battlefield of Megiddo

(Matt. 22:7).

320

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. S.D. Baldwin, Armageddon (Cincinnati, OH: Applegate and Company, 1854).

Like today's dispensationalists, Baldwin insisted on a "literal" interpretation,

except, of course, when a text was "symbolic" (13).

2. Boston Globe, 2 May 1982. Quoted in F.H. Knelman, Reagan, God and the Bomb: From Myth to Policy in the Nuclear Arms Race (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1985),

179. The article originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times ( 4 March 1981).

See Jim Castelli, A Plea for Common Sense: Resolving the Clash Between Religion and

Politics (San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1988), 74.

3. Quoted in Castelli, A Plea for Common Sense, 74.

4. Quoted in Castelli, A Plea for Common Sense, 75.

5. Wolf Blitzer, Jerusalem Post (28 October 1993), A28.

6. Candidate Ronald Reagan on the "PTL Club," 1980. Quoted in Gary North,

"The Armageddon Button," Remnant Review (19 December 1986), 5.

7. Paul Boyer, When Time Shall Be No More: Prophecy Belief in Modern American

Culture (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,

1992), 142.

8. Grace Halsell, Prophecy and Politics: Militant Evangelists on the Road to Nuclear

War (Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill, 1986), dust-jacket copy.

9. Edwin Yamauchi, "Updating the Armageddon Calendar," Christianity Today

(29 April 1991), 50.

10. Grant R. Jeffrey, Armageddon: Appointment with Destiny (Toronto: Frontier Re-

search, 1988), 8.

11. Billy Graham, Storm Warning (Dallas, TX: Word, 1992), 294.

12. Ed Hindson, Approaching Armageddon: The World Prepares for War with God

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997), 36.

13. What does Hunt mean by "fairly soon"?

14. Dave Hunt, Global Peace and the Rise of Antichrist (Eugene, OR: Harvest House,

1990), 13.

15. Jeffrey, Armageddon, 193, 191.

16. See Dwight Wilson, "Foreword," Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and Israel Since 1917 (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics,

[1977] 1991).

17. John F. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis: What the Bible

Says About the Future of the Middle East and the End of Western Civilization (Grand

Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990), 23.

18. See James Glasgow, The Apocalypse Translated and Explained (Edinburgh, T & T

Armageddon Theology

321

Clark, 1872), 419; Alfred Plummer, "Revelation," The Pulpit Commentary, eds.

H.D.M. Spence and Joseph S. Spence (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1913),

396; and R. H. Charles, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The Revelation

of St. John, 2 vols. (New York: Scribner's Sons, 1920), 2:50.

19. David S. Clark, The Message from Patmos: A Postmillennial Commentary on the Book

of Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1989), 103.

20. David Chilton, The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation

(Ft. Worth, TX: Dominion Press, 1987), 411-12.

21. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., "The Preterist Interpretation of the Kingdom," in

Greg L. Bahnsen and Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., House Divided: The Break-Up of

Dispensational Theology (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989),

273.

22. Otto Friedrich, The End of the World: A History (New York: Coward, McCann

and Geoghegan, 1982), 28.

23. Foy E. Wallace, Jr., The Book of Revelation: Consisting of a Commentary on the

Apocalypse of the New Testament (Fort Worth, TX: Foy E. Wallace Jr. Publica-

tions, 1966), 335.

24. Arthur M. Ogden, The Avenging of the Apostles and Prophets: Commentary on

Revelation, 2nd ed. (Somerset, KY: Ogden Publications, [1985] 1991), 320.

Chapter Twenty-Five

DANIEL'S

SEVENTY WEEKS

If Armageddon is a past event, then why do many Christians look for a

future all-out battle between the nations of the world and Israel? As

we just saw, understanding the timing (first century versus distant future)

and theme (first-century Rome and Israel versus a distant revived Roman

Empire and modern Israel) of the event is crucial. There remains, however,

a hermeneutical anomaly called dispensationalism that takes the seventieth

week (representing seven years) of Daniel's prophecy in Daniel 9:24—27,

separates it from the other sixty-nine weeks, and projects it far into the future.

Just before the resumption of the seventieth week, the rapture of the church

supposedly occurs. Following this, the antichrist is revealed, and near the

end of the seven-year period, the battle of Armageddon takes place.

According to this way of interpreting Scripture, between the sixty-ninth

and seventieth weeks of Daniel's prophecy there exists a period of time

called the "church age," now nearly two thousand years in duration, more

than five times longer than the span of the original prophecy. This phantom

time period (also known as a "gap" or "parenthesis") supposedly separates the first sixty-nine weeks (483 years) from the last week (seven years). This

imaginary parenthesis pushes the seven-year interval further and further into

the future for as long as the Church remains on the earth. While Daniel

323

324

LAST DAYS MADNESS

writes that "seventy weeks have been decreed" (Dan. 9:24), dispensationalists

believe that seventy weeks and a gap or parenthesis of indeterminate length

have been decreed. It is surmised that during this future seven-year period

the events in Revelation 4-19 will take place with the rise of antichrist, a

rebuilt temple, the mark of the Beast, and the Battle of Armageddon. An-

thony Hoekema describes it this way:

During this seven-year period, while the church remains in heaven [hav-

ing just been raptured, Rev. 4:1], a number of events will occur on earth

[Rev. 4—19]: (1) the tribulation predicted in Daniel 9:27 now begins, the

latter half of which is the so-called great tribulation; (2) the Antichrist now

begins his cruel reign—a reign which culminates in his demanding to be

worshipped as God; (3) terrible judgments now fall on the inhabitants

of the earth; (4) during this time the "Gospel of the Kingdom" will be

preached—a gospel having as its central content the establishment of the

coming Davidic kingdom, but including the message of the cross and the

need for faith and repentance; (5) at this time a remnant of Israel will turn

to Jesus the Messiah—the 144,000 sealed Israelites of Revelation 7:3-8;

(6) through the witness of these 144,000 an innumerable multitude of

Gentiles will also be brought to salvation (Revelation 7:9); (7) the kings

of the earth and the armies of the beast and the false prophet now gather

together to attack the people of God in the Battle of Armageddon.1

While nearly all Bible scholars agree that the first sixty-nine weeks of

Daniel's prophecy refer to the time up to Jesus' crucifixion, only dispen-

sationalists believe that the entire seventieth week is yet to be fulfilled.

Without a futurized seventieth week, the dispensationalist system falls apart.

There can be no pretribulational rapture, great tribulation, or rebuilt temple

without the gap. How do dispensationalists find a gap in a text that makes

no mention of a gap?

Dispensationalism's Clock of Prophecy

Dispensationalists believe that when the Jews rejected Jesus as their

King and Messiah, God postponed His kingdom program for Israel. The

prophetic time clock stopped for Israel at the end of the sixty-ninth week

(483 years from the decree to build the temple as described in Daniel 9:24).

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

325

The prophetic time clock supposedly will not start ticking again for Israel

until the rapture of the church, a future event. Because the prophecy clock

has stopped, according to dispensationalism, there are no prophetic events prior

to the rapture; therefore, all talk about the antichrist being alive somewhere in

the world today, the "present crisis" that is leading us to Armageddon, and

the role of national Israel in prophecy, becomes irrelevant. At the end of the

seven years, God will have fulfilled His covenantal commitment to national

Israel. It is during the final seven-year period of Daniel's seventy weeks that

Israel and the world experience a great tribulation, with untold suffering to

the Jews and billions of others, ending with the Battle of Armageddon. Is

there biblical support for this view? Let's look at what the Bible says.

Created Out of Necessity

It's been said that necessity is the mother of invention. The "gap" that

has been placed between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks of Daniel's

prophecy was created because it was needed to make the dispensational

hermeneutical model work. Nothing in the text of Daniel 9:24—27 implies

a "gap." This isn't the first place in the Bible where dispensationalists find a

gap where none is specifically indicated.

A widely held opinion among fundamentalists is that the primeval

creation of Genesis 1:1 may have taken place billions of years ago, with

all the geological ages inserted in a tremendous time gap between Genesis

1:1 and 1:2. The latter verse is believed by these expositors to describe the

condition of the earth after a great cataclysm terminated the geological

ages. This cataclysm, which left the earth in darkness and covered with

water, is explained as a divine judgment because of the sin of Satan in

rebelling against God. Following the cataclysm, God then "recreated" the

world in the six literal days described in Genesis 1:3-31.

Most popularly known as the "gap theory," this idea has also been called

the "ruin-and-reconstruction theory" and the "pre-Adamic cataclysm theory."

... [I]t has been widely popularized by the notes in the Scofield Reference

Bible and has been taught in most of the Bible institutes and fundamentalist

seminaries of the United States for the past century.2

Those who hold to the Genesis gap theory cannot be called six-day

creationists. At best, they should be described as six-day recreationists? The

326

LAST DAYS MADNESS

gap theory was designed "to harmonize the Biblical chronology with the

accepted system of geological ages which was becoming prominent" in the

nineteenth century.4

In a similar way, dispensationalists need to insert a period of time

between the feet and the toes of Nebuchadnezzar's statue (Dan. 2:40-

43) and between the sixty-ninth and seventieth week of the prophecy

outlined in Daniel 9:24—27 in order to make the dispensational system

work. A reading of both passages will show that there are no gaps of

time. What we find in dispensational writers is a hermeneutical method

whereby the theological system determines what a text should say to sup-

port the theological system. Dispensationalists are trapped in an endless

loop of circular reasoning.

One dispensational writer, offering no exegetical evidence for the inclusion

of a gap between the feet and toes of the colossus of Daniel 2—a gap that

indicates a period between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks of Daniel

9:24-27—states, "At some point in this symbolism [of Nebuchadnezzar's

statue] an extended gap in time must be fixed, because by verse 44 the in-

terpretation describes the future day of Christ's millennial reign, as will

be seen."5 Again, no such gap is intimated by a reading of the text, nor by

subsequent New Testament interpretative evidence.

So what makes this dispensational writer postpone the kingdom for two

thousand years to "the future day of Christ's millennial kingdom" when

the Bible clearly states that it was set up "in the days of those kings" (Dan.

2:44)?6 There are no exegetical reasons to postpone the kingdom of Daniel

2. No gap is mentioned. The fifth stone-kingdom follows the fourth king-

dom of the statue with no interruption in time. The statue comprises four

kingdoms, one following another, with God's kingdom supplanting the

kingdoms of men.

An Inspired Prophetic Calendar

J. Barton Payne shows that Daniel's prophecy does not require a "gap" to

force it to fit with biblical history. If taken literally, the passage is a beautiful

description of the extraordinary reliability of predictive prophecy found in

the Bible:

The most noteworthy feature of Daniel's prophecy is the inspired

prophetic calendar that accompanies it. Daniel predicted a lapse of

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

327

"seventy weeks [of years]," or 490 years, for the accomplishing of the

redemptive work (Dan. 9:24). The beginning point would be indicated

by the commandment to restore Jerusalem (v. 25), an event that was

accomplished, a century after Daniel, in the reign of the Persian, Artax-

erxes I (465-424 B.C.), under Nehemiah (444 B.C.). But there had been

an earlier attempt, in the same reign, to restore the city's walls, which

had been thwarted by the Samaritans (Ezra 4:11-12, 23). This attempt

seems to have been made under Ezra (458 B.C.; cf. 9:9), on the basis of

the extended powers granted him in Artaxerxes' decree (7:18, 25, even

though nothing explicit is said about restoring Jerusalem). Daniel then

went on to predict that from this commandment, to the Messiah, would

be "seven weeks, and three score and two weeks" (9:25), or 69 weeks of

years, equaling 483 years. From 458 B.c. this brings one to A.D. 26, the

very time which many would accept for the descent of the Holy Spirit

upon Jesus Christ and the commencement of His incarnate ministry. Verses

26 and 27 then describe how, in the midst of the final week (that is, of

the last seven year period, and therefore in the spring of A.D. 30), He

would bring to an end the Old Testament economy by His death. There

could hardly have been a more miraculously accurate prediction than was

this! The 490 years then conclude with the three and a half years that

remained, during which period the testament was to be confirmed to Israel

(cf. Acts 2:38). It terminated in A.D. 33, which is the probable date for the

conversion of Paul. At this point the Jews, by their stoning of Stephen, in

effect cut themselves off from the eternal blessings of inheritance under

the newer testament (cf. Rev. 12:6,14); and shortly thereafter, within that

generation, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem, A.D. 70.7

Stephen was probably martyred the same year Jesus was crucified and

Paul was converted. Paul writes in Galatians 1:18 that he met with Peter

"three years later" in Jerusalem "to become acquainted with Cephas." It was at this same time that Peter was given instructions that the gospel was to

go to the Gentiles (Acts 10-11). This means that Paul's meeting with Peter

and Peter's instructions concerning the Gentiles occurred 3.5 years after the

crucifixion, marking the end of the seventy weeks "for Israel."

This has been the standard interpretation for centuries, except for minor dif-

ferences in details.8 John Nelson Darby and others changed all this with their

church-parenthesis hypothesis. In the Darbyite, and now the dispensational,

328

LAST DAYS MADNESS

scheme of things, the seventieth week does not follow immediately after the

sixty-ninth week. Dispensationalism, following Darby and the Scofield R e fer-

ence Bible, teaches that the seventieth week is still future, and it's not Jesus

who makes a "firm covenant with the many for one week" (Dan. 9:27)— it's

the antichrist It's not Jesus who "will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering" through His shed blood (9:27)9— it's the antichrist. This interpretation is contrary to the New Testament's commentary on Daniel 9:24-27

The sense of the passage, as given in the Septuagint version, which

our Lord quoted in Matthew 24:15, is that the "one week" (the last of

the 70, of which 69 had been previously accounted for) would witness

the confirming of the new covenant with many (see Matt. 26:28, noting

the words "covenant" and "many"), whereby the sacrifices and oblation

of the old covenant were caused to cease (see Heb. 10:9), and the things

predicted in verse 24 [of Daniel 9] were fulfilled.10

As Philip Mauro affirms, using Scripture to interpret Scripture, it is Jesus

who "will make a firm covenant with the many," not the antichrist. This

language is used by Jesus, not the antichrist, in Matthew 26:28 in address-

ing His Jewish disciples in the first century as a fulfillment of the seventieth

week: "For this is My blood of the covenant which is poured out for many for forgiveness of sins." This covenant is "the new covenant in" His own blood

(Luke 22:20). Nothing in the Book of Revelation, a book that supposedly

describes a future seven-year great tribulation (Daniel's "postponed" seven-

tieth week), mentions the antichrist making a covenant with the Jews and

then breaking it. The New Testament fulfillment of the seventieth week of

Daniel 9:27 is found in the redemptive work of the cross. Scripture could

not be any more clear.

There is no reason to believe that there is a gap or that the antichrist is

anywhere mentioned in Daniel 9:24—27. The period of seventy weeks of

years—490 years—"is here predicted as one that will continue uninter-

ruptedly from its commencement to its close, or completion, both with regard to the entire period of seventy [weeks of years], and also as to the several

parts (7, 62, and 1) into which the seventy are divided. What can be more

evident than this? Exactly seventy weeks in all are to elapse; and how can

anyone imagine that there is an interval between the sixty-nine and the one,

when these together make up the seventy?"11 The seventy weeks are a unit:

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

329

"The student of the Hebrew text will note that the masculine plural is here

construed with a verb in the singular (is decreed). The seventy heptades are

conceived as a unit, a round number, and are most naturally understood as

so many sevens of years."12

Taking a Closer Look

For the dispensationalist, "Probably no single prophetic utterance is more

crucial in the fields of Biblical Interpretation, Apologetics, and Eschatology"

than the seventy-weeks prophecy of Daniel 9:24—27.13 If the gap theory

cannot be proved from a study of this messianic prophecy, then there is no

validity to dispensationalism, and the entire end-time system called dispen-

sationalism must be rejected. Because dispensationalists understand this, they

must devise a way to create a gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth

weeks. Let's see if there is any justification for any gaps to be inserted when a specific number of years is given.

Forty Years and No Gap

There are thirteen instances of forty-year time periods with no gaps: (1)

Moses is in Egypt for forty years (Acts 7:23); (2) Moses is in Midian for

forty years (Acts 7:30); (3) Moses and Israel are in the wilderness for forty

years (Deut. 8:2); (4) Othniel judges Israel for forty years (Judges 3:11); (5)

Barak judges Israel for forty years (Judges 5:31); (6) the land of Israel "was

undisturbed for forty years in the days of Gideon" (Judges 8:28); (7) Israel is

enslaved by the Philistines for forty years (Judges 13:1); (8) Eli judges Israel

for forty years (1 Sam. 4:18); (9) King Saul rules Israel for forty years (Acts

13:21); (10) King David rules Israel for forty years (2 Sam. 5:4); (11) King

Solomon rules Israel for forty years (1 Kings 11:42); (12) King Joash rules

Israel for forty years (2 Chron. 24:1); (13) God's judgment upon Egypt was

to last forty years: "A man's foot will not pass through it, and the foot of a

beast will not pass through it, and it will not be inhabited for forty years"

(Ezek. 29:11).

In addition to the forty-year intervals of time, there are thirteen forty-day

time periods found in Scripture. In each case, no gap is implied (Gen. 7:4,

12; 50:3; Ex. 24:18; 34:28; Num. 13:25; Deut. 9:18, 25; 1 Sam. 17:16; 1

Kings 19:8; Ezek. 4:5; Matt. 4:2; Acts 1:2).

330

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Seventy Years and No Gap

Let's look at how the Bible presents the seventy-year time period. Because

Israel refused to honor the Jubilee years—seventy in all—God sent the na-

tion into captivity for seventy years so the land could enjoy its long overdue

sabbath rest (Lev. 25:1-13, 18-22): "Then the land will enjoy its sabbaths

all the days of the desolation, while you are in your enemies' land; then

the land will rest and enjoy sabbaths. All the days of its desolation it will

observe the rest which it did not observe on your sabbaths, while you were

living in it" (Lev. 26:3^35, 43; 2 Chron. 36:21-23; Jer. 25:12; 29:10). Is

there any indication of a gap in this seventy-year period? No! It is the near

termination point of this seventy-year period that provokes Daniel to ask

of the Lord when the "calamity"—seventy years of captivity—will come to

an end (Dan. 9:2). What justification did Daniel have for asking God about

the end of the judgment period? Was it presumption on his part? No. He

took God at His word: seventy years meant seventy years.

The seventy-year period of captivity as described in Jeremiah 29:10

is a pattern for the "seventy weeks" in Daniel 9:24. "Therefore, as Jacques Doukhan has pointed out, 'The seventy weeks' prophecy must be interpreted

with regard to history in as realistic a way as Daniel did for the prophecy of

Jeremiah.'"14 From this alone we can conclude that since the seventy years

of captivity were consecutive with no gap or parenthesis, the "seventy weeks"

must also be consecutive, seeing that there is nothing in the text to make us

think otherwise. Daniel bases his prayer for restoration to the land on the

certainty of the re-establishment promised by God when the seventy years

were completed (Jer. 29:10). God made a covenant. What right do we have

to conclude that God would somehow change the way time is ordinarily kept

when we come to the use of seventy in the same chapter (Dan. 9:2, 24)?

Could God have placed a "gap" between the sixty-ninth and seventieth

years of Israel's captivity, adding, say, a hundred years and still maintain

that He had kept His word? There is no way He could have done it and

remained a God of truth. But what if God came back and said, "I didn't

actually add any years; I just postponed the final year by means of a 'gap'

of 100 years. The 'gap' consisting of 100 years, which you assume to be

additional years, should not be calculated in the overall accounting." This

would mean that 170 years would have passed. Using "gap logic" the Bible

could still maintain that Israel was in captivity for only seventy years. Let's

call this what it is: nonsense.

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

331

What would we think of such a deal? Could God ever delay keeping

His promise in such a way and still be called a covenant-keeping God? No!

And yet this is exactly what dispensationalists do with the "seventy weeks of

years" (490 years) of Daniel's prophecy. A "gap" of nearly two thousand years supposedly does nothing to change the integrity of a prophecy specifying

the passage of only 490 years.

If we can find no gaps in the sequence of years in these examples, then

how can a single exception be made with the "seventy weeks" in Daniel

9:24-27? Some maintain that the passage in Daniel lends itself to inserting

a gap because of the division of weeks: seven weeks, sixty-two weeks, and

one week. Since there is no gap between the seven and sixty-two weeks,

what justification is there in inserting a gap between the sixty-ninth week

(seven weeks + sixty-two weeks = sixty-nine weeks) and the seventieth

week? Moses' life is divided up into three forty-year periods (Acts 7:23;

7:30; Deut. 8:2). Should we look for and expect gaps in the 120 years of

Moses' life? No.

Randall Price claims there is justification for a gap based on "prophetic

postponement" which he describes as "a distinct tenet of dispensational in-

terpretation."15 He offers what he believes are numerous examples of "Old

Testament prophetic texts replete with examples of statements in which a

partial fulfillment can be discerned in history but complete (or ultimate)

fulfillment awaits a future, ideal time, usually the eschaton."16 His examples

are at best questionable. Even so, in none of the passages he cites is there a

postponement or a gap when a specific amount of time is indicated, in this

case, 490 years.

No Time In Between

One writer insists that the language of Daniel 9:26 is so clear that it is obvi-

ous that a gap exists between the two final weeks. Interpreters, he tells us,

stumble and fall on the simple language of the text itself. There is but one

natural interpretation—and that is the one which regards the events of

verse 26 as belonging to a period between the sixty-ninth and seventieth

weeks, when God has sovereignly set aside His people Israel, awaiting a

time of resumption of covenant relationship in the future, after Israel has

been restored to the land.17

332

LAST DAYS MADNESS

AS has already been noted, the text says nothing about "a period between

the sixty-ninth and seventieth-weeks." There can be no "period between" any

time period, whether seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, or years unless a

period of time is expressly given. It is impossible to insert time between the

end of one year and the beginning of another. January 1st follows December

31st at the stroke of midnight. There is no "period between" the conclusion

of one year and the beginning of the next year. Culver, therefore, begs the

question. He first must prove that a period of time should be placed between

the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks before he can maintain that there is a

"period between" the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks. The "simple language

of the text" makes no mention of a gap. As Hans LaRondelle points out, the

text does not read, after the sixtytwo weeks "but not in the seventieth."18

In addition, the text says nothing about the restoration of Israel to her

land as a fulfillment of some covenantal obligation. All the land promises

that God made to Israel were fulfilled (Joshua 21:43—45). Israel was in the

land at the end of the sixty-ninth week. She was still in the land when the

seventieth week commenced immediately after the end of the sixty-ninth

week. Israel was in the land when the temple was destroyed in A.D. 70.

Finally, if God destroys Israel again because of the breaking of a

special covenantal relationship, it would be an act of double jeopardy,

punishing Israel twice for the same transgression, a principle contrary to

God's character. "Whatever you devise against the LORD, He will make a

complete end of it. Distress will not rise up twice" (Nahum 1:9). Israel was

punished by God for the rejection and crucifixion of His Son (Matt. 24,

Mark 13, and Luke 21). God ended Israel's judgment with the destruction

of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

"Silly-Putty" Exegesis

Placing a gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks of Daniel

9:24—27 "must be fixed" because of the system created by dispensationalists,

not because the Bible mentions anything about a gap. For an unintentionally

humorous illustration of the absurdity of the "gap" interpretation, see "Daniel and Revelation Compared," a chart designed and drawn by Clarence Larkin

and reproduced in George M. Marsden, Fundamentalism and American Culture.19

We should be reminded that dispensationalists claim to interpret the Bible

"literally." There is nothing literal about Larkin's interpretive illustration. In

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

333

fact, it demonstrates that dispensationalism does not abide by its interpre-

tive model. As with the time texts of Matthew 24:34 and Revelation 1:1,3,

dispensationalists force the Bible to comply to an already developed system

that insists that these events cannot be describing first-century events. The

system governs explicit texts.

Larkin's illustration of the "ten toes" of Daniel 2 shows the toes being

stretched like "Silly-Putty" over more than two thousand years of history.20

In similar fashion, Scripture must be "stretched" to make it fit the unbiblical

"parenthesis" theory of dispensational premillennialism.

An objection that is often raised by those who insist that a gap is neces-

sary to make sense of Daniel 9:24-27 is that the prophecy seems to predict

that Jerusalem would be destroyed in the seventieth week. As history attests,

Jerusalem was not destroyed until A.D. 70, nearly forty years after the end

of the final week. This means, according to dispensationalists, that a forty-

year gap is necessary to fulfill the content of the entire prophecy. This is a

curious objection coming from those who see no problem in inserting a two-

thousand-year gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks. Futurists

skip over the A.D. 70 destruction of Jerusalem and conclude that Daniel is

describing a future rebuilt temple.

If a gap is necessary to fulfill the content of the prophecy, could we not

assume that a forty-year gap is much more logical than a gap of indetermi-

nate length? Of course, a gap is not needed to make everything fit. More

importantly, there is nothing in Daniel 9:24—27 that even intimates that

a rebuilt temple is in view. All New Testament prophecies concerning the

temple have reference to the temple that was standing in Jesus' day, the

same temple that was destroyed in A.D. 70, John Lightfoot, in a sermon on

Revelation 20:1-2, concludes that "where Daniel ends John begins, and goes

no farther back, and where John begins Daniel ends, and goes no farther

forward. For Daniel sheweth the state and persecutors of the Church of the

Jews, from the building of Jerusalem by Cyrus, to the destruction of it by

Titus, and he goes no farther."21

The Final Seven Years

A careful reading of 9:27 will show that the destruction of Jerusalem

does not take place within the seventieth week. "Desolations are determined'

within the seventieth week (9:26). Disowning "the Holy and Righteous

334

LAST DAYS MADNESS

One," asking "for a murderer to be granted" to them, and putting "to death the Prince of life" (Acts 3:14-15) were what "determined" that the "city and sanctuary" would become desolate (Dan. 9:26).

Daniel is seeing this in the sixth century B.C., but it did not happen

until A.D. 70, when Titus and his Roman legions fulfilled this prophecy

exactly. The destruction of Jerusalem did not immediately follow Calvary,

but it was an event which was determined by the fact that the Jews rejected

Christ. It did not happen in the seventieth 'week', but was determined

in the seventieth 'week'. Our Lord made it clear, both in His Olivet

discourse and as He walked to the cross, that His rejection by the Jews

would mean the destruction of their city and temple (Matt. 23:34-24:38;

Luke 23:27-31).22

As the result of the Jews' rejection of Jesus, they would lose their in-

heritance. This would not occur for another forty years (Matt. 21:33-46;

22:1-14). Similarly, Jesus pronounced the temple "desolate" when He

walked out of it even though its destruction did not come for another

forty years (23:38). In principle, it was a "done deal" when He turned

His back on the temple. It is no wonder that Jesus described the temple

as "your house" (23:38). The temple's destruction was a consequence, a result, of the apostate Jews' rejection of Jesus (see 2 Sam. 13:32; Job 14:15; Isa.

10:22; Lam. 2:8; Luke 22:22).

We might be helped at this point by thinking back to Adam. He was

told that He would die on the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit. But

he did not literally drop down dead. That day he died spiritually, and his

physical death followed as a certain result. In the same way, Jerusalem's

destruction was made certain by the Jewish rejection of their Messiah,

but it was some little time before the certain event occurred. It did not

take place in the seventieth 'week', but was most surely part and parcel

of the events of that week.23

Another example will prove helpful. Nebuchadnezzar saw one statue depicting

four kingdoms. The entire statue was seen "all at the same time," but we know that the kingdoms followed one another in time. Each kingdom was overthrown

by the next kingdom. The kingdoms were not contemporaneous even though

Daniel's Seventy Weeks

335

they were shown together and destroyed with a single strike from the stone (Dan.

2:34—35). Judgment was determined when Daniel interpreted the dream even

though the destruction of each subsequent kingdom came hundreds of years later.

A judge will tell a convicted murderer: "It is the determination of this

court that you will hang by the neck until you are dead." The sentence is

determined on one day while the sentence may not be carried out until

some time in the future. In similar fashion, we are told that the destruction

of Jerusalem was "determined" within the seventy weeks while the sentence

was not carried out until forty years later.

336

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Anthony A. Hoekema, The Bible and the Future (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,

1979), 190.

2. Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Record: A Scientific and Devotional Commentary on

the Book of Beginnings (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1976), 76.

3. Clarence Larkin, Dispensational Truth or God's Plan and Purpose in the Ages

(Philadelphia, PA: Rev. Clarence Larkin Estate, 1920), 22-23.

4. Morris, Genesis Record, 76.

5. Leon J. Wood, Daniel: A Study Guide Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan,

1975), 39-40. Nebuchadnezzar saw one statue depicting four kingdoms. The

entire statue was seen "all at the

6. The dispensationalist wants us to believe that the "kings" of Daniel 2:44 refer to the ten toes, not to the four kings of gold, silver, bronze, and iron. The

toes are never referred to as kings or kingdoms.

7. J. Barton Payne, The Imminent Appearing of Christ ( Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,

1962), 148—49.

8. Philip Mauro, Seventy Weeks and the Great Tribulation (Swengel, PA: Reiner,

n.d.), 74.

9. Those who separate the seventieth week from the sixty-ninth week main-

tain that sacrifices and grain offerings did not stop (Dan. 9:27). From God's

covenantal and judicial perspective they did stop. Jesus put an end to them

through His shed blood. This is why He could cry out, "It is finished" (John

19:30). This is the message of the Book of Hebrews.

10. Philip Mauro, The Wonders of Bible Chronology (Swengel, PA: Reiner, 1970),

97.

11. E.W. Hengstenberg, Christology of the Old Testament and a Commentary on the

Messianic Predictions, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, [1872-76] 1956),

3:143.

12. Milton S. Terry, Biblical Apocalyptics: A Study of the Most Notable Revelations

of God and of Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, [1898] 1988),

201.

13. A.J. McClain, Daniel's Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks (Grand Rapids, MI: Zonder-

van, 1940), 9. Quoted in Hans K. LaRondelle, The Israel of God in Prophecy:

Principles of Prophetic Interpretation (Berrian Springs, MI: Andrews University

Press, 1983), 170.

14. Jacques Doukhan, "The Seventy Weeks of Dan. 9: An Exegetical Study,"

Daniel's Seventy Weeks 337

Andrews University Seminary Studies 17 (Spring 1979), 8. Quoted in J. Randall

Price, "Prophetic Postponement in Daniel 9 and Other Texts," Issues in Dis-

pensationalism, gen. eds. Wesley R. Willis and John R. Masters (Chicago, IL:

Mood Press, 1994), 148. Price does not follow this methodology.

15. Price, "Prophetic Postponement in Daniel 9 and Other Texts," 160.

16. Price, "Prophetic Postponement in Daniel 9 and Other Texts," 159.

17. Robert Duncan Culver, Daniel and the Latter Days (Chicago, IL: Moody Press,

1954), 150.

18. LaRondelle, The Israel of God in Prophecy, 173.

19. George M. Marsden, Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twen-

tieth-Century Evangelicalism: 1870-1925( New York: Oxford, 1980), 58-59.

20. Larkin, Dispensational Truth, 140—41. Larkin says that "what should happen between the 69 & 70 week[s] (the church dispensation) was not revealed to

Daniel." Neither was it revealed to anyone else in the Bible. Dispensationalism

is related, at least on this matter, to gnosticism—a special knowledge (gnosis)

is needed to understand the system. That special gnosis comes in the form of

notes found in the Scofield Reference Bible.

21. James Reid, Memoirs of the Lives and Writings ofthose Eminent Divines, who Convened in the Famous Assembly at Westminster in the Seventeenth Century (Paisley, England:

n.p., 1811), 64.

22. Stuart Olyott, Dare to Stand Alone (Welwyn, Hertfordshire, England: Evangeli-

cal Press, 1982), 125.

23. Olyott, Dare to Stand Alone, 125.

Chapter Twenty-Six

TODAY'S WORLD

IN PROPHECY

Ithought it was the end of the world." Cesar Jamorawon believed the

thunderous eruptions from Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in July of

1991 were a punishment from God. "I thought that this must be a punishment

from God because the world has forgotten Him. I have never experienced a

graver crisis than this in my life."1 From Jamorawon's perspective, the erup-

tion of Mount Pinatubo was a unique eschatological experience, but was it

a sign of coming prophetic events?

This was not the first eruption from the mouth of Mount Pinatubo. The

volatile mount had erupted in 1380. There is little doubt that those who

witnessed Pinatubo's fury more than six centuries ago expressed sentiments

like those of Cesar Jamorawon. A similar reaction was heard in Kobe, Japan,

in January 1995. Minoru Takasu "thought it was the end of the world"2

when a devastating earthquake struck. It wasn't the end of the world then,

and it's probably not a "sign" of the end of the world now.

Of course, we should see in events like earthquakes, volcanoes, famines,

and floods a reminder that God does respond to a world that "has forgot-

ten Him." John Wesley wrote of "The Cause and Cure of Earthquakes"

in 1750:

339

340

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Of all the judgments which the righteous God inflicts on sinners here,

the most dreadful and destructive is an earthquake. This he has lately

brought on our part of the earth, and thereby alarmed our fears, and bid

us "prepare to meet our God!" The shocks which have been felt in divers

places, since that which made this city tremble, may convince us that the

danger is not over, and ought to keep us still in awe; seeing "his anger is

not turned away, but his hand is stretched out still," Isa. x, 4.3

Wesley's assessment of earthquakes as an immediate judgment of God

is quite different from saying that such events should be tied to texts that

indicate the timing of a so-called rapture or the Second Coming. In 1756,

Gilbert Tennent observed that earthquakes were "extraordinary in respect

of number and dreadful Effects"4 in his day. He saw them as indicators that

"some extraordinary Revolutions [might] be near at Hand," not as signs of

the soon coming of Jesus. James West Davidson writes:

Ministers in 1755 as well as 1727, New Light as well as Old, accepted

the prevailing assumptions that earthquakes were naturally caused, that

they were inescapably meant as moral judgments, and that (most im-

portant) they were compatible with other moral judgments which God

accomplished by using human instruments. They saw natural disasters as

one proper part of the climax of history, not because of a preference for

any specific millennial chronologies (once again a wide range of opinion

appeared on that subject), but because catastrophes fell under the more

general category of moral judgment, which was a necessary part of ulti-

mate deliverance.5

"Perhaps because we are to such an extent 'strangers to the past,' we easily

read into the events and circumstances of our own day a distinctiveness and

uniqueness that may not actually be there."6 Much of the speculative nature

of today's Bible prophecy hysteria can be linked to "generational provin-

cialism," that is, the belief that nothing has prophetic significance unless it

happens to the present generation. Many who take this approach seem to be

unaware that wars, earthquakes, famines, and plagues have been a part of the

human condition since the Fall. At various crucial periods in human history,

God has used these phenomena as warnings of impending judgment or as

retribution for covenantal unfaithfulness (Num. 16:30, 32, 34; 26:10; Deut.

Todays World in Prophecy

341

11:6). Of course, not every earthquake or famine has such a special meaning.

Each occurrence, however, ought to serve as a reminder that we are sinners

and our world has been ravaged by the effects of rebellion (John 9:1-3).

Political tyranny and religious apostasy are not necessarily signs of impend-

ing eschatological destruction. They, too, have been with us since the Fall.

The light of the gospel was nearly extinguished as the church approached the

sixteenth century. Few could ever have predicted what was about to happen,

not only in terms of Christian revival but also in the explorer's spirit to open

passages to unknown worlds. Explorers fought the heaviness of pessimism

and charted dreams for parts unknown. How different is our day as we draw

near not only to a new century but also to a new Millennium?

At the end of the year 1492 most men in Western Europe felt exceed-

ingly gloomy about the future. Christian civilization appeared to be

shrinking in area and dividing into hostile units as its sphere contracted.

For over a century there had been no important advance in natural science,

and registration in the universities dwindled as the instruction they offered

became increasingly jejune and lifeless. Institutions were decaying, and

many intelligent men, for want of something better to do, were endeavor-

ing to escape the present through studying the pagan past.7

There is little in this chronicle of the times that could not serve as an

accurate description of our own era. A general societal pessimism fills

speculation about our future. Christian influence seems to be shrinking due

to infighting among rival Christian groups. A general malaise hovers over

the educational establishment. Educational reform is demanded from each

end of the political spectrum and from everyone in between because of a

deficient curriculum that cannot compete with our European and Japanese

economic rivals. Escape is in the air as many turn to paganism through

New Age humanism, the occult, and goddess worship. As in Columbus'

day, Islam is "expanding at the expense of Christendom."8

If, as the writer of Ecclesiastes writes, "there is nothing new under the

sun" (1:9), then how do we evaluate historical tumults prophetically? Five

hundred years ago many in Christendom believed that the end was near.

As we now know, their speculations were misguided. How can we now

discern when such "signs" are prophetic indicators since "a generation goes

and a generation comes" (1:4) but the end does not?

342

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Four Prophetic Keys

Many reasons could be put forth to explain why our Christian counterparts

of long ago were wrong about what they believed to be prophetic certain-

ties. The signs seemed to fit the times. How can we avoid their mistakes?

The following prophetic keys will help any interpreter unlock the door to

the prophetic past and the prophetic future:

• The first prophetic key is to recognize that prophetic themes are most

often set within established time frames. Failure to pay attention to

a time frame can lead a person to assume that his generation is the

generation experiencing the fulfillment when, in fact, the fulfillment

is in the past.

• The second prophetic key is to recognize that as far as history re-

cords, little is unique about our era when it comes to calamities like

plagues, earthquakes, and wars. This means that their contemporary

manifestation does not necessarily carry any prophetic importance.

In terms of a given time frame, the fulfillment of such prophecies is

more than likely past.

• The third prophetic key is to determine historical context. Before an in-

terpreter assumes a future fulfillment—if the time text is clear—he should

search events within the given time frame for possible fulfillment.

• The fourth prophetic key is to distinguish fulfillment from application.

There is much in Scripture that is fulfilled, but principles remain that

can be applied to any era.

Of course, there are other rules of interpretation that apply to texts where

prophecies are found as they would apply to Scripture in general. The four

just listed, however, are the most misunderstood and misapplied when

prophecy is the subject.

Todays World in Prophecy

343

Prophetic Key Number One:

Determining the Time Frame

One of the problems associated with interpreting prophecy is determin-

ing when a prophetic event is to take place. Many prophecies include time

parameters. Abraham's descendants were strangers in the land of Egypt where

they would be "enslaved and oppressed four hundred years" (Gen. 15:13).

This prophecy was fulfilled "to the very day" (Ex. 12:40).

Joseph was told of seven years of plenty and seven years of famine (Gen.

45:6). Times of famine and plenty that follow these two seven-year intervals

of time are irrelevant as a fulfillment of this prophecy.

Israel was to remain in the wilderness for forty years, a year for each day

that the spies spied out the land (Num. 14:33-34). Subsequent forty-year

periods of time are not a fulfillment of this prophecy.

Israel's captivity was seventy years in length, a year of captivity for each

year of sabbath rest violated (2 Chron. 36:21; Lev. 26:33). Based on this

certain timetable of God's binding word, Daniel prayed, petitioning God for

the restoration of Israel to the land. To Daniel's method of calculation, the

seventy years were nearing their completion (Dan. 9:2). Future seventy-year

blocks of time are not a fulfillment of this prophecy.

Exactly 490 years were to pass for Daniel's people and the Holy City

before the Messiah would appear (9:24). Those living in Jesus' day had

made the calculations and were expecting "Messiah the Prince" to appear

(9:25). The "magi from the east" were aware of the prophecy concerning

the coming of a great king. This is why an unusual stellar phenomenon led

them to Jerusalem to inquire about His birth (Matt. 2:1-2). It's possible that

Daniel's prophecy of the "seventy weeks of years" (490 years) was known

outside of Israel since Daniel was a ruler and wise man in Babylon (Dan.

2:46—49). Since Babylon was a center for trade and learning, Babylon's

"wisdom," including Daniel's true wisdom, was in all likelihood exported

with its commercial goods.

Simeon was "looking for the consolation of Israel" (Luke 2:25), as was

Anna (2:36-38). Israel was beset with false messiahs. They, too, had cal-

culated the time for His arrival and hoped to counterfeit His work (Acts

5:36—37). There was an anticipation of the "fullness of the time" (Gal. 4:4;

cf. Mark 1:15).

Those who futurize prophecies, that is, those who see their fulfillment

344

LAST DAYS MADNESS

beyond A.D. 70, also realize the importance of time texts. Hal Lindsey sees

Israel's becoming a nation again as a time indicator. He knows that a prophecy

without a time text is almost impossible to interpret. With the establishment

of the Jewish state in Israel in 1948, Lindsey believes "the whole prophetic

scenario began to fall together with dizzying speed."9 There is, however, little

justification for Lindsey's timing scenario. He understands the "budding" of

the fig tree in Matthew 24:32 to be a symbol of a restored national Israel.

This is why he interprets "this generation" as the generation alive when Israel

became a nation (1948-88). Nothing in Matthew 24:32 says anything about

Israel becoming a nation again. This idea must be read into the passage.

In addition, the New Testament is silent on the subject of Israel's restored

nationhood. The Old Testament prophecies of Israel's restoration had been

fulfilled in the return from the Babylonian captivity.10

We are back to determining what Jesus meant by the time text of "this

generation." As has been demonstrated, "this generation" always means the generation to whom Jesus was speaking. There are no exceptions! This can

only mean that the generation alive between A.D. 30 and 70 experienced

the events described by Jesus in Matthew 24:1-34. Israel may yet have a

role to play in prophecy, hut that role is not based on what Jesus said in Matthew

24 since He said nothing about Israel's becoming a nation again. This means all of

the events in Matthew 24:1-34 are fulfilled. Their meaning is associated

with a past generation, not some future generation. When we read of wars,

earthquakes, plagues, and famines in our generation, they are not prophetic

signs for our day.

Prophetic Key Number Two:

Evaluating the Historical Record

When the topic of the end times comes up in conversation, the usual first

piece of evidence given that our generation is indeed the "Rapture Genera-

tion" is the state of the world, both its moral character and natural calamities.

Nearly all prophetic writers point to the signs of wars, famines, plagues,

lawlessness, and earthquakes as prime indicators that the whole prophetic

scenario is beginning to fit together like some giant prophetic jigsaw puzzle.

Here's one example among many: "I am not predicting Christ's imminent

return in the year 2000. But we have sufficient evidence to substantiate that

Today's World in Prophecy

345

we are the 'Terminal Generation.' My personal conviction is that the deadly

dangers now rising in the curve of probability will require the Second Com-

ing of Christ before too long."11 But what about similar disasters, wars, and

seismic activity in the past? Is our generation unique? A look at plagues,

earthquakes, and wars over the centuries will show that these "signs" are

not unique to our age.

The Black Death

Ring around a rosie,

A pocket full of posies.

Ashes, ashes,

We all fall down.

A delightful nursery rhyme? Well, not quite. Its beginnings are rather

ominous. "Ring around a rosie" is a description of the not-so-delightful

Black Death, probably bubonic plague. The "ring" refers to the round, red

rash that is the first symptom of the disease. The practice of carrying flowers

and placing them around an infected person for protection is described in

the phrase, "a pocket full of posies." "Ashes" is an imitation of the sneezing sounds made by the infected person. "We all fall down" describes the many

deaths resulting from the disease.12

What is often forgotten by today's prophetic speculators is the horrendous

death toll of the Black Death of 1347-50. Europe was nearly decimated. Mil-

lions died. The estimated death toll throughout Europe was about 30 percent

of the population, or twenty-five million out of a population of about eighty

million. "Worldwide, the scholarly estimates ... remain little more than me-

dieval guesses: perhaps 75 million dead out of a total population of perhaps

500 million."13 Today's pestilence catastrophes, including the AIDS epidemic,

do not rival the Black Death, which has been described as the "most lethal

disaster of recorded history."14 The Black Death hit everyone.

Let's compare the Black Death with today's AIDS epidemic. At the time

when the Bubonic Plague swept through Europe, the world's population was

around 545 million. Estimates tell us that 70 million people died as a direct

or indirect result of the plague (12.8% of the population). If 100 million

people die from AIDS, out of today's population of 5 billion, this is only 2%

of the population. In order to compete with the Bubonic Plague, AIDS would

have to kill 640 million people (12.8% x 5,000,000,000 = 640,000,000).

346

LAST DAYS MADNESS

This calculation, however, is irrelevant in terms of the Olivet Discourse since

the events described therein were fulfilled prior to A.D. 70.

Numerous records exist of epidemics that preceded the frightful pneu-

monic/bubonic plagues that visited Europe in 1347. As early as 1331 the

epidemic broke out in Hopei Province in China, with reports that it killed

nine out of every ten people. Numerous other plagues have been recorded,

both before and after the Black Death. The bubonic plague, however, re-

mains unrivaled.

This information is lost on the average Christian, who views only today's

ills as important. When Hal Lindsey, for example, reads Jesus' words in Mat-

thew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, he is sure that "WE ARE THE GENERATION

HE WAS TALKING ABOUT!"15 Those who suffered through the "great dying"

of the fourteenth century thought they were the generation Jesus was talking

about. All the facts seemed to fit. Death, dying, and starvation were every-

where as Jesus foretold. But did Jesus have the fourteenth century in mind?

Many thought He did. Here is how one man described the era:

"O happy posterity, who ... will look upon our testimony as a fable,"

wrote Petrarch. The poet nonetheless felt that the events of "that dread-

ful year 1348" must be recorded for the very posterity that would not

believe the testimony. "Will posterity believe," he wrote from Parma in

the late spring of 1349, "that there was a time when, with no deluge from

heaven, no worldwide conflagration, no wars or other visible devastation,

not merely this or that territory but almost the whole earth was depopu-

lated? When was such a disaster ever seen, even heard of? In what records

can we read that houses were emptied, cities abandoned, countrysides

unfilled, fields heaped with corpses, and a vast, dreadful solitude over all

the world?"16

Their catastrophe was not a fulfillment of prophecy. Jesus had a different

era in mind when He uttered words describing plagues, famines, earthquakes,

and wars on the mount called Olivet. The disciples were to look for signs

within their generation, and they found them.

The Lisbon Earthquake

What about the Lisbon earthquake of 1755? Surely, if the Black Plague

was not a prelude to the end, Lisbon's encounter with the power of the earth

Todays World in Prophecy

347

and the "wrath of God" had to be a sign that the end was near. Had not Jesus

told His hearers that "there will be great earthquakes" (Luke 21:11)? "The

estimates of the death toll range from about 15,000 to more than 75,000.

Modern historians incline to believe that the correct figure is probably about

30,000, which would be more than ten percent of the city's population, the

equivalent of nearly a million in contemporary New York."17

Modern date setters do acknowledge past great earthquakes. But to make

our generation unique in the annals of Bible prophecy, those engaged in

predicting the time of the end assert that we should calculate th e frequency of

earthquakes. Again, the present must be seen as unusual to make the prophetic

system work. Hal Lindsey wrote: "There have been many great earthquakes

throughout history, but, according to surprisingly well-kept records, in the

past they did not occur very frequently. The 20th century, however, has

experienced an unprecedented increase in the frequency of these calamities.

In fact, the number of earthquakes per decade has roughly doubled in each

of the 10-year periods since 1950."18 No statistical evidence is offered.

In fact, Lindsey is wrong. There is nothing unique about the number of

earthquakes that the world is now experiencing. Certainly there are better

detection devices. These alone would make their occurrences seem more nu-

merous. In addition, because of a worldwide news network, communication

satellites, and instant news analysis, we read about even the slightest seismic

tremor in the morning paper.

The way some prophecy analysts talk, only a dozen or so major earth-

quakes have been recorded over the centuries. This is far from the truth.

The Roman writer Seneca, before his death in A.D. 65, stated that frequent

earthquakes had been a characteristic of the ancient world: "How often

have cities in Asia, how often in Achaia, been laid low by a single shock

of earthquake! How many towns in Syria, how many in Macedonia, have

been swallowed up! How often has this kind of devastation laid Cyprus in

ruins! How often has Paphos collapsed! Not infrequently are tidings brought

to us of the utter destruction of entire cities."19 Notice the date of Seneca's

writing—A.D. 65—just five years before the destruction of Jerusalem and

thirty-five years after Jesus' prophecy about earthquakes. After A.D. 70,

earthquakes no longer have the same prophetic significance.

Today's reported earthquakes are not unique, as proven by a thorough

study of history. The greatest student of earthquakes was a Frenchman,

Count F. Montessus de Ballore. From 1885 to 1922 he devoted his time to

studying and cataloging earthquakes and came to an astonishing conclusion.

He cataloged 171,434 earthquakes from the earliest historic times! "The

manuscript is stored in the library of the Geographical Society in Paris,

where it occupies 26 meters (over 84 feet) of bookshelves."20 As much as

we might want to believe that we are the "Rapture Generation," there is no

statistical or biblical evidence to support such a contention.

"Wars and Rumors of Wars"

No one doubts that in spite of the Pax Pomona, wars were prevalent

during the time leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. The

Jews were instigators in a number of revolts that led Rome to increase its

already iron grip on the nation. "The Jewish revolt against Rome was part

of a more widespread rebellion that spread all over the Roman Empire and

culminated in the year after Nero's death, A.D. 68-70, 'when Servius Galba,

consul for the second time with Titus Vinius as his colleague, began the year

that brought death to both and almost meant the downfall of Rome.'"21 In

fact, with the operation of the Roman Peace, any indication of war would

have brought to mind Jesus' prediction of "wars and rumors of wars" since

wars are not much of a sign during an era of wars. Based on the timing text

of Matthew 24:34, the sign regarding wars is over.

But can't a case be made that the many wars of this century and the mil-

lions killed are a prelude to some end-time event? Not in terms of Matthew

24 since the time text refers to the generation to whom Jesus was speaking.

Still, in comparing our century with previous centuries, there is little that

is unique. "After the Goths annihilated the imperial army at Adrianople in

378, Saint Ambrose of Milan, who clearly identified the Goths with Ezekiel's

Gog, proclaimed that 'the end of the world is coming upon us.'"22 The Thirty

Years' War (1618—48) involved ten nations. Experts estimate that thirty to

forty percent of the total German population—seven to eight million civil-

ians—died in the war. World War I was not as devastating for Germany.

The Manchu-Chinese war, which began with the invasion of the Manchus

(from Manchuria) in 1644, resulted in twenty-five million deaths—about

twice as many as were killed militarily in World War I. The War of the Span-

ish Succession (1701-14), a war involving ten European nations and their

colonies in other parts of the world, resulted in the death of over a million.

The famine which followed the war killed another million. The Napoleonic

Wars (1792-1815) were equally destructive. France lost two million people

in these wars. "The total death figure for the 23 years from 1792 to 1815

is set at 5 or 6 million!"23

The Taiping Rebellion (1850-64), described as "the most destructive war of

the entire 19 th century," resulted in the deaths of nearly thirty million. "The Lo-pez War (1864—1870), in which Paraguay fought against Argentina, Uruguay,

and Brazil, cost more than 2 million lives. The war 'reduced the Paraguayan

population from about 1,400,000 to some 221,000,' that is, by 84 percent!

The other three countries 'lost an estimated 1,000,000 men.'"24

World War II certainly was devastating in terms of the number killed and

the unleashing of two nuclear bombs. But considering all the wars that have

been fought over the centuries—over fourteen thousand with estimates of

over 3.6 billion killed—World War II just comes out as one war in a long

history of wars.25

The key to understanding Jesus' prophecy of "wars and rumors of wars"

in Matthew 24:6 is the time text that puts these words in perspective: The

wars Jesus was speaking of were wars that would occur within a forty-year

period after His crucifixion. With so many wars over the centuries, the text

could not possibly have any meaning unless it was limited by time. That

time is past.

350

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. Eileen Guerrero, "I thought this was the end of the world," Marietta Daily Journal (17 June 1991), 1 A.

2. '"The end of the world,'" Marietta Daily Journal (18 January 1995), 1A.

3. John Wesley, "The Cause and Cure of Earthquakes" (1750), Sermons on Several Occasions, 2 vols. (New York: Carlton & Phillips, 1853), 1:506.

4. Gilbert Tennent (1703—64) quoted in James West Davidson, The Logic of

Millennial Thought: Eighteenth-Century New England (New Haven, CT: Yale

University Press, 1977), 102.

5. Davidson, Logic of Millennial Thought, 97.

6. Carl Olof Jonsson and Wolfgang Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?

(Atlanta, GA: Commentary Press, 1987), x. This book is filled with statisti-

cal and historical information that easily refutes the notion that our era is

unique.

7. Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea: A Life of Christopher Columbus

(Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1942), 3.

8. Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea, 3.

9. Hal Lindsey, The Promise (New York: Bantam Books, [1982] 1984), 199.

10. William Hendriksen, Israel and the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House,

1968), 16-31.

11. W.S. McBirnie, 2000 AD!: Nine Years to Doomsday? (Glendale, CA: Voice of

Americanism, 1991), 12.

12. J. Allen Varasdi, Myth Information: An Extraordinary Collection of 590 Popular Mis-

conceptions, Fallacies, and Misbeliefs (New York: Ballantine, 1989), 205—206.

13. Otto Friedrich, The End of the World: A History (New York: Coward, McCann

and Geoghegan, 1982), 115.

14. Barbara Tuchman, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century (London:

1979), xiii. Quoted in Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 101.

15. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: West-

gate Press, 1980), 181.

16. Friedrich, End of the World, 115-16.

17. Friedrich, End of the World, 188.

18. Lindsey, The 1980s, 30.

19. Seneca Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, trans. Richard M. Gummere, vol. 2

(London: 1920), 437. Quoted in Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last

Days—When?, 75.

Today's World in Prophecy

351

20. Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 78.

21. Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 127 note 9.

22. Friedrich, End of the World, 27.

23. Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 147.

24. Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 147.

25. Jonsson and Herbst, The "Sign" of the Last Days—When?, 152-56.

Chapter Twenty-Seven

MYSTERY BABYLON

This report is written with much trepidation and with the realization

that what I say may be mistaken as dogmatic assertions or prophetic

utterances. Therefore, I must stress that those parts that constitute opinion

are based on knowledge gleaned from years of study both in Scripture and

historical records."1 This author has done what dozens of writers had done

before him, "gleaned from years of study both in Scripture and historical

records" and come to the conclusion that the end must be near. Like others

before him he assumed that the prophecies he was studying had not been

fulfilled. He evaluated the conditions of modern nations and peoples by

prophecies made long ago to empires that no longer exist.

Inevitably, the above writer's suppositions were wrong. Just one month

after making some rather specific prophetic statements, he had to write an-

other letter stating that he had jumped the prophetic gun. "Of course," he

explains, "my prophetic scenario was predicated upon the possibility that this

conflict could be the beginning of the end for the United States as the major

economic and military might in the world. It wasn't an iron-clad prophecy

or even a prediction. Even so, many people took it that way."

The problem is just that: Many people take such speculation as near certainty

and structure their lives based on these prophetic "possibilities." Each news

report is studied through the prophetic pronouncements of the latest biblical

353

354

LAST DAYS MADNESS

soothsayer. Gullible Christians are eager to believe the scenarios described by

men and women who are "sure" about their predictions since they are thought

to be "prophecy experts." Consider the following descriptions of Russia's role

in prophecy over the years. Pay close attention to the dates.

• "The time cannot be far off when Russia's millions, augmented by

the armies that she will gather from these and other nations, will be

thrown by their rulers into Palestine in order to destroy the nation

of the jews [1916]."2

• "Russia is going to war with Palestine. That is coming.... There is where

we are to-day. Therefore, we may expect very shortly that this conflict

will take place [1928]."3

•"It is entirely possible that World War III will start in ninety days

[1948]."4

• "Before Russia attacks Israel, however, it will first invade Iran, or Per-

sia, as it is called in Ezekiel chapter 38, verse five. When we apply this

prophecy to modern times, it becomes obvious that the Soviets will

use their recent conquest of Afghanistan as a springboard to overthrow

Iran and gain control of the Persian Gulf area [1980]."5 Since Lindsey's

prophetic conjecture, the former Soviet Union pulled out of Afghanistan,

joined the United States in the defense of Kuwait and Israel in Desert

Storm, and remains a third-rate world power.

• "Russia, who has been able to rebuild its economy and maintain its

military strength through abstinence from the [Gulf] war, will eventually

perceive that the only thing preventing its conquest of the world will

be Israel and the European Community. It will attack Israel and the EC

forces and be destroyed in its attempt at conquest [January 1991]."6

Europe, Russia, and Israel have played prominent roles in speculative

prophetic declarations since World War I. Out of Europe, we are assured,

Antichrist will arise to act as a unifier and peacemaker. Russia, the "Rosh"

of Ezekiel 38 and 39, will gather its troops and attack Israel. Of course,

Israel plays the prominent role as two-thirds of those living in their ancient

homeland will be slaughtered by descending Gentile hordes.7

While this scenario is interesting and makes for fascinating reading, we

must ask a fundamental question: Is it biblical? Bible experts have been

Mystery Babylon

355

involved in solving the prophetic puzzle for some time. Since World War I

prophetic speculation has increased at a frenzied pace. Are today's prophetic

declarations any more accurate? Can we find biblical and historical evidence

that their timing is off?

Many so-called "predictions" are nothing more than the projection of

already existing geopolitical trends that are then read back into Scripture to

fabricate biblical support. When an ancient prophecy does not seem to fit

our era—the depiction of bows and arrows instead of machine guns, for ex-

ample—we are informed that "it was not possible for [a prophet] to describe

modern weapons since he lived at a time when such inventions were beyond

anyone's imagination."8 They were not beyond God's imagination. Prophets,

as "men moved by the Holy Spirit," speak "from God" (2 Peter 1:21). Modern weapons are not depicted because modern weapons are not intended.

Other futurists believe that Peter's prophecy in 2 Peter 3:10 refers to

nuclear war—certainly a description of a "modern weapon." Ed Hindson tries

to make the case that, "Peter's prophecy of a great end-times conflagration

of the earth and its atmosphere uses precise terminology which accurately

describes a nuclear explosion."9 John Phillips also supports this view: "Peter

described in accurate terms the untying of the atom and the resulting rush-

ing, fiery destruction which follows it."10

The futurists cannot have it both ways. This supposed future war is go-

ing to be fought with either ancient weapons or highly modern weapons.

These prophets are describing events that were to happen in their future,

events that are history for us.

Prophetic Key Number Three:

The Historical Context

Just as earthquakes, plagues, and wars are interpreted to justify an ava-

lanche of prophetic sagas predicting an imminent Rapture or some other

end-time event, today's geopolitical affairs are "analyzed" to sanction the

belief that time is running out for the "late great planet earth" and that ours

is the "terminal generation." Prophecies concerning ancient civilizations are

applied to modern political territories. For example, modern Rome and Iraq

are supposedly reincarnations of first-century Roman despotism (headed by

the Pope) and pre-Christian dictatorial Babylon (headed by Saddam Hussein).

356

LAST DAYS MADNESS

In addition, events in Europe are supposedly the outworking of prophecies

that were never entirely fulfilled (a revived Roman Empire). Saddam Hussein's

Iraq, because it is located in the area once occupied by Nebuchadnezzar's

Babylon, must be a further fulfillment of prophetic pronouncements that

are centuries old but are said to have remained dormant until the "fullness

of time," that is, our time.

Babylon (Iraq) in Prophecy

When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, a great deal of speculation

arose concerning Iraq's role as a modern Babylon, supposedly a fulfillment of

prophecies made centuries ago. Were the military actions of Saddam Hussein

a long overdue culmination of prophecies set forth in the Book of Isaiah

hundreds of years before Jesus was born? There were some who thought so.

Charles Dyer, in The Rise of Babylon: Sign of the End Times, claimed that events

depicted in Isaiah 13 were being fulfilled with the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

He stated, '"The day of the Lord' described by Isaiah [in 13:6] refers to the

tribulation period that is still to come. Babylon's destruction will come in

the time of the tribulation—a short period of time just before the second

coming of Christ."11 Is this possible? No. Dyer's interpretation is based upon

"gap theology," that is, an indeterminable period of time is placed between

the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks found in Daniel 9:24—27, a gap nearly

two thousand years in length. Dyer's "time of the tribulation" (the sevenyear

tribulation period following a supposed pre-tribulational "rapture") is Daniel's

seventieth week. This highly questionable interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27

immediately makes his Babylonian scenario suspect.

There are additional reasons to reject Dyer's thesis. Isaiah 13:6 clearly

states that "the day of the LORD is near? Dispensationalists—who insist on

a literal interpretation of Scripture—do not understand "near" to mean "near"

as in "soon." The plain meaning of the text is thrown out the window to

justify a system of theology that demands a futurist interpretation. Dyer, as

a dispensationalist, alleges that the "day of the Lord" always has reference to the end times, specifically an interval called the Great Tribulation that

is in the distant future. This is impossible since Isaiah states that Babylon's

judgment is "near." If "near" means something other than "close at hand,"

then it does not mean anything.

The "day of the LORD" often refers to a time of judgment without refer-

ring to the final judgment. It is the "day of the LORD" any time God acts.

Mystery Babylon 337

357

In fact, Sunday, our day of worship, is called "the Lord's day" (Rev. 1:10) or

"the day of the Lord." This is why it is important to pay attention to time

indicators when determining when prophetic events take place. The Bible

gives us a number of occasions when the "day of the LORD" was "near"

for those hearing or reading the prophecy (Obad. 15; Isa. 34:5, 8; Ezek.

30:2-11; Zeph. 1:4, 7, 14).

The day of judgment was certainly near for Babylon in Isaiah's day:

"Behold, the day of the LORD is coming.... And her days will not be

prolonged" (Isa. 13:9, 22). The passage even tells us who God used to

mete out His judgment: "Behold, I am going to stir up the Medes against

them..." (13:17). We know that Babylon was conquered by the kingdom

of silver—the Medes and Persians—during Israel's exile in Babylon (Dan.

2). The "day of the LORD" came during Belshazzar's feast: "That same night

Belshazzar the Chaldean king was slain. So Darius the Mede received the

kingdom at about the age of sixty-two" (Dan. 5:30-31).

In time the kingdom of bronze (Greece) conquered the Medes and Per-

sians, and the kingdom of iron (Rome) conquered the Greeks. God's king-

dom—the kingdom of stone cut without hands that became a mountain

and filled the earth (2:44—45)—defeated all these kingdoms. This same

Kingdom rolls over all earthly kingdoms that oppose the only legitimate

Kingdom, God's kingdom (Psalm 2; Matt. 25:31-32).

But what of Saddam Hussein's reconstruction of the ancient city of

Babylon? Hussein's building of ancient Babylon "was designed to attract

tourists. Like the Shah's celebrations at Persepolis, this was a measure of

understandable if chauvinistic nationalism rather than an aspiration to im-

perialism. If anything from the past inspired Hussein it was the glorious

role of Baghdad in the Abbasid era (A.D. 749-1258)."12 Mimicking the

past does not fulfill prophecy.

John F. Walvoord believes "Saddam Hussein's ambition to destroy Israel

motivated his move into Kuwait in August of 1990 as he attempted to set

up a power base from which to attack Israel."13 Walvoord's conclusions are

colored by an interpretative system that forces him to see every contemporary

event as some fulfillment of some yet to be fulfilled prophecy with Israel as

the interpretative key. There are a number of problems with his position. First,

the attacks on Israel were not made until after the allied forces threatened

to force Saddam out of Kuwait. The Iraqis used Israel as a trump card. By

attacking Israel, Saddam hoped to force Israel to go on the offensive. Sad-

358

LAST DAYS MADNESS

dam believed that once this happened the Arab part of the coalition would

break away and join with him against the Western aggressors and Israel.

Israel was not a consideration until Saddam realized he was backed into a

military corner from which he had no chance of escaping.

Second, Saddam Hussein did not need Kuwait as a "power base from

which to attack Israel." Iraq is much closer to Israel than Kuwait. The Scud

missiles were launched from western Iraq, not from Kuwait.

Third, Hussein's invasion of Kuwait was motivated by ancient territorial

disputes and economic factors. While some may want to read prophetic

significance into his military venture, there is no justification for doing so.

Fourth, Saddam's "Babylonian" empire is now in shambles. This seems

to support the secondary application—not fulfillment—of Bible prophecy:

Saddam was judged like ancient Babylon and Rome. Any attempt to rebuild

Babylon will be met with destruction (Isa. 13:20).

Should we expect a reconstituted Babylon in the future based upon

events described in the Book of Revelation? Is Revelation's Babylon the

same as the Babylon of the Old Testament? Are "Sodom and Egypt" (Rev.

11:8) and "Jezebel" (2:20) in the Book of Revelation further fulfillments

of ancient prophecies? Not at all. This is a type of interpretive shorthand

that has been used before: "They display their sin like Sodom" (Isa. 3:9;

also 1:9-10). Babylon, as depicted in the Book of Revelation, has been

interpreted in a number of ways: as a designation for first-century Rome,

as a revived Roman empire comprising a ten-nation common market, as a

literal revived Babylon, or as first-century Jerusalem.14 Since the Book of

Revelation was written around A.D. 66, we should be looking for a first-

century application, either Rome or Jerusalem.15 By going back to the first

prophetic key—determining the time frame from the time texts—we can

dismiss the distant futurist interpretations as untenable. Revelation tells us

when the events prophesied will be fulfilled:

• The events "must shortly take place" (1:1).

• "For the time is near" (1:3).

•"I am coming to you quickly"(2:16).

•"I am coming quickly"(3:11).

•"The third woe is coming quickly"(11:14).

Mystery Babylon

359

•"The things which must shortly take place" (22:6).

• "Behold, I am coming quickly" (22:7).

•"For the time is near"(22:10).

•"Behold, I am coming quickly" (22:12).

•"Yes, I am coming quickly" (22:20).

With the time frame established, our next step is to examine the histori-

cal context (the third key) using Scripture to interpret Scripture. Jerusalem

and Babylon are both called "the great city" (Rev. 14:8; 11:8). The Harlot

(Babylon) is "drunk with the blood of the saints" (17:6). Compare this with

Matthew 23:34-36 where Jesus states that "all the righteous blood shed on

earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son

of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar" will be

charged against the generation of Jews who rejected Him and spurned the

Holy Spirit. The same theme is elsewhere used to describe Babylon: "And in

her [Babylon] was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who

have been slain on the earth" (Rev. 18:24). The Book of Acts confirms this

testimony (Acts 7:51-52). Therefore, there is little doubt that the Babylon

of Revelation is the first-century city of Jerusalem.

Jerusalem is also given pagan names designed to describe her treachery and

apostasy. Jerusalem, the place where "their Lord was crucified" (Rev. 11:8), is

"the great city which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt." Babylon is also

described as "the great city" (14:8 and 17:5). Throughout the Bible when

Israel is unfaithful, she is characterized as a "harlot" (Ezekiel 16). "Rome

could not fornicate against God, for only Jerusalem was God's wife (Rev.

17:2-5, cp. Isa. 1:20; Jer. 31:31)."16 In addition, "there is an obvious contrast

between the Harlot and the chaste bride (cp. Rev. 17:25 with Rev. 21:1ff.)

that suggests a contrast with the Jerusalem below and the Jerusalem above

(Rev. 21:2; cp. Gal. 4:24ff.; Heb. 12:18ff.). The fact that the Harlot is seated

on the seven-headed Beast (obviously representative of Rome) indicates not

identity with Rome, but alliance with Rome against Christianity."17 Israel's

collaboration with Rome against Jesus in the first century is quite evident

in John 18:28-32, 19:12-15, and Acts 17:7.

From this evidence we can conclude that the prophecies concerning

Babylon of the Old Testament are fulfilled. The Babylon of Revelation is

360

LAST DAYS MADNESS

used "mystically" (Rev. 11:8) to refer to an apostate Israel of the first century.

The traits of pagan Babylon are used to describe first-century Jerusalem, just

as Old-Testament Jerusalem in rebellion shared the traits of Egypt (Ezek.

23:3, 8, 19, 28) and Sodom (Isa. 1:9-10; 3:9).

Mystery Babylon

361

Notes

1. Albert James Dager, "The Gulf Crisis: The Beginning of the End for America?"

Media Spotlight: A Biblical Analysis of Religious and Secular Media (January 1991), 1.

2. Arno C. Gaebelein, Our Hope XXIII (August 1916), 110. Quoted in Dwight

Wilson, Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and Israel Since

1917 (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, [1977] 1991), 36.

3. F.E. Howitt, "Israel and Other Lands in Prophecy," The Pentecostal Evangel ( 10

March 1928), 2-3. Quoted in Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 79.

4. The Pentecostal Evangel (27 March 1948), 8. Quoted in Wilson, Armageddon

Now!, 155.

5. Hal Lindsey, The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon (King of Prussia, PA: West-

gate Press, 1980), 73-74.

6. Dager, "The Gulf Crisis," L By 1998, Russia's economy was in shambles.

7. "The purge of Israel in their time of trouble is described by Zechariah in these

words: 'And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith Jehovah, two parts

therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein. And I will

bring the third part into the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined,

and will try them as gold is tried' (Zech. 13:8, 9). According to Zechariah's

prophecy, two thirds of the children of Israel in the land will perish, but the one third that is left will be refined and be awaiting the deliverance of God at the

second coming of Christ which is described in the next chapter of Zechariah"

(John E Walvoord, Israel in Prophecy [Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Academie,

1962], 108).

8. Erwin W. Lutzer, Coming to Grips with the Role of Europe in Prophecy (Chicago:

Moody Press, 1990), 31.

9. Ed Hindson, End Times, the Middle East, and the New World Order: How to Make

Sense of World Events in Light of Bible Prophe c y (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1991), 90.

10. John Phillips, Only God Can Prophesy! (Wheaten, IL: Harold Shaw, 1975),

111-12. Quoted in Hindson, End Times, the Middle East, and the New World

Order, 90.

11. Charles H. Dyer, The Rise of Babylon: Sign of the End Times (Wheaton, IL: Tyn-

dale, 1991), 19.

12. Edwin Yamauchi, "Updating the Armageddon Calendar," Christianity Today

(29 April 1991), 51.

13. Quoted in Yamauchi, "Updating the Armageddon Calendar," Christianity Today, 51.

362

LAST DAYS MADNESS

14. Joseph R. Balyeat, Babylon: The Great City of Revelation (Sevierville, TN: Onward, 1991).

15. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation, 2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1999).

16. Gentry, Be fore Jerusalem Fell; 241 note 26.

17. Gentry, Before Jerusalem Fell, 241.

Chapter Twenty-Eight

ROSHING TO

JUDGMENT

In The Edge of Time: The Final Countdown Has Begun, Patti and Paul Lalonde

write that "Bible scholars agree that 'Gog,' also described as the 'prince

of Rosh,' is the leader of what is modern-day Russia."1 Bible scholars do

not agree, but this does not phase the Lalondes. They refuse to consider the

overwhelming contrary opinions of noted Christian scholars and continue

to mislead their readers. Here's how it works. In Ezekiel 38:2 and 39:1,

the Hebrew word rosh is translated as if it were the name of a nation. That

nation is thought to be modern Russia because rosh sounds like Russia. In

addition, Meshech (38:2) is said to sound like Moscow, and Tubal (38:2) is

similar to the name of one of the prominent Asiatic provinces of Russia, the

province of Tobolsk. Edwin M. Yamauchi, noted Christian historian and

archeologist, writes that rosh "can have nothing to do with modern 'Russia,"'

and "all informed references and studies acknowledge that the association

with Moscow and Tobolsk is untenable."2

Timothy J. Dailey writes in The Gathering Storm that the belief that Ezekiel

38 and 39 describe a "Russian-led invasion of the Middle East" is "so com-

monly held as to be almost taken for granted.... So ingrained is this theory

that books on biblical prophecy have assumed routinely over the years that

363

364

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Rosh equals Russian was beyond doubt. Without discussing the evidence,

for example, John F. Walvoord concludes that the description in Ezekiel

38 and 39 'could only refer to what we know today as Russia.'3 What is

the evidence for this commonly held belief? In truth, the Russian invasion

theory rests upon scanty foundations indeed."4

How should we understand the use of rosh in Ezekiel 38-39? Is it really a

cryptic designation for modern Russia? Not if you know a little Hebrew. "Rosh

in Hebrew means 'head' or 'chief'; Russia comes from Rus, a Scandinavian

word that was introduced into Ukraine in the Middle Ages. Meshech and

Tubal are attested in cuneiform texts as Mushku and Tabal, areas in central

and eastern Turkey."5

North by Northeast

The belief that the Hebrew rosh is a prophetic reference to modern-day

Russia has been popularized by the old Scofield Reference Bible. This view,

however, did not begin with Scofield. "Dr. John Cumming, writing in 1864,

said, 'This king of the North I conceive to be the autocrat of Russia. . . .

That Russia occupies a place, and a very momentous place, in the prophetic

world has been admitted by almost all expositors.'"6 While it is true that

Russia is north of Israel, it is also true that the Bible often uses north as a

designation for a geographical area that includes the northeast. For example,

Babylon was east of Israel, but Jeremiah 4:6 warns that the disaster comes

"from the north" (Jer. 1:13-15; 3:18; 6:1, 22; 10:22; Zech. 2:6-7). The

same is true for the Assyrians (Zeph. 2:13) and Persians (Isa. 41:25; Jer.

50:3). Is the Bible in error? Not at all. "From the perspective of the Holy

Land, the invaders came down from the north, even if their place of origin

was actually to the east. Ezekiel is giving the direction of the invasion, not

the place of the invader's origin."7

Not So Fast

Scofield says, with the Lalondes supporting his errant conclusion, that

"all agree" that Russia is designated here. Certainly some expositors hold this view, but many more do not. Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg writes that "the

poor Russians have been here very unjustly arranged among the enemies of

God's people. Rosh, as the name of a people, does not occur in all the Old

Testament."8 More recent commentators are beginning to reject the Rosh

equals Russia hypothesis:

Roshing to Judgment

365

There is no evidence from the ancient Near East that a country named

Rosh ever existed. Some would understand rosh as modern Russia. Pro-

ponents of this view usually appeal to etymology based on similar sounds

(to the hearing) between two words. Such etymological procedures are not

linguistically sound, nor is etymology alone a sound hermeneutical basis on

which to interpret a word. The word "Russia" is a late eleventh-century A.D.

term. Therefore, the data does [sic] not seem to support an interpretation

of rosh as a proper name of a geographical region or country.9

The best translation of Ezekiel 38:2 is "the chief (head) prince of Meshech

and Tubal," since Meshech and Tubal are normally connected (Gen. 10:2;

1 Chron. 1:5; Ezek. 27:13; 32:26). Even dispensational scholars are begin-

ning to admit that rosh does not refer to Russia. Charles Ryrie even takes

issue with the New American Standard translation of Ezekiel 38:2 when he

writes: "The prince of Rosh (better, 'the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal'),

the area of modern Turkey."10

Those dispensational scholars who admit that rosh does not refer to

Russia, still maintain that Ezekiel 38-39 describes a battle that takes place

during a future "Great Tribulation." Three reasons are given: "(1) Some of

the countries named by Ezekiel were located in what is now Russia. (2) The

armies are said to come 'from the far north' (Ezek. 38:6,15; 39:2).... (3) Eze-

kiel spoke of a coalition of several nations, many of whom are today aligned

with or under the influence of the Soviet Union. These include Iran ('Persia'),

Sudan and northern Ethiopia ('Cush'), Libya ('Put'), and Turkey ('Meshech,'

'Tubal,' 'Gomer,' and 'Beth Togarmah'). All these nations (see 38:2-3, 5-6),

possibly led by the Soviet Union, will unite to attack Israel."11

There is little in these three reasons to mandate that modern Russia is the

leader of a confederation of nations to come against Israel.12 The nations

then located in the area that is now Turkey, Syria, northern Iran and Iraq,

and western Russia were nations when Persia and Greece were in power

in the second century B.C. In terms of Israel's location, these land masses

constituted the "far north." An area between the Black and Caspian Seas

was certainly far north in terms of Israel's location. "It may be surprising to

learn that, in many cases, the geographical references to north in the Bible

actually refer to the east. The Book of Jeremiah warns repeatedly of a coming

invasion: 'Raise the signal to go to Zion! Flee for safety without delay! For

I am bringing disaster from the north, even terrible destruction' (Jeremiah

366

LAST DAYS MADNESS

4:6)."13 This passage is a reference to the Babylonian invasion that resulted

in the downfall of the kingdom of Judah in 586 B.C. Babylon was more east

than north. A study of similar passages will indicate similar geographical

orientation (Jer. 1:14-15; 3:18; 6:1, 22; 10; 22; 46:24; Ezek. 26:7; Zeph.

2:13). Even Zion is called "the far north" (Psalm 48:2; cf. Isa. 14:13).

The third reason offered above proves that ancient peoples are indicated

since their ancient names are given. If rosh is a prophetic name for Russia

because it sounds like Russia, then why don't the other nations sound like

their modern counterparts?

The most damaging piece of evidence to the theory that Ezekiel 38 and

39 refer to modern Russia's invasion of Israel during the Great Tribulation

is that there is no mention of Gog and Magog or Meshech and Tubal in

Revelation 4—19, yet this passage is where dispensationalists tell us the

Great Tribulation is described. Revelation 20:8 describes the battle of Gog

and Magog as coming after the thousand years. Moreover, its characteristics

are quite different from the Ezekiel battle. This means, like "Jezebel" (Rev.

2:20), "Sodom and Egypt" (11:8), and "Babylon" (14:8), the Battle of Gog and Magog is characteristic of an Old Testament event, but it is not the same

event! One is past (Ezek. 38-39); the other is future— after the "thousand years" (Rev. 20:8).

Is it true that this battle will take place after the people of Israel come

back to their land in the "latter years" (Ezek. 38:8), in the "last days" (38:16)?

First, as we saw above, there is no mention of a battle with "Gog and Magog"

during the so-called Great Tribulation period. Second, the phrase "in the

latter days" does not refer to events at the end of the world but simply to

future events. In Hebrew there is no word for "in the future." Moses warned

Israel that evil will befall the nation "in the latter days" (Deut. 31:29). When

did this happen? Judges 2:20 tells us that "the anger of the LORD burned

against Israel ... 'Because this nation has transgressed My covenant which

I commanded their fathers.'" Therefore, Deuteronomy 31:29 was fulfilled

in Judges 2:20.

In Jeremiah 30 many judgments were pronounced upon Israel. They

were to be realized in the "latter days" (30:24). We know that Israel suffered

greatly under the Babylonian captivity, which took place in the "latter days"

of which God spoke. But we also know that Israel was restored seventy years

after the captivity began (Jer. 29:10; Dan. 9:2). "The fortunes of Moab"

were to be restored "in the latter days," that is, "in the future" (Jer. 48:47).

Roshing to Judgment

367

The fortunes of Elam were to be restored "in the last days" (49:39). The

New International Version translates Jeremiah 48:47 and 49:39 as "in days

to come." There is no reason to suppose that these passages are predicting

events thousands of years in the future.

But doesn't Ezekiel 38:8 predict that Israel will be "gathered from many

nations"? The futurists teach that Israel was scattered among many nations

only after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and will be regathered

from the nations in the years before the "Great Tribulation" which is still

future. This is not what Scripture teaches. In Ezekiel 12:15 we are told that

God scattered Israel "among the nations" (see 6:6-9). In Jeremiah 29:14

we are told that God will restore the fortunes of Israel and will gather them

"from all the nations." When was this gathering "from all the nations" to be accomplished? "When seventy years have been completed" 0er. 29:10), that

is, after the Babylonian captivity.

Wooden Rifles?

The context of these two chapters makes it clear that the battle is an

ancient one. All the soldiers are riding horses (Ezek. 38:15).14 These horse

soldiers are "wielding swords" (38:4) and carrying "bows and arrows, war

clubs and spears" (39:9). The weapons are made of wood (39:10). Dispen-

sationalists, who insist on literalism and a distant future battle, speculate that

"this warfare will revert to use of old-fashioned weapons.... To maintain a

forced literalism, some go beyond common sense and what the text actually

requires: "The Russians have perfected an actual wooden rifle. They have

compressed wood until it is harder than steel, but lighter to carry.15 It is still

combustible. The Germans used some wooden bullets during World War

II; they were cheaper to make and had the desired effect."16 The weapons

of choice are swords, bows and arrows, and spears, indicators of an ancient

battle in a pre-industrial age. It is amazing to read what some people will

do to make this obvious ancient battle fit a modern context. In 1940, Harry

Rimmer claimed that Russia would use wooden weapons because lasers

would make metal weaponry inoperable in the future. Rimmer wrote: "The

weirdest and most conclusive evidence that we are faced with in a foretell-

ing of events yet to occur is the startling statement that this raiding army is

armed only with wooden weapons!" Weird indeed.17

368

LAST DAYS MADNESS

For Such a Time as This

If this battle is no longer a future event, then when and where in biblical

history did this conflict take place? Instead of looking to the distant future,

James B. Jordan believes that "it is in Esther that we see a conspiracy to

plunder the Jews, which backfires with the result that the Jews plundered

their enemies. This event is then ceremonially sealed with the institution of

the annual Feast of Purim."18 Jordan continues by establishing the context

for Ezekiel 38-39:

Ezekiel 34 states that God will act as Good Shepherd to Israel, and

will bring them back into the land. He continues this theme in Ezekiel

36, saying that God will make a new covenant with Israel. The inaugura-

tion of this new covenant, which we can call the Restoration Covenant,

is described in Zechariah 3, where God removes the filth from Joshua

the High Priest and restores the Temple and Priesthood. . . . Ezekiel

continues in Ezekiel 37 with the vision of the valley of dry bones. The

Spirit of God would be given a greater measure than before (though of

course not as great as at Pentecost in Acts 2), and the result would be

restoration of the people. No longer would there be a cultural division

between Judah and Ephraim, but all would be together as a new people.

... At this point, Ezekiel describes the attack of Gog, Prince of Magog,

and his confederates. Ezekiel states that people from all over the world

attack God's people, who are pictured dwelling at peace in the land.

God's people will completely defeat them, however, and the spoils will

be immense. The result is that all nations will see the victory, and "the

house of Israel will know that I am the Lord their God from that day

onward" (Ezek. 39:21-23). . . . Chronologically this all fits very nicely.

The events of Esther took place during the reign of Darius, after the initial

rebuilding of the Temple under Joshua [the High Priest] and Zerubbabel

and shortly before rebuilding of the walls by Nehemiah. . . . Thus, the

interpretive hypothesis I am suggesting (until someone shoots it down) is

this: Ezekiel 34-37 describes the first return of the exiles under Zerub-

babel, and implies the initial rebuilding of the physical Temple. Ezekiel

38-39 describes the attack of Gog (Haman) and his confederates against

the Jews. Finally, Ezekiel 40-48 describes in figurative language the situ-

ation as a result of the work of Nehemiah.19

The slaughter of Israel's enemies in Ezekiel 39 fits with the number of

Roshing to Judgment

369

deaths listed in Esther 9:16 (75,000). In Esther 9:5 we read that "the Jews

struck all their enemies with the sword, killing and destroying." Ezekiel

38:5-6 tells us that Israel's enemies come from "Persia, Ethiopia [lit., Cush], and... from the remote parts of the north...," all within the boundaries of

the Persian Empire of Esther's day. From Esther we learn that the Persian

Empire "extended from India to Ethiopia [lit., Cush], 127 provinces..." in all (Esther 8:9). "In other words, the explicit idea that the Jews were attacked

by people from all the provinces of Persia is in both passages."20 The paral-

lels are unmistakable.

Revising the Future

The breakup of the Soviet Empire has led some to discard the Rosh=Russia

idea. Pat Robertson thought, like most futurists before him, "that the references

in the prophetic writings to the nations of the North referred to the Soviet

Union." He has since changed his views: "Now I have begun to believe it is

more likely the Muslim republics—such as Kazakhistan, Tadzikhistan, Uz-

bekistan, and Azerbaijan."21 This is a major revision. It is today's newspapers,

however, not biblical exegesis, that bring about these revisions.

Europe in Prophecy

Next to seeing modern Russia attacking Israel in Ezekiel 38 and 39 during

the "Great Tribulation," the second most talked-about prophetic scenario is

that the establishment of a ten-nation European Common Market will be a

fulfillment of Bible prophecy. This "United States of Europe," or European

Economic Community (EEC), is to be ruled by a coming "antichrist" who

is "alive somewhere in the world today."22 According to Hal Lindsey, Dave

Hunt, John F. Walvoord, and many others who write on prophecy, this

"United States of Europe" constitutes a revived Roman Empire.

The idea of a newly confederated group of nations is based, for some,

on the "ten toes" of Daniel 2:41—42 (the toes, however, are never referred

to as kings), the "ten horns" and "ten kings" of Daniel 7:7, 20, 24, and the

"ten horns" and "ten kings" of Revelation 13:1; 17:3, 7, 12, 16. These passages are futurized well beyond their historical time frame and catapulted

into the distant future where they still await fulfillment. This is all done by

inserting a gap of indeterminable time between the sixty-ninth and seven-

tieth weeks of Daniel 9:24—27. As has been pointed out, there is no biblical

370

LAST DAYS MADNESS

reason for inserting this mythical gap between these two sets of "years. "The sequence of years are a unit.

When we look at Scripture and peer into the facts of history, we learn

that "ten kings" were allied "with the Beast" in the first century (Rev. 17:12).

Rome actually had ten first-century imperial provinces. F.W. Farrar lists the

following as the provinces that fulfilled the prediction of Revelation 17:12,

and by way of application, Daniel 7:24—25 and Revelation 13:1: Italy, Achaia,

Asia, Syria, Egypt, Africa, Spain, Gaul, Britain, and Germany.23

These provincial kings did what the Beast (Rome) commanded. Caesar

ruled the Empire, but lesser rulers governed in the conquered territories and

assisted Rome in the persecution of Jews and Christians. They, too, were called

"kings." For example, Caesar was called "king" (John 19:15) while Agrippa, who was most assuredly under the rule and dominion of Caesar, was also

called "king" (Acts 26:2). Dave Hunt obviously misunderstands history when

he writes that "there never were ten kings that ruled the Roman Empire."24

This improper reading of history and misapplied interpretation forces him to

look for a future fulfillment when none is needed. As David A. Clark points

out in his commentary on the Book of Revelation, a ten-nation confederacy

made up of "kings" ruled Rome during the time of Nero:

These verses [in Rev. 17:3, 12] tell us about the horns of the beast.

He had not only seven heads; but ten horns. These ten horns were ten

kings, not kings sitting on the throne of Rome, as I understand, but those

kings and countries subjected by Rome, and which made the empire

great. We know that Rome embraced at that time the countries of Europe

that bordered on the Mediterranean Sea, and the northern part of Africa

and considerable territory in Asia, and also in central Europe. Rome had

conquered the world.25

There is no biblical or historical justification for believing that one day

the Roman Empire will be revived as a fulfillment of prophecies made over

two thousand years ago. Those with a short memory and little regard for

history will not remember that the supposed revival of the Roman Empire

has been identified in various ways, depending on who has been in power

and how the status of nations and territories has been configured to make

the scenario fit with "Bible prophecy." Mussolini's empire, the League of

Nations, the United Nations, the European Defense Community, the Com-

Roshing to Judgment

371

mon Market, and NATO have all been certain candidates.26

Contemporary prophetic literature states that a "ten-nation confedera-

tion" will fulfill Bible prophecy. Hal Lindsey wrote in 1970: "When the

Scripture says 'out of' it means the ten nations (ten kings) which will come

out of Rome, since Rome was the fourth kingdom."27 While many believe

the EEC will fulfill this supposed prophecy of a revived Roman Empire,

as of this writing, twelve nations have already joined the EEC with others

surely to follow.

The community is sure to expand by three to five states in the next few

years, and by many more someday. Mr. [Jacques] Delors, who has to make

proposals for dealing with enlargement, says he is thinking of an ultimate

membership of 35, which will mean profound changes.28

For years we were told that ten was the magic number. Now we have

twelve going on thirty-five, and we still have not gotten to the borders of the

former Roman Empire which included parts of Asia, Syria, Israel, Egypt, and

Africa! Today's prophecy pundits are simply following trends, "predicting a

continuation of the thing that is already happening."29 Biblical texts, more

often than not ripped out of their historical and theological contexts, are

made to fit the changes that one reads in the newspaper. Here is an example

of prophetic speculation by way of social trends:

One of the few advantages of the rapid acceleration of history is that

we are increasingly able to decipher the mysteries of prophetic players

and events that have lain shrouded in the mists of time. Some of these

new insights are already vivid enough to shatter long-standing precon-

ceptions; even those whose precise meanings remain elusive at least have

us looking in the right direction.30

For decades we have been assured that current events line up with pro-

phetic texts. We have been told that prophecy was being fulfilled before our

eyes. Time and time again Christians were to look at the "signs of the times"

as prophetic indicators that the end could not be far off. It seems, however,

that every new geopolitical movement forces prophecy writers to revise their

works. They hope and pray that no one notices. Unfortunately, few people

do take notice of the continual revisions that fail to include any apology that

372

LAST DAYS MADNESS

they were wrong in their assessments in their previous edition. Consider just

some of the more popular examples of revisionist prophetic speculation:

•John F. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis (1974, 1976).

Updated and revised, 1990.

• Edgar C. James, Armageddon and the New World Order (1981). Updated

and revised, 1991.

• Thomas S. McCall and Zola Levitt, The Coming Russian Invasion of Israel

(1974). Updated and revised, 1987.

• Edgar C. James, Arabs, Oil, and Armageddon (1977). Updated and revised,

1991.

•Billy Graham, Approaching Hoofbeats (1983). Updated and revised as

Storm Warning in 1992.

These authors do not constitute a comprehensive list of those who con-

tinue to write and revise books that simply apply a worn-out and discredited

prophetic system to the latest newspaper headlines.31

Since there is no gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks of

Daniel 9:24—27, there is no need to futurize the ten-king prophecies. More-

over, a study of history demonstrates that there were at least ten Roman

provinces ruled by kings in the first century. Finally, the Book of Revelation

makes it clear that the events described therein "must shortly take place"

(1:1). Without this time text and others like it (1:3; 3:11; 22:7), the events of

Revelation can be made to fit any era. Sure enough, this is exactly what we

are experiencing today with the European Economic Community theory.

Prophetic Key Number Four:

Distinguishing Fulfillment from Application

There remains, however, an applicational side to prophecy. While a certain

prophecy may be fulfilled, a principle inherent in the prophetic event can have

numerous contemporary applications. No one denies that there are plans for

the development of a United States of Europe, although some nations are

resisting union through independence movements in Eastern Europe, the

former Soviet Union, Iraq, Yugoslavia, and South Africa. Political unions

Roshing to Judgment

373

can be for good or evil. Under Napoleon and Hitler, a unified Europe was

obviously evil. The former Soviet Union's effort to force such a union on

conquered lands has fallen apart. Independence movements are in full bloom

in the Baltic states. Now Europeans are questioning the wisdom of a United

States of Europe.

Despite the hot rhetoric and flaming spirit, not everyone is eagerly

embracing an economically integrated Europe. Earlier this month [June

1991], for example, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and [former] British

Prime Minister John Major met in England and jointly expressed ambiva-

lence about European monetary union. Several days later, a senior official

at the Bundesbank, Germany's central bank, voiced reluctance about a

single European currency. Other countries are similarly uneasy about a

proposed value-added tax that would impose a uniform 15 percent levy

across the continent. Great Britain, in particular, believes that a rigidly

structured pan-European VAT would tie its hands on domestic fiscal policy

and prevent it from making the proper government-spending choices.

Economic reality, as much as nationalism or protectionism, threatens to

sully Europe's fledgling confederacy.32

In the former Soviet Union we may find that another Napoleon or Hitler

rises Phoenix-like out of the debris of failed communism. So far, no ideology,

secular or spiritual, has taken the place of failed communism. This is danger-

ous. While communism may be dead, nationalism and socialism are not. The

mixture of the two makes for a volatile compound: nationalism + socialism =

nazism. We can find principles in the way God dealt with past tyrannies, both

in specific prophetic events (Babylon and Rome) and later historical figures

who acted like a Caesar (e.g., Mussolini) or a Nebuchadnezzar and his fiery

furnace (e.g., Hitler and his gas ovens). While these prophetic events are past,

they still retain a wealth of contemporary application.

Seeing the prophecies of the "ten kings" as fulfilled prophecy does not

mean we should bury our heads in the political sand. Fulfilled prophecy gives

us a reference point from which to make judgments regarding contemporary

events. If Europe follows in the footsteps of Babylon, Greece, or Rome, we

can expect the same type of judgment to befall her. The ruin of ungodly

leaders such as Napoleon and Hitler gives credence to the biblical principle

that rulers who rebel against God will meet certain doom.

374

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Now therefore, O kings, show discernment;

Take warning, O judges of the earth.

Worship the LORD with reverence, and rejoice with trem-

bling.

Do homage to the Son, lest He become angry, and you per-

ish in the way, For His wrath may soon be kindled.

How blessed are all who take refuge in Him! (Psalm 2:10-12)

The Bible is a record of the reality of God acting in history. God destroyed

all those nations that sought to build kingdoms that competed with His

kingdom—from Babylon to Rome. God has set up His kingdom and it "will

never be destroyed"; it will crush and put an end to all rival kingdoms, "but

it will itself endure forever" (Dan. 2:45). Iraq, Russia, and Europe may raise

their fists in rebellion against God, but God, as He has done in the past, will

slap them down. One day they will all worship at His feet. "For He must reign

until He has put all His enemies under His feet" (1 Cor. 15:25).

Roshing to Judgment

375

Notes

1. Peter and Patti Lalonde, The Edge of Time: The Final Countdown Has Begun

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997), 216.

2. Edwin M. Yamauchi, Foes from the Northern Frontier: Invading Hordes from the

Russian Steppes (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1982), 20, 24-25.

3. John E Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil, and the Middle East, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids,

MI: Zondervan, [1974, 1976] 1990), 141.

4. Timothy J. Daily, The Gathering Storm (Tarrytown, NY: Revell, 1992), 157—

58.

5. Edwin M. Yamauchi, "Updating the Armageddon Calendar," Christianity Today

(April 29, 1991), 51.

6. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970),

63. Cumming's quotation comes from his Destiny of Nations (London: Hurst

and Blackette, 1864), no page number cited.

7. Daily, The Gathering Storm, 166. Archeologist Barry Beitzel states that "the Bible's use of the expression 'north' denotes the direction from which a foe

would normally approach and not the location of its homeland." (The Moody

Atlas of Bible Lands [Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1985], 5).

8. E. W. Hengstenberg, The Prophecies of the Prophet Ezekiel, trans. A.C. Murphy

and J.G. Murphy (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1869), 333.

9. Ralph H. Alexander, "Ezekiel," The Expositors Bible Commentary, gen. ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, 12 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1986), 6:930. For a

discussion of five contemporary views of this battle, see Ralph H. Alexander,

"A Fresh Look at Ezekiel 38 and 39," Journal of the Evangelical Theological

Society, 17 (Summer 1974), 162-65.

10. Charles C. Ryrie, ed., The Ryrie Study Bible (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1978),

1285.

11. Charles H. Dyer, "Ezekiel," in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, eds. John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985),

1300.

12. The former Soviet Union offered to sell missiles to Israel. "It was the first time

for someone from the Eastern bloc to come to us, and we were very happy,"

said Noah Schachar, spokesman for Rafael, an Israeli Defense Ministry agency

(Atlanta Journal/Constitution [19 June 1991], A7). How does this fit in with

Bible prophecy? Why would Israel's enemy be selling her arms?

13. Daily, The Gathering Storm, 165.

14. For some "literalists," horses can be made to mean "horse power." Rob Linsted, 376

LAST DAYS MADNESS

The Next Move: Current Events in Bible Prophecy (Wichita, KS: Bible Truth, n.d.),

41.

15. No reference is given for this claim. Compressed wood is very heavy. Just

compare the weight of a tight-grained wood like oak with pine. Today's light

military weapons are often made from composite materials and plastics, not

wood.

16. Thomas S. McCall and Zola Levitt, Coming: The End! Russia and Israel in Prophecy

(Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1992), 56. This is a revised edition of The Coming

Russian Invasion of Israel, first published by Moody in 1974 and revised in

1987.

17. Harry Rimmer, The Coming War and the Rise of Russia (Grand Rapids, MI:

Eerdmans, 1940), 48-51.

18. James B. Jordan, Esther: In the Midst of Covenant History (Niceville, FL: Biblical Horizons, 1995), 5.

19. Jordan, Esther, 5-7.

20. Jordan, Esther, 7.

21. Pat Robertson, The Secret Kingdom: Your Path to Peace, Love, and Financial Security (Dallas, TX: Word, 1992), 255.

22. See John Ankerberg, et al., One World: Bible Prophecy and the New World Order

(Chicago: Moody Press, 1991), 25. This book is a rehash of decades of failed

predictions.

23. F.W. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1882), 464

note 1.

24. Ankerberg, One World, 25.

25. David S. Clark, The Message from Patmos: A Postmillennial Commentary (Grand

Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1989), 110.

26. Dwight Wilson, Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and

Israel Since 1917 ( Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, [1977] 1991),

216.

27. Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth, 93.

28. Flora Lewis, "Europe's Last-Minute Jitters," New York Times (24 April 1992), A15.

29. George Orwell, "James Burnham and the Managerial Revolution," Collected

Essays, Journalism and Letters, vol. 4 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,

1968), 173. Quoted in Max Dublin, Futurehype: The Tyranny of Prophecy (New

York: Dutton, 1991), 3.

Roshing to Judgment

377

30. George Otis, Jr., The Last of the Giants: Lifting the Veil on Islam and the End Times (Tarrytown, NY: Revell, 1991), 169.

31. Charles H. Dyer, World News and Bible Prophecy (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1993).

This is the same author who wrote The Rise of Babylon, a failed attempt to

interpret Saddam Hussein's empire as a revived Babylonian kingdom.

32. Robert F. Black, "The Dark Side of Europe '92," U.S. News and World Report (24 June 1991), 48-49.

Appendix 1

GOD CAN TELL TIME

Prophetic commentator J. Dwight Pentecost writes that "It is to be ob-

served that the time element holds a relatively small place in prophecy."1

To the contrary, "the time element" plays a major role in prophecy. In fact,

it plays the defining role. Without precision of meaning for the time texts

prophetic pronouncements are meaningless. For example, what significance

could be attached to Jonah's words of judgment in forty days if Nineveh did

not repent? Could the Ninevites have stretched forty days into forty years

or four-hundred years by claiming that the "time element holds a relatively

small place in prophecy" by quoting a version of Psalm 90:4? "For a thou-

sand years in Thy sight are like yesterday when it passes by, or as a watch

in the night" (cf. 2 Peter 3:8). The nearness of the promised judgment led

the Ninevites to repentance and an adverted judgment (Jonah 3:5).

Dispensationalists reject this literal approach to interpreting the time texts

by fabricating a doctrine called imminency or the "any moment rapture of the

church." The following definition by a dispensationalist is typical:

The primary thought expressed by the word "imminency" is that

something important is likely to happen, and could happen soon. While

the event may not be immediate, or necessarily very soon, it is next on

the program and may take place at any time.2

379

380

LAST DAYS MADNESS

This is theological double talk. There is nothing in the time texts that

would support this confusing definition. Words such as "likely," "could hap-

pen," and "may take place" are nowhere indicated. Taking a similar approach,

Thomas Ice writes, "The fact that Christ could return at any moment but not

soon is supported in the New Testament in the following passages: 1 Corin-

thians 1:7; 16:22; Philippians 3:20; 4:5; 1 Thessalonians 1:10; Titus 2:13;

Hebrews 9:28; James 5:7-9; 1 Peter 1:13; Jude 21; Revelation 3:11; 22:7,

12, 17, 20. These verses state that Christ could return at any moment "3

Not one of these verses supports his claim. Not one verse in the New Testa-

ment states that Jesus could return at any moment. Ice contradicts the Bible

when he writes that Jesus could no? return soon. Consider James 5:7-9:

Be patient, therefore, brethren, until the coming of the Lord. Behold,

the farmer waits for the precious produce of the soil, being patient about

it, until it gets the early and late rains. You too be patient; strengthen

your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is at hand. Do not complain, brethren,

against one another, that you yourselves may not be judged; behold, the

Judge is standing right at the door (James 5:7-9).

Contrary to what Ice contends, James tells his first readers that "the com-

ing of the Lord is at hand" ("near"). And if you don't get his meaning, He

defines "at hand" as "standing right at the door," the same words used by Jesus in Matthew 24:33: "Recognize that He is near, right at the door,"4 not

down the road or in the next county. Let's read James 5:8 following Ice's

methodology: "You too be patient; strengthen your hearts, Christ could return

at any moment but not soon." Ice would have James writing the opposite of

what the text actually states. James is clear: "For the coming of the Lord is

at hand." It was near for those who first read his letter.

The biblical writers are straightforward in their claim that certain prophetic

events were to happen "soon" for those who first read the prophecies. The

eschatological events were near for them. No other interpretation is possible if the words are taken in their "plain, primary, ordinary, usual, or normal"

sense; if they are interpreted literally.

If the biblical authors had wanted to be tentative, vague, or ambiguous

in the way they described the timing of future events, they would have

equivocated by using words expressing probability, similar to the way Paul

expresses himself in 1 Corinthians 4:19: "But I will come to you soon [taxu],

God Can Tell Time

381

if the Lord wills. . ." (also see Acts 18:21: "I will return to you again, if God wills.") If the inspired New Testament writers wanted to tell their first readers that Jesus could come at "any moment," they would have written "any

moment." They didn't. They said His coming was "at hand," that He was

coming "quickly," that the time is "near." Ice completely negates the clear assertion of the Bible's time texts by turning them into the "manner" in

which an event is to occur. For example, for Ice "quickly" simply means that

an event happens fast when it happens. But how does this reinterpretation

explain "near" and "shortly"? In what "manner" does one come "shortly"?

After confusing his readers with his "manner" argument, Ice concludes that

every time "quickly" is used "the actions all came about 'soon' after the

prophecy was given. ..."' Exactly!

Debate continues to rage over the use of words like "near," "soon," and

"quickly," even though everyone knows what these words mean in normal

conversation. Supposedly these time indicators are fluid. In fact, they are

so fluid that they actually mean their opposite. For example, Revelation 1:1

tells us that the subsequent events outlined in the book "must shortly take

place." In 1:3 we learn that "the time is near." Why are these definitive time indicators used if they hold a "small place in prophecy"? Why use time markers that in ordinary speech mean close at hand if their real meaning actually

stretches time over centuries? There is no need to be ambiguous about the

meaning of "near," "shortly," and "quickly." Translators chose these English words because they convey the proper meaning of their Greek counterparts.

If these words really meant something else, then translators would have used

the appropriate words.

How Literal are the Literalists?

These time markers indicate that the events depicted in the Book of Rev-

elation were to happen without delay. Dispensational writers object. They

realize that if these time indicators are taken literally they will have to con-

cede that the events depicted in the Book of Revelation are history, fulfilled

prophecy. We should be reminded at this point that dispensationalists insist

on a literal hermeneutic. Not to interpret these texts literally fractures their

system. Charles Ryrie has made this plain by stating that "dispensationalism

claims to employ principles of literal, plain, normal, or historical-grammatical

interpretation consistently."6 Again on the topic of literalism, Ryrie writes:

382

LAST DAYS MADNESS

"Dispensationalists claim that their principle of hermeneutics is that of lit-

eral interpretation. This means interpretation that gives to every word the

same meaning it would have in normal usage, whether employed in writing,

speaking or thinking."7 In another place Ryrie states: "Consistently literal, or

plain, interpretation indicates a dispensational approach to the interpretation

of Scripture. And it is this very consistency—the strength of dispensational

interpretation—that seems to irk the nondispensationalist and becomes

the object of his ridicule."8 Actually, it is the inconsistency of the "literal or plain interpretation" that irks nondispensationalists. How consistent are

dispensationalists in following the "literal, plain or normal" hermeneutical

model when they deny the "literal, plain or normal" interpretation of "near,"

"shortly," and "quickly"?

Charles L. Feinberg

Charles Feinberg writes in his commentary on Revelation that the phrase

"things which must shortly come to pass" in Revelation 1:1 "gives no basis

for the historical interpretation of the book. Events are seen here from the

perspective of the Lord and not from the human viewpoint (cf. II Pet 3:8).

The same Greek words appear in Luke 18:7-8 (Gr en tachet), where the delay

is clearly a prolonged one."9 Feinberg follows the proper method—compar-

ing Scripture with Scripture—but fails in his analysis of Luke 18:7-8. The

unrighteous judge in Luke 18 gives justice to the widow in her lifetime! She

receives justice before she dies. The point of the parable is to show how God

brings about justice for His elect in a timely manner. "I tell you that He will

bring about justice for them speedily' (18:8). If the woman received justice

from the unrighteous judge in her lifetime, then how can we say that God acts

"speedily" when nearly two thousand years have passed since John and the

seven churches in Asia Minor were told that the "time is near" and that Jesus

was "coming quickly"? Feinberg has made "speedily" and "shortly" to mean an extended period of time. The delay in Luke 18:8 is clearly not a prolonged

one. Kurt Aland renders the true meaning of Revelation's time texts:

To a certain extent, the words of Rev. 22:12 can be taken as the title of

the Apocalypse: "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense."

In the original text, the Greek word used is tacu, and this does not mean

"soon," in the sense of "sometime," but rather "now," "immediately."

Therefore, we must understand Rev. 22:12 in this way: "I am coming now,

God Can Tell Time

383

bringing my recompense." The concluding word of Rev. 22:20 is: "He who

testifies to these things says, 'Surely I am coming soon.'" Here we again

find the word tacu, so this means: I am coming quickly, immediately. This

is followed by the prayer: "Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!" These words are a

summary of the contents of Revelation, which uses continually new images

to paint the coming of the Lord. The Apocalypse expresses the fervent

waiting for the end within the circles in which the writer lived—not an

expectation that will happen at some unknown X in time (just to repeat

this), but one in the immediate present.10

Feinberg ignores the obvious meaning of the time texts as described by

Aland and develops a convoluted interpretation that is designed to force a

futuristic interpretation.

Feinberg continues his argument with his comments on Revelation 1:3:

"The time is at hand." "These words (Gr ho kairos engus)," he writes, "appear only twice in the Revelation. Neither reference indicates the possible

length involved. Again, all is seen from the perspective of God."11 There is

no indication in the Book of Revelation or the entire Bible that "at hand"

and "near" are relative terms. There is no passage that points us to viewing

time "from the perspective of God" as if when God says "near" He actually means an indefinite period of time. To make such a claim is practicing the

fine art of megesis—reading an interpretation into a text so that it will say

what you want it to say.

John F. Walvoord

John Walvoord takes a similar position in his interpretation of the time ref-

erence "must shortly come to pass" (Revelation 1:1): "The idea is not that the event may occur soon, but when it does, it will be sudden (cf. Luke 18:8; Acts

12:7; 22:18; 25:4; Rom. 16:20)."12 He interprets "the time is near [at hand]"

(1:3) in the same way: "The expression 'at hand' indicates nearness from

the standpoint of prophetic revelation, not necessarily that the event will

immediately occur."13 Apply the method of Feinberg and Walvoord to the

following passages that contain time indicators. What do they tell you about

the nearness of the events?

• "Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already

become tender, and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near

384

LAST DAYS MADNESS

(Matthew 24:32). How far away is summer after leaves appear? The

analogy makes it apparent that "near" means chronological proximity:

The appearance of leaves means that summer is near. A single growing

season is in view.

• "Even so you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is

near, right at the door" (24:33). Here we find a brief commentary on

what "near" means—"right at the door," not in the next county.

•Jesus said, "My time is at hand [near]" (Matt. 26:18). Jesus' trial and

crucifixion were only hours away. Compare with John 7:6 where early in

His ministry Jesus tells His disciples that His "time is not yet at hand."

• "Then He came to His disciples, and said to them, 'Are you still sleeping

and taking your rest? Behold, the hour is at hand [near] and the Son of

Man is being betrayed into the hands of sinners'" (Matt. 26:45).

• "Arise, let us be going; behold, the one who betrays Me is at hand [near]]

And while He was still speaking, behold Judas, one of the twelve, came

up, accompanied by a great multitude with swords and clubs, from the

chief priests and elders of the people" (Matt. 26:46-47).

• "And the Passover of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jeru-

salem" (John 2:13; cf. 6:4; 11:55). It was the nearness of the Passover

that led Jesus to Jerusalem at this time.

• "Now the feast of the Jews, the Feast of Booths, was at hand' (John

7:2).

Every use of "near" or "at hand" in the New Testament means close in relation to time or distance. Because dispensationalists like Walvoord put "prophetic

revelation" in a different interpretive category, literalism does not apply.

Walvoord's comment on Revelation 11:14, where he maintains that the

word "quickly" is used to describe the timing of Jesus' coming after the

rapture, demonstrates how exegetical gerrymandering takes place within

the dispensational system: "The third woe contained in the seventh trumpet

is announced as coming quickly. The end of the age is rapidly approaching."14

How can "quickly" in Revelation 11:14 mean "rapidly approaching" but

Jesus' coming cannot mean "rapidly approaching" in Revelation 2:16, 3:11,

22:7, 12, and 20? A similar question can be asked of Revelation 12:12

where the devil is said to know "that he has only a short time." Walvoord

understands "short time" to mean not very long, no more than 3.5 years.

The same is true of his interpretation of Revelation 6:11 where the martyrs

God Can Tell Time

385

are "told that they should rest for a little while longer." Why are the time

texts in Revelation 6:11 and 12:12 taken literally by Walvoord but the

many other time texts in Revelation are given a specialized meaning? The

answer is quite simple: The interpretations in both cases are designed to fit

an already developed system.

Robert L. Thomas

Similar to the way Pentecost, Feinberg, and Walvoord strip the time texts

of Revelation of their natural and plain meaning, Robert Thomas dismisses

the "plain and normal" interpretation because such an interpretation would

mean "nearness of fulfillment for the events predicted."15 The time texts are

made to conform to an already-developed theological system. According

to Thomas these events cannot mean "rapidly approaching" because such

an interpretation

would require the events to have taken place close to John's lifetime. As

the matter stands, it has been almost nineteen hundred years since the

prediction and much of what the book predicts still has not begun to

happen. The response of this view to the seeming difficulty raised by the

delay of more than nineteen hundred years is not that John was mistaken

but that time in the Apocalypse is computed either relatively to the divine

apprehension as here and in 22:10 (cf. also 1:3; 3:11; 22:7, 12, 20) or

absolutely in itself as long or short (cf. 8:1; 20:2). When measuring time,

Scripture has a different standard from ours( cf. 1 John 2:18) (Lee). The purpose

of en tachei is to teach the imminence of the events foretold, not to set a

time limit within which they must occur 0ohnson). It must be kept in

mind that God is not limited by considerations of time in the same way

man is (cf. 2 Pet. 3:8).16

Thomas insists on a literal hermeneutic, as do all dispensationalists.17 This

principle is avoided, however, when it comes to the plain meaning of certain

time texts that do not support his position. Thomas writes that Scripture

uses a "different standard from ours" when "measuring time." This just is not the case. The use of "quickly" in other contexts will show that "quickly"

has but one meaning.

•John 11:29: "She arose quickly, and was coming to him."

386

LAST DAYS MADNESS

•John 11:31: "Mary rose up quickly and went out."

•John 13:27: '"What you do, do quickly."'

• Revelation 3:11: "I am coming quickly."

• Revelation 11:14: "The second woe is past; behold, the third woe is

coming quickly."

What does "quickly" mean in these passages? Thomas begins with the

premise that the events prophesied in Revelation have not taken place and

then adjusts the meaning of the time texts to fit his futurist position. He

assumes to be true what he must prove to be true, that the events have not

taken place. If the time texts are understood in their "plain sense," then

there are only two possible meanings: (1) John was mistaken and the Bible

is filled with unreliable information,18 an unacceptable position, or (2) the

events described therein came to pass soon after the prophecy was given.

Earlier in his commentary Thomas writes:

The futurist approach to the book is the only one that grants sufficient

recognition to the prophetic style of the book and a normal hermeneutical

pattern of interpretation based on that style. It views the book as focusing

on the last period(s) of world history and outlining the various events and

their relationships to one another. This is the view that best accords with the

principle of literal interpretation.19

Again and again Thomas abandons the literal method when he comes to

the time texts. He uses 1 John 2:18 and 2 Peter 3:8 in an attempt to prove

that "Scripture has a different standard from ours" when it comes to measuring

time. This can only be true if one begins with the unproven premise that John

was not describing some near eschatological event and that "near," "soon,"

and "quickly" have a specialized meaning in some sections of the Book of

Revelation. John's readers had heard that Antichrist was coming. John assures

them that "many antichrists have arisen" (1 John 2:18). For John and those

who read his letter, this was evidence that it was the "last hour." For Thomas,

"last hour" is nearly two thousand years long. Is this what dispensationalists

mean by the "principle of literal interpretation"?

Thomas, however, reverses himself when he comes to Revelation 6:11

where the martyrs are told to rest for a "little while." He correctly reasons

that "the identical expression comes from the lips of Jesus twice, once in

God Can Tell Time

387

John 7:33 and once in John 12:35. In the former case (John's gospel) the

time is not more than about a year, and in the latter, just a matter of days."20

We must ask Thomas why he does not follow the same procedure in his

interpretation of "soon," "quickly," and "near" when he finds these words in the Book of Revelation. He chides those who do not interpret "little while"

literally in Revelation 6:11.

The proposal that it ["little while"] here points to the indefinite future,

possibly hundreds of years from the persecution of Christianity under the

Roman emperor Trajan to the time of the Waldensians (A.D. 98-1209) or

later, is demeaning to the martyrs. Indefiniteness in such a situation is

worse than no reply at all.21

The same can be said about Jesus' promises that "things must shortly

take place" (Rev. 1:1) and the "time is near" (1:3). How would the martyrs

have felt in the first century when they read that relief would be in a "little

while"? Remember, the last book in the Bible is described as "the Revelation

of Jesus Christ" (1:1). These are Jesus' words that the time stretchers are call-

ing into question. Jesus made it clear that He would come in judgment upon

Jerusalem within a short span of time. Thomas should follow his method

consistently. Of course, if he did, he would no longer be a dispensationalist.

Ed Hindson

Ed Hindson, professor and dean of the Institute of Biblical Studies at

Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, writes in Approaching Armageddon

that "there are no specific time indicators of when" the prophecies outlined in

the Book of Revelation "will be fulfilled."22 In what immediately follows this

statement, Hindson contradicts himself and confuses any astute reader.

The only indication of time is the phrase "the time is at hand" (Greek,

kairos engus). This may be translated "near" or "soon." Taken with the phrase

"come to pass shortly" (Greek, en tachei, "soon") in verse 1, the reader is left expecting the imminent return of Christ.

First he tells us that "there are no specific time indicators," and then he writes that there are two time indicators: "soon" in 1:1 and "near" or "at hand" in 1:3. After reading these specific time markers the reader is left with

388

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the expectation that Jesus' return is "imminent," that it is "near at hand."

Without explaining the obvious contradiction, Hindson moves on as if there

is nothing to reconcile.

Earlier Hindson writes that Revelation "is the 'book of the unveiling,' as

the title indicates. It is meant to be understood! Thus, the promise. 'Blessed

is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep

those things which are written therein' (Revelation 1:3)." If the Book of

Revelation is "meant to be understood," and its first-century readers expected

the "imminent return of Christ," then Jesus' return should have been "near"

for them. By the way, Hindson does not quote all of Revelation 1:3. The

verse concludes with, "the time is near."

In addition to words that express time, the Book of Revelation also

describes events that are time sensitive. History records that the temple in

Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70 by Roman armies led by Titus. In Rev-

elation 11:1-2 we read that the temple is standing and people "worship

in it" (11:1). In his comments on this section of Scripture, Hindson writes

that the temple mentioned in Revelation 11 "must be a third temple yet to

be rebuilt by the Jews in Jerusalem in the future."23 He claims that a "similar

reference is made by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:3—4, where the 'man of sin'

(Antichrist) 'sitteth in the temple of God' claiming to be God."24 Why must

the temple of Revelation 11:1 and 2 Thessalonians 2:4 be a "third temple yet

to be rebuilt"? Hindson assumes that these temple references are describing

a future rebuilt temple simply by stating what he must prove: "Both John

(Revelation 11:1-2) and Paul (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4) indicate there will be

a future temple in Jerusalem."25 Where in all the New Testament does it say

that there will be a rebuilt temple? Would Christians at Thessalonica have

figured out that Paul was describing a rebuilt temple when the temple in

Jerusalem was still standing when they received his letter? The description

of the still operating temple in Revelation 11:1 is a key indicator as to when

the Book was written, prior to the sacking of Jerusalem and the destruction

of the temple in A.D. 70.

Fellow-dispensational writer Stanley D. Toussaint unwittingly destroys

Hindson's logic. In determining when Matthew's gospel was written, Tous-

saint engages in a bit of logic of his own.

[Matthew's gospel] was written no doubt before 70 A.D. The city of

Jerusalem was still standing at the time of writing. This is shown by the

God Can Tell Time

389

fact that Matthew refers to it as the "holy city" as though it was still in

existence (4:5; 27:53). He does not mention its destruction as having been

accomplished at any point.26

Toussaint's deduction can also apply to Revelation when the same principles

are applied. Jerusalem is described as the "holy city" (11:2; 21:2,10; 22:19), and John "does not mention its destruction," therefore the temple was still standing

when John wrote. There is no need to conjure up a rebuilt temple. John's use

of "shortly" and "near" in Revelation 1:1, 3 makes perfect sense.

A Modern Parable

You find that your son's room is a mess. Not an unusual occurrence. You

give the following instructions: "Clean up your room, and do it quickly. I'll

be back soon to check on your progress." An hour later you examine your

son's work and find his room in the same state of disrepair as when you

first saw it. You ask your son why his room is not clean, reminding him that

you told him to do it quickly and that you would return soon to inspect it.

He says, "Dad, you said you would be back 'soon.' As you know, the time

element holds a relatively small place in room cleaning. Besides, when I start

to clean it, I'll do it quickly! I could clean it today or next week, either way,

I will follow your instructions to the letter."

There is no way around these texts. "Soon," "near," and "at hand" are explicit time indicators that are meant to describe a period of time in the

near future. While days, weeks, months, and years are not specified, we can

be certain that the events that are said to be "near," "soon," and coming

"quickly" are not far off in time. Or as Walvoord describes it, the events that

follow are "rapidly approaching."

Using 2 Peter 3:8 to Stretch Time

The favorite text of the time stretchers is 2 Peter 3:8. When all else fails

the time extenders point to this passage as proof positive that time texts are

not what they seem.

But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the

Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day

(2 Peter 3:8).

390

LAST DAYS MADNESS

The argument goes something like this: "Yes, the Book of Revelation

does use the words 'near,' 'quickly,' and 'shortly,' but words related to

time must be interpreted in the light of 2 Peter 3:8. Remember, 'that with

the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one

day.' While the Book of Revelation seems to teach that Jesus would come

'quickly' in judgment, and the time was 'near' for this event, we know

that He was not discussing time from our perspective." Convenient but

not very convincing.

Supposedly, while "near," "quickly," and "shortly" are used in a literal sense in every other New Testament passage where they occur, in the Book of Revelation

we are told that they should be interpreted figuratively, except, of course,

when they need to be interpreted literally. This line of argumentation is

surprising when it is put forth by those who insist on a literal interpretation

of Scripture. Why don't the literalists want to interpret "near," "quickly," and

"shortly" literally in the Book of Revelation when they interpret these same

words literally elsewhere in the Bible? Why doesn't 2 Peter 3:8 apply to

all references to time? Why just in certain prophetic passages? The Book of

Revelation on ten separate occasions, at the beginning (1:1, 3; 2:16; 3:11),

in the middle (11:14), and at the end (22:6, 7, 10, 12, 20), speaks of the

nearness of some great eschatological event.

Centuries before John wrote the Book of Revelation Daniel was told

to conceal the words of the prophecy and "seal up the book until the end

of time..." (Dan. 12:4). John, on the other hand, is told the opposite:

"Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is

near" (Rev. 22:10). If we apply the 2 Peter 3:8 principle of measuring

time to Daniel 12:4 and Revelation 22:10, we can conclude that Dan-

iel's time was actually near and John's time is still in the distant future.

One commentator writes: "It is true that history has shown that 'the

things which must shortly come to pass' (1:1) have taken longer than

John expected."27 History has shown no such thing. God's Word is true.

The Bible states without equivocation that the time was near for God to

pour out His wrath on those who persecuted the saints. Since the Book

of Revelation was written prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70,

the time texts make perfect sense.28

At one point the martyred saints ask, "How long, O Lord, holy and true,

wilt Thou refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell

on the earth?" (Rev. 6:10). "They were told that they should rest for a little God Can Tell Time 370

391

while longer'' (6:11). What does "a little while longer" mean using 2 Peter 3:8? Those who suggest a non-literal interpretation of "near," "shortly," and

"quickly" must also view "a little while longer" in the same way. But this calls into question the reliability of the Bible and makes nonsense of clear

statements. Such an interpretation would be little comfort to those martyred

saints who asked "How long, O Lord?"

In light of the time texts, how should 2 Peter 3:8 be applied? First, there

is nothing in this passage or in any other passage that tells us that any time

text should be filtered through 2 Peter 3:8. Second, if time texts are fluid in

relation to 2 Peter 3:8, then we could never know what God means relative

to time. In fact, we would have to conclude that time texts always mean

their opposite. Third, 2 Peter 3:8 gives us a clue as to how God views time.

Notice that 2 Peter 3:8 states that "with the Lord one day is as a thousand years." Fourth, we are not told that "with the Lord one day is a thousand

years." Rather, "one day is as a thousand years." Are dispensationalists willing to admit that the thousand years of Revelation 20 can be reduced to a single

day? Will the plagues described in Revelation 18:8 take a thousand years

to come? Did Jesus really mean that He would take three thousand years to

rebuild the temple (John 2:19)? Is Jesus still in Joseph of Arimathea's tomb

since three days really means three thousand years (Matt. 27:63)?

With all allowance for linguistic flexibility and comparative lengths of

periods, it would be stretching language to the breaking point to make

"shortly" mean several thousands of years. Such interpretations are only

trifling with words, and the Word of God. The force of these words is

decisive. The things that were to be shown in the visions were close at

hand; they were to begin with the people to whom the book was written

and not thousands of years in the future. God is His own interpreter and

must be allowed to say what He means, and what God says in explana-

tion of His own prophecies must be taken in its obvious meaning and

regarded as authoritative.29

If the Bible can be interpreted so "soon" can mean "late," and "near" can mean "distant," and "shortly" can mean "delayed," and vice versa, then the Bible can mean anything and nothing. Does God have two methods of

measurement? When God says "love," are we to read "hate?" Can we trust

a God whose words can mean their opposite?

392

LAST DAYS MADNESS

God's Own Commentary on Time

Ezekiel, as God's prophet, is called upon to take a message to the land of

Israel: "An end! The end is coming on the four corners of the land" (Ezek.

7:2). How far off is this "end"? "The time has come, the day is near—tumult rather than joyful shouting on the mountains" (7:7). Ezekiel's message is

that God "will shortly pour out" His wrath upon a covenant-breaking nation (7:8).30

The people did not listen to Ezekiel's prophetic word. Maybe they had

Psalm 90:4 in mind when they heard that the judgment was "near": "For a

thousand years in Thy sight are like yesterday when it passes by, or as a watch

in the night." As an object lesson, so no one could misunderstand, God tells

Ezekiel to prepare himself and his "baggage for exile" (12:3). He was to "go

into exile by day in their sight" (12:3). Again and again Ezekiel acted out

scenes depicting exile, an exile that was on the horizon (12:4-7). How did the

people interpret the clear words of the prophet? They did just what the time

stretchers do in our day: They concluded that "near" and "shortly" do not mean soon, impending, or approaching. God asks Ezekiel about a proverb that was

going around: "Son of man, what is this proverb you people have concerning

the land of Israel, saying, 'The days are long and every vision fails'?" (12:22).

The people were disputing the nearness of the judgment by claiming that

there was plenty of time. In fact, they asserted that Ezekiel's prediction about

the nearness of judgment would fail to come to pass.

So as not to be misunderstood, God defines what He means by "near" and

"shortly": "Therefore say to them, 'Thus says the Lord GOD, "I will make this proverb cease so that they will no longer use it as a proverb in Israel." But

tell them, "The days draw near as well as the fulfillment of every vision'""

(12:23). Contrary to what the people thought, "The vision that [Ezekiel]

sees" was not delayed "for many years from now." He is not prophesying "of times far off" (12:26). "They did not deny that a day of evil was coming,

but indulged the hope that it might still be at a considerable distance."31

God, through Ezekiel, set them straight.

Ezekiel's description of the imminent destruction of the temple and the

city of Jerusalem parallels what happened to Israel after the ascension and

enthronement of Jesus. A warning of impending doom had been given to

the nation. Many ignored the warning and died in the conflagration that

came upon the city in A.D. 70, one generation after Jesus pronounced His

judgment (Matt. 24:14, 34; 1 Peter 4:7; Rev. 1:1, 3).

God Can Tell Time

393

The Book of Genesis offers a commentary on the way God tells time.

Pharaoh dreams of cows and ears of corn, some fat and some lean (Gen.

41:1—7). None of Pharaoh's magicians and wise men could interpret the

dream (41:8). Joseph is finally called upon to try his hand at an interpreta-

tion. Through this dream God was telling Pharaoh that there would be seven

years of plenty and seven years of famine in Egypt (41:17-31). Preparations

were to be made during the seven years of abundance so the nation would

survive during the seven years of famine. When would this happen? "Now

as for the repeating of the dream to Pharaoh twice, it means that the matter

is determined, and God will quickly bring it abou t (41:32). How is "quickly"

to be understood? The prophecy is fulfilled in Joseph's lifetime (41:46-49).

Philip Mauro sets forth his reasons why he believes words that deal with

time can only be interpreted literally:

[T]he very first verse [in Revelation] states that God's purpose in giving

the revelation to Jesus Christ was that he might "show unto His servants

things which must shortly come to pass". These words are not at all ambigu-

ous, and the simple-minded would never suspect that they could have been

intended to convey any other than their ordinary and apparent meaning,

namely, that the things foretold in "this prophecy" were to happen in the

era that was just then beginning. The word here rendered "shortly" means

just that. It is variously translated in other Scriptures by the words quickly, speedily, soon. Thus, in Acts 25:4, Festus, after commanding that Paul be

kept at Caesarea, said that "he himself would depart shortly thither". In

Philippians 2:19 Paul writes, "I trust to send Timotheus unto you shortly".

And so also in 1 Timothy 3:14; Hebrews 13:23; and 2 Peter 1:14. In

Galatians 1:6 we have, "so soon removed"; in Philippians 2:33, "so soon as I shall see how it will go with"; and in 2 Thessalonians 2:2, "That ye be

not soon shaken in mind."32

Based on the way "quickly," "near," and "shortly" are used in Genesis through Revelation, any student of the Bible who does not interpret these

time texts in the way the Bible uses them is in jeopardy of denying the

integrity of the Bible.

394

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Notes

1. J. Dwight Pentecost, Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology (Grand

Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Academie, [1958] 1964), 46.

2. Gerald B. Stanton, "The Doctrine of Imminency: Is It Biblical?," in Thomas

Ice and Timothy Demy, eds., When the Trumpet Sounds (Eugene, OR: Harvest

House, 1995), 222.

3. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, Fast Facts on Bible Prophecy (Eugene, OR:

Harvest House, 1997), 102-103. Emphasis added.

4. Does "right at the door" mean near for the dispensationalist during the tribu-

lation period?

5. Thomas Ice, "The Great Tribulation is Future: The New Testament," in

Thomas Ice and Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., The Great Tribulation: Past or Present?:

Two Evangelicals Debate the Question (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel, 1999), 113.

6. Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, 2nd ed. (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1995),

20.

7. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, 80.

8. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, 40.

9. Charles L. Feinberg, "Revelation," Liberty Bible Commentary, eds. Edward E.

Hindson and Woodrow M. Kroll (Lynchburg, VA: The Old-Time Gospel

Hour, 1982), 2:790.

10. Kurt Aland, A History of Christianity: From the Beginnings to the Threshold of the

Reformation, trans. James L. Schaff (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1985),

88.

11. Feinberg, "Revelation," 2:790.

12. John F. Walvoord, The Revelation of Jesus Christ ( Chicago, IL: Moody Press,

[1966] 1987), 35.

13. Walvoord, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, 37.

14. Walvoord, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, 183.

15. Robert L. Thomas, Revelation 1-7 ( Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1992), 55.

16. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 55-56. Emphasis added.

17. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 29-39.

18. "These events are 'soon to take place' (cf. 11:18; 22:10). These words have

troubled commentators. The simplest solution is to take the preterist view

and to say that John, like the entire Christian community, thought that the

coming of the Lord was near, when in fact they were wrong. Our Lord himself

seems to share this error in perspective in the saying: 'This generation will

not pass away before all these things take place' (Mark 13:30).... However,

God Can Tell Time

395

the simple meaning cannot be avoided. The problem is raised by the fact that

the prophets were little interested in chronology, and the future was always

viewed as imminent." (George Eldon Ladd, A Commentary on the Revelation of

John [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1972], 22).

19. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 32. Emphasis added.

20. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 447.

21. Thomas, Revelation 1-7, 448-49.

22. Ed Hindson, Approaching Armageddon: The World Prepares for War With God

(Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1997), 36.

23. Hindson, Approaching Armageddon, 172.

24. Hindson, Approaching Armageddon, 172.

25. Hindson, Approaching Armageddon, 174.

26. Stanley D. Toussaint, Behold the King: A Study of Matthew (Portland, OR: Mult-

nomah, 1981), 333.

27. Robert H. Mounce, The Book of Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,

1977), 243.

28. J. Barton Payne, a premillennialist, wrote that "internal evidence, which is

drawn from the predictions contained within the book itself, is more suited

to the days of Nero [A.D. 64—68]. Unless John's reference in 11:1 to the (Je-

rusalem) temple be taken figuratively, this structure's mere existence would

require a date before 70; the writer's silence in respect to the course of the

Jewish War, and his predictions of its devastation and 3 1/2-year duration in

11:2, suggest a date prior to the winter of 66; and his symbolical specification

in 17:10 of the currently reigning Roman emperor as the sixth of this line of

rulers accords most easily with the historical position of Nero." ( Encyclopedia of

Biblical Prophecy: The Complete Guide to Scriptural Predictions and Their Fulfillment

[Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House (1973) 1980], 592).

29. David S. Clark, The Message from Patmos. A Postmillennial Commentary on the Book

of Revelation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1989), 22-23.

30. I am indebted to Don K. Preston's Can God Tell Time? (Ardmore, OK: Don

K. Preston, 1992) for the material in this section.

31. Patrick Fairbairn, An Exposition of Ezekiel (Evansville, IN: Sovereign Grace

Publishers, 1960), 123.

32. Philip Mauro, The Patmos Visions: A Study of the Apocalypse (Boston, MA: Scrip-

ture Truth Depot, 1925), 24-25.

Appendix 2

FRUITLESS TREES AND

NATIONAL ISRAEL

Israel becoming a nation again in 1948 is the key to much of today's

prophetic speculation regarding the last days. For support of this view,

futurists appeal to Matthew 24:32: "Now learn the parable of the fig tree:

when its branch has already become tender, and puts forth its leaves, you

know that summer is near." This text has been made to read: "Now learn

about restored nationhood for Israel. When Israel becomes a nation again,

similar to the way a fig tree puts forth leaves to herald the coming of sum-

mer, then you will know that I am near to rapture the church." Of course,

this is not what the text says. These questionable ideas are imported into

the text from an already developed eschatological system.

Hal Lindsey has made the most popular case for the view. He writes that

"the figure of speech 'fig tree' has been a historic symbol of national Israel."1

This claim, of course, is irrelevant since we are looking for biblical symbols.

For the moment, however, let us assume that Lindsey is correct, and the "fig

tree" is a biblical symbol of national Israel. Let us go further and assert that Jesus is using the "fig tree" illustration in Matthew 24:32 to say something

about the fate of national Israel. In what way does the Bible apply the fig

tree to Israel's national destiny? For blessing or cursing?

397

398

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jerusalem's Judgment

There is not a single verse in the New Testament that supports the claim

that there is prophetic significance in Israel's restoration as a nation. Beyond

A.D. 70, Israel as a nation plays no prophetic role. The New Testament only

addresses Israel's near destruction never its distant restoration. There is no

mention of a temple being rebuilt or Jews returning to their land as was pre-

dicted in the Old Testament. The Jews did return to their land as prophesied

(Jer. 29:14), "when seventy years have been completed for Babylon" (29:10;

cf. Dan. 9:2). The temple was eventually rebuilt as predicted (Ezra 5:16; John

2:20). These prophecies have been fulfilled. Isaiah 11:11 does mention Israel

returning to their land "the second time." A remnant of Israelites returned

to their land after the Babylonian captivity. The first time was "the day that

they came up out of the land of Egypt" (11:16).2 There is no mention of a

third time. If the Old Testament is the pattern, then we should expect to see

specific New Testament prophecies regarding the future re-establishment of

Israel as a nation and the rebuilding of the temple.

Some futurists maintain that the land promises were never completely

fulfilled. Walter Kaiser offers his opinion contrary to what the Bible actu-

ally says.

Oftentimes students of the Bible point to three passages that appear to

suggest that the promise of land to Israel has indeed been fulfilled: Joshua

21:43—45; 23:14-15; Nehemiah 9:8. These texts assert that "not one of

all the LORD'S good promises to the house of Israel failed; every one was

fulfilled" (Josh. 21:45; cf. 23:14).

However, the boundaries mentioned in Numbers 34:2-12 are not the

ones reached in the accounts of Joshua and Judges. For example, Joshua

13:1-7 and Judges 3:1-4 agree in maintaining that there was much land

that remained to be taken.3

The Bible tells a different story: "So the LORD gave Israel all the land

which He had sworn to their fathers, and they possessed it and lived in it"

(Josh. 21:43). To establish this point, we read, "Not one of the good promises

which the LORD had made to the house of Israel failed; all came to pass"

(21:45). Could the Bible be any more clear? God kept all of His promises

to the letter. God is not obligated to do more than He pledged.

Fruitless Trees and the Nation of Israel 377

399

Futurists acknowledge the absence of any direct reference to a rebuilt

temple, restored nationhood, or reestablishment to the land in the New

Testament, so they insist that the fig tree illustration in Matthew 24:32 com-

pensates for this silence. Contrary to what futurists assert, a study of all the

New Testament texts that compare Israel to a fig tree points to Jerusalem's

destruction not its restoration.

Trees Without Fruit

Matthew 21 and the parallel passages in Mark and Luke shed a great

deal of light on the fig tree illustration in Matthew 24:32. Matthew 21

begins with the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem and the people

"cutting branches from the trees, and spreading them in the road," hon-

oring Him as the "Son of David" (Matt. 21:8-9). Mark writes that they

had spread "leafy branches" (Mark 11:8). As Jesus approached Jerusalem, He

"wept over it" because of its persistent unbelief and its soon-to-be revealed

fate (Luke 19:39-40).

Mark tells us that Jesus "entered Jerusalem and came into the temple; and

after looking all around, He departed for Bethany with the twelve, since

it was already late" (Mark 11:11). Was He looking for "fruit" (i.e., good works) from those who frequented the temple? On His return from Bethany

to Jerusalem, from a distance, Jesus saw "a fig tree in leaf and upon closer

inspection "found nothing but leaves' (11:13). He cursed the fruitless, leavesonly tree: "May no one ever eat fruit from you again!" (11:14). Matthew tells

it this way: '"No longer shall there ever be any fruit from you.' And at once

the fig tree withered" (Matt. 21:19). "The cursing of the figtree signifies that

the entry to Jerusalem and the temple story should not be understood as a

Messianic purification, but as a visitation in judgment upon the temple."4

The nineteenth-century dispensationalist author John Cumming understands

what Jesus had in mind when He cursed the fig tree:

All who have compared the context and the circumstances in which

that miracle was wrought, have one unanimous conclusion, that in blasting

the fig-tree it could not possibly be a momentary ebullition of anger, or

an expression of disappointment, in the Son of God; nor was the fig-tree

regarded as a responsible and therefore guilty thing; it was a lesson to

the Jews, adorned with the leaves of a magnificent profession; watered,

400

LAST DAYS MADNESS

tended, sunned, and showered on for many generations past, but with

no fruit corresponding to their privileges, or at all to justify their loud

and boasting profession; our Lord blasted the fig-tree, and pronounced a

lasting anathema upon it, not because the fig-tree was guilty, but to teach

the nation of whom it was a symbol, that their hypocrisy at last had filled

up their cup, and that the day of their destruction, dispersion, and judg-

ment was now at hand.5

Cumming is correct. But we must go one step further. If the nation of

Israel is to be identified with the fig tree, then Jesus makes it clear that as a

nation she will never produce fruit.6 Those who insist that Matthew 24:32 is

describing renewed covenantal status for Israel as a significant eschatological

sign conveniently overlook what Jesus said about fruit never coming from

the fig tree: "No longer shall there ever be any fruit from you." Jesus forces the Jews to view the temple in a new light.

Mark's Gospel reveals a significant re-evaluation of Jerusalem's Temple.

Although Jesus affirms the significance of the Temple within God's pur-

poses (hence his quoting Isaiah's reference to it as 'my house'), he declares

in word and deed that it now stands under judgement. Jesus enters the

Temple as the Lord himself inspecting his own property and judging it

for its lack of fruit. In due course, it will be destroyed. Its destruction,

however, is also integrally linked to the person of Jesus, whom Mark

portrays as God's appointed replacement of the Temple. Now that the

new has come, the old must pass away.7

After His encounter with the fig tree, Jesus returned to Jerusalem and,

entering the temple, "began to cast out those who were buying and selling

in the temple" (Mark 11:15). It was at this point that the "chief priests and

the scribes ... began seeking how to destroy Him" (11:18). Once again

Jesus leaves the city and comes upon "the fig tree withered from the roots

up" (11:20).

The encounter with the fig tree is not a minor literary diversion. The

cursing of the fig tree and the cleansing of the temple are related. Jerusalem,

the temple, the people, and the religious leaders were fruitless. They had

the outward appearance of religion (leaves) but produced no works (fruit)

(Matt. 3:8, 10; 7:17-19; 12:33; 13:23; 21:43; 23:27). Jesus was looking

Fruitless Trees and the Nation of Israel

401

for the fruit of repentance from Israel. Finding no fruit, Jesus promised to

cut down the fig tree (Israel).

And He began telling this parable: "A certain man had a fig tree which

had been planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it, and

did not find any. And he said to the vineyard keeper, 'Behold, for three

years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree without finding any.

Cut it down! Why does it even use up the ground?' And he answered

and said to him, 'Let it alone, sir, for this year too, until I dig around it

and put in fertilizer; and if it bears fruit next year, fine; but if not, cut it

down'" (Luke 13:6-9).

This parable is an obvious reference to Jerusalem's impending judg-

ment (cf. Isa. 5:1-7). Jesus was in the third year of His ministry when He

concluded that the nation was not worth preserving. He would give it one

more growing season before passing judgment. The response of the Jewish

leadership to Jesus' disciples meant that God would cut Israel down (Luke

13:9). When would this come to pass? "For the days shall come upon you

when your enemies will throw up a bank before you, and surround you, and

hem you in on every side, and will level you to the ground and your children

within you, and they will not leave one stone upon another, because you

did not recognize the time of your visitation" (Luke 19:43—44). What was

the "visitation" that they "did not recognize"? "He came to His own, and those who were His own did not receive Him" (John 1:11). Only when Jesus

came to destroy Jerusalem in A.D. 70 did the apostate Jews of that generation

recognize His visitation (Matt. 24:30; John 19:37; Rev. 1:7).

The incident about the unproductive fig tree (Mk. 11:12-14, 20-21)

involves a prophetic warning of the terrible fate that would come upon

the nation. Jesus saw an ownerless fig tree full of leaves but without fruit

growing on it. The grand display of foliage was nothing but empty pre-

tense, just as the glorious temple of gold and marble and its ceremony

lacked the presence of God-fearing people. Jesus cursed the tree and it

soon withered, indicating that judgment awaited Jerusalem.8

Israel had not displayed the fruit of righteousness required by God (cf.

Hosea 2:12). Notice that Jesus does not say, "Now learn the parable from

402

LAST DAYS MADNESS

the fig tree: when it puts forth its fruit, you know that summer is near." The tree only showed leaves. Every instance of a leaves-only tree in the gospels

is a sign of Israel's judgment, a judgment that came in A.D. 70. Matthew

24:32 has to be embellished in order to make it contradict Matthew 21:19

where Jesus emphatically states that no fruit will ever come forth from

the fig tree. David Reagan writes: "Now, the next day, Jesus calls the fig

tree to mind and says, 'Watch it. When it reblossoms, all these things will

happen.'"9 Cumming, who believes that there is prophetic significance to

Israel's renewed national status, mentions a future tree that puts "forth its

buds."10 Jesus told His disciples the day before that the fig tree would never

produce fruit. Reagan and Cumming have Jesus contradicting Himself. The

fig tree of Matthew 24:32 only puts forth "leaves." There is no mention of

"blossoms" or "buds."

From the Roots

Unfortunately, the clear testimony of the Bible does not convince those

who are intent on making the Bible fit their preconceived view of prophecy.

Philip N. Moore, a self-proclaimed "researcher for Hal Lindsey," demon-

strates the absurd measures one must go through in order to get a text to fit

unproven assumptions about the Bible.

Moore believes that the cursing of the fig tree is temporary. When the

Bible says "from the roots," Moore claims that "the trunk and the branches

and the leaves all withered away, but not the roots."11 Moore calls on M. R.

DeHaan to support his conclusion:

Mark tells us a very interesting detail, which is well worth repeating:

"And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from

the roots" (Mark 11:20). The last three words of this verse tell the story.

From the roots. Remember from the roots. In other words, the trunk and

the branches and the leaves all withered away, but not the roots. The root

remained alive while the rest of the tree withered away. Now the trunk

and the branches and leaves are the visible part of the tree, the roots are

beneath the ground and are the invisible part of the tree.12

Moore concludes, "Surely language could be no plainer than that."13 I

don't know what horticulture school DeHaan and Moore attended, but when

Fruitless Trees and the Nation of Israel 403

the trunk, leaves, and branches wither it's because the roots are dead. A counter

example might help to illustrate the absurdity of their line of argument.

Nebuchadnezzar had a dream of a large tree that was chopped down, its

branches removed, and its foliage and fruit scattered (Dan. 4:14). The stump

remained "with its roots in the ground, but with a band of iron and bronze

around it" (4:15). Notice that the tree was fruit-producing (4:14). The roots

remained alive with the band squeezed around its trunk to inhibit growth

for a season. The lesson? Nebuchadnezzar was judged for a time but was

later restored (4:24-27). When the band was later removed, the tree once

again produced fruit. No such promise is made in reference to the fig tree.

The fig tree is withered "from the roots."

Moore maintains that "from the roots" does not include the roots. Such an

interpretation shows how desperate he is to gain support for his dispensa-

tional view. I don't know of anyone who would exclude the roots with the

phrase "from the roots." Let's put Moore's outrageous theory to the test by

turning to the Bible. Every time you read "from" keep in mind that Moore

would see it as an exclusion.

•"Therefore all the generations from Abraham to David" (Matt. 1:17).

Following Moore's interpretation, Abraham would not be included.

• "From two years and under" (Matt. 2:16). According to Moore, no baby

two-years-old would have been included in Herod's slaughter.

• "Then Jesus arrived from Galilee at the Jordan" (Matt. 3:13). According to

Moore, Jesus really arrived from somewhere else other than Galilee.

• "Shake off the dust from the soles of your feet" (Mark 6:11). According

to Moore, the soles of the disciples' feet were to remain dusty.

•"From childhood" (Mark 9:21). According to Moore, childhood was

not included.

As you can see, Moore's interpretation is absurd. "From the roots" includes

the roots just as it includes whatever the word "from" precedes in a phrase.

The fig tree withered because the roots were dead. To quote Moore, "Surely

language could be no plainer than that."

A Double Negation

To further compound his error, Moore once again abandons his call for

the literal interpretation of the Bible. After Jesus curses the fig tree, He says,

404

LAST DAYS MADNESS

'"No longer shall there ever be any fruit from you,' And at once the fig

tree withered." Mark tells it this way: "May no one ever eat fruit from you

again!" (Mark 11.14). Once again, drawing on DeHaan for support, Moore

concludes that "The word translated forever is aion in the Greek original, and means an age, a period of time, or a dispensation. So what Jesus really said

was 'Let no fruit grow on thee for an age, or a dispensation, for a period of

time.'"13 Moore and DeHaan are mistaken. In addition to the Greek word

aion, two other Greek words are used which are translated "no longer" and

"no one." When coupled with aion, they create an idiom. In this case, "May no one ever eat is a special form of utterance which has parallels in some

languages in a simple future 'no one will ever' or with a somewhat more

emphatic introductory expression, 'it will be very so that no one will ever'.

The form is that of a curse upon the fig tree."14 C. F. D. Moule in his Idiom-

Book of New Testament Greek calls the phrase "most vehemently prohibitive."15

In A Greek-English Lexicon to the New Testament, citing Matthew 21:19 and

Mark 11:14, the authors state that the wording is designed as a "piling up

of negatives ... a double negation."16

Using the fig tree illustration in Matthew 24:32 to support the claim that

all Bible prophecy hinges on Israel's national restoration is a weak reed.

Why would God choose a metaphor as the key sign? It doesn't make any

sense. If dispensationalists still want to maintain that Israel is the fig tree

in Matthew 24:32, then they must live with the implications of the cursed

fig tree in Matthew 21:19.

Fruitless Trees and the Nation of Israel

405

Notes

1. Hal Lindsey, The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1970),

53-54.

2. William Hendriksen, Israel In Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books,

1968).

3. Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Back Toward the Future: Hints for Interpreting Biblical Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1989), 111.

4. Kent E. Brower, '"Let the reader Understand': Temple and Eschatology in

Mark," Eschatology in Bible and Theology: Evangelical Essays at the Dawn of a New

Millennium, Kent E. Brower and Mark W. Elliott, eds. (Downers Grove, IL:

InterVarsity Press, [1997] 1999), 135. Brower's observations are based on

the seminal work of W. R. Telford, The Barren Temple and the Withered Tree

(JSNTSS 1. Sheffield: JSOT, 1980).

5. John Cumming, The End: or, The Proximate Signs of the Close of this Dispensation

(Boston, MA: John P. Jewett and Co., 1855), 139-40.

6. We can expect individual Israelites to produce both good and bad fruit (Jer.

24; Matt. 3:7-10; John 1:47). Of course, the same is true of Gentiles (Matt.

7:17-19).

7. P.W.L. Walker, Jesus and the Holy City: New Testament Perspectives on Jerusalem

(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996), 12-13.

8. Stanley W. Paher, If Thou Hadst Known (Las Vegas, NV: Nevada Publications,

1978), 54.

9. David Reagan, The Master Plan: Making Sense of the Controversies Surrounding Bible

Prophecy Today (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1993), 183. Emphasis added.

10. Cumming, The End, 140. Emphasis added.

11. Philip N. Moore, A Liberal Interpretation on the Prophecy of Israel—Disproved

(Atlanta, GA: The Conspiracy, Incorporated, 1997), 9.

12. M. R. DeHaan, The Jew and Palestine in Prophecy, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI:

Zondervan, 1950), 149.

13. Moore, A Liberal Interpretation on the Prophecy of Israel—Disproved, 9.

14. DeHaan, The Jew and Palestine in Prophecy, 148.

15. C. F. D. Moule, An Idiom-Book of the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (London,

England: Cambridge Univesity Press, [1959] 1977), 136.

16. William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon to the New

Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 4th ed. (Chicago, IL: University

of Chicago Press, 1952), 520.

Appendix 3

" ANTI-SEMITISM" AND

ESCHATOLOGY

In The Living End, Charles Ryrie sets forth his belief that the Bible predicts

"the time of Israel's greatest bloodbath."1 This is true, Ryrie contends,

because the Bible is "history prewritten."2 Indeed, the Bible does predict a

judgment on the Jews, but this event is now history. Instead of encourag-

ing Jews to emigrate to the doomed city, Jesus warned the inhabitants of

Jerusalem to flee from a judgment that was near at hand for them (Matt.

24:16).3 Ryrie and other dispensationalists have futurized prophecies related

to the destruction of Jerusalem beyond their intended first-century time

frame and audience. As we will see, this method has had dire consequences

for the Jews.

Name Calling

Why have some dispensationalists shifted their attack against non-

dispensationalists from exegetical arguments to adhominem attacks? There is

one simple answer: They can no longer defend their system by an appeal to the

Bible or to history. Rank and file dispensationalists are jumping ship, and those

who remain are redefining the system out of existence. Here is an example:

407

408

LAST DAYS MADNESS

For years, dispensational theology, with its differentiation of God's

program for the church and for Israel, shaped conservative evangelical

views. Its literal interpretation of prophecy, promoted by the Scofield

Bible and scholars from Dallas Theological Seminary, marked the restora-

tion of Israel as the starting point for many other end-times prophecies,

culminating in Christ's return.

But some say the influence of traditional dispensationalism has de-

clined in the past decade. Others, like Darrell Bock, professor of New

Testament at Dallas, say it's entering a new phase. He sees it going

through a period of self-assessment. A new, "progressive dispensational-

ism" is emerging, one that is less "land-centered" and "future-centered"

than past versions.4

Others are questioning dispensational "orthodoxy." For example, Robert

L. Saucy, tells us, "Over the past several decades the system of theologi-

cal interpretation commonly known as dispensationalism has undergone

considerable development and refinement." 5 The change has been radical

enough to warrant the giving of a new label—progressive dispensation-

alism—"to distinguish the new interpretations from the older version of

dispensationalism.6

In Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The Search for Definition, the

contributors describe how dispensationalism has changed and will con-

tinue to change. One writer states that "dispensationalism has been in the

process of change since its earliest origins within the Plymouth Breth-

eren [sic] movement of the nineteenth century."7 In the same series, Craig

Blaising admits and welcomes "modifications currently taking place in

dispensational thought."8

A few old-school dispensationalists remain, but they can no longer

turn to their more scholarly counterparts for exegetical backup support,

so they resort to a highly effective form of name calling: "If a person

does not believe that the Bible teaches that Old Testament prophecies

predict a future re-establishment of national Israel he or she is anti-

semitic."9 Those who study the Old Testament prophecies related to Israel

note that these prophecies have been fulfilled in (1) the return of the Jews

after their exile into Assyria and Babylon and (2) the first-century estab-

lishment of the Jewish church.10

' Anti- Semitism " and Eschatology 386

409

A careful study of dispensational rhetoric, reasoning, history, and theol-

ogy will demonstrate that dispensationalism has within its system the seeds

of "theological anti-semitism."

Messianic Vision?

Sid Roth, host of "Messianic Vision," on the September 18, 1991, edi-

tion of the "700 Club," stated that "two-thirds of the Jewish people [living

in Israel] will be exterminated." He, along with other futurists, bases this

belief on a futurized interpretation of Zechariah 13:8-9. He sees incidents

like that of Blacks against Jews in New York as a prelude to a coming great

persecution. Pat Robertson asked Roth: "You don't foresee some kind of per-

secution against Jews in America, do you?" Roth responded: "Unfortunately,

I believe God foresees this." Roth believes that the end (pre-tribulational

rapture) is near. Since he believes that Jews are destined to suffer, based on

a futurized interpretation of Zechariah 13:8-9,11 he postulates that today's

anti-semitism is a prelude to a greater, future tribulation. The reality of vio-

lent acts against Jews today is all part of the inevitabilities that come with

dispensational premillennialism. What is the origin of this position?

The Rupture of Theology

The pre-tribulational rapture is the key to dispensational eschatology.

The pre-tribulational rapture separates dispensationalism from other forms

of premillennialism as well as amillennialism and postmillennialism. This is

what makes it a "fourth view" of eschatology.12 According to dispensational-

ism, prior to the rapture, Israel has no prophetic significance. This is carried to a consistent extreme by some dispensationalists who claim that Jews once

again must be ejected from their homeland and brought back as believing

Israelites. Dr. Paige Patterson stated this position on a Dallas, Texas, radio

program (KCBI) on May 15, 1991. He said:

The present state of Israel is not the final form. The present state of

Israel will be lost, eventually, and Israel will be run out of the land again,

only to return when they accept the Messiah as Savior.

It is only in this way, so the theory goes, that the prophecies concerning

Israel's restoration can literally be fulfilled in prophetic time, that is, after the

410

LAST DAYS MADNESS

rapture of the church. Israel's expulsion occurs prior to the rapture with the

church looking on. Would Christians be fighting against God if they helped

the Jews hold on to their land? Would they be anti-semitic if they allowed

prophecy to unfold and saw millions of Jews persecuted by their enemies?

The Parenthesis

Standard dispensationalism has always taught that the prophetic time

clock stopped ticking when Israel rejected Jesus as the Messiah. This rejec-

tion put the conclusion of Daniel's seventy weeks (490 years) on hold. Israel

experienced 483 years of the prophecy outlined by God in Daniel 9:24-27.

The final week—the seven years that will complete the prophecy—is still

to take place. This is the period of "Jacob's trouble" when Israel will go

through never before experienced persecution. Of course, as with much of

dispensationalism, there are no verses that support this view. One must be

an expert in reading between the verses.

The result of such a system means that Israel has no prophetic significance in

God's program until the church is raptured prior to the seven-year tribulation period

(Daniel's 70th week). This is the dispensational view as ably articulated by

E. Schuyler English:

An intercalary period of history, after Christ's death and resurrection

and the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, has intervened. This is the

present age, the Church age. . . . During this time God has not been dealing

with Israel nationally, for they have been blinded concerning God's mercy in Christ.

... However, God will again deal with Israel as a nation. This will be in

Daniel's seventieth week, a seven-year period yet to come.13

According to dispensationalism, God is now dealing with His Church, His

"heavenly people." God is not, according to dispensationalism, dealing with Israel, His "earthly people." The promises made to Israel are "postponed."

Technically speaking, with this unusual dispensational view in mind, there

can be no such thing as "anti-semitism" as Lindsey and other dispensational-

ists describe it! The Jews are like everybody else: They are lost in their sins

until they embrace Christ as their Lord and Savior. "Anti-Semitism," according

to the dispensational view, is no different from anti-Japanese, anti-Italian,

antiArab, anti-Irish, or anti-German attitudes. Jews are not God's chosen

411

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

people this side of the rapture. This is the dispensational view!

Consider this as well. If the promises to Israel as a people and nation

are postponed, as dispensationalism teaches, then the land promise, and the

promise of "those who bless you, I will bless," also have been set aside until

the prophetic clock ticks once again when the Church is raptured. Treating

Jews with care or persecuting them will affect God in no special way prior to

the rapture. God is not obligated to keep a promise that has been postponed.

Again, these are the implications of the dispensational view of prophecy.

A number of dispensationalists understand the problem of how to view

Israel before the rapture. Stan Rittenhouse has written the following about

present-day Israel:14

• "A curse has been put on Israel."

• "Israel will again be made desolate."

• "Today's Israel is not of God."

• "Today's Israel is not of Christ but rather that of the Devil."

• "The Israel of today is a Satanic counterfeit."

• "Israel must first be destroyed."

Why does Rittenhouse write such inflammatory things about the present

state of Israel? Like a good dispensationalist, he believes that "Today is an

in-between age which is commonly called the Age of Grace, the Age of the

Holy Spirit, or the Church Age (the Church being the body of believers in

Christ, the total and complete group, whosoever that may be, Gentile or

Jew). During this period in between the First and Second Coming[s] of Jesus

Christ, a Satanic counterfeit—political Zionism—masquerading as the State

of 'Israel' will be established."15

According to dispensationalism, God has a special place for Israel, but

only until after the rapture when the church will no longer he earthbound. This means that Israel has no special significance between the first and second comings

of Christ. Dispensational premillennialism, which had its start sometime in

the nineteenth century, does not have a place for Israel until after the rapture.

And even then, two-thirds of the Jews living in Israel will be destroyed.

The establishment of the State [of Israel] is seen as a sign that the Second

Coming is near, to be preceded by a Soviet attack on Israel. These groups

profess simple biblical values and clear cut support for Israel, but their

412

LAST DAYS MADNESS

political activity raises complex, troubling questions for Jews.16

It is this part of dispensationalism that rarely gets public and scholarly

scrutiny. If any group within evangelicalism, other than dispensationalists,

claimed that Israel has no special redemptive significance until after the

rapture, they would be condemned and labeled anti-Semitic.

Armageddon Now!

Modern-day Jews are bothered by the potential for harm that resides in

dispensationalism. Their fear is justified in light of history. Dwight Wilson,

author of Armageddon Now!, convincingly demonstrates that dispensational

premillennialism advocated a "hands off" policy regarding Nazi persecutions

of the Jews during World War II. Since, according to dispensational views

regarding Bible prophecy, "the Gentile nations are permitted to afflict Israel

in chastisement for her national sins," there is little that should be done

to oppose it.17 Wilson writes that "It is regrettable that this view allowed

premillennialists to expect the phenomenon of 'anti-Semitism' and tolerate

it matter-of-factly."18 Wilson describes himself as "a third-generation pre-

millenarian who has spent his whole life in premillennialist churches, has

attended a premillennialist Bible college, and has taught in such a college

for fourteen years."19

Wilson describes "premillenarian views" opposing "anti-Semitism" in the

midthirties and thereafter as "ambivalent."20 There was little moral outcry

"among the premillenarians ... against the persecution, since they had been

expecting it."21 He continues:

Another comment regarding the general European anti-Semitism de-

picted these developments as part of the on-going plan of God for the

nation; they were "Foregleams of Israel's Tribulation." Premillennialists

were anticipating the Great Tribulation, "the time of Jacob's trouble."

Therefore, they predicted, "The next scene in Israel's history may be

summed up in three words: purification through tribulation." It was clear

that although this purification was part of the curse, God did not intend

that Christians should participate in it. Clear, also, was the implication

that He did intend for the Germans to participate in it (in spite of the fact

that it would bring them punishment)— and that any moral outcry against

Germany would have been in opposition to God's will. In such a fatalistic system,

413

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

to oppose Hitler was to oppose God.22

Other premillennial writers placed "part of the blame for anti-Semitism

on the Jews: 'The Jew is the world's archtroubler. Most of the Revolutions

of Continental Europe were fostered by Jews.' The Jews—especially the

German Jews—were responsible for the great depression."23

Wilson maintains that it was the premillennial view of a predicted Jewish

persecution prior to the Second Coming that led to a "hands off" policy

when it came to speaking out against virulent "anti-Semitism." "For the

premillenarian, the massacre of Jewry expedited his blessed hope. Certainly

he did not rejoice over the Nazi holocaust, he just fatalistically observed it

as a 'sign of the times.'"24 Wilson offers this summary:

Pleas from Europe for assistance for Jewish refugees fell on deaf ears,

and "Hands Off" meant no helping hand. So in spite of being theologically

more pro-Jewish than any other Christian group, the premillenarians also

were apathetic—because of a residual anti-Semitism, because persecution

was prophetically expected, because it would encourage immigration to

Palestine, because it seemed the beginning of the Great Tribulation, and

because it was a wonderful sign of the imminent blessed hope.25

Dispensationalism sees a great persecution yet to come where "two

thirds of the children of Israel in the land will perish" during the "Great

Tribulation."26

Dispensational ''Anti-Semitism"

Let me recount another bit of history related to this issue. Dispensational

premillennialist James M. Gray of the Moody Bible Institute believed in the

authenticity of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He defended Henry Ford

when Ford published installments of the Protocols in his self-funded Dearborn

Independent newspaper.

In a 1927 editorial in the Moody Bible Institute Monthly, Gray claimed that

Ford "had good grounds for publishing some of the things about the Jews.

. .. Mr. Ford might have found corroborative evidence [of the Jewish con-

spiracy] had he looked for it."27 As time went on, Gray was coming under

increasing pressure to repudiate the Protocols as a forgery. Not only Gray, but

Moody Bible Institute Monthly was being criticized by the evangelical Hebrew

414

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Christian Alliance for not condemning the manufactured Protocols. Gray grew indignant and once again voiced his belief that the Protocols were authentic.

He did this in the Moody Bible Institute Monthly, a dispensational magazine

still in publication today as Moody Monthly] Gray, of course, pointed out that

"Moody Bible Institute had always worked for the highest interests of Jews

by training people to evangelize them."28

Even so, Gray went on to assert that "Jews were at least partly to blame for

their ill treatment." He supported this contention by referring his readers to an

article written by Max Reich, a faculty member at the Moody Bible Institute.

Reich wrote: "Without religion, the Jew goes down and becomes worse than

others, as a corruption of the best is always the worst corruption."29

Charges of "anti-Semitism" were not abated by Gray's attempts at

clarification. His views concerning the Jews remained. "By the beginning

of 1935, Gray was fending off charges from the American Hebrew and Jewish

Tribune, the Bulletin of the Baltimore Branch of the American Jewish Congress, and even Time magazine that persons connected with Moody had been actively

distributing the Protocols ."30

Of course, Gray was not the only dispensational premillennialist who

vouched for the genuineness of the Protocols and had rather negative ("anti-

semitic"?) things to say about the Jews. Arno C. Gaebelein, an editor of the

Scofield Reference Bible, believed that the Protocols were authentic, that they accurately revealed a "Jewish conspiracy." His Conflict of the Age?1 would be viewed today as an "anti-semitic" work because it fostered the belief that

communism had Jewish roots and that the Bolshevik revolution of 1917

had been masterminded by a group of well-trained Jewish agitators. At the

same time that Gaebelein was using anti-semitic rhetoric, he had a thriving

evangelistic ministry to Jews in New York City. Why the double mindedness?

Dispensationalism requires both the persecution and salvation of Jews.32

Dispensationalism's Future Holocaust?

Over against the clear statements of Scripture and the corroboration of

unbiased secular historians who were living at the time of the destruction of

Jerusalem in A.D. 70, dispensationalists maintain that the events of Matthew

24:1-34 refer to a future seven-year tribulation period where the entire

world will suffer untold persecution and slaughter at the hands of the anti-

christ and his armies. John Walvoord, a leading dispensationalist spokesman,

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

415

writes that these supposed future judgments will be "without parallel in the

history of the world. According to Revelation 6:7 the judgments attending

the opening of the fourth seal involve the death with sword, famine, and

wild beasts of one fourth of the world's population. If this were applied to

the present world population now approaching three billion, it would mean

that 750,000,000 people would perish, more than the total population of

North America, Central America, and South America combined."33

Hal Lindsey supports Walvoord's position, affirming that during the "Great

Tribulation" there will be "death on a massive scale. It staggers the imagination to realize that one-fourth of the world's population will be destroyed within

a matter of days. According to projected census figures this will amount to

nearly one billion people!"34 Of course, with the latest census figures, with

the dispensational view in mind, nearly 1.25 billion people will die. Not only

does the world come in for a beating under the dispensational hermeneutic,

but Israel is specifically hit hard. Walvoord, with his view of a future seven-

year "Great Tribulation," must claim that a large number of Jews living in

Israel will be slaughtered. He writes:

The purge of Israel in their time of trouble is described by Zechariah

in these words: "And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith Jeho-

vah, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left

therein. And I will bring the third part into the fire, and will refine them

as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried" (Zechariah 13:8,

9). According to Zechariah's prophecy, two thirds of the children of Israel in

the land will perish, but the one third that are left will be refined and be

awaiting the deliverance of God at the second coming of Christ which is

described in the next chapter of Zechariah.35

Israel's present population is around 4,500,000. If two-thirds of the

Jews living in Israel at the time of the "Great Tribulation" are to die, this

will mean the death of nearly 3,000,000! In addition, there is continued

immigration from the former Soviet Union supported by Christian organiza-

tions like "On Wings of Eagles." Financial support is raised by Christians to

fund Jewish settlements in the occupied territories. "'This is a biblical issue,'

says Theodore T. Beckett, a Colorado developer who founded the Christian-

sponsored, adopt-a-settlement program. 'The Bible says in the last days the

Jews will be restored to the nation of Israel.'"36 For every three people who

416

LAST DAYS MADNESS

enter, two of them will be killed during the "Great Tribulation." Why aren't

today's dispensationalists warning Jews about this coming holocaust by

encouraging them to leave Israel until the conflagration is over? Instead, we

find dispensationalists supporting and encouraging the relocation of Jews

to the land of Israel. For what? A future holocaust?

Eugene Merrill, while not discussing Zechariah 13:8 in his commentary

on that biblical book, does describe how a future holocaust of the Jews is

in view in Zechariah 14:2. Merrill writes:

The restoration and dominion cannot come until all the forces of evil

that seek to subvert it are put down once and for all. Specifically, the

redemption of Israel will be accomplished on the ruins of her own suf-

fering and those of the malevolent powers of this world that, in the last

day, will consolidate themselves against her and seek to interdict forever

any possibility of her success. The nations of the whole earth will come

against Jerusalem, and, having defeated her, will divide up their spoils of

war in her very midst.37

If this is to be the future of Jews living in Israel, then why aren't dis-

pensationalists warning Jews to flee the city? Israel was warned by Jesus to

"flee to the mountains" (Matthew 24:16). The New Testament is filled with

warnings about the coming A.D. 70 holocaust with no encouragement to

take up residence in Jerusalem. In fact, there was a mass exodus from the

city by those who understood the world-wide implications of the gospel

message and the approaching destruction of what was the center of Jewish

worship (John 4:21-24).

A Past and Confined Holocaust

Preterists believe that the events described in Matthew 24:1-34 were

fulfilled in the events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusa-

lem in A.D. 70. "The guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the

blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah,

whom [they] murdered between the temple and the altar" (Matthew 23:35)

fell upon the generation of Jews who "did not recognize the time of [their]

visitation" (Luke 19:44) and crucified "the Lord of glory" (1 Corinthians

2:8). How do we know this? Because Jesus told us: "Truly I say to you, all

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

417

these things shall come upon this generation" (Matthew 23:36 and 24:34).

No future generation of Jews is meant here.

Unfortunately, by futurizing this prophecy, Jews through the centuries

have been reliving this past (preterist) judgment at the hands of misguided

men who have been driven by bad theology. For example, in the Bavarian

Alpine village of Oberammergau, controversy has arisen over the re-enact-

ment of Christ's Passion. "The classic folk drama originated in 1634, after

villagers vowed to re-enact Christ's Passion regularly if they were spared

from the Black Death."38 The most severe criticism has arisen because of a

single verse from Matthew's gospel: "His blood be on us and on our chil-

dren!" (27:25). While a number of alterations have been made in the play,

the verse from Matthew has not be cut.

The commission voted narrowly to retain the controversial line, prompt-

ing criticism from Rabbi A. James Rudin of the American Jewish Com-

mittee, who is calling for a completely new play that "should reflect the

reality of the 'cursed' Jewish people living in a reborn and independent

state of Israel."39

The play does not need to be rewritten; it just needs a more biblical inter-

pretation. The curse had its end in A.D. 70 upon the generation that uttered

the oath. To continue to futurize the events that are of a certainty fulfilled

prophecy can only do more harm. Much of modern-day evangelicalism and

fundamentalism unwittingly contributes to wide-spread "anti-semitism" be-

cause of their continued futurization of texts that have been fulfilled. Secular

writers have picked up on this element in dispensationalism:

Convinced that a nuclear Armageddon is an inevitable event within the

divine scheme of things, many evangelical dispensationalists have com-

mitted themselves to a course for Israel that, by their own admission, will

lead directly to a holocaust indescribably more savage and widespread

than any vision of carnage that could have generated in Adolf Hitler's

criminal mind.40

Jews are always in jeopardy of being persecuted as long as dispensation-

alists push a false interpretation of prophecy that makes Jews the scapegoat

for a distorted theological system.

418

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jewish "Anti-Semitism"?

Even Jews can sound like theological anti-Semites. Orthodox Rabbi Eliezer

Schach suggested that millions of Jews were murdered during World War II

because of their sinfulness.

The Almighty keeps a balance sheet of the world, and when the sins

become too many, he brings destruction. We don't know how long his

patience holds out, sometimes 20 years, sometimes 10, and sometimes

only a year.... The last time he brought destruction, it was the Holocaust.

... Because of the sins, the Almighty may bring another Holocaust upon

us, and it may already be tomorrow.41

Auschwitz survivor Menachem Russak said Schach "exonerated the Nazi

murderers, but turned them into messengers of God who were sent to punish

the people of Israel for not observing the Torah."42

Dispensational premillennialist Hal Lindsey could be doing the same

when he writes: "Until Messiah comes again and Israel turns to him, the

nation is still officially under God's divine discipline."43 Lindsey concludes

that the destruction of the temple in A.D. 70 "began the long period called

by Jesus the 'times of the Gentiles.' As Moses predicted, during this long

period the Jewish people would be wanderers from place to place with

no assurance of safety or acceptance."44 A preterist, someone who believes

that the prophecies relating to Jerusalem's destruction were fulfilled in A.D.

70, maintains that the destruction of the temple in A.D. 70 ended the forty

year period Jesus outlined in Matthew 24. While Lindsey awaits a future

Jewish holocaust, preterists assert it is over. Sure enough, Lindsey's futur-

ist interpretation is a reality. "For nearly two thousand years now," Lindsey

writes, "this prophecy has been a horrible reality in the life of God's chosen

people. No nation in the history of the world has undergone such persecu-

tion and distress."45 Lindsey is still awaiting a time when God will "purge"

Israel of sin.46 These comments from Lindsey come from a chapter titled

"The Holocaust."

We should bear in mind at this point that anti-semitism is an overused

and often misunderstood term that is applied indiscriminately. Consider the

charge of anti-semitism leveled against the Willowband Declaration, pro-

duced at a meeting convened by the World Evangelical Fellowship in April

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

386

of 1989. An international consultation on Jewish evangelism challenged

Christians "to stop looking for excuses for not sharing the gospel of Jewish

Christ with Jews."47 What was the response of A. James Rudin, a rabbi and

national interreligious affairs director of the American Jewish Committee?

"He called it a 'blueprint for spiritual genocide' and expressed the hope

that it will be 'repudiated by Christians everywhere.'"48 For Rabbi Rudin,

evangelizing J ews is anti-semitic! The belief that Jews are in need of redemption teaches "contempt for Jews and Judaism," says Rabbi Rudin.

Conclusion

What is the answer to anti-semitism? First, we must reject the simplistic

treatments of dispensational writers who consider anyone who does not agree

with their future holocaust view as being an anti-semite. "Being opposed to

the policies of the modern state of Israel for its West Bank atrocities or for

its socialism or for its anti-Christian laws will not suffice as anti-Semitism."

Being "opposed to the policies of Israel's government... is not he same as

being opposed to Jews as such."49 For decades Christians have opposed the

Soviet Union. This did not mean that Christians were prejudiced against the

Russian people or their heritage.

Second, we must understand that minority groups of all kinds suffer

persecution. There was a period in our nation when blacks were enslaved.

For a time, the Irish were often treated worse than blacks. "In the pre-Civil

War South, Irish laborers were often used in work considered too danger-

ous for slaves, who represented a sizable capital investment.... The native

public's reaction to the Irish included moving out of neighborhoods en masse

as the immigrants moved in; stereotyping them all as drunkards, brawlers,

and incompetents; and raising employment barriers exemplified in the stock

phrase, 'No Irish need apply.'"50 Even today we find continued persecution

of blacks, Asians, and Jews. Little is said by our dispensational brethren,

however, when Israel discriminates against Christians or when Arab nations

are just as hostile toward Christians as they are against Jews.

Many conflicts around the globe can be traced to religious intolerance,

[Carl] Henry noted, such as: the Nazi extermination of Jews, the Chinese

Communist massacre of Christians, Israel's official hard-line policy toward

Jews who consider themselves Reformed, Conservative and Messianic

420

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Jews (Christians), the fighting among Irish Protestants and Catholics, and

Islam's persecution of Muslim converts to other religions.51

To what in eschatology can we attribute these acts of persecution? Are

we to assume that only dispensationalism can save us from these centuries-

old rivalries?

Third, the Jews will be safe when Christians can teach others that it is

wrong to do harm to a neighbor, no matter what their race or religion. The

issue, therefore, is ethics, not eschatology.

'Anti-Semitism " and Eschatology

421

Notes

1. Charles Caldwell Ryrie, The Living End (Old Tappan, NJ: Revell, 1976), 81.

"A Bloodbath for Israel" is the title of chapter 8.

2. Ryrie, The Living End, 80.

3. A number of Christian ministries raise funds to help Russian Jews to immigrate

to Israel. Why do they do this when they know that two-thirds of the Jews

living in Israel during the Great Tribulation will be slaughtered?

4. Ken Sidey, "For the Love of Zion," Christianity Today (March 9, 1992), 50.

5. Robert L. Saucy, The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism: The Interface Between

Dispensationalism and Non-Dispensational Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zonder-

van, 1993), 8.

6. Saucy, The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism, 8.

7. Stanley N. Gundry, "Foreword," Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church: The Search far Definition (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992), 11.

8. Craig A. Blaising, "Dispensationalism: A Search for Definition," Dispensa-

tionalism, Israel and the Church, 15. See Craig A. Blaising and Darrell L. Bock,

Progressive Dispensationalism: An Up-to-Date Handbook of Contemporary Dispen-

sational Thought ( Wheaton, IL: Victor/Bridgepoint Books, 1993).

9. Those who accuse non-dispensationalists of being "anti-semitic" rarely

define the term. Instead, they manufacture a new term called "theological

anti-semitism" to suit their defamatory tactics. True anti-semitism is defined

as prejudice against Semitic people because they are semites.

10. See William Hendriksen, Israel and Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book

House, 1968), 16—31. The first church was made up almost exclusively of

Jews. Later, Gentile believers were grafted into an already existing Jewish

Church (Rom. 11:19). These believers, consisting of Jews and Gentiles, are

the true "Jews" (Rom. 2:28—29), the true "circumcision" (Phil. 3:3), the true

"seed of Abraham" (Gal. 3:7, 29), the "children of promise" (4:28), the "commonwealth of Israel" (Eph. 2:12, 19).

11. Zechariah was describing a future holocaust. It was fulfilled in A.D. 70 with

the destruction of Jerusalem and the slaughter of 1,100,000 Jews at the hands

of the Romans.

12. Robert G. Clouse, ed., The Meaning of the Millennium: Four Views (Downers

Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1977).

13. E. Schuyler English, A Companion to the New Scof i eld Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972), 135. Emphasis added.

14. Stan Rittenhouse, "For Fear of the Jews" (Vienna, VA: The Exhorters, 1982), 7, 422

LAST DAYS MADNESS

8, 9, 45, 169, 179.

15. Rittenhouse, "For Fear of the Jews" 1.

16. The B'Nai B'Rith International Jewish Monthly (Sept. 1981), 17.

17. Dwight Wilson, Armageddon Now!: The Premillenarian Response to Russia and Israel

Since 1917 (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1977), Reprinted by the

Institute for Christian Economics in 1991 with an updated foreword by the

author.

18. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 16.

19. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 13.

20. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 94.

21. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 94.

22. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 94. Emphasis added.

23. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 95.

24. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 95.

25. Wilson, Armageddon Now!, 96-97. See comments on page 217.

26. John F. Walvoord, Israel in Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Academie,

[1962] 1988), 108.

27. Timothy P. Weber, Livingin the Shadow of the Second Coming: American Premillen-

nialism, 1875-1982 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan/Academie, 1983), 189.

28. Weber, Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming, 189.

29. Quoted in Weber, Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming, 190.

30. Weber, Living in the Shadow of the Second Coming 189.

31. Arno Clemens Gaebelein, The Conflict of the Ages: The Mystery of Lawlessness: Its

Origin, Historic Development and Coming Defeat (New York: Publication Office

"Our Hope," 1933).

32. Timothy P. Weber, "A Reply to David Rausch's 'Fundamentalism and the

Jew "'Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (March 1981), 70.

33. Walvoord, Israel in Prophecy, 108.

34. Hal Lindsey, There's a New World Coming (New York: Bantam Books, [1973]

1984), 90. Emphasis in original.

35. Walvoord, Israel in Prophecy, 108. Emphasis added.

36. Ann LoLordo, "Evangelical Christians Come to Jews' Aid," Atlanta Constitution (August 8, 1997), A8.

37. Eugene H. Merrill, An Exegetical Commentary:Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi(Chi-

cago, IL: Moody Press, 1994), 342.

38. Michael Walsh, "Oberammergau's Blood Curse," Time (June 4, 1990), 89.

39. Walsh, "Oberammergau's Blood Curse," 89.

"Anti-Semitism " and Esch a tology

423

40. Grace Halsell, Prophecy and Politics: Militant Evangelists on the Road to Nuclear

War (Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill & Co., 1986), 195.

41. "Rabbi sees Holocaust as God's punishment; Israelis are outraged," The Atlanta Journal (December 28, 1990), B5. A shorter version of this Associated Press

news story appeared in USA Today (December 28, 1990), 4A.

42. "Rabbi sees Holocaust as God's punishment; Israelis are outraged," B5.

43. Hal Lindsey, The Promise (New York: Bantam Books, 1994), 190.

44. Lindsey, Promise, 190.

45. Lindsey, Promise, 190.

46. Lindsey, Promise, 191.

47. Arthur H. Matthews, "Evangelism To Jews Supported by Gathering, But

Blasted by Rabbi," World (May 20, 1989), 12.

48. Matthews, "Evangelism To Jews Supported by Gathering," 12.

49. Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., "Anti-Semitism, Reconstruction, and Dispensational-

ism," Chalcedon Report (August 1997), 11.

50. Thomas Sowell, Ethnic America: A History (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 27

and 17.

51. Carey Kinsolving, "Southern Baptist warned of Saudi Arabia's Religious

Persecution," The Washington Post (March 7, 1992).

Appendix 4

SOLA SCRIPTURA

AND PROPHECY

Assembling historical support for a particular theological position is a

common practice among evangelicals, especially in the area of eschatol-

ogy. Standard dispensational works include historical studies to support their

position.1 Of course, there is nothing wrong with historical analysis as long

as the evidence is not used to bolster weak exegetical arguments.

To bolster the claim that much of New Testament prophecy has not been

fulfilled, futurists rummage through the writings of the early Church Fathers.

Since these men are only a generation or two removed from the apostolic era,

so the reasoning goes, their insights are considered invaluable for a right under-

standing of biblical prophecy. Unfortunately, these writers are read selectively

and with a predisposition to an already accepted prophetic perspective. For

example, premillennial pastor Steve Hogan asks, "What do the early Church

Fathers say about the Antichrist?"2 After surveying eight Church Fathers from

Justin Martyr (c. 100-164) to Augustine (354—430) on their views of the

antichrist and the great tribulation, Hogan asks a follow-up question:

Doesn't it seem strange to you that if Nero was the antichrist, and

if the great tribulation had already occurred, then these church fathers

would have said so?3

425

426

LAST DAYS MADNESS

In fact, they did. "All the earliest Christian writers on the Apocalypse,

from Irenaeus down to Victorinus of Pettau and Commodian in the fourth,

and Andreas in the fifth, and St. Beatus in the eighth century, connect Nero,

or some Roman Emperor, with the Apocalyptic Beast."4 In Christian writ-

ings, "Nero is the Anti-Christ whose persecution of the Christians heralds

the destruction of Rome. This view of Nero as Anti-Christ continued to be

celebrated by the Church Fathers and by later Christian writers. The picture

of him as the incarnation of evil triumphed as Christianity triumphed."5

Tertullian (145-200), in chronicling the sufferings of the apostles, wrote,

"At Rome Nero was the first who stained with blood the rising faith" 6

The Bible is the Standard

In terms of sola Scriptura, however, it does not matter what these men

believed. The Bible is the standard. If the Bible says the Beast (antichrist)

appeared in the first century, then it happened, no matter what certain early

Church Fathers assert.7 From the first century to the present, godly men

have been wrong in their interpretation and application of prophetic texts.8

Moreover, there is little if any consensus among the supporters of the his-

toricist and futurist schools of biblical prophecy down through the centuries

as to the identity of the antichrist/beast.9

Second-Hand Sources

Why do we assume that men like Justin Martyr, Cyprian, Irenaeus, and

others are exempt from misapplication and error? Is it because of their

proximity to the events?

Their physical and spiritual fathers and grandfathers would have told

them about this incredibly wicked person, the antichrist, and would have

included this important information in their writings.10

So now we are dependent on second and third-hand testimony to support

a futuristic view of prophecy even though the Bible states unequivocally

that the events of Matthew 24 took place before "this generation" passed

away (v. 34). The biblical time references "near," "shortly," and "quickly"

are dismissed in favor of opinions by uninspired writers written decades

after the fact. When John tells his first-century readers that the presence of

Sold Scriptura and Prophecy

427

antichrist in their day is evidence that "it is the last hour" (1 John 2:18), we are told that historical evidence nullifies such a conclusion. Proximity to an

event does not assure future generations that past events will be reported

or remembered acurately.11 People still believe that religious leaders in the

fifteenth century taught that the earth was flat and Columbus wanted to

prove it was round even though there is no evidence to substantiate this

commonly held fable.12

Immediacy or Imminency?

Once historical sources are used as authoritative, futurists then move to the

next level of analysis by reformulating the debate just enough to obscure the

issue. For example, Hogan, like other futurists, states, "the early church fathers

were expecting the antichrist and the great tribulation to come sometime in

the future."13 A close reading of their writings gives an altogether different

perspective. Ignatius writes around the year A.D. 100 that "the last times are

come upon us,"14 words that echo those of the Apostle Paul when he writes

that "the ends of the ages" had come upon him and the Corinthian Church

(1 Cor. 10:11). They both can't be right. Given a choice, I'll stick with Paul.

Cyprian (c. 200-258) writes "that the day of affliction has begun to hang

over our heads, and the end of the world and the time of the Antichrist..

. draw near, so that we must all stand prepared for the battle."15 This was a

constant theme in Cyprian's writings. These men, along with most of their

contemporaries, believed that they were living in the last days, that the time

of the end was near for them. They were wrong because they misapplied the

time texts. Today's "prophecy experts" repeat their errors.

What happens when futurists encounter time texts which speak of the

near return of Christ? A new doctrine is manufactured called "imminency"

or the "any moment" return of Christ. The following definition is typical:

The primary thought expressed by the word "imminency" is that

something important is likely to happen, and could happen soon. While

the event may not be immediate, or necessarily very soon, it is next on

the program and may take place at any time.16

There is nothing in the time texts that would support this definition.17

Words such as "likely," "could happen," and "may take place" are nowhere indicated. The biblical writers are straightforward in their claim that the

428

LAST DAYS MADNESS

events described were to happen "soon" for those who first read the prophe-

cies. No other interpretation is possible if the words are taken in their "plain,

primary, ordinary, usual, or normal" sense, something dispensationalists

insist upon.18

If the biblical authors wanted to communicate uncertainty about the timing

of future events, they would have equivocated by using words expressing

probability. So then, any time a dispensationalist sees a passage that states

without reservation that Jesus' coming is "near," he substitutes "any mo-

ment," a clear violation of sound biblical exegesis. Thomas Ice and Timothy

Demy try but fail to find biblical support for a similar view by modifying

the meaning of words dealing with time.

The fact that Christ could return at any moment but may not soon is

supported in the New Testament in the following passages: 1 Corinthi-

ans 1:7; 16:22; Philippians 3:20; 4:5; 1 Thessalonians 1:10; Titus 2:13;

Hebrews 9:28; James 5:7-9; 1 Peter 1:13; Jude 21; Revelation 3:11;

22:7, 12, 17, 20.19

These passages offer no support for an "any moment" return of Christ. For

example, James 5:7-9 states clearly that "the coming of the Lord is at hand,"

that "the Judge is standing right at the door." The Christians of Corinth20 were

"awaiting eagerly" the coming of the Lord (1 Corinthians 1:7), a coming

that all first-century Christians were told was near.

Renald Showers makes a surprising admission that contradicts the notion

of imminency as advocated by Ice, Demy, and himself. He asserts that a "per-

son cannot legitimately say that an imminent event will happen soon. The

term 'soon' implies that an event must take place 'within a short time (after a

particular point of time specified or implied).'"21 This means that time words

such as "soon," "near," and "at hand" mean just what they seem to mean. The conclusion? Jesus' coming had to be near for the first-century church since

"'soon' implies that an event must take place 'within a short time.'" This is confirmed to us when we read in Revelation that "the time is near" (1:3).

A Closer Look at History

Dispensationalists are fond of quoting the early Church Fathers to support

their contention that the Church taught the "imminent" or "any moment"

Sola Scriptura and Prophecy

429

return of Christ. As the following survey will illustrate, they believed no

such thing. They believed that end time events were contemporary with

their generation, as these examples demonstrate:

• "Even in Justin Martyr's time there was still the expectation of an imme-

diate Parousia (Dial. c. Tryph. 80)."22 Justin believed that "the Antichrist would be a person who was close at hand, and who would reign three

and a half years."23

•Justin applied the fulfillment of Matthew 24:11 to his own day: "For

what things He predicted would take place in His name, these we do see

being actually accomplished in our sight. For He said, 'For many shall come

in My name, clothed outwardly in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they

are ravening wolves' [Matt. 7:15]. And, 'There shall be schisms and

heresies' [1 Cor. 11:19] And, 'Many false Christs and false prophets

shall arise, and shall deceive many of the faithful' [Matt. 24:11]."24

• "Irenaeus also thought that Antichrist, as foreshadowed by the Wild

Beast, would be a man; and that 'the number of the Beast' represented

Lateinos, 'a Latin.'"25

• "Hippolytus compares the action of the False Prophet giving life to

the Beast's image, to Augustus inspiring fresh force into the Roman

Empire."26

• St. Victorinus (about A.D. 303) identifies Nero as the Beast.27

There is ample evidence to prove that these writers understood that as-

pects of the Olivet Discourse applied to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D.

70. At the same time, they believed that they were living in the last days,

that the Beast was among them, and Jesus' return was near for them. This

only shows that they were as confused about Bible prophecy as today's

prophetic speculators.

First-Century Testimony

There is earlier extra-biblical evidence to support the claim that firstcentury

Christians clearly understood that Jesus would return in judgment before

their generation passed away. A story is told about James, the brother of

Jesus, stating that Jesus' coming was "about to take place."28 Second-cen-

tury ecclesiastical writer Hegesippus, quoting what James said to a group

430

LAST DAYS MADNESS

of Scribes and Pharisees, "reflects the tradition of the early church on [the

subject of the immediacy of the second advent] by stating that Jesus 'is about

to come on the clouds of heaven.'"29 When asked about the "Son of Man,"

James responded: "He is now sitting in the heavens, on the right hand of

great Power, and is about to come on the clouds of heaven."30 The Greek word

mello, "about to," "communicates a sense of immediacy."31 "If the author had not wished to stress the immediate aspect of Christ's coming, he could still

have stressed the certainty of Christ's coming with erketai, thereby omitting

the immediate factor."32

After hearing James' statement—an obvious allusion to Matthew 26:64—

the officials of the temple cast him down from the "wing of the temple," as

Hegesippus tells it, and later stoned him and beat out his brains with a club.

This was in A.D. 63. "Immediately after this," Hegesippus writes, "Vespasian invaded and took Judea."33 James identifies the coming of Jesus "on the

clouds of heaven" with the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Here is an

eyewitness to the life and words of Jesus confirming the biblical testimony

that Matthew 24:30 would be fulfilled in the very near future.

Even with history favoring the preterist position, F. W. Farrar concludes

that the Bible clearly states that Jesus would return in judgment within the

lifetime of the apostolic writers. While history is instructive, in the final

analysis the Bible is the only infallible standard to which we can appeal:

But to me it seems that the founder of the Preterist School is none

other that St. John himself. For he records the Christ as saying to him

when he was in the Spirit, 'Write the things which thou sawest, and THE

THINGS WHICH ARE, and the things which are about to happen ( a mellei

ginesthai) after these things.' No language surely could more clearly define

the bearing of the Apocalypse. It is meant to describe the contemporary

state of things in the Church and the world, and the events which were

to follow in immediate sequence. If the Historical School can strain the

latter words into an indication that we are (contrary to all analogy) to

have a symbolic and unintelligible sketch of many centuries, the Preterist

School may at any rate apply these words, ha eisen, 'THE THINGS WHICH

ARE,' to vindicate the application of a large part of the Apocalypse to

events nearly contemporary, while they also give the natural meaning to

the subsequent clause by understanding it of events which were then on

the horizon. The Seer emphatically says that the future events which he

Sola Scriptura and Prophecy 407

431

has to foreshadow will occur speedily ( en taxe i) and the recurrent burden

of his whole book is the nearness of the Advent ( ho kairos engus ["the time

is near"]). Language is simply meaningless if it is to be so manipulated by

every successive commentator as to make the words "speedily" and "near"

imply any number of centuries of delay.34

Further evidence will show that second-century writers did not believe

in imminency. Like today's prophetic speculators, they misapplied the time

texts to their day.

Second-Century Testimonies

Second-century writers believed that the return of Christ was near for

them. Henry Clarence Thiessen writes that "the church looked for [Jesus]

to come in their day.... We may assume that the early church lived in the

constant expectation of their Lord, and hence was not concerned with the

possibility of a tribulation period in the future."35 If the early church (post

A.D. 70) believed that Jesus was to come in their day, then they were wrong.

Trying to make their words say something different is not honest.

Alan Patrick Boyd, a dispensationalist who deals honestly with their writ-

ings, shows that the ante-Nicene36 fathers believed in the "immediacy of the

Second Advent."37 He states "that Clement perceived the apostolic message

to be the proclamation of the immediacy of the kingdom of God"38 and

"the immediacy of the Second Advent."39 The author of "2 Clement also

believed in the immediacy of Christ's return."40 The writer of the "Epistle of

Barnabas purports a credence in immediacy."41 "The Didache also maintains

immediacy.... [I]n direct dependence on Luke 12.35, 37, 40 and Matthew

24:42, 44, he warns the readers to be ready because of the immediacy of

Christ's return."42 "Ignatius held to immediacy as well.... Furthermore, he

employs the term prosdoka (Polyc. 3.2) of waiting for Christ—a clear indica-

tion of Ignatius' belief in immediacy."43

Conclusion

J. L. Neve states that ". . . the time of the Apostolic Fathers, like that

of primitive Christianity, was thoroughly eschatological in tendency.

Men had the consciousness that they were living in the last times. The

immediate return of Jesus was anticipated. It was this expectation which held the

432

LAST DAYS MADNESS

congregation together."44 George Eldon Ladd notes: "The early church lived

in expectation of Christ's return." Ladd quotes 1 Clement 23 in support:

"Ye perceive how in a little time the fruit of a tree comes to maturity. Of a

truth, soon and suddenly shall His will be accomplished, as the Scripture

also bears witness, saying, 'Speedily will He come and will not tarry', and

'The Lord shall suddenly come to His temple, even the Holy One, for whom

ye look."' Ladd continues:

To deduce from this attitude of expectancy a belief in a pretribulation

rapture and an any-moment coming of Christ, as has often been done, is

not sound. The expectation of the coming of Christ included the events which

would attend and precede His coming. The early fathers who emphasized an

attitude of expectancy believed that this entire complex of events—An-

tichrist, tribulation, return of Christ—would soon occur. This is not the

same as an any-moment coming of Christ.45

Many ante-Nicene writers "thought that the Roman persecution which

they were undergoing at the time was the foretold tribulation period and

that the current emperor was the Anti-Christ. Therefore they were expect-

ing the return of Christ momentarily to deliver them from the tribulation

and the Anti-Christ."46

The time texts—"near," "shortly," "quickly"—could, if stretched, still be interpreted somewhat literally in the second and third centuries. As

time passed, however, a reassessment of these time texts in relation to

world conditions had taken place. A strong futurism replaced preterism.

"From the 4th century on, the belief in the millennium declined.... The

persecutions against the church drew to an end with the conversion of

Constantine, and the church saw a new day of peace dawning."47 Biblical

scholars began to reassess prophetic texts. Most adopted a futurist view,

reinterpreting and relativizing the time texts and, thus, obscuring the plain

teaching of the Bible.

Sola Scriptura and Prophecy 433

Notes

1. John F. Walvoord, The Millennial Kingdom (Grand Rapids, MI: Dunham Pub-

lishing Co., 1959), 37-58, George N. H. Peters, The Theocratic Kingdom of

Our Lord Jesus Christ, as Covenanted in the Old Testament and Presented in the New

Testament, 3 vols. (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, [1884] 1972),

and Grant R. Jeffrey, Apocalypse: The Coming J udgment of the Nations (Toronto, Ontario: Frontier Research Publications, 1992), 313-22 are representative

examples. For a critique of these works and a different historical perspective,

see Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., He Shall Have Dominion: A Postmillennial Eschatology

(Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1992), 73-93.

2. Steve Hogan, "Matthew 24—The Future is Coming," (unpublished manuscript,

1997), 21.

3. Hogan, "Matthew 24—The Future is Coming," 21.

4. Frederic W. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1882),

472.

5. Miriam T. Griffin, Nero: The End of a Dynasty (New Haven, CT: Yale University

Press, [1984] 1985), 15.

6. Tertullian, "Scorpiace: Antidote for the Scorpion's Sting," in "The Writings of Tertullian," 2:8, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1956),

3:648.

7. Much of what the Church Fathers wrote remains untranslated in Latin (Pa-

trologia Latina: 218 volumes) and Greek (Patrologia Graeca: 166 volumes),

therefore, we cannot be dogmatic in asserting what the early Church Fathers

believed. "The patrologies combined weigh in at over a million pages." R.

Howard Bloch, God's Plagiarist: Being An Account of the Fabulous Industry and

Irregular Commerce of the Abbe Migne (Chicago: The University of Chicago

Press, 1994), 1.

8. See Leroy Edwin Froom, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers: The Historical

Development of Prophetic Interpretation (Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald,

1950), 4 vols.

9. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 434—35.

10. Hogan, "Matthew 24—The Future is Coming," 21.

11. Paul F. Boiler, Jr., Not So!: Popular Myths About America from Columbus to Clinton

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1995) and Paul F. Boiler, Jr. and John

George, They Never Said It: A Book of Fake Quotes; Misquotes, and Misleading At-

tributions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

12. Jeffrey Burton Russell, Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians

434

LAST DAYS MADNESS

(New York: Praeger, 1991).

13. Hogan, "Matthew 24—The Future is Coming," 21. Emphasis added.

14. The Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians, chapter 11, in Ante-Nicene Fathers, 1:54.

Quoted in Froom, Prophetic Faith, 1:209.

15 . The Epistles of Cyprian, Epistle 55.

16. Gerald B. Stanton, "The Doctrine of Imminency: Is It Biblical?," in Thomas

Ice and Timothy Demy, eds., When the Trumpet Sounds (Eugene, OR: Harvest

House, 1995), 222.

17. Matthew 10:22-23; 16:27-28; 24:34; 26:64; John 21:21-22; Romans

13:11-12; 16:20; 1 Corinthians 7:29; 7:31; 10:11; 2 Thessalonians. 2:6-7;

Philippians 4:5; Hebrews 9:26; 10:25, 37; James 5:3, 7-9; 1 Peter 4:7; 5:4;

1 John 2:18; Revelation 1:1, 3; 3:10-11; 11:14; 17:8; 22:6, 7, 10, 12, 20.

18. Elmer L. Towns, "Literal Interpretation of Prophecy," in Mai Couch, gen. ed.,

Dictionary of Premillennial Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications,

1996), 317-19.

19. Thomas Ice and Timothy Demy, Fast Facts on Bible Prophecy (Eugene, OR:

Harvest House, 1997), 102.

20. Notice the second person plural ("you") throughout the passage (1:1-9).

21. Renald Showers, Maranatha: Our Lord Come! (Bellmawr, NJ: The Friends

of Israel Ministry, 1995), 128. Quoted in Ice and Demy, Fast Facts on Bible

Prophecy, 102.

22. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 108, note 1.

23. Dialog with Trypho. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 433.

24. Justin Martyr, "Dialogue with Trypho," The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325, eds. Alexander Roberts and James

Donaldson (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1956), chap, xxxv, 1:212.

25. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 433.

26. De Antichristo, 6. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 433.

27. Farrar, Early Days of Christianity, 433.

28. W. Montgomery, "James, the Lord's Brother," Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, ed. James Hastings, 2 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1916),

1:628.

29. Alan Patrick Boyd, "A Dispensational Premillennial Analysis of the Escha-

tology of the Post-Apostolic Fathers (Until the Death of Justin Martyr)"

(unpublished master's thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary, 1977), 28. Boyd

cites Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 2.33. The correct reference is 2:23.

30. Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History, "The martyrdom of James, who was called the Sola Scriptura and Prophecy

407

436

LAST DAYS MADNESS

Post-Apostolic Fathers, 35.

44. J.L. Neve, A History of Christian Thought, 1:43. Quoted in William Everett Bell, A Critical Evaluation of the Pretribulation Rapture Doctrine in Christian Eschatology,

1, note 1 and 49. Emphasis added. Also quoted in Boyd, 28, note 1.

45. George Eldon Ladd, The Blessed Hope (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1956),

20.

46. William Everett Bell, Jr., "A Critical Evaluation of the Pretribulation Rapture

Doctrine in Christian Eschatology" (unpublished doctoral dissertation, New

York University, 1967), 54. Conclusion based on P. Allan Carlsson, "A Histori-

cal Approach to the Doctrine of the Rapture" (unpublished Master's thesis,

Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois, 1956), 119-24.

47. Thiessen, Lectures in Systematic Theology, 366.

Appendix 5

ZECHARIAH 14 AND

THE COMING

OF CHRIST

In the premillennial view of Bible prophecy, the events depicted in

Zechariah 14 are most often interpreted as depicting the second coming

of Christ when Jesus will descend from heaven and stand on the Mount of

Olives and from there set up His millennial kingdom. The chronology out-

lined in Zechariah, however, does not fit this scenario. Events actually begin

in chapter thirteen where it is prophesied that the Shepherd, Jesus, will be

struck and the sheep will be scattered (Zech. 13:7). This was fulfilled when

Jesus says, "You will all fall away, because it is written, 'I WILL STRIKE DOWN

THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP SHALL BE SCATTERED"' (Mark 14:27).

What follows describes events leading up to and including the destruction

of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. God will act as Judge of Jerusalem and its inhabit-

ants. As the king, He will send "his armies" and destroy "those murderers,

and set their city on fire" (Matt. 22:7).

For I will gather all the nations [the Roman armies] against Jerusalem

to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered [Matt.

24:17], the women ravished [Luke 17:35], and half the city exiled [Matt.

437

438

LAST DAYS MADNESS

24:16], but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city [Matt.

24:16]" (Zech. 14:2).

This happened when the Roman armies, made up of soldiers from the

nations it conquered, went to war against Jerusalem. Rome was an empire

consisting of all the known nations of the world (see Luke 2:1). The Roman

Empire "extended roughly two thousand miles from Scotland south to the

headwaters of the Nile and about three thousand miles from the Pillars of

Hercules eastward to the sands of Persia. Its citizens and subject peoples

numbered perhaps eighty million."1 Rome was raised up, like Assyria, to

be the "rod of [God's] anger" (Isa. 10:5). "So completely shall the city be

taken that the enemy shall sit down in the midst of her to divide the spoil.

All nations (2), generally speaking were represented in the invading army,

for Rome was the mistress of many lands."2 Thomas Scott, using supporting

references from older commentators and cross references to other biblical

books, writes that Zechariah is describing the events surrounding Jerusalem's

destruction in A.D. 70.

The time when the Romans marched their armies, composed of many

nations, to besiege Jerusalem, was "the day of the Lord" Jesus, on which

he came to "destroy those that would not that he should reign over

them" [Matt. 22:1-10; 24:3, 23-35; Luke 19:11-27, 41-44]. When

the Romans had taken the city, all the outrages were committed, and

the miseries endured, which are here predicted [Luke 21:20-24]. A very

large proportion of the inhabitants were destroyed, or taken captives, and

sold for slaves; and multitudes were driven away to be pursued by various

perils and miseries: numbers also, having been converted to Christianity,

became citizens of "the heavenly Jerusalem" and thus were "not cut off

from the city" of God [Gal 4:21-31; Heb. 12:22-25].3

Forcing these series of descriptive judgments to leap over the historical

realities of Jerusalem's destruction in A.D. 70 so as to fit a future judgment

scenario is contrived and unnecessary. A proximate fulfillment is more logical

and consistent with basic hermeneutical principles.

Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when

He fights on a day of battle (14:3).

Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

439

After using Rome as His rod to smite Jerusalem, God turns on Rome

in judgment. Once again, Assyria is the model: "I send it against a godless

nation and commission it against the people of My fury to capture booty

and to seize plunder, and to trample them down like mud in the streets....

So it will be that when the Lord has completed all His work on Mount

Zion and on Jerusalem, He will say, 'I will punish the fruit of the arrogant

heart of the king of Assyria and the pomp of his haughtiness'" (Isa. 10:5-6,

12-13). "It is significant that the decline of the Roman Empire dates from

the fall of Jerusalem."4 Thomas Scott concurs: "It is also observable, that the

Romans after having been thus made the executioners of divine vengeance

on the Jewish nation, never prospered as they had done before; but the Lord

evidently fought against them, and all the nations which composed their

overgrown empire; till at last it was subverted, and their fairest cities and

provinces were ravaged by barbarous invaders."5

And in that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is

in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split

in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the

mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south

(Zech. 14:4).

It is this passage that dispensationalists use to support the view that

Jesus will touch down on planet earth and set up His millennial kingdom.

Of course, one of the problems in making Zechariah 14:4 refer to Christ's

second coming is the absence of any reference to Him coming down. But

let's assume that Jesus' coming is implied. How else would Jehovah be able

to "stand on the Mount of Olives"? Numerous times in the Bible we read

of Jehovah "coming down" to meet with His people. In most instances His

coming is one of judgment. In no case was He physically present.

Mountains, like sun, moon, and stars, are often used to represent tribes,

nations, and kingdoms. For example, Israel is depicted as a mountain (Amos

4:1; Zech. 4:7; John 4:21; Rev. 8:8; 21:10).

The symbolic nature of mountains comes from the Apostle John's Jewish

heritage. John was a Jew, and the book of Revelation must be interpreted

with one eye on the Old Testament: "The Book of Revelation is the most

thoroughly Jewish in its language and imagery of any New Testament

440

LAST DAYS MADNESS

book. This book speaks not the language of Paul, but of the Old Testa-

ment Prophets Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel."6

In the Old Testament, a mountain was often a symbolic reference to a

kingdom or national power. The prophet Isaiah wrote of a time when "the

mountain of the LORD'S temple will be established as chief among the

mountains; it will be raised above the hills, and all nations will stream to it"

(Isaiah 2:2). In Jeremiah 51:25, God issued a stern warning to the nation

of Babylon: '"I am against you, O destroying mountain, you who destroy

the whole earth,' declares the LORD, 'I will stretch out my hand against

you, roll you off the cliffs, and make you a burned-out mountain.'"

The prophet Daniel saw a vision in which "the rock that struck the

statue became a huge mountain and filled the whole earth" (Daniel 2:35).

What did the mountain symbolize? "In the time of those kings, the God

of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it

be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them

to an end, but it will itself endure forever" (2:44).

The Old Testament uses the figure of a mountain to refer to a kingdom.7

Jesus describes Israel's judgment in terms of a mountain being "taken up

and cast into the sea" (Matt. 21:21; Mark 11:23). Jesus delivered His judg-

ment discourse concerning the destruction of the temple from the Mount of

Olives (Matt. 24-25). Notice how many times God's coming is associated

with mountains.

• "So I have come down to deliver them from the power of the Egyptians,

and to bring them up from that land to a good and spacious land, to a

land flowing with milk and honey... (Ex. 3:8).

• "Then Thou didst comedown on Mount Sinai, and didst speak with them

from heaven... (Neh. 9:13a).

• "Bow Thy heavens, O LORD, and come down; touch the mountains, that

they may smoke" (Psalm 144:5).

• "For thus says the LORD to me, 'As the lion or the young lion growls

over his prey, against which a band of shepherds is called out, will not

be terrified at their voice, nor disturbed at their noise, so will the LORD

of hosts come down to wage war on Mount Zion and on its hill'" (Isa.

31:4).

• "Oh, that Thou wouldst rend the heavens and come down, that the

Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

441

mountains might quake at Thy presence— (Isa. 64:1).

• "When Thou didst awesome things which we did not expect, Thou

didst come down, the mountains quaked at Thy presence" (Isa. 64:3).

In Micah 1:3 we are told that God "is coming forth from His place" to

"come down and tread on the high places of the earth." How is this descriptive language different from the Lord standing on the Mount of Olives with

the result that it will split? Micah says "the mountains will melt under Him,

and the valleys will be split, like wax before the fire, like water poured down

a steep place" (1:4). "It was not uncommon for prophets to use figurative

expressions about the Lord 'coming' down, mountains trembling, being

scattered, and hills bowing (Hab. 3:6, 10); mountains flowing down at his

presence (Isaiah 64:1, 3); or mountains and hills singing and the trees clap-

ping their hands (Isaiah 55:12)."8

Isaiah 40:4 is descriptive of earth-moving events that did not literally

take place.

Clear the way for the LORD in the wilderness; make smooth in the

desert a highway for our God. Let every valley be lifted up, and every

mountain and hill be made low; and let the rough ground become a plain,

and the rugged terrain a broad valley.

The New Testament specifies how we should interpret these verses by

applying them to the coming of Christ. Christ's coming is preceded by "ev-

ery mountain and hill" being brought "low" (Luke 3:5). Was there a major

realignment of the topography of Judea when Jesus came on the scene after

the announcement of John the Baptist? Was any mountain or hill "made

low"? And yet, the prophecy was fulfilled in the first century.

What is the Bible trying to teach us with this descriptive language of the

Mount of Olives "split in its middle"? The earliest Christian writers applied

Zechariah 14:4 to the work of Christ in His day. Tertullian (A.D. 145—220)

wrote: '"But at night He went out to the Mount of Olives.' For thus had

Zechariah pointed out: 'And His feet shall stand in that day on the Mount

of Olives' [Zech. xiv. 4]."9 Tertullian was alluding to the fact that the Olivet

prophecy set the stage for the judgment coming of Christ that would once

for all break down the Jewish/Gentile division. Matthew Henry explains

the theology behind the prophecy in this way:

442

LAST DAYS MADNESS

The partition-wall between Jew and Gentiles shall be taken away. The

mountains about Jerusalem, and particularly this, signified it to be an enclosure,

and that it stood in the way of those who would approach to it. Between

the Gentiles and Jerusalem this mountain of Bether, of division, stood, Cant, ii. 17. But by the destruction of Jerusalem this mountain shall be made

to cleave in the midst, and so the Jewish pale shall be taken down, and the

church laid in common with the Gentiles, who were made one with the

Jews by the breaking down of this middle wall of partition, Eph. ii. 14.10

You will notice that there is no mention of a thousand year reign fol-

lowing the presence of Jehovah on the Mount of Olives. While we are

told that "the LORD will be king over all the earth" (14:9), this does not

mandate an earthly millennial reign of Christ. This language is neither new

or foward looking. "For the LORD Most High is to be feared, a great King

over all the earth. He subdues peoples under us, and nations under our feet"

(Psalm 47:2, 3). This is exactly what happened with the destruction of

Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

443

Notes

1. Otto Friedrich, The End of the World: A History (New York: Coward, McCann

and Geoghegan, 1982), 28.

2. G. N. M. Collins, "Zechariah," The New Bible Commentary, F. Davidson, ed., 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1954), 761.

3. Thomas Scott, The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, According

to the Authorised Version; with Explanatory notes, Practical Observations, and Copious

Marginal References, 3 vols. (New York: Collins and Hannay, 1832), 2:955

4. Collins, "Zechariah," 761.

5. Scott, The Holy Bible, etc., 956.

6. Ferrel Jenkins, The Old Testament in the Book of Revelation, 22.

7. Charles H. Dyer, World News and Bible Prophecy (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 1993),

150-51.

8. Ralph Woodrow, His Truth is Marching On: Advanced Studies on Prophecy in the

Light of History (Riverside, CA: Ralph Woodrow Evangelistic Association,

1977), 110.

9. "Tertullian Against Marcion," Book 4, chapter XL, in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 3:417.

10. Matthew Henry, Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible, 6 vols. (New

York: Fleming H. Revell, n.d.), 4:1468.

Index

A

abomination of desolation, chap. 8

Archer, Gleason, 48

Idumeans, 105

Armageddon ( movie), 132

Jews, 107-09

Armageddon, chap. 24

Romans, 106

false predictions, 316

zealots, 104

Halsell, Grace, 314

Adams, Jay, 224-25

Har-Mageddon, 317

aerial warfare, 132

Megiddo, 317-19

aion, 69

Reagan, Ronald, 313, 314

angels=messengers, 174—75

Armageddon Now!, 412—13

Ankerberg, John, (A.D. 70 dating), 31

(note 10)

B

Antichrist, chap. 21

Babylon, 356-59

biblical definition, 267-70

Babylon=Israel, 359

Dixon, Jeane, 264

bar codes, 246—49

Hitler, Adolf (William Shirer),

beast, 255-61

265-66

Nero, 257-59

Hunt, Dave, 263

relevant solution, 255

Jewish, 265

Solomon's number, 260-61

Kirban, Salem, 264

temple, 256-57

Lindsey, Hal, 263

time texts, 255-56

anti-semitism

black death, 16, 21, 345-46

Armageddon Now!, 412 — 413

Blaising, Craig, ix

curse, 411-12

Boccaccio, Giovanni, 21

Gabelein, Arno C., 414

Bock, Darrell, 196

Gray, James M., 413-14

Bohr, Neils, 13

Hands Off, 413

Brown, John, 192

Israel's greatest bloodbath, 407

Bullinger, E.W., 143

Jewish, 418

burned with fire, 114—15 (note 15)

Lindsey, Hal, 415

buying and selling, 249-50

Moody Bible Institute Monthly,

413-14

c

On Wings of Eagles, 415

Caligula, 85

Protocols of the Elders ofZion, 413 Callahan, Tim, 47

Rittenhouse, Stan, 411

Camping, Harold (1994?), 27

Rudin, James A., 418-19

Cawood, Hap, 66

Ryrie, Charles, 407

Cestius, 111

Walvoord, John, 415

Clarke, Adam, 183, 193

Zechariah 13:8, 415-16

Clinton, Bill, 236-37

apostasy, 293-97

Columbus, Christopher, 341

445

421

421 LAST DAYS MADNESS

comets, 132-33

Theudas, 74

coming of Christ, 71, 200

False Prophets, 84

France, R.T., 162

Falwell, Jerry, 36

Old Testament, 72

famines, 79-80

Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24:30),

fig tree, 177-80

159

buying and selling, 400

"on the clouds," 160-61

Cumming, John, 399

Revelation, 72

double negation, 403-4

"sign in heaven," 163

DeHaan, M. R., 402-4

Copperfield, David, 266

fruit, 399-402

historic symbol, 397

D

Kaiser, Walter, 398

Dager, Albert James, 353

land of Israel, 398

date setting, 353-55

Lindsey, Hal, 397

daughter of the priest, 114 (note 114)

Moore, Philip N., 402-4

day of the Lord, 275, 282-85, 283

Moule, C.F.D., 404

(John Walvoord)

roots, 402

DeYoung, James, 62

dispensationalism, vii

Walvrood, John F., 178-179

Dispensationalism, Israel, and the

four winds, 175-76

Church, ix—x

G

Dixon, Jeane, 264

Gaebelein, Arno C.

Dobson, Ed, x

Luke and the Olivet Discourse,

Donatus, 21

114 (note 3)

Dwight, Timothy, 22

this generation=race, 185

Dyer, Charles, 26, 32 (note 26), 356

Conflict of the Ages, 414

Gasque, W. Ward, 16

E

gathering, 173

earthquakes, 80-81, 346-47

genea, 185

de Ballore, F. Montessus, 347

generational provincialism, 340

Lindsey, Hal, 347

genos, 186

Lisbon (1755), 346

Wesley, John, 339-40

Graham, Billy, 20, 119, 315

end, 86-87

great tribulation, chap. 9

Ezekiel 5:9, 120

end of the age, 68-70, 189-91

Kirban, Salem, 117

end of the world, 339

Van Impe, Jack, 117-18

Europe, 367-72

Gulliver's Travels, 252

F

false messiahs, 73

H

Dositheus (Samaritan), 74

Hagee, John, x

Simoh Magus, 73

Halley's Comet, 82

Index

447

Hamilton, Floyd

Lalonde, Peter and Paul, 242-43

Hammond, Henry, 45

land, 166

Har-Mageddon, 317

Laney, J. Carl, 48

heaven and earth, chap. 15

Larue, Gerald, 47

Hendriksen, William, 185, 220

Late Great Planet Earth

Hindson, Ed, 315

sales, 213 (note 13).

Hitler, Adolf, 265-66

lawlessness, 85-86

horse power, 375 (note 14)

Lewis, C.S., 48

Hundred Years' War, 17

Lightfoot, John, 192

Hunt, Dave

lightning, 123-25

blessed hope, 223-24

Lindsey, Hal, 13-14

How Close Are We?, 157, 206, 223 allegorizing, 135-36

rapture, 205-06

date setting, 118, 207

rapture or resurrection, 211-12

"hero or bum," 209

1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, 221

locusts as Cobra helicopters, 135

this kind of generation, 54

rapture (date setting), 206

rapture (no church), 218-19

I

rapture (Rev. 1-3), 217-18

Ice, Thomas

rapture ("the ultimate trip"), 132

angels, 174

requiring the second coming, 344

rapture as "deduction," 222

"this generation," 187, 208, 209

immediately, 141—42

UFOs, 134

imminency, 41, 379-81, 427-28

"we are the generation," 35

inquisition, 21

Weaver, Randy and Vicki, 28

Ironside, H.A., 222

Lisbon earthquake (1755), 22

Islam, 341

literal hermeneutics, xi, 100

(note 10)

J

James, William T., 36

Feinberg, Charles L., 382-83

Jeffrey, Grant, 24-25

Hindson, Ed, 387-89

Jupiter Effect, 133

Ryrie, Charles, 381-82

Jerusalem surrounded by armies, 111 Thomas, Robert L., 387

Walvoord, John F., 383-85

K

"little while," 42 (note 9),

Kaiser, Walter, 398

Luther, Martin, 22

Kik, Marcellus, 184, 191

Kirban, Salem, 118, 264

M

Koresh, David, 27-28

Man of Lawlessness

Agrippa, 305-06

breath, 306

Ladd, George Eldon, 394 (note 18)

Caligula, 291

LaHaye, Tim, 206-07, 219

coming of the Lord, 274—76

423

423 LAST DAYS MADNESS

day of the Lord, 275, 282-85, 283 Nero, 82, 85

0ohn Walvoord), 287 (note 27)

Novatian, 21

gathering together, 277-80

"gods," 300-1

P

Iraq, 357-58

parenthesis, 410

"is now present," 282

Patterson, Paige, 409

Jewish apostasy, 293-97

Payne, J. Barton, 395 (note 28)

Jewish lawlessness, 298-303

Pella, 111

John Levi of Gischala, 302-3

Plymouth Brethren, ix

Kuwait, 357-58

predictions (false), 23-30

Macknight, James, 275-76

preterism (definition), viii

Mystery Babylon, chap. 27

progressive dispensationalism, 408

Nero, 290

prophetic keys, 342

papacy, 289-90

Pseudo-Ephraem, 223

Phannias, 302

Psychic Network, 66

presence, 276-77

priest, 292-97

R

restrainer, 303-5

Rand, Ayn, 28

signs and false wonders, 307-8

rapture, chaps. 16-17

sitting, 301-2

date setting, 206

sunagogue, 278

Hunt, Dave, 205-6

time indicators, 277, 280-82

Lindsey, Hal, 132, 206

Titus, 291

no church, 218-19

mark of the beast, 243-46

no supporting texts, 211, 216

"marriage and giving in marriage,"

resurrection, 211-12

195

1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, 221-23

Mather, Increase, 132-33

Titus 2:13, 223-26

Matthew 16:27-28, 44-46

Revelation 1-3, 217-18

Matthew 24:14, 87-89

"ultimate trip", 132

meteorites as stars, 143

Relfe, Mary Stewart, 237-38

Missler, Chuck, 82

Richards, Larry, 48

mountains, 110-112

Robertson, Pat, 131-32

Montanus, 21

room cleaning (time), 389

Morris, Henry M., 13, 325

Rosenthal, Marvin, 210-11, 216

Moule, C.F.D., 404

Rosh, chap. 28

bows and arrows, 367

N

Cumming, John 364

newspaper exegesis, 210

Daily, Timothy J., 363-64

"Newton's Gift," 237

Esther, Book of, 368-69

Noah, 195-96

Hengstenberg, Ernst Wilhelm, 364

Index

449

Jordan, James B. 368-69

Spurgeon, Charles H., 46, 191

north, 364-66, 375 (note 7)

stars

Ryrie, Charles, 365

as meteorites, 143

Scofeld Reference Bible, 364

as nations, 143

wooden rifles, 367, 376 (note 15)

as symbols of kingdoms, 145-46

Yamauchi, Edwin M., 363

falling to earth, 142

Roth, Sid, 409

Streisand, Barbra, 20

Ruby Ridge, 28

Sudden Impact, 132

Russell, Bertrand, 46

Sumrall, Lester, 23

Ryrie, Charles, 119, 134-35, 407

sun, moon, stars

Babylon, 150

commentaries, 144—45, 146—47

Sabbath day's journey, 111, 115(note 27) Egypt, 150-52

Saucy, Robert L., ix

going dark, 147-49

Scojield Reference Bible, 185, 187

Israel, 152-53

seventy weeks, chap. 25

signs of blessing, 153-54

antichrist, 328

Synagogue of Satan, 54

desolations "determined," 334

final week, 327 (3 1/2 years),

334-35

Taylor, Charles, 26

gap, 324-26, 329-31

temple=house, 51-52, 70

Mauro, Philip, 328-29

Balfour Declaration (1917), 93

new covenant, 328

blood sacrifices, 97-98

Payne, J. Barton, 326-27

Ezekiel's, 96

Price, Randall, 331

four, 97

"Silly-Putty" exegesis, 332-33

"no verses," 95

signs in the heavens, 81-82

planned obsolescence, 98-99

666,

Ryle, J.C., 109

Barney, 233

stones, 68

Hebrew letters (nrwn qsr), 258

third, 68, 95

Hitler, Adolf, 235

Tertullian, 19

Luther, Martin, 234

"this" and "that," 193

Nero, 235, 257-59

"this generation," chap. 14

Reagan, Ronald Wilson, 231

as race, 58, 183, 184-87

666: The Final Warning!, 231

commentaries, 59-60, 186

Solomon's number, 260-61

"this," 58

technology, 242-52

Matthew 23:36, 52-55

Smith, Chuck (Christmas), 228(note 13) Matthew 24:34, 55-59

Sodom, 110, 115 (note 25)

time texts, viii, 38-40, 207,

Son of Man, 168-69

dispensational commentators,

382-89

425

425 LAST DAYS MADNESS

God's commentary (Ezek. 7-12),

Von Daniken, Erich, 135,139 (note 18)

392-93

Vultures, 126-27

"I hope," 213 (note 7)

imminency, 379-81

w

Ladd, George Eldon, 394 (note 18) Walvoord, John, 26

2 Peter 3:8, 389-92

Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East

Revelation, 358

Crisis, 35-36, 209-10

room cleaning, 389

date setting, 36, 65-66

speedily (EW. Farrar), 435

day of the Lord, 283

time frame, 342-44

great tribulation, 118

Thomas, Robert L., 220

rapture, 211, 216

thousand years, 379, 442

Russia, 364

Matthew 16:27-28, 44

taken away (Matt. 24:40), 197,

Matthew 23:35, 59

203 (note 21)

Matthew 23:39, 60-62

two-thirds of Israel (Zech. 13:8-9),

Torrey, R.A., 48

360 (note 7)

transfiguration, 44-45

wars, 78-79, 348-49

tribulation, 82-83, 110

Weaver, Randy and Vicki, 28

Trinity Broadcasting Network

Wells, H.G., 28

(TBN), 66

Wesley, John, 339-40

trumpet, 176-77

When Russia Bombs Germany (1940),

u

138 (note 6)

Unidentified Flying Objects, 82

Westminster Confession of Faith

Lindsey, Hal, 133

"Of the Church" (Antichrist), 16

Ryrie, Charles, 135

When Worlds Collide, 132

Whisenant, Edgar, 24, 66

V

Why I Am Not a Christian, 46

Vandals, 21

wilderness, 123

Van Impe, Jack

Wilson, Dwight, 23, 412-13

great tribulation (1976), 118

World Wide Web (WWW), 250-52

marriage and giving in marriage, 195 WyclifFe, John, 17

Soviet Flag, 66

Van Kampen, Robert, viii, ix, xi (note 2)

Y

allegorical, viii

Yahoo!, 251-52

antichrist, 235-36

Hitler, Adolf, 236

z

literal, xi (note 2)

Zechariah, Son of Berechiah (Matt.

Matthew 24:14

23:35), 59

preterist, viii

Zechariah 14, app. 5

Document Outline

- Preface

- Introduction

- Chapter One : The Dating Game

- Chapter Two : When Will These Things Be?

- Chapter Three : When Did Jesus Come In Glory?

- Chapter Four : Timing is Everything

- Chapter Five : See That No One Misleads You

- Chapter Six : Signs for All to See

- Chapter Seven : The Temple of Doom

- Chapter Eight : The Abomination of Desolation

- Chapter Nine : The Past Great Tribulation

- Chapter Ten : Signs in the Heavens

- Chapter Eleven : Sun, Moon, and Stars

- Chapter Twelve : The Return of Christ

- Chapter Thirteen : Gathering the Elect

- Chapter Fourteen : This Generation or This Race?

- Chapter Fifteen : The Passing Away of Heaven Earth

- Chapter Sixteen : Avoiding Rapture Fever

- Chapter Seventeen : No Evidence for a Rapture

- Chapter Eighteen : Who's got the Number?

- Chapter Nineteen : Technology and the Mark of the Beast

- Chapter Twenty : Identifying the Beast

- Chapter Twenty-One : Identifying Anti-Christ

- Chapter Twenty-Two : The Man of Lawlessness (I)

- Chapter Twenty-Three : The Man of Lawlessness (II)

- Chapter Twenty-Four : Armageddon Theology

- Chapter Twenty-Five : Daniel's Seventy Weeks

- Chapter Twenty-Six : Today's World In Prophecy

- Chapter Twenty-Seven : Mystery Babylon

- Chapter Twenty-Eight : Roshing to Judgment

- Appendix 1 : God Can Tell Time

- Appendix 2 : Fruitless Trees and National Israel

- Appendix 3 : "Anti-Semitism" and Eschatology

- Appendix 4 : Sola Scriptura and Prophecy

- Appendix 5 : Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

- Index

Table of Contents

1 The Dating Game .. 19

4 Timing Is Everything 51

5 See That No One Misleads You 65

7 The Temple Of Doom 93

8 The Abomination Of Desolation 101

9 The Past Great Tribulation 117

10 Signs In The Heavens 131

11 Sun, Moon, And Stars . 141

12 The Return Of Christ 157

13 Gathering The Elect 173

14 This Generation Or This Race? .. 183

16 Avoiding Rapture Fever 205

17 No Evidence For A Rapture 215

18 Who's Got The Number? 231

20 Identifying The Beast 255

21 Identifying Antichrist 263

23 The Man Of Lawlessness (II) 289

25 Daniel's Seventy Weeks 323

26 Today's World In Prophecy 339

27 Mystery Babylon 353

Preface

Introduction

Chapter Two : When Will These Things Be?

Chapter Three : When Did Jesus Come In Glory?

Chapter Six : Signs for All to See

Chapter Fifteen : The Passing Away of Heaven Earth

Chapter Nineteen : Technology and the Mark of the Beast

Chapter Twenty-Two : The Man of Lawlessness (I)

Chapter Twenty-Four : Armageddon Theology

Chapter Twenty-Eight : Roshing to Judgment

Appendix 1 : God Can Tell Time

Appendix 2 : Fruitless Trees and National Israel

Appendix 3 : "Anti-Semitism" and Eschatology

Appendix 4 : Sola Scriptura and Prophecy

Appendix 5 : Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

Index

Table of Contents

1 The Dating Game .. 19

4 Timing Is Everything 51

5 See That No One Misleads You 65

7 The Temple Of Doom 93

8 The Abomination Of Desolation 101

9 The Past Great Tribulation 117

10 Signs In The Heavens 131

11 Sun, Moon, And Stars . 141

12 The Return Of Christ 157

13 Gathering The Elect 173

14 This Generation Or This Race? .. 183

16 Avoiding Rapture Fever 205

17 No Evidence For A Rapture 215

18 Who's Got The Number? 231

20 Identifying The Beast 255

21 Identifying Antichrist 263

23 The Man Of Lawlessness (II) 289

25 Daniel's Seventy Weeks 323

26 Today's World In Prophecy 339

27 Mystery Babylon 353

Preface

Introduction

Chapter Two : When Will These Things Be?

Chapter Three : When Did Jesus Come In Glory?

Chapter Six : Signs for All to See

Chapter Fifteen : The Passing Away of Heaven Earth

Chapter Nineteen : Technology and the Mark of the Beast

Chapter Twenty-Two : The Man of Lawlessness (I)

Chapter Twenty-Four : Armageddon Theology

Chapter Twenty-Eight : Roshing to Judgment

Appendix 1 : God Can Tell Time

Appendix 2 : Fruitless Trees and National Israel

Appendix 3 : "Anti-Semitism" and Eschatology

Appendix 4 : Sola Scriptura and Prophecy

Appendix 5 : Zechariah 14 and the Coming of Christ

Index